1 / 25

THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK OF PUBLIC EDUCATION

THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK OF PUBLIC EDUCATION. Dr. Leonard Elovitz Kean University. COMMON LAW. CASE LAW 1. LAW- A BINDING RULE OF ACTION ESTABLISHED BY AN AUTHORITY 2. COURT DECISIONS 3. NOT LEGISLATED 4. DISCOVERED LAW. ORIGINAL LAW IN USA.

masato
Download Presentation

THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK OF PUBLIC EDUCATION

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK OF PUBLIC EDUCATION Dr. Leonard Elovitz Kean University

  2. COMMON LAW CASE LAW1. LAW- A BINDING RULE OF ACTION ESTABLISHED BY AN AUTHORITY2. COURT DECISIONS 3. NOT LEGISLATED4. DISCOVERED LAW

  3. ORIGINAL LAW IN USA 1. ENGLISH COMMON LAW2. DOCTRINE OF "STARE DECISIS"C. GREATEST PART OF LAW INCLUDING EDUCATION

  4. FEDERAL CONSTITUTION NO MENTION OF EDUCATION 10TH AMENDMENT“THE POWERS NOT DELEGATED TO THE UNITED STATES BY THE CONSTITUTION, NOR PROHIBITED BY IT TO THE STATES, ARE RESERVED TO THE STATES RESPECTIVELY, OR TO THE PEOPLE.”

  5. “It is, of course, quite true that the responsibility for public education is primarily the concern of the states, but it is equally true that such responsibilities, like all other state activity, must be exercised consistently with federal constitutional requirements as they apply to state action.” • Copper v. Aaron (1963)

  6. Branches of Government

  7. FEDERAL COURTS INVOLVED MAINLY IN THE PROTECTION OF INHERENT RIGHTS OF INDIVIDUALS FIRST AMENDMENT – “CONGRESS SHALL MAKE NO LAWS RESPECTING AN ESTABLISHMENT OF RELIGION OR PROHIBITING THE FREE EXERCISE THEREOF; OR ABRIDGING THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH OR OF THE PRESS; OR OF THE RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO PEACEABLY ASSEMBLE AND TO PETITION THE GOVERNMENT FOR A REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES.

  8. TYPES OF SCHOOL CASES 1) THE USE OF PUBLIC FUNDS FOR NON-PUBLIC SCHOOLS OR STUDENTS2) THE REGULATION OF PROCEDURES IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS WHICH ARE OBJECTED TO ON RELIGIOUS GROUNDS.3) FREEDOM OF SPEECH4) RIGHTS OF ASSEMBLY5) RIGHTS OF PETITION

  9. 5TH AMENDMENT PROVIDES THAT NO PERSON SHALL BE COMPELLED IN ANY CRIMINAL CASE TO BE A WITNESS AGAINST HIMSELF

  10. 14TH AMENDMENT “NO STATE SHALL MAKE OR ENFORCE ANY LAW WHICH SHALL ABRIDGE THE PRIVILEGES OR IMMUNITIES OF CITIZENS OF THE U.S.; NOR SHALL ANY STATE DEPRIVE ANY PERSON OF LIFE, LIBERTY OR PROPERTY, WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW; NOR DENY TO ANY PERSON WITHIN ITS JURISDICTION THE EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAWS.” IMPORTANT CONCEPTS1. DUE PROCESS2. EQUAL PROTECTION

  11. TYPES OF CASES • FLAG SALUTES • RIGHTS OF PARENTS • RACIAL SEGREGATION • TEACHER DISMISSAL • PUPIL DISCIPLINE • SCHOOL FUNDING

  12. Article I Section 8 “The Congress shall have the power to lay and collect taxes … to pay debts and provide for the general welfare of the United States”

  13. Article I Section 10 Guarantees the sanctity of contracts

  14. FEDERAL LEGISLATION PROVIDES FUNDS - ESEA, TITLE I, ETC. CAUSES CHANGE P.L. 504 – ACCESS OF HANDICAPPED P.L. 94 – 142 EDUCATION OF HANDICAPPED NCLB - NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND PROVIDES PROTECTION - CIVIL RIGHTS ACTS EFFECT OF BREAKING LAWS - LOSS OF FUNDING

  15. EXECUTIVE BRANCH Department of Education Cabinet Level Secretary Arne Duncan Functions Formulate federal funding programs Enforce federal educational laws

  16. State of New Jersey N.J. CONSTITUTION SINCE 1875 CONTAINS CLAUSE – “ THE LEGISLATURE SHALL PROVIDE FOR A THOROUGH AND EFFICIENT SYSTEM OF FREE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOR ALL CHILDREN IN THE STATE BETWEEN THE AGES OF FIVE AND EIGHTEEN YEARS.”

  17. Governor Appoints the members of the State Board And the Commissioner Governor Chris Christie

  18. STATE LEGISLATION – NJ TITLE 18A – OPERATION OF EDUCATION PROVIDES FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF DEPT. OF EDUCATION ESTABLISHES FUNDING – School Funding Reform Act (SFRA) 2008

  19. NJ DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION STATE BOARD OF ED. 1. 12 MEMBERS 2. CITIZENS OF THE STATE 3. 5 YR. RESIDENCE 4. AT LEAST 3 WOMEN 5. NO MORE THAN 1 PER COUNTYAPPOINTED BY GOVERNOR WITH ADVICE AND CONSENT OF THE SENATE 6 YEAR OVERLAPPING TERMSNO COMPENSATIONRULES AND REGS. – TITLE VI – ADMINISTRATIVE CODE ARCELIO APONTEPresident

  20. NJ DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION1. APPOINTED BY GOVERNOR WITH A&C OF SENATE2. 4 YR TERM WITH GOVERNOR3. CHIEF EDUCATION OFFICER OF THE STATE4. A JUDGE IN DISPUTES CAN BE OVERRULED BY STATE BOARD Chris Cerf

  21. LOCAL BOARD OF EDUCATION MEMBERS 1. U. S. CITIZENS 2. ONE YEAR RESIDENCE 3. READ & WRITE 4. REGISTERED VOTER 5. NO COMPENSATION 6. MAKE POLICY 7. EMPLOY SUPERINTENDENT

  22. SUPERINTENDENTOF SCHOOLS • ADMINISTERS DISTRICT CONSISTENT WITH POLICY • CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF SCHOOL DISTRICT • EDUCATIONAL LEADER

  23. ORGANIZATION AND OPERATION OF COURTS A.FUNCTION OF COURTS – RESOLVE CONFLICTS B. JURISDICTION – FEDERAL 1. CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS 2. FEDERAL STATUTES 3. DIVERSITY OF STATE RESIDENCE OF LITIGANTS 4. CASES ON ACTS OF CONGRESS – I.E. CIVIL RIGHTS ACT

  24. STATE - NJ 1. PETITION TO COMMISSIONER HEARD BY ALJ a. IS DISPUTED LOCAL DECISION IMPROPER AS A MATTER OF LAW b. IS THE EVIDENCE AVAILABLE SUFFICIENT TO SUSTAIN THE FACTUAL CONCLUSIONS ORB TO FIND NEW CONCLUSIONS OF FACT c. WAS THE EXERCISE OF LOCAL DISCRETION ARBITRARY, UNREASONABLE, OR CAPRICIOUS • ALJ RECOMMENDS DECISION TO COMMISSIONER

  25. NJ Cont. 3. COMMISSIONER HAS 45 DAYS TO ADOPT, REJECT OR MODIFY 4. APPEALS TO STATE BOE WITHIN 30 DAYS 5. APPEALS TO SUPERIOR COURT 6. STATE SUPREME COURT – LIMITED RIGHT TO APPEAL 7. US SUPREME COURT – EXTREMELY LIMITED RIGHT TO APPEAL

More Related