140 likes | 231 Views
SKA: Configurations and Simulations. Ramesh Bhat Colin Lonsdale Roger Cappallo Shep Doeleman Divya Oberoi Joanne Attridge. MIT Haystack Observatory. Simulator Functions. A general purpose tool for LOFAR/SKA studies Create Synthetic Data Sets
E N D
SKA: Configurations and Simulations Ramesh Bhat Colin Lonsdale Roger Cappallo Shep Doeleman Divya Oberoi Joanne Attridge MIT Haystack Observatory
Simulator Functions • A general purpose tool for LOFAR/SKA studies • Create Synthetic Data Sets • Performance simulations, at high level design specs • Realistic effects: Ionosphere, Variable beams, Skies • Configuration Studies • Explore Design Parameter Space: • Automation to allow efficient searches • Identify trends in performance • Testing Calibration and Postprocessing • Direct access to structures solved for • Controlled environment for isolation of effects • Test New Postprocessing Algorithms • Science Applications (e.g. EOR)
Includes FITS Image import Variable station beams Thermal Noise (Rx) Arbitrary array configuration. Arbitrary station config. Gaussian sources Arbitrary time/freq obs. True parallelization in time. Functional parallelization otherwise Exportable to FITS Script driven to support automated parameter searches 4-D Ionosphere with line integration. Site mask incorporation Sky noise due to Galactic Background. Will Include Polarization Realistic skies Source Spectral Index Out-of-beam source contributions (CasA in sidelobes, etc…) Extension to 3-D FFTs for wide field imaging. RFI (limited) Simulator Status
Functional Flow Diagram config generator LOsim obs_spec proc_spec skies sites array Script driven Simulator Module Calibration structures for comparison (u,v) FITS MIRIAD PSF Stats Imaging Fidelity
Image Import and Simulation After Before
Simulator Beowulf • 20 nodes • 2.4 GHz P4, $900 each • 1 Gbyte of RAM • 60 Gbyte of disk • Gigabit ethernet switch • 24-port • $2000 • UPS and misc • Excellent price/performance • 50-80 Gflops • 1.5 Tbytes of disk • <$25,000
Configuration Studies - in progress ProposedUSSKAConfiguration • Parameter space is vast: • Configurations (log spirals, random,…) • Number of stations (variable sensitivity …) • No of elements/station, Staion layout • Bandwidth and integration time • Sky properties and observing geometry • Frequency, polarization, spectrum, … • Weighting schemes, tapering • Ranges of corrupting influences. • Strategy: parameterize configurations and explore limited ranges, identify trends • Input from ALMA, ATA, SMA studies. Inner~100kmarray
Figures of Merit: • PSF statistics: RMS, size, min, max, deviation. Computed for declination, integration, bw. • Cable Length (Prim’s Algorithm). • Sensitivity Loss due to: weighting, fixed taper. • PSF statistics for Inner compact array/core. • Image fidelity for a few benchmark images. • Robustness: impact of random station loss. • Calibratability: requires calibration software.
Configuration Optimization Figures of Merit: PSF RMS vs Radius PSF Beam Size Cable Length
Configuration Optimization Figures of Merit weighted And Combined into Optmization function
Progress so far and Future Work • Good progress with the simulator package, downstream pipeline, automation, FOMs. • Many configs tested so far, calculation of FOMs. • Continue extensive configuration studies • Explore N, Nant/station, station layout, etc. • Range of observing conditions, time/bw effects. • Configuration evaluation along FOM axes • Continue Code Development • New modules based on priority