1 / 11

Causality Patterns Between International Financial Markets

Causality Patterns Between International Financial Markets. Test problem. Financial markets Europe America Asia. Causal relationship? Time lag? Stability?. Finland. Causality. A concept that has puzzled philosophers and scientists for hundreds of years starting from the ancient Greece

mccann
Download Presentation

Causality Patterns Between International Financial Markets

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Causality Patterns Between International Financial Markets

  2. Test problem Financial markets Europe America Asia Causal relationship? Time lag? Stability? Finland

  3. Causality • A concept that has puzzled philosophers and scientists for hundreds of years starting from the ancient Greece • A common feature in all definitions throughout the years is the relation between cause and effect • The first definitions too abstrtract for empirical testing • Hume (1740) made a step towards empirical testing of causality emphasizing that causation is a relation between experiences rather than one between facts • Hume’s view is an analogy to classcal statistical inference

  4. Causality • Hume recognized three basic criteria for causality • Spatial/temporal contiguity • Temporal succession • Constant conjunction • Feigl (1953) defined causality as ”predictability according to a law or set of laws” • Suppes (1970) operationalized the predictability in terms of probability: • One event is the cause of another if the appearance of the first event is followed with a high probability by the appearance, and there is no third event that we can use to factor out the probability relationship between the first and second event

  5. Causality in the Granger sense • The practical solution to the problem of statistically measuring causality between observed time series was presented by Granger (1969) • Granger’s definition is a combination of Feigl’s, Hume’s and Suppes’ concepts • Granger defined causality between two variables X and Y in terms of one-period predictability

  6. Causality in the Granger sense Variable X is said to cause another variable Y with respect to a given universe or information set that includes X(t) = {Xt, Xt-1,…} and Y(t) = Yt, Yt-1,…} if Yt+1 can be better predicted by using the information in X(t) than by not doing so, all other relevant information being used in each cases

  7. Causality in the Granger sense – Statistical definition • A significance test of the difference between residual sum of squares from a linear autoregressive equation estimated in unconstrained and constrained forms:

  8. Time in measuring causality • The concept of causality itself contains an implicit assumption of a certain time sequence between the effects, i.e. cause precedes the effect in time • The time lag varies depending on the data used from a fraction of a second (chemical processes) to decades (medical research) • In testing causal relationships between financial markets daily or weekly observations most common, even though the importance of intraday data is growing • Problems with the nonsynchronous market open times

  9. The Finnish financial markets – some special characteristics • Rapid growth in the 1990’s • 30-folded market capitalization in nine years • Total equity turnover in 2000 more than 200 times that of 1991 • Thin in international comparison • 158 listed series at the end of 2000 • Extreme dependence on the IT sector and especially on one share series, Nokia • 66% of turnover and 70 % of market capitalization in 2000 • Statistically anomalous and problematic in modeling and predictions

  10. Yearly Equity Turnover (Million €) of Helsinki Stock Exchange

  11. Market Capitalization 31.12.

More Related