1 / 8

Enhancing User Experience through Recommender Systems Workshop in Dublin

Join the ACM Recommender Systems workshop in Dublin to explore topics like Social Web, Human Decision Making, Context-Aware Systems, and more. Learn from industry experts like Ronny Kohavi from Microsoft and Amazon's recommender system. Discover the importance of experimenting with different variants and listening to your customers for a successful online experience.

mechelle-pacheco
Download Presentation

Enhancing User Experience through Recommender Systems Workshop in Dublin

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ACM RecommenderSystems 2012 Dublin 9-13 September Kompan,Kramár,Zeleník,Bieliková

  2. O čom? • Pracovné dielne: • Recommender Systems and the Social Web (RSWeb) • Human Decision Making in Recommender Systems • Context-AwareRecommenderSystems (CARS) • Recommendation Utility Evaluation (RUE) • RecSysDataChallenge • InterfacesforRecommenderSystems (Interfaces) • Personalizing the Local Mobile Experience

  3. OnlineControlledExperimetns • RonnyKohavi Microsoft • Listening to thecustomers, not to theHiPPO • Amazon recommender • If you’re going to experiment, try more variants, especially if they’re easy to implement

  4. OnlineControlledExperimetns • At Amazon, half of the experiments failed to show improvement • QualPro tested 150,000 ideas over 22 years (75%) • Based on experiments with ExP at Microsoft • 1/3 of ideas were positive ideas and statistically significant • 1/3 of ideas were flat: no statistically significant difference • 1/3 of ideas were negative and statistically significant

  5. Kde • recsys.acm.org • Ulozisko • ACM DL

More Related