1 / 30

High-Resolution Analysis of Propane Bands: Modeling of Titan's Infrared Spectrum

This study focuses on the high-resolution analysis of various propane bands in Titan's infrared spectrum, with the goal of modeling the spectra and determining propane abundances. New spectroscopic data and a Hamiltonian matrix were used to calculate the interacting states of propane. Further theoretical work and lab spectroscopy are needed to fully model all the bands.

mdahl
Download Presentation

High-Resolution Analysis of Propane Bands: Modeling of Titan's Infrared Spectrum

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. HIGH-RESOLUTION ANALYSIS OF VARIOUS PROPANE BANDS: MODELING OF TITAN'SINFRARED SPECTRUM J.-M. Flaud

  2. Propane - Historical Perspective First identification of C3H8 on Titan came from Voyager IRIS (Maguire et al. Nature,1981) Although multiple bands identified, the S/N was poor, Only the 26 band at 721 cm-1 was ever used for VMR determination (papers by Coustenis et al.)

  3. CIRS Titan Spectrum Instrument and mission Titan spectrum CIRS composition - overview

  4. CIRS Cassini Composite Infrared Spectrometer (CIRS)

  5. Propane: spectroscopic data When starting the study: -line data only publicly available (GEISA 1992 and later) for the v26 mode at 748 cm-1, based on unpublished measurements by S. Daunt. • Medium resolution lab absorption spectra courtesy of S. Sharpe, PNNL recorded at room temperature • Propane has 27 IR modes with low energy modes: v14 (216 cm-1), v27 (268 cm-1), v9 (369cm-1) lots of strong hot bands

  6. CIRS Propane Band Detections:13-11 μm

  7. CIRS Propane Band Detections:11-9 μm

  8. CIRS Propane Band Detections:8-6 μm

  9. Propane: New spectroscopic data Need of line by line list to model the spectra We included in our study a new set of propane lines for several bands v19(1338), v18 (1376),),{v24 ,v4}(1472)in the region 1300-1500 cm-1, as measured and modeled by Flaud, Lafferty and Herman, J. Chem. Phys(2001). We checked the fundamental mode v26 intensities in GEISA and found that they are about x 2.38 too high; probably because the band sum was scaled to lab spectra that includes hot bands These enable an independent measurement of the propane abundance from a different CIRS focal plane (FP4) to the v26 (FP3).

  10. CIRS Propane Band Detections: 8-6 μm

  11. Hamiltonian matrix used to calculate the {241, 51 ,171, 41 } interacting states of propane. HW : Watson-type Hamiltonian. CA , CB , CC: a-, b-, c-type Coriolis interactions. F: Fermi-type interaction

  12. Mixing coefficients of the J0,J and J1,J levels of the 41 state into the 241 state of propane. The different mixing coefficients lead to an inversion of the J0,J and J1,J states starting at J=15.

  13. Central region of the C-type jet-cooled ν24 band of propane. Because of the strong A-type Coriolis interaction with the levels of 41, the Rq0 and pQ1 lines of ν24 are highly perturbed.

  14. Propane abundances on Titan

  15. Propane – Summary All four bands of propane tentatively identified by IRIS are now clearly seen by CIRS at much higher S/N. In addition 3-4 further bands have now been detected. Abundances retrieved here agree well with previous results for ν26, and with new ν18 measurement. ν24 measurement in very poor agreement: probably due to continuum fitting and/or aliasing. v26 needs to be re-measured for: - Better modeling and better accuracy - Missing hotbands,.

  16. Hamiltonian matrix used to calculate the {261, 92} interacting states of propane.

  17. The lines marked with a ‘*’ belong to the 9 cold band

  18. Spectra Residuals (χ2 reduces from 6.9 to 2.4) Titan spectra average, 30S–30N latitude, 100–150km,(black line) compared to three models: (i)C2H2, C2H6 and HCN only (no propane); (ii) GEISA 2003 propane atlas; (iii) This work

  19. Propane abundances on Titan

  20. Propane – Next Steps Need further theoretical work and lab spectroscopy to measure line positions and intensities and model the remaining bands: ν8 – 860 cm-1 v21 – 922 cm-1 v20 – 1054 cm-1 v7 – 1157 cm-1

  21. PROPANE AND TITAN I would like to thank: W. J. Lafferty, F. Kwabia, C. A. Nixon, D. E. Jennings, B. Bézard, N. A. Teanby, P. G. J. Irwin, T. M. Ansty, A. Coustenis, F. M. Flasar.

  22. High resolution analysis of the ethylene-1-13C spectrum in the 8.4–14.3-μm region J.-M. Flaud , W.J. Lafferty, Robert Sams, V. Malathy Devi, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy 259 (2010) 39–45

  23. Hamiltonian matrix used to calculate the {101, 81, 71, 41, 61} interacting states of ethylene -1-13C

  24. Range of quantum numbers observed for experimental energy levels and a statistical analysis of the results of the energy level calculation for the 101, 81, 71 and 41 ro-vibrational levels of ethylene -1-13C

  25. 50 40 30 Mixing coefficients (%) 20 K =8 a 10 K =7 a 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 J Mixing coefficients of the Ka=7 and 8 rotational levels of 41 onto the 71 state for mono-13C ethylene

  26. .A portion of the mono-13C ethylene spectrum showing absorption lines of the forbidden ν4 band. Lines involving the Ka = 8 upper state levels of 41 are seen only because they borrow their intensity from the pQ10 line of the strong ν7 band. Unlabeled strong lines are the ν7 transitions.

  27. Mono-13C ethylene in Titan Problem: Discrepancy of ~40% in measured absolute intensities between high and low resolution spectra!!!

  28. CONCLUSION More high resolution spectroscopic work is needed for a lot of “difficult” molecules (Lots of vib-rot interactions, tunneling effects,…) in order to provide line by line lists (including hot bands) Or For “heavy” molecules cross sections measurements (Various P and Ts) PROBLEM: BOTH require a lot of work!!

More Related