250 likes | 380 Views
Access Rules. Presentation to EPRA October, 2004. Overview. Background (Legislation / current levels) BCI approach to the development of the Rules Rationale for this approach Process Outcomes. Legislative Background. Section 19(11) Broadcasting Act 2001
E N D
Access Rules Presentation to EPRA October, 2004
Overview • Background (Legislation / current levels) • BCI approach to the development of the Rules • Rationale for this approach • Process • Outcomes
Legislative Background Section 19(11) Broadcasting Act 2001 ..shall make rules requiring each broadcaster to take specified steps to promote the understanding and enjoyment by- (a) persons who are deaf or hard of hearing, and (b) persons who are blind or partially sighted, of programmes transmitted on ay broadcasting service provided by him or her. Section 19(12) ‘may...require a broadcaster to ensure that a specified percentage of programmes transmitted on a broadcasting service..employs specified means’
Forms of Access Provision • Subtitling • Captioning • Sign Language • Audio description
Current Service levels Subtitling RTE 1 Net 2 TG4 TV3 Peak Time 82% 53% 50% 12% Over 24 hours 42% 14% 11% 11% Over 18 hours 56% 19% 15% 8.5% Conventional subtitles (page 888) widely available Cost depends on mix of programming
Irish Sign Language • Limited provision on RTE 1 • Language particular to country • Specialist programmes/all programmes • ‘Closed’ signing not possible on analogue system • ‘Open’ signing is possible
Audio Description There is no audio description provision Needs digital distribution Concerns about archive of material
BCI Approach • Influenced by: • BCI regulatory principles • Culture • Precedent - Children’s Advertising Code • Flaws in traditional approach • Feedback from constituent groups
Approach to Development of Rules • Information gathering • Research - ‘Accessing Television’ • Pre-consultation • Initial submissions from stakeholder groups • Developed process based on information
Process • Phase 1TargetedConsultationOct 2003 - Jan 2004 • Consultative Forum established • 24 Members • 4 meetings • Independently chaired • Members are representatives of the interested parties • Agenda • Phase 2Public Consultationon Draft Access Rules September - November 2004
Process Phase 1 • Consultative Forum Members • Broadcasters: RTÉ, TV3, TG4 • User Groups: Irish Deaf Society • National Association for Deaf People • Irish Hard of Hearing Association • National Council for the Blind in Ireland • Cable: Chorus, Setanta, ntl • Regulators: BCI, Comreg
Rationale • Preferred Method • Ownership • Targeted • Timeframe
Issues to consider • Language • How issue is framed • Not a singular voice • Representative nature of members • Credibility and acceptance of Chairperson • Transparency • Assistive technologies
Outcomes • Access Principles • Influencing Factors • Technical Issues • Proposals on Access Targets
Access Principles • Agreement on: • Access • Excellence • Incremental Progression • Responsiveness
Influencing Factors Agreement on: 1. Differentiation between broadcast services *stage of development *level of current provision *nature of broadcaster, public/private *technical/human resource cost *technical capacity *type of programme schedule 2. Service Provision 3. Funding 4. EU Developments
Technical Factors • Agreement on: • Technical limitations • Agreement significant in clarifying expectations
Chairperson’s Report • Recommended adoption of: • Access Principles • influencing factors • Technical Report • Also included proposed targets
Stakeholder submissionsKey points raised • User Groups • RTÉ • TG4 • TV3
Phase 2 Public Consultation • Consideration by BCI of Forum outcomes • Drawing up of targets and timeframes • Production of Access Consultation Document (in braille and on audio tape and signed video) • 12 week timeframe
Proposed Targets Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6 Yr 7 Yr 8 Yr 9 Yr 10 RTE 1 55% 62% 69% 75% 81% 86% 90% 93% 96% 100% Network 2 24% 33% 42% 51% 60% 67% 73% 80% 85% 90% TG4 24% 30% 36% 42% 50% 56% 62% 68% 74% 80% TV3 12% 19% 26% 33% 40% 44% 48% 52% 56% 60%
Determining factors • National free to air service • Public Sector Broadcaster • Commercial broadcaster • Current levels/capacity • Stage of development • Mix of programming • Key service - news/youth/ • Linguistic imperative
Summary of key questions • Should there be specific % targets? • Should programme genres/time blocks be prioritised? • Should children’s programmes be prioritised? • Should captioning be allowed? • What issues should be addressed in the guidelines? • Do you agree with the use of an 18 or a 24 hour day as the basis for targets?
Summary of key questions • Views on the principle of setting different targets for each broadcaster? • Views on proposal to use a 10-year timeframe? • Views on proposed targets? • View on sign language and audio description for public service broadcaster only? • Views on the proposed review period of 3 years?
Next steps • Deadline 10th November 2004 • Summary of responses • Consideration and decision December 2004