1 / 7

Karen Mossberger , Ph.D Univ. of IL at Chicago

Karen Mossberger , Ph.D Univ. of IL at Chicago. EVALUATING BROADBAND USE FOR BUILDING SMART COMMUNITIES Funded by John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, Partnership for Connected Illinois, Institute for Policy & Civic Engagement (UIC).

marvin
Download Presentation

Karen Mossberger , Ph.D Univ. of IL at Chicago

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Karen Mossberger, Ph.DUniv. of IL at Chicago EVALUATING BROADBAND USE FOR BUILDING SMART COMMUNITIES Funded by John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, Partnership for Connected Illinois, Institute for Policy & Civic Engagement (UIC)

  2. Goals of Smart Communities/ Why Study? • Creating a culture of technology use in 5 low-income communities in Chicago • Creating capacity and leadership for technology use among community organizations - sustainability • Integrating technology into existing efforts at community revitalization, sponsoring a number of technology-related activities, assumed to lead to broad and sustainable change • Smart Communities $ 7 million SBA grant (City of Chicago/LISC) – FamilyNet Centers/EveryDay Digital, Business Resource Networks, Digital Youth Network (after school activities, summer job program), YouMedia, Civic 2.0, Tech Organizers • Chicago $9 million PCC grant as well (overlap but not focus of evaluation)

  3. Multilevel Evaluation Components • Process evaluation • Site visits, interviews, program data and budgets, attendance at bi-weekly partner meetings • Individual outcomes • Surveys of participants in FamilyNet & Business Resource Networks/baseline data & 6-month follow-up • Interpersonal outcomes • Questions on resource sharing and social networks/FamilyNet surveys • Organizational outcomes • Lead agencies, key partner organizations – baseline and final interviews, follow-up survey for Civic 2.0 participants • Community-level outcomes • City-wide surveys in 2011, 2013 (panel data) – comparing Smart Communities with other low-income neighborhoods & city-wide averages on 20 aspects of technology use & barriers

  4. From 2008 Study Mossberger & Tolbert (2009) Digital Excellence in Chicago: A City-wide View Available at Cityofchicago.org

  5. Chicago “Smart Communities,” 2008

  6. Outcomes – Individuals/FamilyNet Intermediate Outcomes - Use and Skills • Broadband adoption (federal requirement) • Change in internet use anywhere as well as broadband adoption? • Change in activities online – for work, job search, education, community info, e-government, health info, transit, etc. • Measures of knowledge correlated with skill, self-reported skill • Self-reported outcomes – did this help you to . . . Other • Feedback on program • Continued barriers to use • Unintended consequences • Social networks for sharing technology and help/informal learning Will use ETO database to draw sample, to match survey responses with baseline data for respondents

  7. Increased Broadband Adoption & Uses • Residents & Businesses • Culture of Use in Community • (sustainability and leadership) • Proximity/Social Networks and Informal Learning • Integration of Technology for Community Organizations, Businesses, and Schools • Economic Opportunity for Individuals • Business Growth and Local Economic Development • Educational Improvements • Greater Access to Health Care, Government Services • Civic Engagement • Stronger Community-Based Organizations

More Related