140 likes | 221 Views
Metadata and resource quality analysis for ASPECT. Rosa MarÃa Gómez de Regil EdReNe seminar The Hague, May 19 2011. ASPECT project. CNDP as content provider 379 resources produced by the SCEREN network (november 2010) LRE v4.0 application profile OAI/PMH repository Quality analysis
E N D
Metadata and resource quality analysis for ASPECT Rosa María Gómez de Regil EdReNe seminar The Hague, May 19 2011
ASPECT project • CNDP as content provider • 379 resources produced by the SCEREN network (november 2010) • LRE v4.0 application profile • OAI/PMH repository • Quality analysis • content • Scale from 1 to 5 for each criteria • metadata
Quality of contents • Travell well criteria • 1. Adaptability • 2. Visual characteristics (few text, translation possibilities) • 3. Resources address curriculum topics that could be considered trans-national • 4.Interactive, customisable learning environments (like online exercises and tests). • 5. Open licence • 6. Structure • 7. Information contain in the resources is up to date or provided in real time (e.g. data feeds, news).
Quality of contents • 1. Adaptability • Scale : 4 • Comment : textual resources in HTML • 2. Visual characteristics • Scale: • 1 – 19% • 2 – 36% • 3 – 21% • 4 – 7% • 5 – 8 % • undetermined – 9%
Quality of contents • 3. Transnational curriculum topics conforming • Scale : 5 – 23 % • Comment : resources are designed for the French curriculum • 4. Interactivity • Scale: • 1 – 41 % • 2 – 28 % • 3 – 20 % • 4 – 8 % • 5 – 1 % • undetermined – 2 %
Quality of contents • 5. Open licence • Scale : 5 – 100 % • Comment : resources contain a rights description, but their licence is not always explicit • 6. Structure • Scale: 5 – 100 % • Comment : Well structured resources (very textual resources) • 7. Up to date • Scale : 5 – 33% • Comment : explicit update information
Quality of metadata • Criteria issued from the Catholic University of Leuven and CNDP feasibility • URL • Format • Rights description • Learning resource type • Document type (from LOMFR) • Analysis • completeness • pertinence • recommendations
Quality of metadata • 1. URL • 44 % redirected URLs • 3% broken links • 3% authentication required • 2. Format • HTML by default • Granularity issues : images & videos included in a webpage • 3. Rights description • 19 % records do not contain a good description of rights
Quality of metadata • 4. Learning resource type • 37 % records do not contain this information • 2 % records need revision • 2 % records can be enriched • some records do not fit to a learning resource type • 5. Document type • 26 % records do not contain this information • 2 % records can be enriched
Conclusions • Quality of contents (in a travel well context) • Need to improve/adapt the offer of digital educational resources • Quality of metadata • Completeness • Globally metadata provided by CNDP is complete • Pertinence • Need of frequent verifications of URLs • Need to establish a maintenance plan of the whole corpus of metadata
Contact information Rosa Maria Gómez de Regil Research and development engineer rosa-maria.gomez@cndp.fr – +33 (0)5 49 49 79 14 SCÉRÉN [CNDP] @4 - avenue du Futuroscope - Téléport 1 BP 80158 - 86961 Futuroscope cedex FRANCE www.sceren.fr