1 / 11

NTUA Contributions in D26

D26 Contribution: Physical Layer Impairment Aware Wavelength Routing Algorithms with Analytical Rules. NTUA Contributions in D26. NTUA Contributions in D26 4 Network-Level Simulation DT (Matthias)

Download Presentation

NTUA Contributions in D26

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. D26 Contribution: Physical Layer Impairment Aware Wavelength Routing Algorithms with Analytical Rules

  2. NTUA Contributions in D26 • NTUA Contributions in D26 • 4Network-Level Simulation DT (Matthias) • 4.1 Network Architecture and Planned Networks BT (Ben), DT (Matthias), PLABS (Simone), Siemens (Dominic) • 4.2 Description of the Simulation Architectures NTUA (Tanya), Siemens (Dominic) • 4.3 Simulation Results NTUA (Tanya), Siemens (Dominic)

  3. Network Design Procedure Network Resource Optimisation (Planning) Network Architecture and Traffic Matrix Dynamic Network Simulation: blocking performance Load balancing etc Physical Layer PLI: Physical Layer Impairments

  4. Dynamic Network Simulation SP/SWP QA QB

  5. Simulation Characteristics • Reference Network: Pan European • Physical Layer comprises fully dispersion compensated fibre links like explained in D19 • Physical Layer Modeling performed with analytical rules and on the basis of Q-factor (D19) • Each fibre link carries L wavelengths • Dynamic connection requests are assumed and traffic generation and inter-arrival times are uniformly distributed • No Traffic Matrix input considered for the time being • No Network Planning considerations are accounted for – at the time being wavelength number can only be fixed • No wavelength conversion, No regeneration, No protection

  6. Evaluation of Cost constraint PATH COST Shortest Widest Path Shortest Path Resource Utilisation Load Balancing

  7. SP versus SWP - PLI blind We expect that turning PLI awareness on will have little effect on the blocking performance of the SWP

  8. SP versus SWP - PLI aware • Load balancing ensures good physical performance for lightpaths • Also SWP algorithm finds alternative routes for impaired paths SWP SP

  9. The effect of the PLI awareness- The 2nd Constraint c) a) d) b)

  10. The effect of the 3rd Constraint

  11. Future Work • Next Step is to add the Traffic Matrix • Optimize the XPM Model • Update the Physical Layer Modeling with impairments: • Switching • SPM • Noise and Jitter from Wavelength Converters • SRS • PMD ??? • Multi-fiber/Multi-wavelength links

More Related