60 likes | 75 Views
This resource aims to help vocational teachers and trainers develop and enhance their skills in designing and assessing competition briefs. It covers identifying the elements of a good brief, brainstorming ideas, and preparing for CPD events related to competition briefs. The resource provides criteria for creating clear and challenging tasks with appropriate marking schemes, emphasizing fairness and feedback. It also evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of a horticulture competition brief based on these criteria. Supporting the development of competition briefs, it encourages team collaboration, systematic review, setting timetables, seeking feedback, and identifying areas for improvement through coaching approaches.
E N D
Developing competition briefs CPD2d How to use this resource: To develop and enhance skills in the design and assessment of skills competition briefs for vocational teachers and trainers
Aims • Identify what makes a good competition brief. • Begin to brainstorm ideas for a competition brief • Consider how to continue to prepare for CPD events
Competition briefs • Two broad requirements: - Clear and simply expressed task which provides realistic challenge - Marking scheme which sets clear standards and leads to fair and reliable judgements basis for feedback on performance • What are the strengths and weaknesses of the horticulture competition brief against these two requirements?
Competition task • Is it clearly stated? Are the expected outcomes clear? • Is the task achievable by most competitors in the time available? • Is the target level specific? • Is the task challenging but realistic? • Does the task include important aspects? Process as well as technical skills? • Are conditions for the competition clearly set out? • Are competitors clear about what they will be judged on and the relative weighting?
Marking scheme • Marking schemes for judges and competitors consistent? • Expected standards of performance clearly set out? • Balance between objective and subjective elements right? • Reliability of subjective marking? Can marks be awarded reliably from the descriptors? What arrangements for ensuring fairness and reliability? • Marking scheme manageable and easily understood? • Weighting of marks reflects difficulty/importance? • Mark scheme provides a good basis for feedback?
Supporting the developing and improvement of competition briefs • Encourage development in teams. • Facilitate review of briefs within and across vocational areas, encouraging use of a systematic set of questions. • Act as an objective reviewer. • Set a timetable for development, review and refinement of briefs; allow enough time. • Identify areas for improvement as questions for specialists ie challenge and apply coaching approaches. • Ensure feedback from competitors and judges.