1 / 12

Split-n-Save: Path Multiplexing in Wireless Ad Hoc Routing

This research explores the use of path multiplexing to improve routing performance in wireless ad hoc networks. The proposed Split-n-Save protocol enhances existing multipath routing schemes by dynamically changing paths for packet transmission. The performance is evaluated using metrics such as packet delivery ratio, average end-to-end delay, routing overhead, node satisfiability, and network survivability. Simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness of path multiplexing in achieving better routing performance. Future work includes developing a probabilistic model for Split-n-Save, exploring other multiplexing ideas, and improving simulation setups for wireless ad hoc networks.

melissakelly
Download Presentation

Split-n-Save: Path Multiplexing in Wireless Ad Hoc Routing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Split-n-Save :Path Multiplexing in Wireless Ad Hoc Routing Meeyoung Cha and DK Lee Advisor - Sue Moon (Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology) IEEE INFOCOM 2005 Student Workshop

  2. Motivation of Our Work • On-demand routing is favored in resource constrained environments of wireless ad hoc network.(e.g., AODV, DSR) • Recent routing schemes use multipath routing for fast path fail-over. (e.g., AOMDV, MDSR, NDMR, MP-DSR, SMR) Do existing multipath routings perform well in terms of the number of active nodes over a time period or workload balancing throughout the network? “ ”

  3. Multipath Routing Basics Description of a typical multipath routing 1. using default path Destination 2. failure detection X 3. fast transition to one of the candidate paths default path Origin candidate paths 4. using new path Candidate paths are used only after the main path is no longer available. Let’s use multiple paths more actively!

  4. Split-n-Save • We propose Split-n-Save • Added featureto an existing multipath routing protocol (patch to AOMDV ns-2 code) • Use path multiplexing change paths every k (frequency of multiplexing) packets Expectedbenefits of Split-n-Save • Inherit all benefits from the underlying routing protocol • Improve routing performance • number of active nodes over a time period • well-balanced workload throughout the network

  5. Routing Performance Metrics • To measure the efficacy, we use the following metrics. • Packet delivery ratio • Average end-to-end delay • Routing overhead We also propose using two other metrics. • Node satisfiability : ratio of the number of forwarding packets generated by itself and that by the other nodes • Network survivability : number of active nodes over a period of time

  6. Simulation Settings • CMU wireless extensions to ns-2

  7. Simulation There exists a specific k value that performs best for each routing performance metric.

  8. Simulation – End-to-end Delay surging points We find several surging points when k = 0 and 1.

  9. Simulation – Node Satisfiability node satisfiability # of packets sent by itself # of packet forwarded = Node satisfiability improves when k > 0.

  10. Preliminary Results • For network survivability, temporal information alone was not enough. We plan to use spatial info as well. - track down the location and causality of node failure. • For other metrics, path multiplexing clearly improves the routing performance with carefully chosen frequency of multiplexing.

  11. Conclusions • We propose and evaluate Split-n-Save, which exploits path multiplexing in multipath routing. • We propose two other metrics: • node satisfiability and network survivability • Frequency of multiplexing can be used to cope with path fail prediction and path optimality. • Path multiplexing should reflect network dynamics.

  12. Future Works • Methodology • Probabilistic model for Split-n-Save • Other multiplexing idea • Revisit routing performance metrics for wireless ad hoc network • Suggestions on simulation in wireless ad hoc network • Good guideline for simulation setups • More practical movement pattern model • Grid movement, communication on the road, campus network

More Related