1 / 22

Communication Partner Augmentative Communication Training (CO-PACT)

Communication Partner Augmentative Communication Training (CO-PACT). Sarah Barber, Elisha Huskes, Jennifer Uhler, Susan M. Moore; University of Colorado at Boulder Tracy Kovach; The Children’s Hospital, Denver. Challenges for Communication Partners.

Download Presentation

Communication Partner Augmentative Communication Training (CO-PACT)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Communication Partner Augmentative Communication Training (CO-PACT) Sarah Barber, Elisha Huskes, Jennifer Uhler, Susan M. Moore; University of Colorado at Boulder Tracy Kovach; The Children’s Hospital, Denver

  2. Challenges for Communication Partners • Limited and/or unknown AAC system vocabulary • AAC system unavailable for interaction • Limited operational knowledge of AAC system (Murphy et al., 1996)

  3. Characteristics of Communication Partners • Over use of “yes/no” questions • Insufficient use of interactive strategies (e.g., turn taking, “wait time,” open ended questions, etc.) • Interest in communicative content • ALL modes of communication unrecognized (Light et al., 1985a, b & c)

  4. Effectiveness of Communication Partner Training Current research shows Communication Partner training effective in: • increasing positive communication behaviors of partners • positively influencing the participation and language learner of the AAC user ( Patterson, 1991; http://www.hanen.org/research.html)

  5. Questions • What is the most effective method(s) for Communication Partner training? • What are the challenges associated with implementation of training methods? • What is the effect of training on the child and their communication partner’s skills?

  6. 3 Approaches to Communication Partner Training • Self-Assessment • Biblio-therapy • Direct training

  7. Case Studies • 3 Paraprofessionals ~ 1 received self-assessment, biblio-therapy and direct training ~ 1 received self-assessment and biblio-therapy ~ 1 received self-assessment • 3 Parents ~ 1 received self-assessment, biblio-therapy and direct training ~ 1 received self-assessment and biblio-therapy ~ 1 received self-assessment

  8. Self-Assessment • Completion of a self-assessment was used as a self-reflection tool. • The communication partner rated their knowledge, skills and communicative competencies in working with children who use AAC. • Rationale: To heighten awareness of the skills and competencies necessary to be an effective communication partner.

  9. 1 = least competent, 5 = most competent

  10. 1 = least competent, 5 = most competent

  11. Biblio-Therapy • Reading materials about the specific skills addressed (wait time, turn taking, communication temptations, and open ended questions) were provided. • Rationale: To provide participants with additional information and rationale for the skills being addressed.

  12. 1 = least competent, 5 = most competent

  13. 1 = least competent, 5 = most competent

  14. Videotape Analysis • Focusing Communication Partners on targeted strategies (wait time, turn taking, open ended questions, and communication temptations). • Videotape analysis of interaction and development of communication goals to be addressed • Distribution of reading materials and completion of self-assessment • Rationale: To provide multi-model focus

  15. 1 = least competent, 5 = most competent

  16. 1 = least competent, 5 = most competent

  17. Documentation of Change • Pre and post rating on Communication Partner Questionnaire • Coding of Communication Partner and AAC user interactions using videotapes. • Communication Partner anecdotes

  18. Outcomes • The following trends were noted: ~ Change was demonstrated on specific skill and competency items related to interaction. ~ Self-perceptions reflect an increase in knowledge about skills and competencies needed as a result of the self-assessment ~ The most marked change in perception of knowledge, skills and competencies was noted following intervention using all 3 approaches

  19. Biblio-Therapy ~ “The articles were extremely helpful. I made copies of the articles for the rest of the paras and the special education teacher in my classroom.” Videotape Analysis ~ The participant in the training condition expressed a sincere gratitude regarding the “gift” we gave her by allowing her to step back and view herself interacting with her child. Participant Quotes and Anecdotes • Self-Assessment • ~ “Filling out the questionnaire made me aware of the variety of skills I needed to communicate effectively with an AAC user.”

  20. Challenges in Implementation of Training Methods • Scheduling • Attendance • Problems with Technology • Participation • Time (self-assessment) • Coding (reliability) • Other

  21. Future Directions • Key Considerations ~ There is a significant need for partner training in the schools and at home ~ A more extensive study is necessary to determine which method of training is the most effective and efficient ~ Future studies need to address previously mentioned challenges, and find effective ways to work around them. • Determination of the feasibility of communication partner training across settings and partners.

  22. Bibliography The Hanen Center: Research. http//www.hanen.org/research.html. 5/18/00, 12:30P.M. Light, J., Collier, B., Parnes, P. (1985b). Communication Interaction Between Young Non-speaking Physically Disabled Children and their Primary Caregivers: Part 2– Communication Functions. Augmentive and Alternative Communication, 1, 98- 107. Light, J., Collier, B., Parnes, P. (1985a). Communication Interaction Between Young Non-speaking Physically Disabled Children and their Primary Caregivers: Part 1– Discourse Patterns. Augmentive and Alternative Communication, 1, 74-83. Light, J., Collier, B., Parnes, P. (1985c). Communication Interaction Between Young Non-Speaking Physically Disabled Children and their Primary Caregivers: Part 3- Modes of Communication. Augmentive and Alternative Communication, 5-133. Murphy, J., Markova, I., Collins, S., & Moodie. (1996). AAC Systems: Obstacles to Effective Use. European Journal of Disorders of Communication, 31, 31-44. Patterson Sharp, S. (1991). The Effects of Training the Speaking Peer Partners of an Augmentative Communication Device User. Indiana University: Master’s Dissertation.

More Related