170 likes | 301 Views
The Challenges Ahead: Evolution of the Market For Oilfield Services and Equipment in Russia. Thane Gustafson Cambridge Energy Research Associates. Moscow, December 2003. Russian Oil Production Trends (million barrels per day).
E N D
The Challenges Ahead: Evolution of the Market For Oilfield Services and Equipment in Russia Thane Gustafson Cambridge Energy Research Associates Moscow, December 2003
Projected Production by 2010: The West Siberian “Brownfield” Will Still Dominate (million barrels per day/million metric tons per year) Timan-Pechora .5/25 Condensate .3/15 Undiscovered .2/11 Sakhalin .5/24 Russian Core 8.3/ 413 Russian Sector of the Caspian .2/8 East Siberia .2/8 TOTAL RUSSIA 10.1/503 Source: Cambridge Energy Research Associates. 30704-2
From Brownfield to Greenfield:How Tight the Bottleneck?How Long the Delay? 2012 2008 Source: Cambridge Energy Research Associates. 30709-8
4.50 4.00 3.50 Average 3.00 2.50 US$ per bbl 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 - Surgut Lukoil Yukos Sibneft Tatneft TNK Int. Rosneft TNK-BP (check) YukosSibneft (e) Source: UFG Research estimates, TNK-BP The Leading Russian Companies Have Kept their Lifting Costs Low (2002): But How Long Can They Continue Doing So?
What will Drive Cost Trends in the Brown Fields of West Siberia? • The dollar prices of key ruble-denominated inputs will continue to increase: • Steel: Prices of casing, pipelines, processing equipment will triple by 2010 • Wages: Will also triple • Electricity: Many pumps are electrically-driven; prices are being deregulated • Oil toolsand rigs: Most of these are produced in Russia; prices will rise with expanding demand and real appreciation of ruble • Opportunities for increased productivity? • Western and offshore competition: Favored by currency movements, but difficult to overcome habit of choosing lowest-cost contractor • Potential from Spin-Offs and Competition: May prove to be illusory as monopolist faces monopsonist at local level
Growth of the Work-over and Service Market Source: OMZ Source: TNK.
Outlook for Categories I and II: Well Maintenance, Workovers, and Field Redevelopment
35000 18.0% 16.0% 30000 14.0% 25000 12.0% 20000 10.0% metres drilled 8.0% 15000 6.0% 10000 4.0% 5000 2.0% 0 0.0% 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 % exploration Expn Drilling Devt Drilling Sources: InfoTEK, RPI FSU O&G Statistics Yearbook, Oil & Capital Exploration and Development Drilling in Russia
Evolution of Demand for Oilfield Equipment and Services to 2010 Category IV is New Wells in New Fields (incl. transportation, etc.) Category V is New Fields in New Areas (incl. new infrastructure, etc.)
Russian versus Western?Who Has the Market Share?The picture in the early 1990s Edge (In theory) Source: Cambridge Energy Research Associates. 30709-5
The Market Shifts in the Later 1990s:The Western Opportunity Fades Opportunity Source: Cambridge Energy Research Associates. 30709-6
Will the Market Shift Again in the Mid-2000s? Hybrids May Dominate, but Who Will Own Them? appreciation Source: Cambridge Energy Research Associates. 30709-7
Possible Consequences of the Recent Troubles for the Oil Services Market • State Campaign against “Rape and Pillage”? • Pressure to return to “traditional” emphasis on infill drilling as opposed to “harmful” techniques to maximize per-well flow rates • Ban on “cherry-picking” by shutting unprofitable wells • Stricter enforcement of FDPs mandated by institutes • Pressure to explore more than is economically justifiable? • Rejection of 10-year R/P ration in favor of traditional 40-year • Implicit or explicit threats of license removal for non-compliance • Pressure to begin premature development of “rim” opportunities? • Some companies favored over others? • Rosneft, LUKoil, Surgut move ahead • YukosSibneft slows down? • TNK-BP becomes leader? • These possibilities will impact the size and shape of the oil services market
THE BIGGEST CONSTRAINT AHEAD:The Race Between Crude Oil Available for Export and Export Transportation Capacity Source: Cambridge Energy Research Associates. 90304-7
Possible Implications of Recent Troubles for Oil Transportation—and Thus for the Oil Services Sector • Tensions between the private sector and the state could produce slow-down or paralysis in decision-making • Yukos’s Daqing project may lose speed; yet Nakhodka pipeline is too uneconomic to go forward • Murmansk pipeline and terminal could get tied up in battles over state-monopoly principle and right of private stakeholders • The state may move to contain or shut existing loopholes for exports • By ending the “90% rule” on oil products export tax—and then raising export taxes • By raising railroad tariffs to snuff out non-Transneft crude exports • These could result in constrained exports, shut-ins, lower production—in a word, lower activity—and thus less spending on services