1 / 40

CONTROL POLICY

CONTROL POLICY. COURT OF AUDITORS REPORT. Registration and validation of catch data. NATIONAL CATCH REGISTRATION SYSTEMS HAVE NUMEROUS SHORTCOMINGS INCOMPLETE AND UNRELIABLE DATA. Consequences. COMMISSION UNABLE TO: IDENTIFY ERRORS AND ANOMALIES TAKE NECESSARY DECISIONS IN DUE TIME.

melva
Download Presentation

CONTROL POLICY

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CONTROL POLICY COURT OF AUDITORS REPORT

  2. Registration and validation of catch data • NATIONAL CATCH REGISTRATION SYSTEMS HAVE NUMEROUS SHORTCOMINGS • INCOMPLETE AND UNRELIABLE DATA

  3. Consequences COMMISSION UNABLE TO: • IDENTIFY ERRORS AND ANOMALIES • TAKE NECESSARY DECISIONS IN DUE TIME

  4. CONTROL • INSPECTION SYSTEMS DO NOT GUARANTEE EFFICIENT PREVENTION OR DETECTION • LEGAL BASIS IS INCOMPLETE AND NOT APPLIED BY MS • ABSENCE OF GENERAL CONTROL STANDARDS • MS DO NOT MAKE OPTIMAL USE OF INSPECTION ACTIVITES

  5. RESULT • LIMITED CAPACITY OF THE COMMISSION TO EVALUATE THE SITUATION IN THE MS • INEFFICIENT AND INSUFFICIENT CONTROLS • INFRINGEMENT CULTURE IN THE SECTOR AND IN THE ADMINISTRATIONS • PUTS THE CFP INTO QUESTION

  6. INFRINGEMENTS MS & COM • FOLLOW-UP PROCEDURES DO NOT GUARANTEE THAT SANCTIONS ARE IMPOSED • NON-EXISTENT OR NOT VERY DISSUASIVE SANCTIONS • ONLY PROCEDURE "ACTION IN EVENT OF FAILURE": LONG AND NOT VERY EFFECTIVE PROCEDURE

  7. CONCLUSION • FAILURE OF CONTROL POLICY • POLITICAL FAILURE OF RESOURCE MANAGEMENT • HEAVY CONSEQUENCES FOR THE FUTURE OF THE RESOURCE, THE INDUSTRY AND DEPENDENT REGIONS

  8. RECOMMENDATIONS • STRENGTHEN THE CONTROL, INSPECTION AND SANCTION SYSTEMS • IMPROVE THE COLLECTION, ANALYSIS AND CONTROL OF BASIC DATA • GUARANTEE GLOBAL CONTROL PRESSURE • PUT DISUASIVE SANCTIONS IN PLACE • ESTABLISH GENERAL STANDARDS OF CONTROL • REINFORCE THE CAPACITY AND POWERS OF THE COMMISSION • STRENGTHEN THE POWERS OF COMMISSION INSPECTORS • POWER TO SUSPEND PAYMENTS OF COMMUNITY AID • BROADEN THE MANDATE OF THE AGENCY

  9. EVALUATION OF THE CATCH RECORDING AND VERIFICATION SYSTEMS COMMISSION ANALYSIS

  10. TEST • 15 MS • GEOGRAPHICAL AREA: BALTIC,NORTH SEA AND NORTH ATLANTIC • TIME LINE : JANUARY 2007 • SPECIES: COD, PLAICE, SOLE, ANGLERFISH, HAKE • DATA : ° VMS (>15 mt) ° LOGBOOK (>10 mt) ° LANDING DECLARATION (>10 mt) ° SALES NOTES (>10mt) ° LIST OF VESSELS / SPECIES ° INSPECTIONS • VESSELS : 13.500

  11. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. MS Number Nbr of Nbr of GAPS (>24 h at sea) JUMPS (>50 knots) of UNIQUE DUPLICATE T otal Avg Avg T otal gap Total Avg Avg Dis - Vessels records records Number Nbr Duration d uration Number Nbr placement with (avg per (avg per per per gap per per per j ump VMS vessel) vessel) vessel (in days ) month vessel (in nm) (%) 7,6% BEL 78 309,6 2, 6 46 0,59 4,0 2 0,03 78,0 DEU 65 265,94 0,6 44 0,68 2,6 5,7% DNK 99 686,72 0,5 1 0 0,1 2,3 0,7% 1,76 ESP 337 341,2 3 0,9 60 0,18 2,7 1,5% 594 4222,3 1 ,00 EST 2 81 0,5 2 1,0 3,4% FIN 3 922,33 0 1 0,33 1,0 1,1% 9 3 110,2 0,74 8,1% 2,06 FRA 491 595,39 4,2 365 3,4 1010 1345,8 1,29 GBR 385 316,13 0,9 125 0,32 3,5 3,7% 497 9,9 10,9% IRL 105 311,31 0,1 70 0,67 5,1 47 0,45 99,1 0,94 12,8% LTU 32 35 ,75 0,1 30 4,2 LVA 37 350,68 0,2 2 0,05 6,0 1,0% 2 0,05 144,1 NLD 134 430,82 24,0 16 0,12 3,1 1,2% 2 0,01 1,1 POL 218 208,37 11,8 5 0,02 4,5 0,3% 57 0,26 4,6 0,99 8,6% 2,86 PRT 73 1196,85 0 72 2,7 209 1976,7 SWE 167 728,54 0,7 2 0,0 1 4,5 0,2% 2 0,01 0,2 VMS Data Quality !

  12. Inspected Number Sum Of Avg Avg Weight Min Max MS Species Landing Landings Weight Weight Difference Weight Weight inspected 120 122393 1020 19 8991 DEU COD - 40% non - insp. 847 515259 608 1 10250 inspected 105 142423 1356 20 15675 DNK COD - 37% non - insp. 1919 1645398 857 3 20768 inspected 44 20971 477 54 3400 ESP ANF - 29% non - insp. 1952 656334 336 50 3285 inspected 100 383044 3830 50 13104 - 81% ESP HKE non - insp. 2814 2015138 716 50 18333 inspected 31 24542 791 4 1750 +8% FRA ANF non - insp. 1888 1610588 853 1 8700 inspected 305 4 69407 1539 1 15968 - 81% GBR ANF non - insp. 1396 408543 293 0 9827 inspected 18 11542 641 11 2959 IRL ANF +14% non - insp. 363 265231 731 2 14391 inspected 17 64211 3777 472 7582 LTU COD - 47% non - insp. 37 74584 2016 56 6743 inspected 125 149129 1193 0 13453 LVA COD +19% non - insp. 56 79528 1420 0 10278 inspected 48 321613 6700 1042 13722 NLD PLE - 7% non - insp. 410 2559227 6242 53 25209 inspected 50 53768 1075 54 3597 NLD SOL - 4% non - insp. 392 405726 1035 12 3703 inspected 144 103903 722 28 5558 - 58% POL COD non - insp. 943 282653 300 0 5324 inspected 23 77970 3390 0 23228 - 64% SWE COD non - insp. 1073 1296899 1209 0 24135 Logbook weights of inspected vs. non-inspected Landings !

  13. Difference between Logbook and Landing weights 0% class tolerance margin overestimation of logbook weights

  14. Inspected Number Sum Of Avg Avg Weight Min Max MS Species Landing Sales Weight Weight Difference Weight Weight 109 98300 901,83 18 7685 inspected DEU COD - 31% 653 404027 618,72 2 8761 non - insp. 230 116601 506,96 1 14525 inspected DNK COD - 14% 4795 2089934 435,86 - 690 450001 non - insp. 15 7479,9 498,66 50,9 2562 inspected ESP ANF - 24% 1035 391669,9 378,43 50 9830 non - insp. 29 147745,2 5 5094,7 75 12977 inspected - 87% ESP HKE 1530 1039833,9 679,63 50 19297 non - insp. 25 1203,5 48,14 2 363,8 inspected +202% FRA ANF 7965 1157002,9 145,26 0,1 13325 non - insp. 269 291188,6 1082,5 0,8 12475 inspected - 80% GBR ANF 1262 278847,4 220,96 0,1 8594 non - insp. 13 35558 2735,2 425 6831 inspected - 56% LTU COD 72 86130 1196,3 10 6125 non - insp. 48 119940 2498,8 175 12120 inspected LVA COD - 12% 31 68400 2206,5 100 9075 non - insp. 36 234148 6504,1 96 13069 inspected NLD PLE - 4% 402 2501163 6221,8 50 24009 non - insp. 40 43802 1095,1 51 3959 inspected NLD SOL - 12% 407 393809 967,59 52 2981 non - insp. 22 67631,5 3074,2 240 19958 inspected - 63% SWE COD 976 1098265 1125,3 3 20747 non - insp. Sales note weights of inspected vs. non-inspected Landings !

  15. Logbooks vs. Sales Notes Weight = Average weight per fishing trip (in kg)=> Should be NEGATIVE !!

  16. FIDES/CRONT vs. Received data

  17. Conclusions • No reliable catch registration by MS • No verification and cross-checking • No reliable catch declaration to Commission (FIDES/CRONT)

  18. POLITICAL ASSESSMENT OF CONTROL • CONTROL TARGETING TECHNICAL MEASUREMENTS AND ACTIONS AT SEA • EFFICIENCY: - 1/600 at sea - 1/60 at landings - 1/6 at sale • ABSENCE OF CONTROL AUCTIONS, TRADERS AND IMPORTS

  19. FISHERIES ENFORCEMENT • REPORT BY THE COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR GENERAL (2003): ° There is a very low probability (<1%) that on any day of fishing vessel will be subject to a inspection at sea, ° around six per cent chance of being inspected on land ° cross checking data (60 -70 % )

  20. AN EXPENSIVE POLICY • OPERATIONAL COSTS MS : 272,5 M € °ADMIN 14.5 5.4 % °AIR 18.1 6.6 % °SEA 147.7 54.2 % °VMS 2.9 1.1 % °SHORE 89.3 32.7 % TOTAL 272,5 100.0%

  21. A REGULATION TOO COMPLEX CASE BY CASE ° COMPLEX CFP ° OBLIGATIONS TO REPORT ° TECHNICAL PROTOCOLS NOT STANDARDISED ° ABSENCE OF STANDARDS OF CONTROL LOGIQUE MILLEFEUILLES SIMPLIFICATION AND HARMONISATION

  22. INADEQUATE INSPECTION LOGIC • FOCUS ON INSPECTION AT EXTRACTION : ° FISHING ZONES ° GEAR ° MINIMUM SIZES AND BY-CATCHES ° CATCHES (TAC & QUOTAS)

  23. WITHOUT RESULTS • SANCTIONS INSUFFICIENT AND UNHARMONISED • ABSENCE OF A CULTURE OF CONTROLS

  24. POLITICAL ASSESSMENT OF CONTROL COMPLEX INEFFICIENT EXPENSIVE WITHOUT RESULTS

  25. REFORMING FISHERIES CONTROL

  26. New policy framework Criteria: • Simplify • Harmonise • Cost effective • Develop a culture of control and inspection

  27. Culture of inspection and control • Development of inspection methodologies at sea and land; • Development of audit methodologies; • System of alert and mutual assistance.

  28. Use of new technologies: • Electronic logbook (ERS) • Vessel detection system (VDS); • Satellite based vessel monitoring system(VMS) • Tracability

  29. ROLE OF THE COMMISSION • PROPOSAL OF A NEW FRAMEWORK • TO AVOID APPROACH OF SUBSTITUTION • TO CREATE AN EFFECTIVE FRAMEWORK FOR ACTIONS BY MS • NO DIRECT CONTROL • CONTROL AND VERIFICATIONS OF INSPECTION DEVISCES OF MS • TO STRENGTHEN COOPERATION BETWEEN MS: ° MUTUAL ASSISTANCE SCHEMES. ° ALERT SYSTEM • SANCTIONS

  30. Reinforce the powers of the Commission • Strengthen the powers of Commission inspectors; • Revision of the initiatives taken by the Commission - Preventives mesures - Suspension and withdrawal of EC aid; - Closure of fisheries.

  31. Revising mandate of Control Agency • extending the scope of the activities of the Agency to include coordination of control of markets and cross border transport

  32. OBJECTIVES • STRENGTHEN THE CONTROL, INSPECTION AND SANCTION SYSTEMS • IMPROVE THE COLLECTION, ANALYSIS AND CONTROL OF BASIC DATA • GUARANTEE GLOBAL CONTROL PRESSURE • PUT DISSUASIVE SANCTIONS IN PLACE • ESTABLISH GENERAL STANDARDS OF CONTROL • IMPROVE THE CAPACITY AND ROLES OF THE COMMISSION AND BROADEN THE MANDATE OF THE AGENCY

  33. WEAK SANCTIONING CAPACITY SANCTION APPROACH STRENGTHEN COMMISSION POWERS PROCEDURES FINANCING LINK EFF NEW POLICY FRAMEWORK WEAK COMPLIANCE CULTURE FINANCING THE MS ABSENCE OF APPROACH BASED ON INCENTIVES NEW FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT CONSUMER AWARENESS FINANCING THE SECTOR AGENCY DEVELOP A COOPERATIVE APPROACH AMONG MS

  34. ACTIONMEDIUM TERM • LAUNCH THE REFORM OF THE CONTROL POLICY AND THE CONTROL REGULATION • COMISSION CONTROL POLICY TF • EXPERT WORKING GROUP • COM ADOPTION TIME : OCTOBER 2008 • COUNCIL ADOPTION : 2009 • Entry in force : 2010

  35. ACTIONSHORT TERM • 2008: ° IMPROVE VMS SYSTEM ° IMPLEMENT ELECTRONIC LOGBOOK ° IMPROVE MS AND COM DATA BASE ° START GENERALISATION OF CROSS CHECKING METHOD. ° INCREASE LEVEL OF SANCTIONS COM FINANCIAL SUPORT

  36. INTERNAL COM • STOP CASE BY CASE LOGIC • REORIENTED CONTROL ACTIVITIES • REINFORCE CROSS-CHECKING APPROACH • START AGENCY DEVOLUTION PROGRAM

More Related