430 likes | 715 Views
Measurement of pain . Dr. S. Parthasarathy MD., DA., DNB, MD ( Acu ), Dip. Diab . DCA, Dip. Software statistics PhD ( physio ) Mahatma Gandhi medical college and research institute , puducherry – India . Why this topic ? . Pain is not simple Subjective Multi dimensional
E N D
Measurement of pain Dr. S. Parthasarathy MD., DA., DNB, MD (Acu), Dip. Diab. DCA, Dip. Software statistics PhD (physio) Mahatma Gandhi medical college and research institute , puducherry – India
Why this topic ? • Pain is not simple • Subjective • Multi dimensional • Sensory, emotional etc…etc… • Day , age , drugs etc, etc ….
The first man • So simple • Keele , Lancet , 1948 • Measured pain as • Mild, moderate, severe • Unfortunately or fortunately , it still remains
Rotter scale and locus of control • The Locus of Control is a 13 item questionnaire • People with an internal locus of control believe that their own actions determine the rewards • those with an external locus of control believe that their own behavior doesn't matter much • Scores range from 0 to 13. A low score indicates an internal control while a high score indicates external control. • But why we need it ??
Nurse or PCA • Internal ------ • External --------
In the post op ward Pulse BP Temperature Respiration And pain as the fifth vital sign
So how do we measure pain ?? • Pain is a separate language • Subjective • Multidimensional • So very difficult
Advantages • Extremely simple • Sensitive • Reproducible • Quick • Cheap • Can also use for nausea, patient satisfaction • Both vertical and horizontal scales are available
Disadvantages • Patient understanding • Resting and movement • Unidimensional
Numerical rating scale similar to VAS 0- 10 numbers 0 = least pain 10 = maximum pain
Mcgill pain questionnaire • Melzack- Torgerson (1971) • Sensory • Affective • and emotional components of pain addressed
Mcgill pain questionairre • Crushing • Throbbing • Cramping • Splitting • Cutting • Shooting • Etc etc
Mcgill pain questionairre • 102 word descriptors into 20 subclasses • For each subclass – patient has to tell the description • To tell the score
Three things in MPQ • PRI • Summation of Scores of each class • NWC number of words chosen • PPI • 1 to 5 (mild to very severe
Advantages - Disadvantages • Wholesome • Data analysis • All components • Assessment of therapy • Very lengthy • Frustrated • Repetition not possible • Knowledge of patients
Short form MPQ • Instead of 20 – 15 • Instead of 102 - 15 * 4 = 60 • VAS • PPI is there. • Less vast and less frustrating
MPQ and all painful conditions • 50 • Causalgia 40 amputation • LBA,cancer, PHN primi • Arthritis 30 multi • toothache 20 fracture, bruise, cut 10 sprain 0
Problems in children • Pain can be measured by self-report (what children say), • biological markers (how their bodies react), and behavior (what children do). • Because pain is a subjective event, self-report is best if it is available. • behavioral or biological measures • Cry, vocalization HR,BP,autonomic NS • Faces
It may vary • Stranger • Fearing child • Injection
Regular techniques • VAS • NRS • Acceptable over 8 years • Faces Pain Scales • Faces pain scales comprise a series of line diagrams of faces with expressions of increasing distress
OUCHER • The OUCHER is a poster developed for children to help them communicate how much pain or hurt they feel. • There are two scales on the OUCHER: a number scale for older children and a picture scale for younger children.
So many scales • Manchester scale • Pieces of hurt scale • The Bieri Faces Pain Scale • Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability Scale (FLACC)
Neonate • The Neonatal Facial Action Coding System consists of 10 facial actions that coders identify from videotapes. • Facial movements observed in response to heel lance were: brow bulge, • eye squeeze, • nasolabial furrow and lip part, taut tongue, mouth stretch, and chin quive
AGE and pain assessment • coding hurt Faces VAS NRS 0 2 4 6 8 1 0 12
Special Considerations for the CognitivelyImpaired Child • What are the Barriers to effective pain management in the cognitively impaired ? • the complexity of pain assessment in those who cannot verbalize their pain • outdated beliefs that these children have altered or • blunted pain perception • limited evidence for the safety and efficacy of analgesic regimens • an exaggerated concern regarding opioid side effects
The University of Wisconsin Pain Scale for Preverbal andNonverbal Children • Cry, • Faces • Behaviour • Posture • Sleep • And the FLACC scale
Summary • Pain measurement – multidimensional • SDS, VAS, NRS • Mcgill - long and short forms Paediatric pain Codes, hurt, faces , VAS , NRS