1 / 14

Riverland Community Services

Riverland Community Services. Managing Risk - Surviving Extinction. Situation – Jan 2010. Small somewhat isolated Centre 280km from Metropolitan Adelaide Four funded programs NAHA (SAAP) (2.3FTE) ER (Emergency Relief – No funds for staffing) Salvation Army Mission Funding (1.1FTE)

mervyn
Download Presentation

Riverland Community Services

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Riverland Community Services Managing Risk - Surviving Extinction

  2. Situation – Jan 2010 • Small somewhat isolated Centre • 280km from Metropolitan Adelaide • Four funded programs • NAHA (SAAP) (2.3FTE) • ER (Emergency Relief – No funds for staffing) • Salvation Army Mission Funding (1.1FTE) • Financial Counselling (0.6FTE • Homelessness - 60% of total staffing • Financial Counselling (Funding till June 2011)

  3. State Government Environment • Commitment to “reforming” the whole homelessness system (Increased Federal funding) • Intention to reduce the number of homelessness service providers in the region • 6 NGO’s providing homelessness support services across the Riverland region • The “talk” was that they would like to see 2 providers (Generic + Domestic Violence)

  4. Risk Assessment – Early 2010 • Current local service delivery was small & vulnerable in a reform process that includes tendering • Several other current providers in the region had a more extensive suite of services and larger staff pool • Loss of the homelessness funding may jeopardise the capacity to sustain any Salvation Army service capacity

  5. Strategy • To “partner” with another provider who had a larger service profile, but would see benefits in joining with us • Established working relationship with AcCare • When approached they expressed their own concern about succeeding in the tender process

  6. Steps forward • Identified benefits for each organisation in a “partnership” (more than just winning the tender) • Both identified an increased probability of success if AcCare was the lead agency in any tender process • Both agencies committed to the relationship being one of “equals” • Confirmed through an MOU, ratified by DHQ

  7. MOU • Built on mutual trust and equality in decision making • Allocated key responsibilities • AcCare – Financial Accountability • Salvation Army – Data reporting • Service delivery governed by development of a “Service Plan” approved by both agencies

  8. MOU • Clear structure for management and implementation of the “Service Plan” • A defined meeting and reporting structure with meetings minuted • Defined process for resolution of conflict or disagreement

  9. Joint tender submission • Invested time getting agreement on a model • AcCare’s overseas experience influenced model development • Used Salvation Army tender writing expertise to shape the tender content and format

  10. Celebration

  11. Consequences • Post tender feedback – best submission • Resources available to Salvation Army for homelessness support almost doubled • Implementation of the new service model shared by the two organisations • Solving implementation issues draws on the wisdom of both parties • The strengths of each organisation are becoming clearer and shaping implementation

  12. Partnership Principles • Importance of networking and joint working with other agencies • Healthy confidence in our strengths • Realistic appreciation of risks we face • Openness to “partnerships” where we are not the “lead” agency • Capacity to negotiate a partnership that is based on equity and respect

  13. The way forward • Commitment to co-location • Maintain individual agency branding • Present a unified program presence to the community • Enhance each agencies service delivery by the cross pollination of ideas • Maintain effective communication as the foundation of the partnership • Celebrate milestones together

  14. Thank you for your attention

More Related