100 likes | 117 Views
Some Additional TPC Aspects to Consider. Peter Larsson Ericsson Research peter.larsson@era.ericsson.se. Motivation. Three concerns: TPC Request/Report frames in conjunction with 802.11 Power Management need to be addressed.
E N D
Some Additional TPC Aspects to Consider Peter Larsson Ericsson Research peter.larsson@era.ericsson.se Peter Larsson, Ericsson Research, Sweden
Motivation • Three concerns: • TPC Request/Report frames in conjunction with 802.11 Power Management need to be addressed. • TPC Request/Report frames works fine for downlink power control, but would benefit from additional support in the uplink. • AP centric radar detection would benefit from additional TPC support in the uplink. Peter Larsson, Ericsson Research, Sweden
Power Management and TPC (1) N.B CF-Pollable STAs not considered Beacon Beacon ACK TPC Report AP Time PwrMgt=0 PwrMgt=1 Channel busy STA TPC Request ACK Awake Awake • Power is consumed when being awake. • Why bother, one is anyway sending data immediately after the TPC frames? • Not entirely true! Implementation specific. E.g. after long silence, the first frame should be able to determine a sensible power level. Peter Larsson, Ericsson Research, Sweden
Power Management and TPC (2) N.B Ack response on PS poll not considered Beacon Beacon TIM ACK TPC Report AP Time PwrMgt=1 PwrMgt=0 STA TPC Request PS Poll ACK Awake Awake Awake Peter Larsson, Ericsson Research, Sweden
The Proposal Beacon Beacon AP Time Transmit Power indication Transmit Power indication STA Awake Awake • Exploit 802.11 power save philosophy, i.e. wake up at TBTT, wait for beacon, do what is needed, then go back to sleep. • Complement with transmit power indication in Beacon in addition to existing TPC frames Peter Larsson, Ericsson Research, Sweden
TPC UL/DL N.B Commonly, not all STAs do TPC in one frame time UL DL Message complexity = O(N) Active and precise TPC Message complexity = O(N) Active and precise TPC Beacon Beacon Beacon ACK Beacon ACK ACK ACK TPC Rep TPC Req TPC Req TPC Rep TPC Req./ Rep. AP AP Time Time ACK ACK ACK ACK TPC Rep TPC Rep TPC Req TPC Req STA STA STA 2 STA N STA 2 STA N STA 1 STA 1 Message complexity = O(1) Passive TPC. Reduced powerconsumption. Not useful TPC Beacon Beacon Beacon AP Time STA STA 1,2,…N STA 1,2,…N Peter Larsson, Ericsson Research, Sweden
AP Centric Radar Detection • 2 complementary mechanisms for radar detection. • Medium silencing • TPC in UL • Regular TPC updates, in addition to on demand updates (i.e. TPC Req/Rep) will ease radar detection. Peter Larsson, Ericsson Research, Sweden
Proposed alternatives • Alternative 1. • 8 bit IE payload containing transmit power indication. • Alternative 2. • 16 bit IE payload containing8 bit transmit power indication and 8 bit estimated interference level • Alternative 1+2=3. • 8 bit IE payload containing two fields in alt 2 added together.See 02/069 p.9. N.B. this is compatible with alt 1. Peter Larsson, Ericsson Research, Sweden
Conclusion • It was suggested that beacons contain transmit power information. • The beacon TP indication will complement the TPC request/ report method. • The proposal provides: • A 802.11 power management compatible TPC mechanism for UL. • Improved medium efficiency for UL • Improved means for radar detection. Peter Larsson, Ericsson Research, Sweden
Two Ways Forward • Consider the power save, UL complexity & radar detection issues in conjunction with TPC later in the LB process. • Including TP level indication in the beacon may then be a recommended amendment. • Consider this issue this meeting and amend necessary beacon IE format/text in the draft. Peter Larsson, Ericsson Research, Sweden