1 / 39

Constitutional Law

Constitutional Law. Political Question Definition Nixon v. United States Nixon? Chief Judge, US District Ct, Miss Received a gratuity – ask a DA to halt the prosecution of a businessman ’ s son Jury: false statements; sentenced to prison House: impeachment; Senate. Issue:

merton
Download Presentation

Constitutional Law

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Constitutional Law

  2. Political Question • Definition • Nixon v. United States • Nixon? • Chief Judge, US District Ct, Miss • Received a gratuity – ask a DA to halt the prosecution of a businessman’s son • Jury: false statements; sentenced to prison • House: impeachment; Senate

  3. Issue: • Senate (Impeachment Rule XI) – Committee to “receive evidence and take testimony” • Art. I:3:6: The Senate shall have the sole power to try all impeachments. • District Ct/Ct of Appeals: nonjusticiable

  4. Nonjusticiable (political question) • Textually – constitutional commitment of the issue to a coordinate political department • Lack of justiciable discoverable and manageable standard • “Try”– no justiciable manageable standard (p. 27) • “Sole”– Ct cannot review

  5. Argue: Senate will usurp judicial power • Two safeguards • Impeachment: two legislative bodies • Senate: 2/3

  6. 1788 US Constitution (p. 26) • Articles I – VII • Amendments I – XXVII • Bill of Rights I - X

  7. Legislative Power • Legislative Power • House of Representative, 435 • Senate, 100: 2/state • Sources (p. 33)

  8. McCulloch v. Maryland • Federal – Bank • Maryland – Tax • McCulloch, refused to pay tax • Argue (p. 34) • S Ct: • Art. I:8:8: To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper必要且合理 for carrying into execution the foregoing power … • Art. VI: This Constitution ... shall be the supreme law of the land ... 憲法至高性

  9. Commerce Power 商務權 (interstate commerce) • Gibbons v. Ogden (p. 35) • Ogden (NY/NJ – New York Law) • Gibbons (Act of Congress) • Ct: ruled for Gibbons • Ogden - injunction

  10. NLRB v. Jones and Laughlin Co. • National Labor Relations Act of 1935 (p. 36, ft 21) • Affectation doctrine 影響理論 • Wickard v. Filburn (p .37) • Perez v. U.S. (p. 37)

  11. Racial Discrimination • Katzenbach v. McClung (p. 38) • Civil Right Act; restaurant • Limitation • U.S. v. Lopez (p. 39) • Gun-Free School Zone • True nexus

  12. Taxing Power • Limit • Amendment X: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people. • Bailey v. Drexel Furniture Co. (p. 41) • Social welfare • United States v. Constantine • Police Power

  13. Spending Power 預算支出權 • Oklahoma v. Civil Service Commission • Hatch Political Activity Act (p. 44, fn 38) • South Dakota v. Dole • Alcohol

  14. War and Defense Power • Martial Law/Courts-Martial • Different from Art III court (p. 46) • 台灣省戒嚴令 1949/5 - 解嚴 1987/7 (38年又56天) • Exceptions (p. 47)

  15. Samuel Chase (p. 50) Andrew Johnson Bill Clinton NOT includes Richard Nixon Resigned Impeachment

  16. Grade 6: 2 5: 5 4: 9 3: 20 2: 7 1: 2 Degrees J.D. – Taiwan does not have the program LL.B. – Not L.B. LL.M. – Not L.M. Experience Law Firm – Name Do not use “I” Company Position (Legal Intern) Worked on… Past Tense – NOT “works on, becomes” Resume – Comments

  17. Do not list “preparation for the bar exam”– NOT work experience Visited NY No need to list “ROC”– if the resume is used outside Taiwan Years Recent – past E.g. 2012, 2011 Lawyer,Lee & Li A space after “,”; # Format is IMPORTANT Different fonts

  18. Executive Power • Who can be the president? • Qualification (p. 51) • Arnold? • Electoral System 選舉人制度 • Indirect election • 538 electors (since 1964) Electoral College 選舉人團 • 48 states –winner-takes-all rule • California (55), Texas (34), New York (31), Florida (27), Illinois (21) and Pennsylvania (21). • Undemocratic/Swing state • Federalism/protection of small states • 2008 Election • Obama 28 states + DC - 365 • McClain 22 states - 173

  19. Term (p. 53) • Reasons for removal • Death • Resignation • impeachment

  20. Veto Power 否決權(p. 56) • Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer • Pardon Power 赦免權(p. 57) • Murphy v. Ford

  21. Commander-in-Chief/International Affairs (p. 58) • War Power Resolution (WPR) • United States v. Courtiss-Wright Export Corp. • Congress- joint resolution: authorizes the president to prohibit the sales of arms to Bolivia and Paraguay • Reestablishment of peace • President: embargo

  22. President • Sole organ of the nations – external relations • Sole representative with foreign nations • Congressional Legislation • Accord to the President • Degree of discretion • Freedom from statutory restriction • President • Better opportunity of knowing the conditions • Confidential sources • Ct: Reversed

  23. Campell v. Clinton • President violated WPR/War Powers Clause • NATO – Yugoslavia • Ct: Lack of Standing 無當事人資格

  24. Privileges and Immunities (p. 60) • United States v. Nixon • Deep throat • Mark Felt (associate director of FBI) • Washington Post

  25. Judicial Power • Structure (p. 62) • Supreme Court • 9 justices • Court of Appeals • 13 Circuit • District Court • Article III judges/courts • A writ of certiorari申請上訴狀

  26. Bill of Rights 人權法案 • 1789: Amendments I-X (p. 67) • First Amendment • Jury (p. 68) • Civil • Criminal • 國旗敬禮

  27. Religious Class/School (p. 70) • Freedom of Speech • 焚燒國旗 (p. 73) • New York Times v. Sulivan • Public officials • Martin Luther King 金恩 • NY Times – Advertisement • Sulivan – police commissioner 局長 (Montgomery, Alabama) • Lower Court/Jury – 500,000

  28. breathing space • Actual malice 真實惡意 • Knowledge – false • Reckless disregard – false • Supreme Ct: Reversed • 刑法第310條規定，意圖散布於眾，而指摘或傳述足以毀損他人名譽之事者，為誹謗罪 • 同法第311條第3款規定，以善意發表言論，對於可受公評之事，而為適當之評論者，不罰。 • 2009 板橋地方法院 余天案

  29. Commercial Speech • 藥劑師 • 律師 • Advertisement • In person

  30. Phillip C. Jessup International Law Moot Court Competition National Round Int’l Round - DC ELSA WTO Moot Court Competition Regional Round Int’l Round – Geneva, Taipei International Law Competition

  31. 刑事被告 • Warrant (p. 79) • Miranda v. Arizona • Miranda Warning

  32. Equal Protection 平等保護原則 • Scott v. Sanford (p. 82) • Dred Scott • Missouri Compromise • Amendment XIV (p. 83) • Plessy v. Ferguson (p. 85) • Separate but Equal • Brown v. Board of Education (p. 86) • Korematsu v. United States (p. 87)

  33. Equal Protection – Scrutiny • Strict Scrutiny • Compelling + necessary • Middle-Tier Scrutiny • Important + substantially related to • Rational Basis Scrutiny • Legitimate + rationally related to • Examples • Taiwan immigrants/US citizens – extra 2% tax • Chinese students – employment, extra investigation • Women can’t vote

  34. Affirmative Action • Regents of the Univ. of CA v. Bakke (p. 91) • Quota; “narrowly tailored” • Gratz v. Bollinger (undergraduate) • 20 points • Grutter v. Bollinger (law school) • Favors minority

  35. Abortion (right of privacy) • Roe v. Wade • First trimester • Second trimester • Third trimester

  36. Civil Procedure • Subject Matter Jurisdiction (p. 262) • Federal law + 75,000 • Personal Jurisdiction • Int’l Shoe Co. v. Washington • Minimum contacts – long-arm statute • Venue

  37. Complaint • Summons – served! • Injunction • Discovery • Deposition – witnesses • Interrogatory - parties

  38. Jury (jurors) – Amendment VI • Challenge for cause • E.g. race • E.g. victim • Peremptory challenge

  39. Default judgment • Summary judgment • After jury • JNOV • Final judgment • Claim preclusion – res judicata • Issue preclusion – collateral estoppel

More Related