1 / 13

An Agile Method for E-Service Composition

An Agile Method for E-Service Composition. Author : Pouya Fatehi , Seyyed Mohsen Hashemi Department of Computer Software , Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad university Tehran, Iran Reporter : Calvin Chang. OUTLINE. Introduction Agile Model for Service Composition

mason
Download Presentation

An Agile Method for E-Service Composition

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. An Agile Method for E-Service Composition Author : PouyaFatehi, Seyyed Mohsen Hashemi Department of Computer Software , Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad university Tehran, Iran Reporter : Calvin Chang

  2. OUTLINE • Introduction • Agile Model for Service Composition • Second level of AM4SC • Comparison of AM4SC with other Service Composition Methods

  3. Introduction • E-services more popular today • Develop composite service • The composability feature of services leads to lowcost development of high quality services reason • Software as a Service (SaaS) model which is a rapidly growing model of software licensing • Under SaaS, the software publisher (seller) runs and maintains all necessary hardware and software and buyers obtain access using the Internet

  4. Agile methodologies is more useful for developing services. • In this paper try to represent a new agile methodology for services Which agile methods are the most effective for composite service development ? The Impact of Methods and Techniques on Outcomes from Agile Software Development Projects • using two agile methods is better in productivity rather than using only one method. • No significant further advantage in increasing the number of methods used beyond two. • Significant difference between the eXtreme Programming/Scrum combination.

  5. eXtreme Programming (XP) Scrum • Very much oriented towards technology • Practices and programmer activity • Focused on agile project management aspects • Scrum is a wrapper around other engineering approaches complementarity • Changing development process can not implemented in a single shot • Defined two implementation levels

  6. Agile Model for Service Composition • 4 activities • Scrum methodology • 6 practices • XP method (AM4SC)

  7. 4 activites 1- Planning process 2-Arrangement process • According to agile manifesto, proposed model would not be a complete model but it is started with a simple model and will be finalized with iteration and incremental in later evolves. • This process will be done at a periodical session • Output of services and features that should be included in next iteration • Expected input, expected output and requirement list determined 3-Modeling process 4- Implementation Process • Done with any available service modeling tools • The platform of independent model for composite service that offered in previous step mapped to platform of specific model

  8. life cycle will be continued till getting customers feedback and their new requirements

  9. 6 practices Collaborative programming Iterative and Incremental development • Developers of services share their experiences for modeling and implementing composite service in low cost at easiest way • Main features developed in first iteration then with refactoring other features would be inserted to composite service incrementally Online customers Continues integration • Feedbacks will be used to increase quality and acceptance of developed service • Release beta versions in web • Whole service model should be integrated to implement composite service, this makes model more reliable Reusability through design Service model refactoring • Ensuring that a piece of functionality is implemented in a single place • Services which used in composite service, implement functionality once • Logics of model sections must stay unchanged • useful for decreasing cost and time to apply changes that consumer expects

  10. Second level of AM4SC • Six agents collaborate together to achieve model goals

  11. Unit test maker Tester agent • Searches among reference models for defined problem domain that described by service requester requirements • Tests composed service with created unit tests and surveys the results. • The composed service delivers to service requester • model with failed unit tests delivered to automated modeler for refactoring and changing model to satisfy all unit tests Model refactoring • When unit tests fails or in next iteration of service development, cycles to add more features in composed service Feature selector • Select features by pairs that service requester sent as an input • customer’s requests should be categorized across the developer’s policies and their priorities which provided by requester • Output of this agent, also is useful tool for accessing progress of development process Automated refactor/modeler agent • Creates requests for binding required service based on selected features and artifacts that defined by unit test maker agent. Service creator • Binds services and creates needed relationship designed in service model between input and outputs of services

  12. Comparison of AM4SC with other Service Composition Methods

  13. THANKS

More Related