100 likes | 197 Views
1 st Annual Workshop on Languages for the Professions Sept. 19-22 Northern Arizona University Flagstaff, AZ. Four intensive days Sponsored by Goethe Institute, Chicago and the Center for International Education, NAU Focused on German (…for now). Overview. Goals:
E N D
1st Annual Workshop on Languages for the Professions Sept. 19-22 Northern Arizona University Flagstaff, AZ
Four intensive days • Sponsored by Goethe Institute, Chicago and the Center for International Education, NAU • Focused on German (…for now) Overview • Goals: • Characterize differences between conventional and STEM-oriented language instruction • Inventory existing modules, approaches, concepts. Who is trying what and how? • Begin to develop a pedagogical framework for organizing a STEM-oriented curriculum. • Develop a vision for future development.
David James, Univ. of Pennsylvania • Marianne Lancaster, Emory Univ. • KatjaFullard, Goethe Institute • Tobias Barske, Univ. Wisconsin Stevens Points • Ninja Nagel, Barrington High School • Damon Rarick, Univ. Rhode Island • Gisela Hoecherl-Alden, Boston University • Eck Doerry, Northern Arizona Univ.
Many innovative materials and techniques being developed • across disciplines, languages, levels in acquisition process • Could these be organized into a coherent STEM language pedagogy? • How could such developments be coordinated and shared? STEM module STEM module Motivations STEM module STEM module STEM module STEM module STEM module STEM module STEM module STEM module STEM module STEM module
Student motivations • Language is not their primary goal • Very practical focus. Engagement = clear relevance/utility • Need to quickly gain basic functionality • Challenges for language faculty • Lack of familiarity with STEM areas and content • Apparent paradox of having to teach something you don’t know • Anxiety about collaboration for STEM faculty • Lack of time to develop cohesive materials and curricula How is Language for STEM different?
Learning based on CEFR Place modules on framework Curricula = pathways Overall vision STEM module STEM module STEM module A1 STEM module STEM module STEM module A2 STEM module STEM module STEM module B1 STEM module STEM module STEM module B2 STEM module STEM module STEM module C1
By content type and complexity: Orthagonal organizational frameworks Letters Measurement Numbers Graphics Units Spatial Relationships (over, under, beneath) Orientation (upright, sideways, slanted) Process description (before, after, while, first, next) linear vs. parallel
Hierarchical • Global Challenges • Communication • Economic • etc. • Concentric from user’s perspective • Others? Orthagonal organizational frameworks Broader World Business City My interests Jobs Hobbies Dining out About Me School
Clearinghouse for STEM language instruction • Main features: • Add newly developed modules • Mechanisms for curation/improvement • Find modules based on framework/criteria • Curriculum builder • Strong social aspects (think Ebay + Amazon + Facebook): • Authors identified, credited…paid? • Ratings and attached comments for modules • Ratings and attached comments for curricula Vision: Develop collaborative Portal
Short: • Write up results in white paper • Communicate initial thoughts, call for participation • Medium: • Organize another meeting in 2014 • Funding for meetings and IT development • Long: • Develop and deploy collaborative website • Involve community, organize curation • Long-term Funding Next Steps…