1 / 42

1938 when he premiered in comic book form Superman’ s flying was explained as jumping

1938 when he premiered in comic book form Superman’ s flying was explained as jumping with super strength. TheAdventures of Superman(1950). Faster than a speeding bullet !. More powerful than a locomotive !. Able to leap tall buildings with a single bound !.

may-webster
Download Presentation

1938 when he premiered in comic book form Superman’ s flying was explained as jumping

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 1938 when he premiered in comic book form Superman’s flying was explained as jumping with super strength.

  2. TheAdventures of Superman(1950) Faster than a speeding bullet! More powerful than a locomotive! Able to leap tall buildings with a single bound!

  3. The Superman movie (1978) included camera shots of stopping, hovering, surveying below before launching off in a new direction. What’s wrong with that?

  4. When an object explodes or breaks apart:: Is this ever possible? In free space? Even in the initial moment along the ground? Why?

  5. Explosion (inelasticun-collision) Before the explosion: Mass, M vo = 0 After the explosion: v1 v2 m2 m1

  6. No external forces, so P is conserved. Initially:P = 0 Finally: P= m1v1+ m2v2= 0 m1v1 = - m2v2 v1 v2 m1 m2 Explosion... vo = 0

  7. Before fission: Uranium nucleus After fission: 1 2 Which fragment has a greater momentum? A) 1 B) 2 C) both the same

  8. Before fission: Uranium nucleus After fission: 1 2 Which fragment has a greater speed? A) 1 B) 2 C) both the same

  9. Before fission: Uranium nucleus After fission: 1 2 Which fragment has a greater momentum? C) both the same speed? A) 1 Same momentem! Total momentum before fission is zero, so total after must still be zero (no external forces so momentum is conserved). Since momentum is a vector, fragments 1 and 2 must have equal and opposite momenta. Since fragment 1 has a smaller mass, it must have greater speed since v = p / m.

  10. p = 0 pgas procket pi = 0 = pf = pgas + procket pgas = – procket pi = 0 = pf = prifle + pbullet prifle = – pbullet

  11. A cannon rests on a railroad flatcar with a total mass of 1000 kg. When a 10 kg cannon ball is fired at a speed of 50 m/sec, as shown, what is the speed of the flatcar? A) 0 m/s B) ½ m/s to the right C) 1 m/s to the left D) 20 m/s to the right

  12. ? A bomb at rest explodes into four fragments. The momentum vectors for three of the fragments are shown. Which arrow below best represents the momentum vector of the fourth fragment? C D A B

  13. ? No external forces act on the bomb, so its momentum must be conserved: the total momentum before the explosion is zero, so total momentum after must also be zero. A B C D

  14. An explosive charge separates rocket stages high in earth’s atmosphere. Which best represent the trajectories of the stages? A B C

  15. An artillery shell bursts at the peak of its trajectory. Which best represents its streaming fragments? A B D C

  16. For a particle decaying in flight would this pair of trajectories be possible? Why?

  17. Status of particle physics early 20th century Electron J.J.Thomson 1898 nucleus ( proton) Ernest Rutherford 1908-09 a Henri Becquerel 1896 Ernest Rutherford 1899 b g P. Villard 1900 X-rays Wilhelm Roentgen 1895

  18. Status of particle physics early 20th century Electron J.J.Thomson 1898 nucleus ( proton) Ernest Rutherford 1908-09 a Henri Becquerel 1896 Ernest Rutherford 1899 b g P. Villard 1900 X-rays Wilhelm Roentgen 1895

  19. 1930 Series of studies ofnuclear beta decay, e.g., Potassium goes to calcium10K40 20Ca40 Copper goes to zinc29Cu64 30Zn64 Boron goes to carbon5B12  6C12 Tritium goes to helium1H3  2He3 1932 Once neutron discovered, included the more fundamental n  p + e For simple 2-bodydecay, conservation of energy and momentum demand both the recoil of the nucleus and energy of the emitted electron be fixed (by the energy released through the loss of mass) to a single precise value. Ee = (mA2 - mB2 - me2)c2/2mA but this only seems to match the maximum value observed on a spectrum of beta ray energies!

  20. 1932n  p + e- + neutrino charge0 +1 -1 ? mass939.56563938.272310.51099906? MeV MeV MeV neutrino mass < 5.1 eV < me /100000  0

  21. 1932 Carl Anderson first observes the positron in a cloud chamber photograph. • Droplet density (thickness) of track appears to • identify it as that of an electron • Curvature of track confirms the charge to mass • ratio (q/m) is that of an electron • The particle’s slowing in its passage through • lead foil establishes its direction ( UP! ). • Direction ofcurvatureclearly indicates it is • POSITVELYcharged!

  22. Additional comments on Matter/Antimatter Production • Particles are created in pairs e+ and annihilate in pairs e+e- e- Notice how this “conserves” ELECTRIC CHARGE (as well as MOMENTUM and ENERGY) p+pp+p+p+p Center of Momentum frame Lab frame (fixed target) a c d b a b a b at threshold of production final state total energy = 4mprotonc2 Soconservationofenergyargues:EaCOM+EbCOM=4mc2

  23. 1936 Millikan’s group shows at earth’s surface cosmic ray showers are dominated by electrons, gammas, and X-particles capable of penetrating deep underground (to lake bottom and deep tunnel experiments) and yielding isolated single cloud chamber tracks

  24. 1937 Street and Stevenson • 1938 Andersonand Neddermeyer • determine X-particles • are charged • have 206× the electron’s mass • decay to electrons with • a mean lifetime of 2msec 0.000002 sec

  25. 1947 Lattes, Muirhead, Occhialini and Powell observe pion decay 

  26. 1947 Lattes, Muirhead, Occhialini and Powell observe pion decay Consistently ~600 microns (0.6 mm) 

  27. Under the influence of a magnetic field m+ p+ m+ energy always predictably fixed by Ep

  28. 1932 n  p + e- + neutrino charge 0 +1 -1 ? mass 939.56563 938.272310.51099906? MeV MeV MeV neutrino mass < 5.1 eV < me /100000  0 m+ m+ energy always predictably fixed by Ep simple 2-body decay! p+ ?? p+m+ + neutrino? charge +1 +1 ?

  29. n p + e- + neutrino? p+m+ + neutrino? Then m-e- + neutrino? p ??? m e

  30. n p + e- + neutrino? p+m+ + neutrino? Then m-e- + neutrino? p ??? m e As in the case of decaying radioactive isotopes, the electrons’s energy varied, with a maximum cutoff (whose value was the 2-body prediction) 3bodydecay! e m 2 neutrinos

  31. Hadrons“heavy” or “strong” particles” p, n(the nucleons)and those they interacted “strongly” with Mesonsintermediate or medium mass  Leptons “light particles” e-, e+, , 

  32. 1953, 1956, 1959Cowan & Reines Savannah River (1000-MWatt) Nuclear Reactor in South Carolina looked for the inverse of the process n p + e- + neutrino p + neutrino n + e+ with estimate flux of 51013 neutrinos/cm2-sec observed 2-3 p + neutrino events/hour also looked for n + neutrino p + e- but never observed!

  33. 1953 Konopinski & Mahmoud introduce LEPTON NUMBER to account for which decays/reactions are possible, which not e,  ( )  assigned L = +1 e+, + ( +)  assigned L = -1 n p +e- + neutrino p + neutrino  n + e+

  34. 1953 Konopinski & Mahmoud introduce LEPTON NUMBER to account for which decays/reactions are possible, which not e,  ( )  assigned L = +1 e+, + ( +)  assigned L = -1 n p +e- +  p +   n + e+

  35. 1953 Konopinski & Mahmoud introduce LEPTON NUMBER to account for which decays/reactions are possible, which not e,  ( )  assigned L = +1 e+, + ( +)  assigned L = -1 n p +e- +  p +   n + e+ n +   p + e- ???

  36. 1962 Lederman,Schwartz,Steinberger Brookhaven National Laboratory using a  as a source of  antineutrinos and a 44-footthick stack of steel (from a dismantled warship hull) to shield everything but the ’s found 29 instances of  + p  + + n but none of  + n  e+ + n

  37. Elastic collision

  38. p p p p p p

  39. 1947 Rochester and Butler cloud chamber cosmic ray event of a neutral object decaying into two pions K0  + + 1949 C. F. Powell photographic emulsion event K+ + + 1950 Carl Anderson Cal Tech  p + 

  40. 1952 Brookhaven Cosmotron 1st modern accelerator artificially creating these particles for study 1954 6.2-GeV p synchrotronLawrence,Berkeley 1960 28-GeV p synchrotronCERN, Geneva 33-GeV p synchrotronBrookhaven Lab 1962 6-GeV e synchrotron Cambridge 1963 12.5-GeV p synchrotronArgonne Lab 1964 6.5-GeV p synchrotron DESY,Germany 1966 21-GeV e LinacSLAC (Standford)

More Related