1.05k likes | 1.24k Views
Formation Flying. Rachel Winters Matt Whitten Kyle Tholen Matt Mueller Shelby Sullivan Eric Weber Shunsuke Hirayama Tsutomu Hasegawa Aziatun Burhan Masao Shimada Tomo Sugano. Motivation. Can enable baseline to form large instruments in space Escort Flights
E N D
Formation Flying Rachel Winters Matt Whitten Kyle Tholen Matt Mueller Shelby Sullivan Eric Weber Shunsuke Hirayama Tsutomu Hasegawa Aziatun Burhan Masao Shimada Tomo Sugano
Motivation • Can enable baseline to form large instruments in space • Escort Flights • Provide detection/protection from threats • Provide visual inspection for damage
Design • A satellite that will fly escort to the space shuttle • Satellite provides visual inspection of shuttle exterior for 24 hour period of time • Satellite will be transported into space on shuttle • Satellite must meet University Nanosat requirements
Systems Integration & Management Rachel Winters, Matt Whitten • Expendable vs Recoverable spacecraft (90%) • Recovery method designed (80%) • Determine shuttle-interface requirements (100%)
Relative Orbit Control & Navigation Kyle Tholen, Matt Mueller • Determine relative orbit to meet mission requirements (90%) • Determine major disturbances from orbit and counteract them (100%) • Single vs Multiple spacecraft (90%)
Configuration & Structural Design Shelby Sullivan, Eric Weber • Find general hardware (cameras, thrusters, etc.) (100%) • Design structure (material, shape) (90%, pending necessary changes) • Solidwork components (60%)
Attitude Determination & Control Shunsuke Hirayama, Tsutomu Hasegawa • Determine method of attitude control (80%) • Single vs Multiple cameras (90%)
Power, Thermal & Communications Aziatun Burhan, Masao Shimada, Tomo Sugano • Determine power needed by satellite (70%) • Battery only vs Solar Cell + Battery (70%) • Define thermal environment (outside and inside sources) (80%) • Determine insulation needed (60%) • Determine transmission method (100%)
Trade Studies • Expendable vs Recoverable Satellite • method of picture storage • viable method of recovery • reasonable amounts of extra fuel needed • Single vs Multiple Satellite(s) • amount of extra fuel needed for plane transfers • ability to “see” entire shuttle with only 1 satellite
Solar cells + Battery vs Battery only • Amount of power solar cells can provide in 24 hr period • Amount of power needed by satellite components • Size of battery needed to compliment solar cells vs size of battery needed with no recharge • Single vs Multiple camera(s) • Ability to control attitude • Camera size
Other Design Aspects • Structure: Rectangular satellite with aluminum supports, center of mass designed to be at the center of the prism. • Navigation: Will be using DGPS for location and velocity information, magnometer and gyro for attitude determination. • Transmission: Decided to store images on memory stick instead of using live transfer.
Systems Integration and Management Rachel Winters Matt Whiten
SIM • Role: Work with all groups to balance workload. • Tasks: • Research lightband technology • Perform trade study on attitude sensors • Research ARVD • Research, calculate and design recovery method. Matthew Whitten
SIM • Attitude Sensors • Distance requires the camera to have the most accurate attitude control • Small satellite requires inexpensive and small equipment • Recovery Method • Robotic arm’s length must be able to reach the recovery orbit around the shuttle • Design and format end effect to capture satellite Matthew Whitten
Special Requirements • Transmission restrictions • NASA operates in the S-band of frequencies, from 1700 - 2300 MHz, the space shuttle is generally contacted at 2106.4 and 2041.9 MHz, and the Orbiter also uses the Ku-band, from 15250 - 17250 MHz. • Vibration requirements • Vibration tests with NASA are usually done from 20 - 2000 Hz.
Satellite-Shuttle Interactions • Capture feasibility case study • MIR Space capsule • SPARTON satellite • SFU Satellite • Automatic movement near to shuttle • Mini AERCam • STS-87
Orbital Navigation and Control Group Members: Kyle Tholen Orbit Determination Delta V Estimation GPS Navigation Matt Mueller Effects of Earth’s Oblatness Propulsion Methods Orbit Modeling in STK
Delta V estimation • Delta V for orbit transfers estimated with Clohessy Wiltshire equations:
GPS Navigation • GPS can be used to determine position in orbit • Two signals are transmitted from GPS satellites • Precise Position Service (PPS) • Very accurate • Currently restricted to military applications • Standard Position Service (SPS) • Available for anyone to use • Not as accurate as PPS
GPS Navigation Continued • Use Differential GPS (DGPS) for a much more accurate position • Need a known fixed reference position with GPS capabilities • Space Shuttle are GPS certified and position is known very accurately with ground tracking • DGPS can potentially be accurate to the centimeter.
Orbit Determination • Need two orbits to view shuttle from all angles • Orbits achieved through small changes in Inclination and Eccentricity
Causes secular drift in right ascension, argument of perigee and mean anomaly Effect Of Earth’s Oblatness
Earth’s Oblatness Continued • Effect on shuttle and satellite nearly the same over 24 hr period deg deg deg • These values will give the change in the relative distance to the shuttle, estimation of deltaV needed to correct orbit.
Propulsion Methods Requirements • Small amount of thrust • Capable of being used numerous times • Small size, light weight • Low price Possible candidates • Small mono-propellant hydrazine thrusters • Cold gas thrusters • Due to simplicity, ease of handling and price, cold gas thrusters were chosen as method of propulsion
Orbit Modeling in STK • Visualization of relative orbit proved difficult without simulation • Created scale simulation of shuttle orbit as well as satellite orbit • Useful to visualize relative orbit about shuttle and aid in initial selection of orbit parameters • Use of MATLAB distance function determined final orbit parameters • Simulation proved orbit provided 100% visible coverage of shuttle
Configuration & Structural Design Shelby Sullivan Eric Weber
Satellite Structure Cube (60x60x50 cm) Aluminum Low cost and availability Success on many other satellites Adequate properties for mission Configuration Keep the moments of inertia near center of cube Allow space for large camera to see through one face Allow for proper thermal control Structure and Configuration
Structure and Design Gyro Transceiver CPU Magnometer Thruster
Structure and Design • Future Work • Reconfigure satellite structure to better accomplish design goals • Model remaining hardware • Place selected hardware to accomplish design goals
Camera - MegaPlus II EP1600 16 Megapixel 4872 x 3248 Three sensor grades for “demanding applications” Selectable 8, 10, or 12 bits/pixel “Temperature Resistant” construction
Lens - Nikon Super Telephoto 1000mm • Angle of view – 2 x 1.4 degrees • Length – 24 cm • Mass – 2 kg • Fixed focal length • Little to no moving parts • Higher vibration resistance • Higher temperature resistance
Sample PicturesWith Pixels/Meter 2350 9500 600 ~ 360m from shuttle ~ 700m from shuttle 390 200
~360m From Shuttle • ~Cross-sectional are of shuttle • 400 m^2 • Field of View area • 105 m^2 • ~25% of shuttle captured per photo • Accuracy required for view of shuttle • X angle ~ 2.6° • Y angle ~ 0.86°
Attitude Determination & Control Shunsuke Hirayama Tsutomu Hasegawa
Moment of inertia of a*b*h cube sat. h b a Once we get angular acceleration, we can get the Moment. Where, is body frame mex = Jώ + ω x (Jω) basedmoment From Nihon Univ. Text book Tsutomu and Shunsuke
Attitude determination x y Front View Side View z
Aerodynamic torque for worst case S = 0.4243 m2 Altitude 326-346km
Gravity-Gradient Torque n3 = μ = 398600 km3/s2 R3 3263 km3
Solar Radiation Pressure Torque Our surface material is Aluminum 0.02 K 0.04 (surface reflectivity) Is = 1358 w/m2 at 1 AU
Choosing reaction wheel • Using Matlab we calculated required torque to change attitude with disturbances. The result is below: For Y axis Rise Time: 14.178531 Settling Time: 1.322471 Overshoot: 32.247096 % Max Torque: 0.024617 There is error so that we should work on matlab again. Max torque is 24.6mNm so that we use reaction wheel produced by Sunspace whose max torque is 50mNm.
Problem about simulation • Disturbance torque is: Required torques is: We should figure out what is wrong and fix it.
Requirement for reaction wheel The rotation speed of satellite should be: 360º/90min = 0.06667deg/s = 0.0698 rad/min - 1.163x10-3 rad/s It takes 90 min to go around the orbit. 360º/90min We use 0.1 rad/s as a rotation speed in matlab
Future work • calculate a disturbance from magnetic torque. • work on matlab with all disturbances.
Communications Tomo Sugano