1 / 16

Voices of the Poor: Deprivation Analysis in Argentina and Mexico

Explore the insights from "Que dicen los pobres" study in Argentina and Mexico, focusing on key indicators like income, water access, education, and health. Discover how poverty is measured and its impact on deprived populations in these Latin American countries.

martinjoan
Download Presentation

Voices of the Poor: Deprivation Analysis in Argentina and Mexico

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Latin America • - Argentina • - Mexico • To come • - Brasil, Chile, Peru, El Salvador

  2. Basic Facts • Mexico • Population: 110 million • GNI per capita (PPP): $12,000 • Growth in 1995-2005: 3.7% • 1995 – 2000: 5.6% • 2000 – 2005: 1.8% • Argentina • Population: 40 million • GNI per capita (PPP): $11,670 • Growth in the 1995-2005: 2.1% • 1999- 2002: - 5%

  3. Voices of the poor, in Mexico 3,000 “poor” people (adults) were interviewed They were asked to name and rank the most important aspects of deprivation and the said: Income Access of drinking water Education Health Nutrition Shelter “Que dicen los pobres”

  4. Datasets • Mexico: ENIGH (Encuesta Nacional de Ingresos y gastos de los Hogares). Nationally representative. Years: 1994, 2000, 2006. • Argentina: EPH (Encuesta Permanente de Hogares). Urban, 60% total population. Years: 1995, 2000, 2003 • Unit of Analysis: Individuals – Households • Poverty measures regularly used: • Poverty Line (Food, Capabilities, Patrimony): Hincome • Unsatisfied Basic Needs: H

  5. Selected Indicators & Deprivation Cutoffs

  6. RESULTS - Argentina and Mexico

  7. ARGENTINAIncidence of deprivations

  8. ARGENTINAH and Mo for different k values - Ranking weights

  9. ARGENTINAContribution of each indicator to M0when k=3 and ‘ranking’ weight M0=0.016 M0=0.018 M0=0.032

  10. ARGENTINAH and Mo for different k values – ‘equal weight’

  11. ARGENTINAContribution of each indicator to M0when k=2 and ‘equal’ weight M0=0.035 M0=0.032 M0=0.046

  12. MEXICOIncidence of deprivations

  13. MEXICOH and Mo for different k values – Ranking weight

  14. MEXICOContribution of each indicator to M0when k=2 and ranking weight M0=0.041 M0=0.036 M0=0.048

  15. MEXICOH and Mo for different k values – ‘equal weight’

  16. MEXICOContribution of each indicator to M0when k=2 and ‘equal’ weight M0=0.041 M0=0.036 M0=0.048

More Related