1 / 23

Councillor Peter Walker Cabinet Member for Education London Borough of Merton

Primary school expansion strategy St. Mary’s RC Primary School Chair: Paul Ballatt – Head of Commissioning, Strategy and Performance Children, Schools & Families Dept. Councillor Peter Walker Cabinet Member for Education London Borough of Merton. The Challenge.

maya-stokes
Download Presentation

Councillor Peter Walker Cabinet Member for Education London Borough of Merton

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Primary school expansion strategySt. Mary’s RC Primary SchoolChair: Paul Ballatt – Head of Commissioning, Strategy and PerformanceChildren, Schools & Families Dept.

  2. Councillor Peter Walker Cabinet Member for EducationLondon Borough of Merton

  3. The Challenge • Between 2007/8 and 2013/14 there will be a growth in the number of primary school children aged 4 of 30% - 800+

  4. 3 Key factors for expansion strategy • Building on excellent education • Sustainable solutions for our schools • Value for money

  5. Result of Borough wide consultation autumn 2010 7 Schools including St. Mary’s RC agreed to provide extra reception classes in September 2011 and consider permanent expansion Council budget in March agreed 4-year capital sums for primary school expansion programme

  6. Tom Procter Manager of Contracts and School Organisation, Children, Schools & Families Dept.

  7. Aim • Rationale for why proposing expansion of St. Mary’s RC • Legal process • School’s vision for expansion • Building feasibility and phasing strategy

  8. Birth rate increase = additional primary school places

  9. Why St. Mary’s?- Overall criteria in selecting schools • Educational standards – good & outstanding schools • Parental preference - popular and over-subscribed schools • Smaller schools expand where feasible • Location – where places most in demand • Physical constraints of existing school sites • Value for money and affordability • Balance of faith based schools

  10. Legal process for St. Mary’s RC Decision made • Extra reception class in September 2011 This consultation on permanent expansion from September 2012 • Statutory consultation to 11 May > Consider > Publish a statutory notice > Decision > Statutory duty to implement • Decision is after planning permission granted for building or “subject to planning permission”

  11. Sarah Crouch Headteacher, St. Mary’s SchoolSchool vision for expansion

  12. What can we gain?

  13. What we don’t want to lose.

  14. Building project

  15. Existing site and surrounding

  16. Building project Value for money for short term and long term solutions • Short term – extra reception class • Longer term – school gradually providing for 7 extra classes (210 pupils) from 2011/12 to 2017/18

  17. Feasibility study – key questions • Council building used in the short term? • Council building used or demolished in longer term? • Feasible to connect to existing school building? • School improvement/value for money/affordability

  18. Feasibility study – priorities for school • Additional 7 classrooms • 2nd hall/larger hall for assemblies • Early years play • Whole school play/PE • Appropriate ICT facilities • Appropriate staff facilities

  19. Existing site close up

  20. Building Expansion strategy – DRAFT feasibility layouts Phase 2 – By Sep 2012 Phase 1 – ground floor of building for 2 classrooms until summer 2014 at latest Phase 3 – Building demolished for play space by Sep 2014 Phase 3 – By Sep 2014 Phase 1 – staff car park becomes playground Note – this is a draft indicative layout from the feasibility study – not a final layout plan

  21. What questions do we have for the council? • What happens if the budget is not available? • Timing-if the two classes are not ready for September, what happens? How would this be funded? • Why are we not building two new Reception classes straight away? • How much say do we have on details and how much say do we have on bigger picture decisions? • Can we say no? • Are there enough children? • What will the length of the building programme be? • Will the council give a guarantee to complete the chosen option? • Is there adequate funding for heating, lighting and resources? • Why are we not having a prefab classroom rather than the social services building? • Will we have foundations that can take an extra storey? • Is the social services building structurally sound? • Is it possible for parents to meet with the building team? • How are the Council going to communicate once everything starts? • Will we get to retain any budget surplus? • How will noise disruption affect children? • When will the Council decide which option to go with? • Eco friendly build? Solar panels? • What did the Council learn from expanding Holy Trinity?

  22. Agreed reception class expansions21 FE total - 630 extra reception places in 6 years)

More Related