60 likes | 209 Views
Geodetic Constraints on W and R. Jessica Murray Nov. 1, 2006. Resolution of Coseismic Slip. From inversion of Parkfield area geodetic data (GPS, EDM). Resolution 5 km below Carr Hill. Resolution 5 km below a point 3 km SE of Gold Hill. Langbein et al., BSSA , 2006.
E N D
Geodetic Constraints on W and R Jessica Murray Nov. 1, 2006
Resolution of Coseismic Slip From inversion of Parkfield area geodetic data (GPS, EDM) Resolution 5 km below Carr Hill Resolution 5 km below a point 3 km SE of Gold Hill Langbein et al., BSSA, 2006
Resolution of interseismic creep rate From inversion of Parkfield area interseismic geodetic data (trilat, EDM, GPS) Murray and Langbein, BSSA, 2006
Trade-off between interseismic slip rate and locking depth Inversion of Parkfield interseismic GPS data Left: CVSS as a function of transition depth and deep slip rate Below: interseismic slip rate using best fitting transition depth and deep slip rate. Murray et al., GRL, 2001
Slip rate and locking depth on Southern SAF and San Jacinto Fialko, Nature, 2006 With rigidity contrast SAF: 25 mm/yr, 17 km SJF: 21 mm/yr, 12 km Shear zones offset from fault trace SAF: 25 mm/yr, 12 km SJF: 19 mm/yr, 10 km
Seismogenic thickness from seismicity Nazareth and Hauksson, BSSA, 2004