1 / 19

what Role For “Community” ACTION In Combating Poverty And Social ExclusioN ?

what Role For “Community” ACTION In Combating Poverty And Social ExclusioN ? . Presentation to the conference: Big society: snapshots from the frontline Friday 28 th October, 2011, Manchester Katherine Duffy. Structure of presentation.

merlin
Download Presentation

what Role For “Community” ACTION In Combating Poverty And Social ExclusioN ?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. what Role For “Community” ACTION In Combating PovertyAnd Social ExclusioN? Presentation to the conference: Big society: snapshots from the frontline Friday 28th October, 2011, Manchester Katherine Duffy

  2. Structure of presentation • Lessons from 90s about strengths and limitations of combating poverty and social exclusion (PSE) at the local level • Current UK policy landscape and PSE • Social impact of the financial crisis • Alternative...?

  3. 20 UK Parliamentary constituencies with the highest child poverty (CP) and highest unemployment (U)* • ManchesterCP%Rank U%* Rank • Central 52 3 12.0 20 • Blackley 43 15 11.2 31 • Gorton 43 16 10.2 52 • Sources: www.endchildpoverty.org.uk poverty in your area March 2011; Commons Library research report: unemployment by constituency Sept 2011 • *JSA figs, September 2011

  4. Blackburn: the Roman Road Estate in the early 1990s (Very high unemployment and reliance on welfare benefits, low skills, labour market isolation; younger and different demographics; high housing turnover and voids, rent debt, closed down shops, services, school....) Some social survey results:- • What’s the best thing about Roman Road? • Friends • The road out of it • What’s the worst thing about Roman Road? • The people • The road into it • Source Duffy 1992 in Campbell and Duffy

  5. Challenges in combating local area based poverty and social exclusion (PSE) • Poor spaces – desertification • Absence of “organic” or “mechanical” communities in the classical sense • Therefore: limitations for combating PSE of local social capital promotion and local human capital investment • Role of state: universality, equity (social rights), democratic accountability; but also lack of local flex; bureaucracy;

  6. EU “Poverty 3” (1990-94) positive local action: revalue & redistribute Positive role for VCS/E: partnership, participation and multidimensional approach:- VCSE community reach/flex • Increasing circulating income from state (e.g. take up of free school meals, welfare rights/ advice) • Revalorisation of local resources & local demand and supply (human capital; third labour market, self employment, low income trading; community assets, green jobs and spaces ...) • Partnership/ community bargaining and “policy bending” “soft” resources (urban, ESF etc.) & mainstream spending Process does matter: participation/democratic governance • Private sector? Regional investment?; Aggregate demand? Universality and equity?

  7. UK policy landscape & PSE: from solidarity to exchange (source Duffy and Kiernan July 2011) “Open public services” (services for the public) • Ideal of “people power” • Driven by fast pace cuts and “any qualified provider” competition • Autonomous service units in fragmented service landscape (but integrated/holistic approach better for disadvantaged) • Preference for income generation (implies user charges) • Commissioning risks – individual, neighbourhood... • Government accountability: for cost effectiveness (not universality, equity); quality for whom? provider accountability? Investment, outcomes, PBR; care, trust, giving?

  8. Big Society and Localism Poverty is not about money; inequality is incentive to change Poverty redefined as 120,000 troubled “workless” families; Child poverty commitment redefined as early years intervention • Front-loaded LA cuts 27% over 4 years; service closure, chaos • Housing benefit caps and lack of housing; closure of homeless services • Competition – from profit seekers to school gate mums and dads? • Is volunteering free? service consistency, continuity, skills, management costs • Community right to buy and community right to challenge – asset transfer to whom? Special interests; asset-grab? • Poor areas – which communities, what assets?

  9. The Work Programme – the government’s national anti-poverty programme • Aim is not to cut poverty but to cut welfare • Low pay and insecure work increasing – poverty in old age too • Harsh conditionality and poor evidence on employment; effects on human rights and mental health • Mandatory “volunteering”? • Poor areas isolated from jobs • Creaming & gaming: what happens to the most disadvantaged and those who don’t get jobs? • Prime contractors: accountability limited by confidentiality • Targets very difficult/ impossible (London Observatory) • Sub-contractors not guaranteed price or work flow • PBR difficult for small VCS • What is happening to needs-based approach of VCS? • Contractors as “poverty pimps” and risk to VCSE reputation, reach, survival

  10. Making work pay: Universal Credit • Universal Credit real time payment √ – but with BACS ? ICT already got problems • Family tensions over who is payee • Privacy and data sharing • If payment system goes wrong – no money in house at all • Still several work/ budget “spikes” and 80% withdrawal rate for some clients • “Mini” jobs problem for parents & disabled people • UC is not about level of benefits/ credits: many cut – but there are no rich children in poor families

  11. Human Dignity and Social Exclusion (central and eastern Europe) 1994-7 Impact of turbulence and system change to neoliberalism in many “transition” countries – increased risks of inequality, poverty and social exclusion • Adequacy: local patchwork; caps; gaps, standards... • Affordability: user charges, unemployment • Accessibility: rural location; discrimination, exclusion of “undeserving” poor • Accountability: de-statisation, privatisation

  12. EAPN messages on the causes and path of the financial crisis (Brussels 23 September 2011) • Cause: long-term shift in income from wages to profits • It’s not a “Greek” crisis; it’s a global crisis of distribution • Before crisis - deepening poverty from commodity price inflation (food, fuel) • “Austerity” is a cause of crisis and a pro-crisis response • The crisis has provided cover for “shrink the state” strategy • Crisis - working poor initially less protected than those on benefits • The poor willsuffer longer from “austerity” policy • Political capital reduced; solidarity weak; hunt for the “guilties” risks dangerous populism

  13. What has happened to poverty trends in Europe in the last 10 years? • The “boom” years up to 2007: relative poverty did not fall in most countries; it rose in some (rising inequality) • The financial crisis: poverty on a fixed standard rose in the recession 2007-9, before the implementation of “austerity” programmes

  14. EAPN assessment of the social impact of the crisis in Europe • Serious social strain (increasing mental ill-health, domestic violence, blaming the victims, rise in crime) • Social protection and social services targeted for cuts • Big cuts to NGOs and community groups: smaller NGOs and advocacy worst affected • “Austerity” strategy spreading by 2010 (despite some states out of recession) • Social costs not counted, not costed • Countries with best social protection systems recovered best from recession (EU Social Protection Committee evidence) • Breakdown of social contract/ loss of faith in government in worst affected “periphery” countries

  15. Anything positive come out of the crisis? • Many people are more aware of the economic system they live under and that there is a systemic crisis • Corruption is more visible • Beginning to realise austerity is a race to the bottom – every country loses; in a race to the top – every country gains • People are discussing alternatives and how to achieve them... revalue, redistribute ... and reboot

  16. From here ...The Trafford Centre, Manchester, England 177,000 m2 of retail space....to where?

  17. Getting out of the crisis: from pro-growth to pro-development • More, better, useful clean green and white jobs • Share our wealth widely • Distribute our national wealth fairly • Get our resources fairly • Regenerate politics from the base • Social investment pact; green development • O.7% GNP to Millennium Development Goals; ILO “social floors” • Minimum wage 60% of average wage; minimum social standards and incomes above relevant poverty threshold; maximum wage? • Global tax justice and better regulation of trans-national corporations • World social forum; ATTAC, Occupy; • Annabel Kiernan

  18. Choose lifeThank you, Katherine Duffy; k.b.duffy@talktalk.net

More Related