310 likes | 435 Views
Future Firefighting Advancements. Members: Jennifer Au, Anthony Bonomo, Laura Freyman, Brian Kwong, Benjamin Li, Jessica Lieberman, Levon Mktrchyan, Michael Price, Andrew Skoda, Mary Tellers, Andrew Tomaschko and Johnny Wu Mentor: Dr. Fred Mowrer Librarian: Nedelina Tchangalova. Outline.
E N D
Future Firefighting Advancements Members: Jennifer Au, Anthony Bonomo, Laura Freyman, Brian Kwong, Benjamin Li, Jessica Lieberman, Levon Mktrchyan, Michael Price, Andrew Skoda, Mary Tellers, Andrew Tomaschko and Johnny Wu Mentor: Dr. Fred Mowrer Librarian: Nedelina Tchangalova
Outline • Introduction • Research Question • Literature Review • Methodology • Project Timeline • Conclusion
Foundation • Time is a critical factor in fire emergencies • Emergencies can develop quickly • EFRs don’t have enough time to make decisions • Building sensors can detect various environmental factors • More information can be obtained sooner • Educated decisions could be made with more information
“The potential amount of information that can be available to first responders is staggering.” -William Davis, Ph.D., Fire Research Group, NIST
Current Technology • There are specific sensors: • Photoelectric smoke sensors • Ionization smoke sensors • Heat sensors • CO Bases • Manual Pull Stations • Examples of potential sensors • HVAC sensors • Security sensors Heat Sensor Surveillance Camera
Current Technology • Fire Panel Annunciator Systems • Honeywell Notifier Fire Panel • Siemens MXL • Simplex-Grinnell 4100U Network • BFRL Building Tactical Information Project • ONYX First Vision Panel
Problem and Solution • Problem: • Abstract and convoluted raw data • Not all sensor data used in emergencies • Solution: • Compile data from sensor systems into comprehensible form • Display information in an effective standardized interface to EFRs
Why Our Project is Unique • Variety of sensor types • Security • HVAC • Fire • Sophisticated analysis • Processing, interpolation and prioritization of time sensitive information • Direct communication with EFRs in the building • i.e. Flashover
Research Question How can a system be created that takes information gathered by various building sensors and sends that information in real time to the people who need it?
Building Tactical Information Project • Four objectives • Determine data most useful to EFRs • Develop a data dispersion standard • Demonstrate technology effectiveness • Address security issues
Workshop for EFRs • Information Sets • “En-Route” • “On the scene” • Information Areas • Static • Building plans • Sensor layouts • Dynamic • Direct sensor readings • Display of Information
Workshop for EFRs • System should include • Sensor variety • Fire • HVAC • Security • Facilities management • Reliable • Educational Video
Standardization • NEMA SB30 Fire Activated Smoke Detector Activated Heat Detector Elevator
Communication Methods • Project 25 (P25) could bridge network communication gap • OPNET • Mobile radio • Standard between agencies • Voice, video and data communication • Wireless Access Points
Proposed System Current System Our System
Tasks • Establish EFR needs • “Workshop to Define Information Needed by Emergency Responders During Building Emergencies” • Develop Specifications • Perform a case study of sensors systems in buildings • Design and prototype • Use existing materials • Modular capabilities • Test and revise • Confirming accuracy of data returned by device • Usability testing
Phase 1: Planning • Fall 2008- Fall 2009 Sub-team 1 : • Case study and sensor survey • Study building and fire codes • Determine standard operating procedures Sub-team 2: • Further background research • NIST, on campus, corporate research Sub-team 3: • Obtain money and resources • Keep corporate and government contact
Phase 2: Implementation • Spring 2009-Fall 2010 • Begin thesis Sub-team 1: • Establish algorithms • Code interface Sub-team 2: • Design interface • Aesthetics and usability • Run fire simulations Sub-team 3: • Create fire detection system mockup • Test sensor output
Phase 3: Assessment • Fall 2010- Spring 2011 • Complete Thesis • Evaluate • Reliability • Validity • Usability • Synthesize Results
Validity • Internal validity • Assure that the display and the sensor outputs correspond • External Validity • Differences in building sensor organization • Anticipate all possible scenarios
Reliability • Run fire simulations through the system • Assure consistency of results • Assess material functionality • Withstand emergency environment • Evaluate interface success • Quick processing
Usability • Qualitative evaluation • Constraints • Meet needs expressed by EFRs • Dovetail with SOPs • Simplicity of use
Conclusion FFA’s system will: Present critical situational information Allow for informed decisions Work with existing technologies Interoperate between sensor brands Facilitate communication between EFRs Save lives and property
References • http://sensing.honeywell.com/index.cfm/ci_id/16046/la_id/1.htm • http://www.fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/fire05/art105.html • http://www.fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/fire04/art021.html • http://fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/fire05/PDF/f05017.pdf • http://www.notifier.com/products/datasheets/DN_7051.pdf • http://www.fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/fire06/PDF/f06044.pdf • http://fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build07/PDF/b07022.pdf • http://www.fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build07/PDF/b07024.pdf