150 likes | 299 Views
Practice Quiz 3. Hurley 4.3 - 4.7. For the quiz …. I will provide you with a categorical proposition, like… No apples sold in Minnesota are mushy weapons I’ll ask you for its quality qualifier quantity quantifier copula distribution letter name terms. 1. Consider:
E N D
Practice Quiz 3 Hurley 4.3 - 4.7
For the quiz … I will provide you with a categorical proposition, like… No apples sold in Minnesota are mushy weapons I’ll ask you for its • quality • qualifier • quantity • quantifier • copula • distribution • letter name • terms
1 Consider: No non-A are B (T) Obversion • Some non-A are B. (F) • All A are non-B. (Und.) • All non-A are non-B. (T) • Some non-A are not B. (T) • No B are non-A. (T)
2 Consider: All A are non-B. (F) Contraposition • All A are non-B. (F) • All non-B are A. (Und.) • No non-A are B. (Und.) • All B are non-A. (F) • Some non-A are not B. (T)
3 Consider: Some A are not non-B. (T) Some A are B. • Contraposition (T) • Contrary (F) • Conversion (T) • Obversion (T) • Subcontrary (Und.)
4 Consider: Some non-A are B. (F) Some B are non-A. • Subcontrary (T) • Conversion (Und.) • Contraposition (Und.) • Conversion (F) • Contraposition (F)
5 Assume Aristotle (Traditional standpoint). Consider: Some A are non-B. (F) Some A are not non-B. (F) • Illicit, contrary • Illicit, subalternation • Subcontrary • Illicit, subcontrary • Contraposition
6 No S are P. (Aristotelian standpoint) After filling in the diagram … • Area 2 is shaded, and there is a circled X in area 1. • Areas 1 and 3 are shaded. • Area 1 is shaded, and there is a circled X in area 2. • There is an X in area 2. • Area 1 is shaded, and there are no other marks.
7 All S are P. (Boolean standpoint) After filling in the diagram … • Areas 1 and 3 are shaded. • Area 2 is shaded, and there are no other marks. • Area 1 is shaded, and there is a circled X in area 2. • There is an X in area 2. • Area 1 is shaded, and there are no other marks.
8 Shade area 2 and place an X in area 1. Which of the following would be valid inferences: • shaded area 2. • an X in area 3. • an X in area 1. • shaded 1. • no X’s or shadings.
9 Shade area 1 and place an X in area 2. Which of the following would be valid inferences: • shaded area 2. • an X in area 3. • shaded area 1, and X in area 2. • shaded 1. • no X’s or shadings.
10 Assume Aristotle (Traditional standpoint). Consider: No non-A are B. (T) Some non-A are not B. (F) • Illicit, subalternation • Illicit, contradictory • Contradictory • Illicit, subcontrary • Conversion
11 Assume Bool (Modern standpoint). Consider: No A are B. (T) Some A are B. (F) • Existential fallacy • Illicit, contradictory • Contradictory • Illicit, subcontrary • Conversion
12 Assume Bool (Modern standpoint). Consider: No A are B. (T) All A are B. (F) • Existential fallacy • Illicit, contrary • Contradictory • Illicit, subcontrary • Conversion
13 Assume Aristotle (Traditional standpoint) All square circles are happy shapes. Some square circles are happy shapes. • Existential fallacy • Valid, contradictory • Valid, subcontrary • Invalid, subalternation • Invalid, contrary