200 likes | 303 Views
Presenter Disclosure Information. Echocardiographic Tissue Doppler Imaging Is a Powerful Independent Prognosticator of Overall Mortality in the General Population Results From the Fourth Copenhagen City Heart Study (2002-2007).
E N D
Presenter Disclosure Information Echocardiographic Tissue Doppler Imaging Is a Powerful Independent Prognosticator of Overall Mortality in the General Population Results From the Fourth Copenhagen City Heart Study (2002-2007) Disclosure information The following relationships exist related to this presentation: Rasmus Mogelvang – No disclosures Peter Sogaard – Consulting fees GE Healthcare Modest level Sune A. Pedersen – No disclosures Niels T. Olsen – No disclosures Peter Schnohr – No disclosures Jan S. Jensen – No disclosures Gentofte Hospital Copenhagen City Heart Study
Echocardiographic Tissue Doppler Imaging Is a Powerful Independent Prognosticator of Overall Mortality in the General Population Results From the Fourth Copenhagen City Heart Study (2002-2007) Survival Normal Rasmus MogelvangThe Copenhagen City Heart Study& Department of Cardiology,Gentofte University HospitalDenmark Abnormal Time Gentofte Hospital Copenhagen City Heart Study
The Failing Heart Heart Failure High morbidity and mortality Increasing incidence Gentofte Hospital Copenhagen City Heart Study 3
The Failing Heart High morbidity and mortality Heart Failure Increasing incidence Constant advances in treatment Echocardiography Early identification Conventional Tissue Doppler Imaging versus Gentofte Hospital Copenhagen City Heart Study 4
Methods 1,100 persons from the Copenhagen City Heart Study Conventional Echocardiography & Tissue Doppler Imaging Mean Follow-up: 5.1 years Copenhagen http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps Gentofte Hospital Copenhagen City Heart Study 5
Characteristics of the Study Population Survivors Non-survivors P-value (n=90) (n=946) Age - years 58 74 P<0.001 Male gender – % 41 44 P=0.58 Body Mass Index – kg/m2 25.6 25.7 P=0.91 Heart rate – beats per minute 69 71 P=0.10 Hypertension – % 42 72 P<0.001 Diabetes - % 7 13 P<0.04 Ischemic heart disease - % 8 21 P<0.001 Severe diastolic dysfunction – % 0.7 1.2 P=0.47 Left ventricular ejection fraction <50% - % 0.9 3.5 P<0.05 Left ventricular dilatation - % 5.7 5.5 P=1.00 Left ventricular hypertrophy - % 15 37 P<0.001 Gentofte Hospital Copenhagen City Heart Study 6
Tissue Doppler Imaging s’ Systole Diastole a’ e’ Gentofte Hospital Copenhagen City Heart Study 7
Tissue Doppler Imaging s’ s’ a’ e’ Systole Diastole Non-survivors Survivors a’ s’ – cm/s 6.1 5.3 e’ e’ – cm/s 7.2 5.4 a’ – cm/s 6.7 6.3 Gentofte Hospital Copenhagen City Heart Study 8
Kaplan-Meier Survival Plots s’ Survival - % 100 High values 95 Medium values 90 Low values 85 6 5 4 3 1 2 Follow-up in years a’ Survival - % 100 High values 95 Medium values 90 Low values 85 6 4 5 3 1 2 Gentofte Hospital Copenhagen City Heart Study 9
Kaplan-Meier Survival Plots Multivariate Analysis s’ Survival - % 100 High values 95 Medium values RR 1.25 per cm/s; P<0.04 90 Low values 85 6 5 4 3 1 2 Follow-up in years RR 3.0 8 cm/s vs. 3 cm/s a’ Survival - % 100 High values 95 Medium values RR 1.25 per cm/s; P<0.001 90 Low values 85 Gentofte Hospital Copenhagen City Heart Study 10
Kaplan-Meier Survival Plot for e’ e’ Survival - % 100 High values 95 values Medium 90 85 values Low 80 6 5 4 3 1 2 Follow-up in years Multivariate analysis Relative Risk 1.02 (0.90-1.16); P=0.77 Gentofte Hospital Copenhagen City Heart Study 11
s’, e’,and a’ according to increasing age a’ e’ s’ cm/s 10 8 6 4 2 Gentofte Hospital Copenhagen City Heart Study 12
s’, e’,and a’ according to increasing age a’ e’ s’ cm/s 10 8 6 4 2 Gentofte Hospital Copenhagen City Heart Study 13
s’, e’,and a’ according to increasing age a’ e’ s’ cm/s r=-0.8 10 r=0.3 r=-0.4 8 6 4 2 Gentofte Hospital Copenhagen City Heart Study 14
e’/a’ s’ Systole Diastole a’ e’/a’ e’ Gentofte Hospital Copenhagen City Heart Study 15
Interdependence of s’, e’,and a’ s’ Systole Diastole a’ e’/a’ e’ Gentofte Hospital Copenhagen City Heart Study 16
Interdependence of s’, e’,and a’ s’ e’/s’ Systole Diastole a’ e’/a’ e’ Gentofte Hospital Copenhagen City Heart Study 17
eas-index Interdependence of s’, e’,and a’ s’ (e’/a’)/s’ e’/s’ a’ e’/a’ e’ Gentofte Hospital Copenhagen City Heart Study 18
Kaplan-Meier Survival Plot for the eas-index Survival - % 100 95 1. tertile 2. tertile 90 3. tertile 85 6 5 4 3 1 2 Follow-up in years Multivariate analysis 3.tertile vs. 1.tertile Relative Risk 2.6 (1.4-4.7); P<0.003 Adjusted for age and sex Gentofte Hospital Copenhagen City Heart Study 19
Conclusions Tissue Doppler imaging is a powerful prognosticator, even in the presence of a normal conventional echocardiographic examination 1 Low values of s’ and a’ were significant predictors of death 2 Combining the information of systolic and diastolic performance strengthens the prognostic value of tissue Doppler imaging 3 Tissue Doppler imaging is a powerful prognosticator - even in the presence of a normal conventional echocardiographic examination Low values of s’ and a’ were significant predictors of death in the general population 1 2 Survival Combining the information of systolic and diastolic performance strengthens the prognostic value of tissue Doppler imaging TDI Normal 3 TDI Abnormal Time Gentofte Hospital Copenhagen City Heart Study