1 / 18

High Performing Victorian Government Schools

High Performing Victorian Government Schools. How our best performing schools come out on top A snapshot. There is a well-documented link between socio-economic characteristics and learning outcomes. What some teachers do. Differential performance. 10 Lessons — Two sorts.

mead
Download Presentation

High Performing Victorian Government Schools

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. High Performing Victorian Government Schools How our best performing schools come out on top A snapshot

  2. There is a well-documented link between socio-economic characteristics and learning outcomes EMR Breakfast Session, 24 August 2010

  3. What some teachers do EMR Breakfast Session, 24 August 2010

  4. Differential performance EMR Breakfast Session, 24 August 2010

  5. 10 Lessons — Two sorts 10 lessons were identified which identify the key success factors; but these lessons, which inevitably overlap, were of two different sorts • Those which constitute preconditions for substantial improvement • Those which enable the schools to sustain improvement over time EMR Breakfast Session, 24 August 2010

  6. Precondition 1Strong leadership that is shared, stable and sustained over time ‘I know of no improving school that doesn’t have a principal who is good at leading improvement’ — Michael Fullan • Strong, stable leadership with a clear vision and direction for the school • The leadership load is willingly shared and leadership capacity built • Though teaching is key, leaders establish the conditions for high quality teaching • Instructional leadership as the focus EMR Breakfast Session, 24 August 2010

  7. Precondition 2High levels of expectation and teacher efficacy • High expectations — challenge the argument ‘you cannot expect more from these kids’ • Higher aims and targets than matching equivalent SFO schools • High expectations for students flows through to staff and promotion of teacher efficacy — we can make a difference for the students we teach EMR Breakfast Session, 24 August 2010

  8. Precondition 3Ensuring an orderly learning environment where every student is well known • A fundamental precondition for improved teaching and learning, and subsequent improvement in student outcomes • The starting point for improvement in each case • A key mechanism for getting teacher consistency • The basis for further united action in the school • The mirror image of the situation in under-performing schools EMR Breakfast Session, 24 August 2010

  9. Precondition 4A focus on what matters most • Relatively few priorities focused on core things students need — generally literacy, numeracy and VCE results • A clear sense of how to prioritise and put first things first • Reflects the importance of leadership (Precondition 1) EMR Breakfast Session, 24 August 2010

  10. Some quick wins from these schools The orderly learning environment in every case — uniform, punctuality, etc. (‘The story of the red bags’) • Understudies • The observation room • Work Ethic Committee EMR Breakfast Session, 24 August 2010

  11. Sustaining improvement Six key interrelated strategies that: • Build on the preconditions for improvement • Sustain ongoing improvement momentum beyond the initial successes achieved EMR Breakfast Session, 24 August 2010

  12. The sustaining factors • Building teaching and leadership expertise • Structure teaching to ensure all students succeed A greater focus on research is required to support instructional leadership in the school — A short digression (An exercise you can use in your schools) EMR Breakfast Session, 24 August 2010

  13. Effect on Achievement over time? Typical Effect Size 1.0 0 .20 .40 Decreased Zero Enhanced EMR Breakfast Session, 24 August 2010

  14. Influences on Achievement .40 .30 .50 .60 .15 Typical Teacher Effects .70 .80 Developmental Effects ZONE OF DESIRED EFFECTS 0 .90 REVERSE 1.0 EMR Breakfast Session, 24 August 2010

  15. Rank these 10 effects: • Home-School programs • Direct instruction • Reducing class sizes by 5 students • Feedback to students on their work • Open rather than traditional classrooms • Homework • Study skills • Integrated curriculum programs • Hold a student back a year • Peer tutoring EMR Breakfast Session, 24 August 2010

  16. The measured effect EMR Breakfast Session, 24 August 2010

  17. The sustaining factors • Building teaching and leadership expertise • Structure teaching to ensure all students succeed • Using data to drive improvement • A culture of sharing and responsibility • Tailoring initiatives to the direction of the school • Engender pride in the school EMR Breakfast Session, 24 August 2010

  18. Conclusion • Many of the lessons are no surprise and reflect the findings of research • The distinction between preconditions for improvement and other factors related to sustaining momentum is new. This has implications for how the Department and schools approach improvement • Two factors related to preconditions are either new or demonstrated in more significant ways — the extent to which success relates to leadership; and the central importance of an orderly learning environment • The successes of these schools were not achieved overnight. A stable and consistent leadership team worked on their strategic approach for a significant number of years EMR Breakfast Session, 24 August 2010

More Related