530 likes | 761 Views
Airline Culture for the 21 st Century. Ron Westrum Professor II Society and Risk University of Stavanger Sola Airport September 2014. Airline culture---”the good old days”. How important is culture?. Consider that technology clearly makes a difference:
E N D
Airline Culture for the 21st Century Ron Westrum Professor II Society and Risk University of Stavanger Sola Airport September 2014
How important is culture? • Consider that technology clearly makes a difference: • A. The jet engine---greater speed, much greater safety, more comfort • B. The glass cockpit ----cut the overall accident rate by one-half!
And is culture more important than: • A. Training? • B. The right personnel? • C. Financial resources? • D. Formal structure?
British Airways---Putting People First • The Legend: • “When British Airways decided in the mid-80s to put its thousands of staff through a special training course, Putting People First, it was a minor sensation. Embracing a philosophy of going that extra mile to satisfy customer needs was seen as the catalyst that transformed a state-owned, somewhat despised national carrier into a world-ranking business.” • Sounds Good, Right?
But there were major problems • Management backed the programme, but was inconsistent in other moves it made. • Not everyone employed by BA was treated to the same warm, friendly approach. • As BA’s economic fortune changed, so did its support for the programme.
Airline culture change –how serious? Type I Type III Type II
We get three different cultures • Pathological ---high power emphasis • Bureaucratic---high turf emphasis • Generative---high mission emphasis
Pathological Cultures • Exist to enhance power and privileges of a leader • Create atmosphere of intimidation and threat • Often shoot the messenger of bad news • Will “make an example” of those who dissent
Bureaucratic cultures • Work for the protection of “turf” • Insist on doing things by the rules • Excellent for routine business • Often too slow to react in emergencies
Generative cultures • Oriented to the organization’s mission • Willing to put rules and hierarchy aside • Share a compelling vision • Encourage innovation
Some generative leaders: General George C. Marshall, Jean-Luc Picard
NASA Apollo Mission Control • Highly selected • Highly trained • Highly practiced • Brilliantly led
And the answer is….. • Behavioral Science Technologies • Ojai, California • Expertise: Lost time accidents
But after six months, not a lot had changed….. • 40% of management feels there has been significant change….. • But only 8% of workers feel the change is significant….. • Therefore, not much has changed!
NASA decides to fire BST…. • After 9 months, NASA dismisses its “culture doctors.” • And declares that the culture is “fixed!” • Really?
NASA centers---Complex, technical, etc. NASA has ten technical centers Each is filled with rocket scientists and rocket engineers It is hard to influence highly trained professionals, especially from the outside… Rather like “herding cats”
Two important requirements for cultural change • First, cultural change typically has to come from the top down • Second, cultural change is a strenuous exercise, an organization has to be willing to go through it.
Culture degrades: Korean Air (lines) makes the “shun list” • A string of accidents 1983-1999 puts Korean Air on the U.S. Defense Department’s “Shun list” • Problems with Korean Air Culture: • Rapid expansion in 1980’s led to poor cockpit culture • Authoritarian attitudes • Too many new ex-military pilots • Promotions based on friendships and “connections”
Korean Air’s culture is fixed by a foreigner • David Greenberg, a retired Delta Vice-President was brought in by Korean Air (he was made a vice president of KAL). He changed the promotions system and training program, and put an end to the string of crashes that had put KAL and Korean Air on the “no fly” list • As a result of the changes brought about by Greenberg, the airline came off the “Shun list” and was allowed to rejoin Delta and Air France in their code-sharing Skyteam alliance.
How do leaders build an effective culture? • While many articles on “high reliability” or “resilience” describe how such environments operate, • How do leaders build such a “high reliability” system from scratch? • As far as I know, there is no accepted answer to this question. But we can look at some individual cases…
Southwest’s history • First, Southwest was created in an exceptionally hostile and challenging environment. It was continuously under attack from competition. • Second, the airlines borrowed the personnel playbook of Pacific Southwest airlines. • Third, Southwest had an extremely gifted and charismatic leader, Herb Kelleher
So: Southwest’s culture • The result of these and other forces led to an airline with: • 1) a strong emphasis on trust and co-operation • 2) an ability to do the impossible (e.g. short turn-around times) • 3) an environment emphasizing creativity and humor • 4) Unusual employee engagement and ownership
The results of Southwest culture • The airline became one of the most popular employers in the country • It expanded gradually, yet always successfully • It had a low accident rate. • It became the nation’s most successful airline, with never a bad quarter.
But Southwest is having problems now • Was Southwest’s culture dependent on having a single fleet? (Southwest is now using more than one kind of aircraft) • Can the new leader innovate like Herb Kelleher? • Can Southwest continue to afford its high labor costs?