1 / 5

Facing the crisis : what reactions of LMP?

Facing the crisis : what reactions of LMP?. Phase I (2008-2010) Ambivalent trends - Some adaptations and deviations from the standard activation/ welfare to work framework … - Internal flexibility and employment maintenance - Income support policies (UI, minimum wage )

matana
Download Presentation

Facing the crisis : what reactions of LMP?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Facing the crisis: whatreactions of LMP? Phase I (2008-2010) Ambivalent trends -Some adaptations and deviationsfrom the standard activation/welfare to workframework… -Internalflexibility and employment maintenance - Income support policies (UI, minimum wage) -But « activation » stillgoing on - Institutionalreforms (PES, one stop centres) - Focus on privatesector (ALMP programmes) - Welfare to workschemes Phase II (2010-?) At least in politicaldiscourse, one single orientation Fiscal austerity + wagemoderation+activation

  2. Reactions of labour market policies: a typology Source :OECD, 2009 ; European Commission, 2009 ; Messenger, 2009 ; SPC, 2009 Erhel (2010) Document de travail CES

  3. Reactions of labour marketpolicies: adaptations in 2010-2011 • Source: EEO, Quarterly Reports Executive Summary, september 2010

  4. A crisis of the paradigm? -Clearsigns of radicalisation Strikingexamples in the threepresentations But also French debate (see « RSA » debate) Underlyingdiscourse: we have not gone far enough and shoulddeepen activation etc.! -But trends over the last 20 yearsevidence the failure of that model Indeed, it has been implemented: seeeven OECD indicators! EPL has gone down, traps have been reduced, indirect labour costsalso…) But verylimitedimprovement in LM performances (U, quality of work) and highcyclicalvulnerability in some countries + polarization and asymmetry (workers are paying) + forgotten promises (flexicurity) >>>A paradigm in crisis

  5. Whatdynamics? -Twoways • Continuity>>>new crisis and social/politicalinstability in Europe • Anotherparadigm: but what components? EU 2020 Employment guidelines> focus on education Social investment? Green economy and sustainablegrowth? Quality of work/quality of life? Someelements but still not so consistent as the activation model…

More Related