730 likes | 837 Views
More on the A-Word. Credit: Anthony Aguirre, Martin Rees, Frank Wilczek Blame: Max Tegmark. dse. Big Bang Zoom. Four gradual discoveries: The Universe is much larger than once imagined The Universe can be well described mathematically
E N D
More on the A-Word Credit: Anthony Aguirre, Martin Rees, Frank Wilczek Blame: Max Tegmark
Big Bang Zoom • Four gradual discoveries: • The Universe is much larger than once imagined • The Universe can be well described mathematically • In most theories, we can’t observe everything that exists • There are selection effects
Big Bang Zoom How big is our Universe?
Big Bang Zoom • Four gradual discoveries: • The Universe is much larger than once imagined • The Universe can be well described mathematically • In most theories, we can’t observe everything that exists • There are selection effects • - probability that a random point in our observable universe is near the surface of a planet ~ 10-43
Big Bang Zoom • If we want to test a mathematical theory predicting a larger universe than we can observe, then we’re forced to compute anthropic selection effects. • That this is hard isn’t Alex Vilenkin’s fault! So we shouldn’t vent our frustrations on those who try to work on the problem..
Cmbgg OmOl The Standard Model Lagrangian L= (From T.D. Gutierrez)
Cmbgg OmOl C = h = G = kb = qe = 1 Particle physics Standard model parameters: Required Cosmology Optional
Cmbgg OmOl How measure? Particle physics Standard model parameters: Why these values? Required Cosmology Optional
Brief History of the Universe Fluctuation generator Fluctuation amplifier Hot Dense Smooth Cool Rarefied Clumpy (Graphics from Gary Hinshaw/WMAP team)
MATTER BUDGET Required (Q) Optional INITIAL CONDITIONS tot
OUR TOOLS
Measuring clustering
History CMB Foreground-cleaned WMAP map from Tegmark, de Oliveira-Costa & Hamilton, astro-ph/0302496
Boomzoom z = 1000
Boomzoom z = 2.4 Mathis, Lemson, Springel, Kauffmann, White & Dekel 2001
Boomzoom z = 0.8 Mathis, Lemson, Springel, Kauffmann, White & Dekel 2001
Boomzoom z = 0 Mathis, Lemson, Springel, Kauffmann, White & Dekel 2001
1parmovies LSS
1parmovies Clusters LSS Tegmark & Zaldarriaga, astro-ph/0207047 + updates
1parmovies CMB Clusters LSS Tegmark & Zaldarriaga, astro-ph/0207047 + updates
1parmovies CMB Clusters LSS Ly Tegmark & Zaldarriaga, astro-ph/0207047 + updates
1parmovies CMB Clusters LSS Lensing Ly Tegmark & Zaldarriaga, astro-ph/0207047 + updates
1parmovies CMB Clusters LSS Lensing Lya Tegmark & Zaldarriaga, astro-ph/0207047 + updates
? Cosmological data Cosmological Parameters Why these particular values? Nature of dark matter? Nature of dark energy? Fundamental theory Nature of early Universe?
PREDICTING It's tough to make predictions, especially about the future. Yogi Berra
Cmbgg OmOl Parameter status?
Cmbgg OmOl Parameter status? Environmental Environmental Fundamental? Fundamental?
Big Bang Zoom What are the 4 multiverse levels like? Same effective laws of physics, different initial conditions Same fundamental laws of physics, different effective laws Nothing qualitatively new Different fundamental laws of physics
Cmbgg OmOl Motivates B What determines the constants of nature? What do the constants of nature determine? Most of our paper Certified 100% philosophy free!
Cmbgg OmOl Three little numbers:
Cmbgg OmOl R~ /mp M~ mp Weisskopf 1975 Carr & Rees 1979
Cmbgg OmOl R~ 1/1/21/2mp2 M~ 3/23/2 /mp2
Cmbgg OmOl R~1/mp21/2 M~ 3/2 /mp2 Weisskopf 1975 Carr & Rees 1979
Cmbgg OmOl R~ /mp3/23/4 M~ 3/4 /mp1/2 Carr & Rees 1979
Cmbgg OmOl M~ /mp2 Weisskopf 1975 Carr & Rees 1979
Cmbgg OmOl R~ 3 /mp33/2 M~ 5 /mp31/2 Carr & Rees 1979
Cmbgg OmOl R~ /mp5 M~ /mp5 Carr & Rees 1979
Cmbgg OmOl Based on Carr & Rees 1979, Barrow & Tipler 1986 Inside black hole Below quantum limit
Cmbgg OmOl Fine-tuning? NO! Based on Carr & Rees 1979, Barrow & Tipler 1986 Inside black hole Below quantum limit
Big Bang Zoom MT 1998,gr-qc/9704009, Ann. Phys., 270, 1-51
Cmbgg OmOl Most spectacular fine tuning known outside cosmology is arguably in nuclear physics
Cmbgg OmOl Savas will return to this! Effect of Higgs VEV v=246 GeV: Agrawal, Barr, Donoghue & Seckel 1998, PRL, 80, 1822 • v/v0<0.5: protons (uud) decay into neutrons (udd) • v/v0<0.8: diproton & dineutron • v/v0=1: we are here • v/v0>2: deuterium unstable • v/v0>5: neutrons (udd) unstable even in nuclei • v/v0>103: protons (uud) decay to ++ (uuu)
Cmbgg OmOl Oberhummer, Csoto & Schlattl, astro-ph/0007178, Science, 289, 88 + 8Be 8Be+ 12C 12C+ 16O C & O yield given by one parameter that depends on , mu/QCD, md/QCD : Jeltema & Sher, hep-ph/9905494 oxygen carbon oxygen carbon carbon oxygen 5 Msun 1.3 Msun 20 Msun