1 / 27

B Physics and Quarkonia at CMS

B Physics and Quarkonia at CMS. ICNFP 2014 Kolymbari , Crete 6 August 2014. Claudia-Elisabeth Wulz CMS Collaboration Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna. Overview. Selected recent results:

melanie-ashley
Download Presentation

B Physics and Quarkonia at CMS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. B Physics and Quarkonia at CMS ICNFP 2014 Kolymbari, Crete 6 August 2014 Claudia-Elisabeth Wulz CMS Collaboration Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna

  2. Overview • Selected recent results: • CP-violating phase ϕsand decay width difference DGs of Bs with Bs -> J/y f(1020) • Production cross sections • J/y and y(2S) prompt double-differential • Polarization • J/y, y(2S),ϒ(1S), ϒ(2S),ϒ(3S) CMS PAS BPH-13-012 CMS PAS BPH-14-001 PLB 727 (2013) 381 PRL 110 (2013) 081802 All CMS public B physics results: https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/CMSPublic/PhysicsResultsBPH

  3. Bs-> J/ψ(μ+μ-) Φ(K+K-) Decay channel: Bs -> J/y(μ+μ-) Φ(K+K-) Bs-Bs mixing -> time-dependent, flavour-tagged analysis Data: √s = 8 TeV, Lint = 20 fb-1, 49000 reconstructed Bsdecays Weak phase from interference of direct decays and decays from mixing, and decay width difference of light and heavy Bs mass eigenstates: _ fD + new physics? J/y Φ Bs -fD fM _ Bs + new physics?

  4. Angular analysis • Time-dependent, angular analysis to disentangle CP-odd and CP-even final states: • Measure decay angles Θ(θT,φT,ψT) and proper decay length ct of Bs Signal model φ a parameter set: ΔΓs, ϕs, cτ, IA0I2, IAIII2, IATI2, IASI2, δ0, δII, δT, δS bi and di depend on ϕs Extended maximum likelihood fit with signal model used to extract parameters. PRD 87 (2013) 112010 - LHCb

  5. Event selection and Bs reconstruction • Trigger: displaced J/y, optimized for b hadrons • 2 muons with pT(μ) > 4 GeV, pT(μμ) > 6.9 GeV • Mass window for μμ: [2.9,3.3] GeV • Common decay vertex, Lxy/σxy> 3, dca3D < 0.5 cm • c2 vertex fit probability > 15% • Offline selection: • pT(μ+), pT(μ-) > 4 GeV, IημI< 2.1 • Dimuons from common vertex from Kalman fit • J/ymass constraint: Imμ+μ-– MJ/yI< 150 MeV • pT(K+),pT(K-) > 0.7 GeV • ϕmass constraint: ImK+K-– MΦI < 10 MeV • Bs (μμKK) reconstruction by combined kinematic and vertex fit: • c2 vertex fit probability > 2% • Mass within [5.24, 5.49] GeV • Selected primary vertex: closest to Bs(minimal angle between flight direction and momentum of Bs) CMS PAS BPH-13-012

  6. Background, efficiencies, resolution • Main background: non-prompt J/yfrom b hadrons • Lifetime and angular resolution and efficiencies: from simulation • Angular efficiency: modeled by 3D-function of decay angles • Angular resolution: not in nominal fit, but included as systematic uncertainty • Proper decay time efficiency: not in nominal fit, flat in fitting range [0.02,0.3] cm, variations included as systematic uncertainty • Proper decay time resolution (70 fs or 21 μm): per-event uncertainty from Bs vertex finding + scale factor κ(cτ) taking into account the difference with respect to the resolution CMS PAS BPH-13-012

  7. Flavor tagging Flavor of Bs at production time determined by tagging e or μ on opposite side and considering its charge Tagging performance optimized by maximizing tagging power Ptag= εtag(1-2ω)2 separately for e and μ(ω … mistag fraction) εtag measured from data, using self-tagging channel B+ -> J/yK+, and checked by simulation with B+ -> J/yK+ and Bs-> J/y K*0 events Combined average tagging performance: ω= (32.3 ± 0.3)%, εtag= (7.67 ± 0.04)%, Ptag= (0.97 ± 0.3)% CMS PAS BPH-13-012

  8. Systematic uncertainties CMS PAS BPH-13-012

  9. Fit results Multi-dimensional maximumlikelihood fit appliedwithtaggedsignalmodel, Gaussianconstraint on Δmsto PDG value Fit range: Bs mass in [5.24, 5.49] GeV ct in [0.02, 0.3] cm CMS PAS BPH-13-012

  10. Results on Φs,ΔΓs CMS PAS BPH-13-012 ϕs = - 0.03 ± 0.11 (stat.) ± 0.03 (syst.) rad ΔΓs= 0.096 ± 0.014 (stat.) ± 0.007 (syst.) ps-1

  11. Quarkoniacross sections and polarization Heavy quarkoniainterestingtounderstandhadronformation. S-wavevectorquarkoniaformedfrom heavy qqpairscreatedas: colorsinglet (CS) 3S1[1]oroneof 3 coloroctets (CO)1S0[8], 3S1[8], 3PJ[8] -> similarcrosssectionshapes, but different polarizations. Experimental situation on polarization not clearuptonow, crosssectionsonlymeasured in lowerpTrange. _

  12. Quarkonium polarization Polarizationof JPC = 1––quarkoniumstatesmeasuredthrough angular distributionofdileptonsfrom J/yorϒdecay z Quarkonium rest frame PRD 16 (1977) 2219 PRD 19 (1979) 207 Quantization axis z ϑ ℓ + production plane φ y x Transverse JZ = ±1 Longitudinal JZ = 0 EPJC C69 (2010) 657 Frame-invariant:

  13. Selection of prompt charmonia Prompt charmoniadistinguishedfrom B-hadrondecaysthroughμμ pseudo-proper decaylengthl(Lxy ... most probable transversedecaylength) Yield: extendedunbinnedmaximum-likelihood fit to 2D M-ldistribution l =Lxy.mψ(nS)/pT EPJC 71(2011) 1575

  14. Single μ efficiencies, correlations and acceptance Single muonefficiencies: tag&probemethod ρ: trigger-inducedmuon pair correlations Acceptance: polarization-dependent Unpolarizedscenariousedforcrosssectionmeasurements CMS-PAS-BPH-14-001

  15. J/ψand ψ(2S) production CMS PAS BPH-14-001 ICNFP, Aug. 2014

  16. ψ(nS) and ϒ(nS) polarizations PLB 727(2013) 381 J/yandy(2s) polarizations, 7 TeV ϒ(1s), ϒ(2s), ϒ(3s) polarizations, 7 TeV PRL 110 (2013) 081802 ϒ(1S) ψ(2S) J/ψ ϒ(2S) ϒ(3S) - Full angular decaydistributionsmeasured in 3 framesand frame-independently - Continuumbackgroundfromsidebands in the invariant mass distribution - Non-prompt charmoniumcontributionsremovedusingdecaylength

  17. J/ψand ψ(2S) polarization

  18. J/ψand ψ(2S) polarization • No strong polarization • No strong pTdependence • Similar in otherframesandforotherpolarizationparameters • NLO NRQCD predictions (nofeed-down for J/y) do not agreewithdata

  19. ϒ(nS) polarization • No strong polarization • No strong pTorydependence PRL 110 (2013) 081802 PRL 108 (2012) 151802

  20. ψ(2S), ϒ(3S) production versus NRQCD JHEP 02 (2012) 011 PRD 87 (2013) 052004 CMS-PAS-BPH-12-006 PLB 727 (2013) 381 PRL 110 (2013) 081802 PLB 736 (2014) 98 • cb(3P) feed-down to (3S) neglected • Unpolarized1S0[8]component dominates quarkonium production

  21. Conclusions on new CMS results • CMS has measured with very good precision CP-violating phase fs and decay width difference DGs of Bs with Bs-> J/y(μμ)f(KK), in agreement with standard model (√s = 8 TeV, Lint = 20 fb-1). • CMS has measured J/y and y(2S) prompt double-differential cross sections up to O(100 GeV) in pT(√s = 7 TeV, Lint = 4.9 fb-1). • CMS has measured polarization of JPC = 1––quarkoniumstatesthroughangular distributionofdileptonsfrom J/yorϒdecays(√s = 7 TeV, Lint = 4.9 fb-1). No strong polarizationisseen.Unpolarized1S0[8] component dominates quarkoniumproduction. • CMS is preparing to take new B physics data at √s = 13 TeV in 2015. ICNFP, Aug. 2014

  22. BACKUP

  23. Charmonium spectrum ψ‘ J/ψ directly produced directly produced cc _ ψ’ non-prompt (b-hadrons) non-prompt (b-hadrons) χc2 χc1 1--

  24. Bottomonium spectrum χbJ(3P) directly produced directly produced directly produced (1S) (2S) (3S) (3S) (2S,3S) 1-- χbj(1P) χbj(2P) χbj(2P) 1-- _ bb 35-45% χbj(3P) χbj(3P) χbj(3P)

  25. Pseudo-proper decay length l = Lxy· mψ(nS)/pT Eur.Phys.J.C71:1575,2011

  26. Hadron formation and NRQCD NRQCD is an effective field theory that factorizes quarkonium production in two steps: production of the initial quark-antiquark pair (perturbative QCD) hadronizationof the quark pair into a bound quarkoniumstate (non-perturbative QCD) NRQCD predicts the existence of intermediate color-octet (CO) states in nature, that subsequently evolve into physical color-singlet (CS) quarkonia by non-perturbative emission of soft gluons. quarkonium ( ) = 2S+1LJ[C], C = 1,8 antired Quantum numbers of the heavy quark pair S, L, J = spin, orbital and total ang. momentum antiblue _ possibly coloredqq pair ofany possible 2S+1LJ quantum numbers 2) non-perturbative evolution to the observed bound state Quantum numbers change! Cartoon by P. Faccioli red green 1) perturbative phase

  27. B Physics and Quarkonia at CMS ICNFP 2014 Kolymbari, Crete 6 August 2014 Claudia-Elisabeth Wulz CMS Collaboration Institute of High Energy Physics, Vienna

More Related