1 / 31

2006 Key Findings

SURVEY on SCHOOL FAMILY EDUCATION (SFE). 2006 Key Findings. PRESENTATION TOPICS. Survey Design SFE Participation (past 6 months) SFE: Satisfaction/ Commitment/ Advocacy/ Loyalty Impact on Family/ Personal Life (after attending SFE) Family Life Centre: Awareness & Visitation

meda
Download Presentation

2006 Key Findings

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SURVEY on SCHOOL FAMILY EDUCATION (SFE) 2006 Key Findings

  2. PRESENTATION TOPICS • Survey Design • SFE Participation (past 6 months) • SFE: Satisfaction/ Commitment/ Advocacy/ Loyalty • Impact on Family/ Personal Life (after attending SFE) • Family Life Centre: Awareness & Visitation • PSG/ PTA • Service Providers • Key Findings & Recommendations

  3. SURVEY DESIGN

  4. SCHOOL FAMILY EDUCATION (SFE) • A family learning model for 3 target groups: • To equip PARENTSwith parenting skills & train them to become parent facilitators. • To help SCHOOL STAFF to enhance their family life. • To provide STUDENTS with life-skills training. • Programme Development: • 2002 ( piloted in 4 schools) • 2004 (18 schools) • 2005 (80 schools)

  5. TWO-PRONGED APPROACH • Organizing Workshops/ Talks/ Activities • Core topics include: -- improving parenting skills; -- improving marital-relationship skills; -- improving family-life skills & personal-life skills. • Family Life Centre/Corner • A resource library; • A place for networking & building closer ties; • A place to seek information/ referral on family life issues; • A place for holding small talks & support group meetings; • Accessible & conveniently located.

  6. PARTICIPATION RATE (past 6 months) 95% 83% ( ) ( ) 82% ( )

  7. SATISFACTION/ COMMITMENT/ ADVOCACY/ LOYALTY (Students) 86% ( ) 71% 68% ( ) ( ) 59% ( ) (Continue SFE) (Recommend SFE)

  8. SATISFACTION/ COMMITMENT/ ADVOCACY /LOYALTY(Staff) 94% 84% ( ) 82% ( ) ( ) 80% ( ) (Recommend SFE) (Continue SFE)

  9. SATISFACTION/ COMMITMENT/ ADVOCACY/ LOYALTY (Parents) 99% ( ) 86% 98% ( ) ( ) 85% ( ) (Recommend SFE) (Continue SFE)

  10. SFE ACCEPTANCE LEVEL

  11. AFFINITY WITH SFE PROGRAMMES

  12. SATISFACTION WITH FAMILY LIFE(After Attending SFE Programmes) Less Satisfied Remained the same More Satisfied ( ) 76% ( ) 24% * ( ) ( ) ( ) 1% 22% 77% 7% ( ) 29% ( ) ( ) 64%

  13. IMPACT on FAMILY LIFE(After Attending SFE Programmes)

  14. IMPACT on FAMILY LIFE(After Attending SFE Programmes)

  15. IMPACT on FAMILY LIFE(After Attending SFE Programmes)

  16. IMPACT on PERSONAL LIFE(After Attending SFE Programmes)

  17. IMPACT on PERSONAL LIFE(After Attending SFE Programmes)

  18. IMPACT on PERSONAL LIFE(After Attending SFE Programmes)

  19. SFE TIME-SLOT (Most Preferred) Staff -------------------------------------------------------- Parents -------------------------------------------------------

  20. 21% ( ) Parents 31% 30% ( ) ( ) 10% 8% ( ) ( ) * ( ) Over 30 min to 45 min Over 2 hrs Over 45 min to 1 hr Over 1 hr to 1.5 hr 30 min or shorter Over 1.5 hr to 2 hrs SFE DURATION (Most Preferred) 31% Staff ( ) 29% 22% ( ) ( ) 12% ( ) 5% 1% ( ) ( ) Over 30 min to 45 min Over 2 hrs Over 45 min to 1 hr Ovr 1 hr to 1.5 hr 30 min or shorter Over 1.5 hr to 2 hrs

  21. FAMILY LIFE CENTRE (FLC)

  22. FLC AWARENESS/VISITATION --- % not visited (past 6 months) --- 93% --- % not aware --- ( ) 72% ( ) 67% ( ) 34% ( ) Parents Parents Staff Staff Students (never visited) … 71%

  23. FLC’s RATINGS

  24. FLC’s USEFULNESS

  25. PSG/ PTA[NOTE: Data to be interpreted with caution due to small sample size n=40] • SFE performance ratings………………………..100% • Effectiveness of SFE Programmes……………..100% • Satisfaction with SFE Programmes……………. 97% • Would attend SFE Programmes in future……..100% • Aware of Family Life Centre…………………….. 90% • Usefulness of Family Life Centre………………. 97% • Satisfaction with Family Life Centre…………… 97% • Encountered problems in Family Life Centre… 31% • Satisfaction with Service Provider……………… 88% • Parent-School relationship has improved…….100% • Can run SFE Programmes on its own………… 63%

  26. SERVICE PROVIDERS[NOTE: Data to be interpreted with caution due to small sample size n=29] • PSG/PTA is actively involved in SFE………………………… 89% • Active PTA/PSG is important to SFE…………………………100% • PSG/PTA can run SFE Programmes on its own................. 82% • Satisfied with Working-Relationship with school..………. 86% • SFE Programmes: Ever conducted & Ratings Ever ‘Good/ conductedVery good’ Talks………………………………………… 100% 97% Workshops………………………………… 100% 97% Family bonding events…………………… 93% 86% Seminars………………………………………90% 86% Social events…………………………………86% 86% PSG meetings……………………………… 76% 72% Focus group discussions………………… 62% 59% Dramas/ Plays……………………………… 24% 21%

  27. SERVICE PROVIDERS[NOTE: Data to be interpreted with caution due to small sample size n=29] • Ratings of Family Life Centre: ‘Good/ Very good’ -- MCYS resource materials ………………………… 100% -- Notice Boards……………………………………….. 100% -- Environment…………………………………………. 96% -- Reading materials…………………………………… 92% • Scope of Services provided: -- Providing/Recommending programmes…….. 100% -- Participating in SFE Programme Plan………… 100% -- Providing/Recommending trainers/speakers.. 97% -- Guiding SFE coordinator/school staff………… 97% -- Providing/Recommending SFE co-coordinator. 93% -- Providing/Recommending FLC materials…..….. 83% -- Providing/Recommending venue ……………….. 69%

  28. KEY FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

  29. KEY FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS • Good news abounded in SFE-participating schools. • SFE was increasingly accepted as a worthy curriculum in schools. • SFE has created immense improvements on family life. • SFE has helped improve personality traits of individuals. • SFE-Attendees were highly satisfied with SFE Programmes. • SFE-Attendees were advocates of SFE programmes, and want to recommend to Non-Attendees counterparts. • Readiness to Introduce SFE to ALL SCHOOLS. • Optimism from SFE-participating schools offers convincing evidences to non-participating schools. • Success stories serve as catalyst for earlier introduction of SFE in ALL schools. • Highly committed & loyal SFE-Attendees to serve as ambassadors for SFE. Proper training to be instituted to increase their power of persuasion.

  30. KEY FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS MCYS to be mindful of most-desired timeslot and duration when organizing SFE programmes. • Best TIMESLOT for SFE programmes. • For Parents : Saturday morning (25%) Saturday afternoon (25%) • For Staff : Weekday afternoon (60%) Weekday morning (20%) • Preferred DURATION of SFE sessions. • By Parents : 45 mins - 2 hour (80%) • By Staff : 1 hour or shorter (83%)

  31. KEY FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS • Family Life Centre (FLC) was well-managed & equipped. • MCYS to give its thumbs-up to the deserving schools as acknowledgement of a job well done. • Family Life Centre (FLC) has some caveats that need attention. • Non-Awareness of FLC was high. i. Among Parents : 67% ii. Among Staff : 34% • Non-Visit to FLC was even higher. i. Among Parents : 93% (past 6 months) ii. Among Staff : 72% (past 6 months) iii. Among Students : 71% (ever visited) • An effective ‘media plan’ to be instituted to raise awareness & visitation to FLC to higher levels.

More Related