350 likes | 628 Views
Physics of fusion power. Lecture 2: Lawson criterion / Approaches to fusion. Key problem of fusion. …. Is the Coulomb barrier. Cross section . The cross section is the effective area connected with the likelihood of occurrence of a reaction
E N D
Physics of fusion power Lecture 2: Lawson criterion / Approaches to fusion.
Key problem of fusion • …. Is the Coulomb barrier
Cross section • The cross section is the effective area connected with the likelihood of occurrence of a reaction • For snooker balls the cross section is pr2 (with r the radius of the ball) 1 barn = 10-28 m2 The cross section of various fusion reactions as a function of the energy. (Note logarithmic scale)
The cross section s Averaged reaction rate • One particle (B) colliding with many particles (A) • Number of reactions in Dt is • Both s as well as v depend on the energy which is not the same for all particles. One builds the average Schematic picture of the number of reactions in a time interval Dt
Averaged reaction rate ….. • The cross section must be averaged over the energies of the particles. Assume a Maxwellian Averaged reaction rates for various fusion reactions as a function of the temperature (in keV)
Sizeable number of fusion reactions even at relatively low temperatures The Maxwellian (multiplied by the velocity) • Even for temperatures below the energy at which the cross section reaches its maximum, there is a sufficient amount of fusion reactions due to the number of particles in the tail of the Maxwell distribution The cross section The product of distribution and cross section Schematic picture of the calculation of the averaged reaction rate (Integrand as a function of energy)
Compare the two The averaged reaction rate does not fall off as strongly when going to lower energies Cross section as a function of energy Averaged reaction rate as a function of Temperature
Current fusion reactor concepts • are designed to operate at around 10 keV (note this is still 100 million Kelvin, matter is fully ionized or in the plasma state) • Are based on a mixture of Deuterium and Tritium • Both decisions are related to the cross section Averaged reaction rates for various fusion reactions as a function of the temperature (in keV)
Limitations due to the high temperature • 10 keV is still 100 million Kelvin (matter is fully ionized, i.e. in the plasma state) • Some time scales can be estimated using the thermal velocity • This is 106 m/s for Deuterium and 6 107 m/s for the electrons • In a reactor of 10m size the particles would be lost in 10 ms.
Two approaches to fusion • One is based on the rapid compression, and heating of a solid fuel pellet through the use of laser or particle beams. In this approach one tries to obtain a sufficient number of fusion reactions before the material flies apart, hence the name, inertial confinement fusion (ICF).
Week five …… • Guest lecturer and international celebrity Dr. D. Gericke will give an overview of inertial confinement fusion …..
Magnetic confinement .. • The Lorentz force connected with a magnetic field ensures that the charged particles cannot move over large distances across the magnetic field • They gyrate around the field lines with a typical radius At 10 keV and 5 Tesla this radius of 4 mm for Deuterium and 0.07 mm for the electrons
Lawson criterion • Derives the condition under which efficient production of fusion energy is possible • Essentially it compares the generated fusion power with any additional power required • The reaction rate of one particle B due to many particles A is • In the case of more than one particle B one obtains
Fusion power • The total fusion power then is • Using quasi-neutrality • For a 50-50% mixture of Deuterium and Tritium
Fusion power • To proceed one needs to specify the average of the cross section. In the relevant temperature range 6-20 keV • The fusion power can then be expressed as
The power loss • The fusion power must be compared with the power loss from the plasma • For this we introduce the energy confinement time tE • Where W is the stored energy
Ratio of fusion power to heating power • If the plasma is stationary • Compare this with the fusion power • One can derive the so called n-T-tau product
Break-even • The break-even condition is defined as the state in which the total fusion power is equal to the heating power • Note that this does not imply that all the heating power is generated by the fusion reactions
Ignition condition • Ignition is defined as the state in which the energy produced by the fusion reactions is sufficient to heat the plasma. • Only the He ions are confined (neutrons escape magnetic field and plasma) and therefore only 20% of the total fusion power is available for plasma heating
n-T-tau • Difference between inertial confinement and magnetic confinement: Inertial short tE but large density. Magnetic confinement the other way around • Magnetic confinement: Confinement time is around 3 seconds • Note that the electrons move over a distance of 200.000 km in this time
Energy Cycle in a Power Plant Electrical power out External Power In 1GW 0.2GW Steam Turbine D 1.8GW He (20% of power) 3GW Waste heat T Energy losses due to imperfect confinement Neutrons (80% of fusion power)
n-T-tau is a measure of progress • Over the years the n-T-tau product shows an exponential increase • Current experiments are close to break-even • The next step ITER is expected to operate well above break-even but still somewhat below ignition
Some landmarks in fusion energy Research • Initial experiments using charged grids to focus ion beams at point focus (30s). • Early MCF devices: mirrors and Z-pinches. • Tokamak invented in Russia in late 50s: T3 and T4 • JET tokamak runs near break-even 1990s • Other MCF concepts like stellarators also in development. • Recently, massive improvements in laser technology have allowed ICF to come close to ignition: planned for this year.
Force on the plasma • The force on an individual particle due to the electro-magnetic field (s is species index) • Assume a small volume such that • Then the force per unit of volume is
Force on the plasma • For the electric field • Define an average velocity • Then for the magnetic field
Force on the plasma • Averaged over all particles • Now sum over all species • The total force density therefore is
Quasi-neutrality • For length scales larger than the Debye length the charge separation is close to zero. One can use the approximation of quasi-neutrality • Note that this does not mean that there is no electric field in the plasma. • Under the quasi-neutrality approximation the Poisson equation can no longer be used directly to calculate the electric field • The charge densities are the dominant terms in the equation, and implicitly depend on E.
Divergence free current • Using the continuity of charge • Where J is the current density • One directly obtains that the current density must be divergence free
Also the displacement current must be neglected • From the Maxwell equation • Taking the divergence and using that the current is divergence free one obtains the unphysical result: • To avoid this, the displacement current must be neglected, so the Maxwell equation becomes
Quasi-neutrality • The charge density is assumed zero (but a finite electric field does exist) • One can not use the Poisson equation to calculate this electric field (since it would give a zero field) • Valid when length scales of the phenomena are larger than the Debye length • The current is divergence free • The displacement current is neglected (this assumption restricts us to low frequency waves: no light waves).
Force on the plasma • This force contains only the electro-magnetic part. For a fluid with a finite temperature one has to add the pressure force
Reformulating the Lorentz force • Using • The force can be written as • Then using the vector identity
Force on the plasma • One obtains • Important parameter (also efficiency parameter) the plasma-beta Magnetic field pressure Magnetic field tension