1 / 16

Working group on multimodal meaning representation

Working group on multimodal meaning representation. Dagstuhl workshop, Oct. 2001 http://www.dagstuhl.de/DATA/Title/01441.html. Scope. What should we consider as meaning?

maxine-dyer
Download Presentation

Working group on multimodal meaning representation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Working group on multimodal meaning representation Dagstuhl workshop, Oct. 2001 http://www.dagstuhl.de/DATA/Title/01441.html

  2. Scope • What should we consider as meaning? • How the processing of the input should lead to some update of the information state of the system (domain model, discourse model, user model, bla, bla, bla etc.); • Such a representation: • Should support both interpretation and generation; • Should support any kind of multimodal input and output; • Should support the variety of semantic theories;

  3. Objectives • Provide interface formats within a MM dialogue architecture • Incremental construction (reference interpretation etc.) up to a final representation (e.g. fixed frame à la MUC) or system action/feedback; • Should also be a basis for the definition of annotation schemes of MM semantic content. • Specification and comparison of application-specific representations • Towards a framework allowing one to compare existing representations (e.g. M3L) or define a new one, while ensuring some level of interoperability between these.

  4. What it is not • A domain model representation, or an ontology • There is OIL, DAML, Topic Maps etc. • A representation of lower-level linguistic or gestural information (e.g. syntax, etc.) • Some features may be percolated, though, or pointed to… • A representation of the underlying processes • Focus on the output of what is done by a given module

  5. Basic constraints • Uniformity (representation for various types of inputs and outputs) • Incrementality (usable at various stages) • Before/after fusion, semantic/pragmatic aspects • Extensibility • Method for designing schemas (XML or others), rather than one specific schema • Clear and explicit semantics

  6. Methodology • Basic components • Represent the general organization of any semantic structure • Parameterized by • data categories taken from a common registry • application specific data categories • General mechanisms • To make the thing work • General categories • Descriptive categories available to all formats

  7. Basic components (1) • Temporal structures (“events”) • Dialogue turns/utterance • Gestures • Actions on/in the task • Referential structures (“participants”) • Individuals and objects participating in an event • Comprises spatial structures • Propositional content (BG)

  8. Basic components (2) • Restrictions (on temporal and referential structures) • E.g. Gesture types, Linguistic modifiers, Dialogue acts, etc. • Dependency structures (linking events and referential structures) • E.g. Participant roles (cf. AGENT-SOURCE-GOAL), Discourse/rhetorical structure, temporal relations

  9. Example • Typology of gesture types (registry) • Communicative gestures (wave) • Designation gestures • Shrug • Nod • Movement attributes (intensity, etc.) • One given format will choose among these, or even define its own categories

  10. General mechanisms • Links • Internal links • To lower levels (syntactic structures, prosodic cues, gestural trajectories, etc.) • To domain model (types and instances) • Alternatives (cf. ambiguities) • E.g. disjunction of internal links

  11. General categories • Architectural • Producer (consumer?) of the information, confidence, devices • Environmental • Time stamps, spatial information (speaker’s position, graphical configurations, gestural trajectories etc.) • Interactional • Speaker (user state?), other addressees etc.

  12. Combining basic components and data categories Just to illustrate things…

  13. Example Pointer to speaker’s characteristics <semRep id=”rep1”> <event id=“e0”> <cat>utterance</cat> <speaker target=“Peter”/> <adressee target=“System”/> </event> <event id=“e1”> <tense>present</tense> <evtType>wanttogo</evtType> … </event> <participant id=“x”> <num>sing</num> </participant> <relation source=“x” target=“e1”> <role>agent</role> </relation> </semRep> • In black: basic components and mechanisms • (meta-model of semantic representation) • In blue: parameter component chosen from reference registries • Categories • Values Peter: I want to go …

  14. <semRep id=”rep1”> <event id=“e0”> <evtCat>utterance</evtCat> <speaker target=“Peter”/> <adressee target=“System”/> <alt> <dialAct cert=“0.8”>Order</dialAct> <dialAct cert=“0.3”>Inform</dialAct> </alt> </event> <event id=“e1”> <tense>present</tense> <voice>active</voice> <wh>none</wh> <evtType>wanttogo</evtType> … </event> <participant id=“x”> <lex>I</lex> <synCat>Pronoun</synCat> <num>sing</num> <pers>first</num> … </participant> <participant id=“y”> <lex>Paris</lex> <synCat>ProperNoun</synCat> <pers>third</num> … </participant> <participant id=“z”> <lex>Nancy</lex> <synCat>ProperNoun</synCat> <pers>third</num> … </participant> <relation source=“x” target=“e1”> <role>agent</role> </relation> <relation source=“y” target=“e1”> <role>source</role> </relation> <relation source=“y” target=“e1”> <role>goal</role> </relation> </semRep> I want to go from Paris to Nancy

  15. <semRep id=”rep1”> <event id=“e0”> <evtCat>utterance</evtCat> <agent target=“Peter”/> <adressee target=“System”/> <dialAct>Order</dialAct> </event> <event id=“e1”> <tense>present</tense> <voice>active</voice> <wh>none</wh> <evtType>wanttogo</evtType> … </event> <event id=“e2”> <evtCat>gestural</evtCat> <agent target=“Peter”/> <when>2001-11-1:xxxxxx</when> <gestType>designation</gestType> <graphContext target=“ctxt23“> </event> <participant id=“x”> <lex>I</lex> … </participant> <participant id=“y”> <lex>here</lex> <synCat>adverb</synCat> </participant> <participant id=“z”> <lex>there</lex> <synCat>adverb</synCat> </participant> <relation source=“y” target=“e2”> <MMLink>co-designation</MMLink> </relation> </semRep> I want to go from here to there

  16. Future work • SIGSEM Working group on meaning representations (ACL) • Liaison with ISO TC37/SC4 - linguistic resources • Preparation of a working draft • Liaison with Isle • Liaison with SIGMedia and SIGDial • W3C/VoiceXML

More Related