1 / 28

Measurement of Sivers Asymmetry for Di-jets in 200 GeV pp Collisions at STAR

Sivers +kT x. . z.  . y. x. spin+. Vertical Spin. Measurement of Sivers Asymmetry for Di-jets in 200 GeV pp Collisions at STAR. Jet 1. Outline Motivation Principle of measurement, trigger Toy model of Sivers asymmetry Measured SSA & DSA Comparison with theory

mei
Download Presentation

Measurement of Sivers Asymmetry for Di-jets in 200 GeV pp Collisions at STAR

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Sivers +kTx  z  y x spin+ Vertical Spin Measurement of Sivers Asymmetry for Di-jets in 200 GeV pp Collisions at STAR Jet 1 • Outline • Motivation • Principle of measurement, trigger • Toy model of Sivers asymmetry • Measured SSA & DSA • Comparison with theory • Conclusions  Jet 2 Jan Balewski, IUCF for STAR Collaboration SPIN2006, Kyoto, Japan  (deg) 180o Jan Balewski: Di-jet Sivers in p+p @ 200 GeV

  2. Motivation for Di-Jet Sivers Effect Measurement • Sivers effect: • Sensitive to parton orbital angular momentum • Needs ISI and/or FSI to evade time-reversal violation. • HERMES transverse spin SIDIS asymmetries  non-zero u and d quark Sivers functions of opposite sign, different magnitude. • Sivers effect in pp  spin-dependent sideways boost to di-jets, suggested by Boer & Vogelsang (PRD 69) • Both beams polarized, xa  xb  can distinguish q vs. g Sivers effects. • Do we observe q Sivers consistent with HERMES? Tests universality. • First direct measurement of gluon Sivers effects. Jan Balewski: Di-jet Sivers in p+p @ 200 GeV

  3. unpol proton 2 p3 2 2 partonic scattering Polarized jet 1 spin jet 2 + spin- dep. kTx Sivers ON p4 spin 1  > 180 for kTx > 0 y x di-jet bisector kTx 2 Sivers Mechanism of SSA proton 1 intrinsic  kT p2 intrinsic  kT  p1 • Spin dependent kTX offset • deflects both jets in the same direction • reduces average di-jet opening angle • can be measured from correlation between di-jet bisector vs. spin direction • from accumulated-spectra (spin) Jan Balewski: Di-jet Sivers in p+p @ 200 GeV

  4. L0 jet patch trigger + L2 EMC-only dijet-finder  2.6M event sample from 1.1 pb–1 of transverse p+p collisions during 2006 run EMC Barrel  = -1 EMC Endcap TPC  =+2 Reco cos(bisector) measures sign of net kTxfor event BBC East BBC West spin Yellow beam Blue Jet 1   bisector  4 (deg) Endcap essential for q vs. g Sivers distinction Jet 2 |3-4| < 60   3 (deg) EMC-based Di-jet Trigger in STAR L2 trigger thresholds: ETEMC > 3.6, 3.3 GeV Is -distribution narrow enough for precise determination of centroid ? Have we measured di-jets? Jan Balewski: Di-jet Sivers in p+p @ 200 GeV

  5.  (rad) EMC-only  resol’n << kT-induced  width Full  width ~21    (full reco) –  (L2) [deg] -resolution, pT of Reconstructed Di-jets Data: offline di-jet reco for ~2% of all runs PYTHIA+GEANT: full reco jet vs. parton • Jet finder • TPC+EMC • jet cone radius 0.6 Typical xT ~ 0.05 - 0.10; 1+2 range  0.01 < xBj < 0.4 How close full recon jets resemble original scattered partons ? How close EMC-only jets resemble full reco jets ? Jan Balewski: Di-jet Sivers in p+p @ 200 GeV

  6. Intrinsic kTx,y width = 0.75 GeV/c  () = 6.3 resol’n smear reproduces observed  width beam 1 spin up beam 1 spin down  smearing dilutes AN by only 10% of its value  EMC-only analysis OK Toy Model of Sivers Spin Effect Generates AN (+) - (-) • Throw 1e6 2-parton events in transverse plane • Match to pT distribution from full jet reco. • Gaussian + exp. tail kT distrib’n reproduces  shape • Sivers spin-dep. kTx offset spin-dep.  distrib’n shift • Vary kTx offset, see how pol’n observables change • Can introduce  resolution smearing, see its effects AN=measure of L-R asymmetry of kT distribution in L-R symmetric detector (+) - (-) vs. AN ? Jan Balewski: Di-jet Sivers in p+p @ 200 GeV

  7. STAR EMC  coverage -1 +2 proton proton Yellow(-z) Blue(+z) • Event weights by |cos(bisector)| account for beam pol’n compo-nent  kT plane.  rotation samples kTy, parity-violating sp•kT correl’n Measured Sivers AN for Di-jets Null Tests STAR data both jets rotated by 90 • AN – L/R asymmetry integrated over STAR detector pseudorapidity Jan Balewski: Di-jet Sivers in p+p @ 200 GeV

  8. Quark Sivers Functions Constrained by SIDIS Results • V & Y use these Sivers fcns. (assuming zero gluon Sivers) to predict SSA for pp  dijet + X, integrated over kT distributions within both protons. Note strong y- and weak pT - dependence. • Sivers sensitivity in depend-ence of SIDIS yield on (hadron– proton spin ). • HERMES positive Sivers SSA for  +, but  0 for  –, fitted by Vogelsang & Yuan with u and d quark Sivers fcns. of different sign and magnitude: W. Vogelsang and F. Yuan, PRD 72, 054028 (2005). Jet 1 rapidity Jet pT (GeV/c) Jan Balewski: Di-jet Sivers in p+p @ 200 GeV

  9. Emphasizes (80%+) gluon Sivers • Model w/o hadronization, integrated over STAR , 5<pT<10 GeV/c, includes only quark Sivers -- predicts AN ~ ANHERMES where q Sivers dominates • Sign of predictions reversed to adhere to Madison AN sign conventio • STAR measured AN all consistent with zero  both quark and gluon Sivers effects much smaller in pp  di-jets than in HERMES SIDIS !! Measured Sivers AN for Di-jets vs. Theory Emphasizes (50%+ ) quark Sivers Jan Balewski: Di-jet Sivers in p+p @ 200 GeV

  10. Drell-Yan S SIDIS l- p  * q q Initial state interaction p l+ ISI for Drell-Yan vs. FSI for SIDIS  opposite sign predicted for Sivers SSA Theory - exp’t discrepancy raises questions! • Are observed di-jet Sivers SSA much smaller than predictions because: • ISI & FSI both important in pp  jets and tend to cancel? • Need q Sivers or different q Sivers x, kT - shapes in HERMES fits? • Contributions from Collins fragmentation asymmetries in incompletely reconstructed jets conspire to cancel Sivers asymmetries for quarks, while gluon Sivers functions naturally small? • If ISI / FSI cancel at mid-rapidity, does their balance change at high  to yield sizable Sivers contribution to observed pp   0X SSA? Jan Balewski: Di-jet Sivers in p+p @ 200 GeV

  11. Large STAR EMC acceptance  large 2006 triggered di-jet data set. • Di-jet ANSivers all consistent with zero  quark Sivers effects ~ 5-10  smaller than expected from SIDIS. Gluon Sivers comparably small. • Sensitivity of analysis to ANSivers 0 confirmed by toy model simulations. Beam spin-sorting verified via known non-zero SSA. • Results constrain treatments of Sivers effect and of transverse spin asymmetries in pp collisions. • Extend di-jets in future to higher , where ANmeas(pp   0X) sizable. Summary and Conclusions Jan Balewski: Di-jet Sivers in p+p @ 200 GeV

  12. BACKUP Jan Balewski: Di-jet Sivers in p+p @ 200 GeV

  13. STAR EMC  coverage -1 +2 proton proton STAR data both jets rotated by 90 Yellow(-z) Blue(+z) Event weights by |cos(bisector)| account for beam pol’n compo-nent  kT plane.  rotation samples kTy, parity-violating sp•kT correl’n y z 4 3 SY unpol unpol 1 2 2 1 Blue Yellow Cross-ratio  forbidden 2-spin correlation  cos(bisector) SY 4 3 Measured Sivers AN for Di-jets Null Tests AN – L/R asymmetry integrated over STAR detector pseudorapidity Jan Balewski: Di-jet Sivers in p+p @ 200 GeV

  14. Beam polarization calibration: used online RHIC polarimeter results: PB = 0.57, PY = 0.59.Normalization unc. = 0.15 AN . • Other sources: syst. unc.<  0.001, confirmed by null tests& consistency of results for different polarization fill patterns. Systematic Corrections, Checks, Errors ANfalse requires instrumental spin-dependent change in  distribution shape. Cross-ratio extraction, excellent L-R detector symmetry, bunch-to-bunch spin changes, etc., make these very small. • L2 jet vs. parton  resolution smearing: • Systematic uncertainty = 0.05 AN covers model-dependence of toy-model dilution factor already included. • Different di-jet yield extraction methods: • Syst. Unc. = 0.2  (stat. unc.)covers observed changes when  integration range, baseline subtraction are varied. Jan Balewski: Di-jet Sivers in p+p @ 200 GeV

  15. EMC Barrel  = -1 EMC Endcap y TPC   =+2 x BBC East BBC West Jet 1 ET> 3.6 GeV yellow blue -60 deg EMCal Geometry in L2 trigger +60 deg Barrel EMC -1 -units =+ 0 1 2 Endcap EMC Jet 2 ET> 3.3 GeV STAR Excellent Coverage for Di-Jets L2 jet Jan Balewski: Di-jet Sivers in p+p @ 200 GeV

  16. STAR Triggered on Di-Jet Found On-line • L0 di-jet logic: • BBC East.West • Etot >14 GeV • hardwired jet patches • jet size : 1x1 (x) • one jet Et>4.0 GeV • event rate ~120 Hz Comparison with off-line  similar Z=Et/GeV =360o 2005 data event Jet  is weighted with EM ET • L2 di-jet logic: • 5500 EMC towers • sliding jet patches • jet size : 0.6x0.6 (x) • jet1 Et>3.6, jet 2 Et>3.3 GeV • decision : 60 muSec/event • event rate ~8 Hz =180o ~180 o back-to-back di-jet L2 algo result • L0-L2 logic benefits: • large acceptance combined with trigger rejection power • full statistics on-line trigger monitoring of EMC • compact trig info saved for each event =0o  -1 0 +2 Jan Balewski: Di-jet Sivers in p+p @ 200 GeV

  17. Toy M-C Matched to Real Data ()=220 Toy M-C Back-to-back di-jet ()=21o Jet 1 Tails are different pp200 Real L2 di-jet events Jet 2 Jan Balewski: Di-jet Sivers in p+p @ 200 GeV

  18. Sivers Sensitive Observables independent 3 Alternative Sivers Spin Observables Width of  influenced by DSA Sivers kTx leads to displacement of  (other beam unpolarized) ++ Yell + Blue + narrows eps  spin- spin+ kTx destructive  x N<,- N>,+ Z-axis +- Yell - widens Blue + 180o  (deg) N>,- N<,+ kTx  constructive Based on Toy M-C rel. sensitivity of 7  1 7 • epsR w/ more -slices  AN() Jan Balewski: Di-jet Sivers in p+p @ 200 GeV

  19. Di-jet Results Sivers epsN()=AN ()*P May 2006 epsN() Unpolarized Yield() Blue SSA epsN() epsN=0 epsN() +/- 1(A) Yellow SSA ‘mixed’ DSA • 3M events • Fit: A-B*sin(2) Jan Balewski: Di-jet Sivers in p+p @ 200 GeV

  20. May 9 April 6 WCM intensity No spin Info @ STAR STAR magnet incident ( ~10 days ) good STAR data good data days in 2006 2006 pp200 Transverse Run @ RHIC STAR event count • Available STAR events: • both TPC & EMC active • few M 1-jet trig, ET>8.0 GeV • 3M di-jet trig, 2xET>3.7 GeV • few M di-jet w/o TPC • (crude run QA) Yellow Abort gap Blue Abort gap Yellow bXing (uses revTick) spin8 state STAR spin sorting (uses V124) • other value • B –Y – 51 • B –Y + 53 • B +Y – 83 • B +Y + 85 Example of di-jet events for one of 4 RHIC fill polarization patterns { \\ , \\+1, // , //+1 } Jan Balewski: Di-jet Sivers in p+p @ 200 GeV Imperfections : few ppm

  21. Run QA • Pass 1 (results presented in May of 2006) • use run Browser: TPC & BTOW & ETOW • triggers: BJP0, EJP0 • classify runs based on fill pattern 1-4 • drop run if mean -180omore than: - 1 deg AND it is more than 2 sigma effect, or - 3 deg (no matter what sigma) - in any of the subsamples: bjp0 or ejp0 • Pass 2 (new TrgJetTree in hand) • use run Browser: BTOW & ETOW (include no-TPC runs) • triggers: BJP0, EJP), minB, zB • use official off-line QA (from Jim & Co.) • suggestions? Jan Balewski: Di-jet Sivers in p+p @ 200 GeV

  22. Offline Evaluation of Di-jets all BJP1 trig ET2>3 GeV ET2>4 GeV ET2>5 GeV 2005 data • Input: 84k BJP1 triggered events from 2005 • ( L0 BJP1: ET>4 GeV , only BTOW-W) L2 algo: uses BTOW E+W Offline jet finder : no  cut • Bias introduced by L2 di-jet 2006 trigger • Compare 2006 L2 vs. off-line di-jets - Issam Qattan, IUCF • Avoid any -shape model, fit ’= a*+b to match + & - spin state distributions • (perhaps it will work?) all BJP1 trig ET2>3 GeV ET2>4 GeV ET2>5 GeV 2005 data ETEMC / ETTOT Jan Balewski: Di-jet Sivers in p+p @ 200 GeV

  23. Justin Stevens Endcap+Barrel E+E B+E Barrel+Barrel Expectation: Sivers Asy Depends on Partonic Process Favors quark-gluon Z=# of events Favors quark jets Selecting regions in  & pT changes probabilities of partonic processes. • Available info (trigger level) • Eta1,2 • ET1,2 • Et tot • Tower multiplicity • Additional info • Example: • Asymmetric Endcap-Endcap jets • Quark –blue beam • Gluon – yellow beam Jan Balewski: Di-jet Sivers in p+p @ 200 GeV

  24. East BBC West BBC 2 6 2 6 Top view X Blue-Left Blue beam  +Z Y Yellow beam Yellow-Left Is the Di-jet Spin Sorting Correct?( Find MinB BBC SSA) Off-Line 12M MinB evens On-Line West-Blue 5.6  West-Yellow 0.3  YES ! Pol patt 1,2,3,4 East-Blue 0.1  East-Yellow 5.8  Jan Balewski: Di-jet Sivers in p+p @ 200 GeV

  25. An Integrated vs. Averaged Jan Balewski: Di-jet Sivers in p+p @ 200 GeV

  26. Single-Transverse Spin Asymmetries Werner Vogelsang BNL Nuclear Theory Spin 2006, Kyoto, 10/02/2006

  27. • careful analysis of gauge links in 22 QCD scattering • color structure of amplitudes plays role • complicated, but simplifies if moment is taken: • then everything has structure as in unpol. case, but with different color weights: (2) Non-universality in ppjet jet X Bacchetta, Bomhof, Mulders, Pijlman Jan Balewski: Di-jet Sivers in p+p @ 200 GeV

  28. Taking into account Process-dependence Unpol.partonic cross sections • phenomenology is beginning : AN See Feng Yuan’s talk Jan Balewski: Di-jet Sivers in p+p @ 200 GeV

More Related