1 / 7

Advanced IPv6 Residential Security draft-vyncke-advanced-ipv6-security-01.txt

Advanced IPv6 Residential Security draft-vyncke-advanced-ipv6-security-01.txt. Eric Vyncke evyncke@cisco.com Mark Townsley townsley@cisco.com March 2010. Advanced Security. Dynamic Policy & Signatures Update. On-line Access to IP Address Reputation. IPS. User control. User Feedback.

martin-dunn
Download Presentation

Advanced IPv6 Residential Security draft-vyncke-advanced-ipv6-security-01.txt

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Advanced IPv6 Residential Securitydraft-vyncke-advanced-ipv6-security-01.txt Eric Vynckeevyncke@cisco.com Mark Townsleytownsley@cisco.com March 2010

  2. Advanced Security Dynamic Policy & Signatures Update On-line Access to IP Address Reputation IPS Usercontrol User Feedback

  3. Overview • 7 policies are identified in the -00. These are largely based on features which are commonly available in “advanced” security gear for enterprises today • Home edge router is not something that is purchased and thrown away when obsolete. Instead, it is actively updated like many other consumer devices are today (PCs, iPods and iPhones, etc.) • Business model may include a paid subscription service from the manufacturer, a participating service or content provider, consortium, etc.

  4. Why is this important to IPv6? • Security policy can be adjusted to match the threat as attacks arrive • We don’t break end-to-end IPv6, unless we absolutely have to

  5. -00 at IETF 76 • -00 presented at V6OPS & SAAG • Globally positive reaction • The crypto part could be improved/better presented • Paranoid Openness is very much needed for IPv6 • Already known as Universal Threat Mitigation for large enterprises • Could/should cross pollination with simple-security ID

  6. Between IETF76 & 77 • Small design team has be created • But, little progress done (Eric’s & Mark’s fault) • -01 delta • Some cosmetics • More reference to UTM • Reference to previous I-D

  7. After IETF 77 • Activate the design team • Some discussions at HomeGate interim in Paris • BoF in IETF 78? • Bring rule7 (rate limited but open inbound) into simple security?

More Related