1 / 7

Benchmarking for Excellence Butler vs Peers: A Five Year Trend

Explore a detailed analysis of Butler Community College's performance compared to peer institutions in key areas like student success, employment rates, tuition dependency, and enrollment growth. Data source: Kansas Higher Education Statistics.

martelli
Download Presentation

Benchmarking for Excellence Butler vs Peers: A Five Year Trend

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Benchmarking for ExcellenceButler vs Peers: A Five Year Trend Updated AY 2019

  2. Data Source, Peer Basket, and Year of Submission • Data Source: Kansas Higher Education Statistics (KHESTATS) Portal of the Kansas Board of Regents • Peer Basket: A pool of five other public community colleges in Kansas whose aggregated data is used for comparison purposes • Year of Submission: The Academic Year during which the data is submitted to KBOR (which generally lags a year from the currency of the data)

  3. Benchmarks for Butler Butler seeks to be at least comparable to its peers in four comprehensive measurement indicators as described below: • Student Success: Higher Percentage than Peer Basket or at par • Employment: Higher Percentage than Peer Basket or at par • Tuition Dependency: Within +3 % of Peer Basket or at par • Enrollment Growth/Loss: Higher enrollment growth or lower enrollment loss than Peer Basket or at par

  4. Student Success(as measured by completion, transfer, or retention of degree-seeking students in a three year period)Met Benchmark: AY 2014, AY 2015, AY 2016, AY 2017Did not meet Benchmark: AY 2018

  5. Employment(As measured by Percentage of Graduates Employed in Kansas and Kansas City, MO )Met Benchmark: AY 2014, AY 2015, AY 2016, AY 2017, AY 2018

  6. Tuition Dependency(As measured by percentage of revenue coming from Tuition/Fees)Met Benchmark: AY 2014, AY 2015, AY 2017, AY 2018Did not meet Benchmark : AY 2016

  7. Enrollment Growth/Loss(As measured by percentage change of FTE enrollment fall over fall)Met Benchmark: AY 2014, AY 2015, AY 2016Did not meet Benchmark: AY, 2017, AY 2018

More Related