1 / 22

Building Bridges

Building Bridges. Working with families impacted by parental mental ill health Briony Hallam Rosie Mather. Family Action’s direct services:.

melba
Download Presentation

Building Bridges

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Building Bridges Working with families impacted by parental mental ill health Briony Hallam Rosie Mather

  2. Family Action’s direct services: “work with individuals and families, helping to build on each individual’s strengths to overcome obstacles and to provide practical and emotional support when they are at their most vulnerable.” (Annual Report 2004-2005)

  3. Aims of workshop • Increase awareness of the issues for families affected by parental mental ill health • Improve knowledge of strategies to support parents and children • Learn about findings from the recent independent evaluation of Family Action’s Building Bridges services

  4. Overview • Issues for parents and children • Working with competing needs • Feedback/discussion • Family Action Building Bridges - outcomes

  5. Identifying need • Approx 1 in 4 adults experience mental distress (ODPM 2004) • 30-50% of them have children (Gopfert, Seeman and Webster 2004) • Parental mental illness can have an adverse effect on child mental health and development (Falkov 1998) • Serious psychiatric disorder is a factor in cases of fatal child abuse (Part 8 reviews) • Maternal morbidity (30% of women with PND are still ill one year post partum) • Young carers – emerging evidence base

  6. Impact: on children • Developmental • Educational e.g. interaction, young carer role • Emotional e.g. impact of insecure attachment • Social e.g. isolation, bullying • Cognitive e.g. motor skills, concentration

  7. My mum’s heart

  8. Impact: on parents • Stigma • Uncertainty & complexity • Focus on risk rather than impact • Feeling “on trial about parenting abilities” • Parenting abilities and capacity – may need help • Impossibility of parenting without family and social networks • Fear • of losing children, reality of it happening • of mental illness • Access & reuniting with children • Recovery impeded by anxiety

  9. Adults, whose diagnoses include: Bi-polar disorder Schizophrenia Personality disorder PTSD OCD Substance misuse (dual diagnosis) Depression-related illnesses Don’t define parent by illness Non-stigmatising value of voluntary sector Don’t treat every case as inevitably a safeguarding issue Who does Building Bridges work with?

  10. Voluntary organisation Adult mental health 10% 11% CAMHS 3% Education 9% Social Services children/family 29% GP/Health Visitor 8% Not known 4% Other Social Services adult 9% 1% Self 16% Who refers to Building Bridges?

  11. What does Building Bridges do? • Build relationships • Provide models of behaviour • Monitor – reduce risk • Place the child at the centre of the work • Contain – and prevent crisis • Information & advocacy • Value and increase self-esteem • Opportunities to develop

  12. Evaluation and outcomes

  13. Outcomes I: independent evaluation Characteristics critical to successful interventions: • close attention to getting, keeping and engaging parents • a strong theory base • synthesis of practical and emotional support • working with both parents and children • a practical, flexible and partnership approach which is valued by parents and other stakeholders (Building Bridges, Morris J. July 2007)

  14. Outcomes II: statutory services • A reduction in the number of children looked after • A statistically significant reduction in the number of children on child protection plans • A statistically significant reduction in the number of adults on CPA

  15. Evaluation: Parents’ views • Non-judgmental and flexible • Helps children to understand mental illness • Helps families link in with other agencies • Prevents deterioration in family relationships Random sample of 40 closed cases resulted in 31 interviews with parents (response rate 78%).

  16. BB Evaluation: other agencies’ views • whole family focus - services are flexible and tailored to individual families; • ability to work with families with high levels of need, including those where children are on child protection plans • willingness to work with families where there are profound & enduring mental health problems • synthesis of practical and emotional support • positive working relationships with other agencies

  17. “For families who are easier to engage there are more services. But Building Bridges works with those who are the hardest to engage with, who aren’t motivated to go to a parents’ group or whatever. When we agreed to fund them we agreed they would start with the harder to reach families and that’s what they’ve delivered”. Local authority stakeholder, for BB Evaluation, 2007

  18. Working with competing needs Small group exercise: • Discuss the competing needs between adult and child • Plan how you will address this with the family • Identify your first three steps • Share key messages from your discussion with whole group

  19. Situation 1: • School referral: 10 yr old truanting. On investigation you discover this is due to him accompanying his mother to medical appointments in order to interpret between her and medical staff. Mother (diagnosis schizophrenia/schizoid affective disorder) • Conflicting need? M’s treatment needs vs. child’s education

  20. Situation 2: • GP referral: lone mother (diagnosis severe depression), one child, girl, 2 years old, identified language delay. The key issue is emotional neglect of the child – e.g. mother often puts the child to bed straight after nursery, and is not engaging with her. • Conflicting needs? M’s need to focus on self vs. child’s need for relationship with mother and emotional stimulation?

  21. Situation 3: • YOT referral: Daughter, 13, involved with YOT. M’s diagnosis (bi-polar – often means inconsistent parenting, between harsh or no discipline). Mother needs to establish boundaries and build more positive relationship with her daughter. • Conflicting need? Young person’s need for clear boundaries to support through teenage years vs. mother’s difficulties and need for support with her identified mental health problems.

  22. Building BridgesFor more information, please contact: Family Action Building Bridges services: Rose de Paeztron, Strategic Development rose.depaeztron@family-action.org.uk Building Bridges evaluation: download at www.family-action.org.uk Join (free) Parental Mental Health & Child Welfare Network: www.pmhcwn.org.uk

More Related