300 likes | 322 Views
Operators. Quantum Operators. Quantum mechanical operators must be linear and Hermitian . For any linear combination of solutions y 1 and y 2 of Schrödinger Equation Effect of  should be linear combination of individual effects
E N D
Operators Postulates
Quantum Operators Quantum mechanical operators must be linear and Hermitian. For any linear combination of solutions y1 and y2 of Schrödinger Equation Effect of  should be linear combination of individual effects Â(ay1+by2) = a Ây1+ b Ây2 Classical observables have real values operators must have real eigen values (a* = a, Hermitian) (Â-EF ya) same value Postulates Hermitian operator  “matrix element” Check this out for p This is actually true for all wf’s
n times same coefficients same coefficients Functions of Operators Postulates
Presence of i in p important !!! Hermitian and Anti-Hermitian Operators Transposed and complex conjugate ME Hermitian Postulates
Symmetries of Matrix Elements Postulates
y3 ++ y2 + y2 , y3, (y2·y3) - -- position x Expectation Values in Component Representation Solutions to PiB problem: a) LC of p-eigen functions Y generally not EF to p-operator Observable not sharp (s ≠0) Solutions to PiB problem: b) LC of Ĥ-eigen functions y generally not EF to Ĥ-operator Observable not sharp (s ≠0) Example: |cn|2= Probability(state yn) Postulates weighted average <E>
Instant Problem: Calculate P(p) Particle in a box: Postulates
Instant Problem: Calculate P(p) Particle in a box: Postulates
Presence of i in p important !!! Hermitian and Anti-Hermitian Operators Transposed and complex conjugate ME Hermitian Postulates
Symmetries of Matrix Elements Postulates
Commutators Postulates
Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Relation Observed for PiB model: Is this general, for which observables A,B ? Postulates
anti-Hermitian Hermitian<>=imaginary <>=real ≥0 Postulates Heisenberg Uncertainty Relation Example: already derived for PiB
The End -- of this Section Now, that was fun, wasn’t it ?! Postulates
Presence of i in p important !!! Hermitian and Anti-Hermitian Operators Transposed and complex conjugate ME Hermitian Postulates
Gaussian Wave Packet (discrete) k0=20, Nk=40 Postulates
Gaussian Wave Packets Wave traveling to x>0 Normalization Postulates
y3 ++ y2 + y2 , y3, (y2·y3) - -- position x Eigen Functions of Hermitian Operators Set of all eigen functions {ya} of Hermitian  form a complete set of orthogonal basis “vectors” Integral over overlap vanishes identical integrals (Hermitian) Postulates {|ya>}=complete: must cover all possible outcomes of measurements of A normalized ya:
Wave Function. -a/2Position x +a/2 = math. solutions of PiB problem Particle-in-a-Box Ĥ-Eigen Functions Normal Modes All PiB energy eigen functions = orthonormal set Scalar product (Overlap) Integral over overlap vanishes j,c ≠ Ĥ-EF Representation of Y (PiB) Postulates All physical solutions can be represented by LC of set {yn} or {|yn>}
z y Components:Projections x 3 2 Illustration: Representations of Ordinary Vectors z’ Normal vector spaces: coordinate system defined by set of independent unit, orthogonal basis vectors 4 Scalar Product Example Representation of r in basis {x,y,z} Representation of r in basis {x’,y’,z’} Postulates LC of basis vectors
z y 4 x 3 2 Instant Problem: Find Components of a Vector z’ Independent unit basis vectors Example: Calculate cx, cy, cz of Postulates
z y 4 x 3 2 Instant Problem: Normalize a Vector z’ Independent unit basis vectors Example: Calculate N such that Postulates
y x Instant Problem: Find Orthonormal to a Vector Independent unit basis vectors x Postulates
y3 ++ y2 + y2 , y3, (y2·y3) - -- position x PiB Wave Functions as Superpositions of Normal Modes General (all possible) solutions to PiB problem: LC of Ĥ-eigen functions {yn} (Y ≠ Ĥ-EF) Orthogonality/ Normality (<sin|cos> cross terms vanish) Constraint on cn & cm:Normalization of Y: Postulates “Fourier” Coefficients cn cn=<yn|Y>: Amplitude of yn in Y|cn|2: Probability of Yto be found in yn
3 2 Representations of Wave Functions/Kets Normal vector spaces: coordinate system defined by set of independent unit basis vectors j3 Express Y in terms of sets of orthonormalized EFs j2 3 different observables j1 Postulates All representations are equally valid, for any true observable.
Symmetries of Matrix Elements Postulates
Commutators Postulates
Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Relation Observed for PiB model: Is this general, for which observables A,B ? Postulates
anti-Hermitian Hermitian<>=imaginary <>=real ≥0 Postulates Heisenberg Uncertainty Relation Example: already derived for PiB