120 likes | 137 Views
Family, Children and Youth Domain. Prairie Metropolis Centre Research Symposium January 23, 2009 Edmonton Presented by : Dr . Anna Kirova Domain Leader. Purpose. T his policy research priority domain, established in 2007 by the federal Metropolis partners will:
E N D
Family, Children and YouthDomain Prairie Metropolis CentreResearch SymposiumJanuary 23, 2009 Edmonton Presented by : Dr. Anna Kirova Domain Leader
Purpose This policy research priority domain, established in 2007 by the federal Metropolis partners will: • Examine the consequences of migration to Canada for families, children and youth • Develop proposals for enhancing immigrant success • Place high priority on policy-relevant research
Overview 58 Research Priority Questions organized 11 Priority Themes : • Migration Decisions • Cultural Identity • Education and Cultural Identity • Educational Outcomes • Civil Participation and Work • Extracurricular Activities • Mental Health • Health and Movement • Health and Gender • Services • Intergenerational Dynamics
Overview • 127 PMC research affiliates • 57 indicated family, children and youth as one of their affiliation choices • 12 indicated family, children and youth as their only choice for affiliation
The Mapping Project Conducted by: Dr. Anita Gagnon, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal , Family Children and Youth Priority Leader Aligning research to meet policy objectives for migrant families: An example from Canada. AJ Gagnon, M-P Joly, J Bocking (paper accepted by Health Research Policy and Systems Jan 10 2009) Objective: To determine what has been studied within a research-policy partnership over the last 10 years about immigrant “family, children and youth” in the absence of a clearly defined priority area.
Type of Studies • Qualitative works were available to inform the eleven priority themes • Quantitative results were available for 5 priority themes: • Educational outcomes • Civic participation and work • Mental health and movement • Services
Conclusions • All federal priority themes were addressed but few specific policy questions were addressed., • The greatest volume of policy-relevant academic works were identified for Services and Educational and Cultural Identity. • Most studies were descriptive and non-comparative in nature, with small study population drawn from local areas.
Recommendations • Specifying federal priorities can be expected to more clearly direct future research within a policy-research partnership. • These have been identified by the federal partners as follows: • Mental health: accessibility of health services; health care services for seniors; (unpaid) contributions of seniors to family • Refugee families • Programs for youth/multiculturalism • Contributions of families in language acquisition and integration • The role of federal government in supporting families in becoming proficient in one of the official languages.
Implication for the PMC’s Family, Children and Youth Domain • Consider the less researched areas/age groups in our research • Engage in larger-scale, cross-centre or comparative studies. • “Translate” descriptive findings to policies • Submit publications for the Working Paper Seires