60 likes | 181 Views
TEAM BOAR. Phillip Byers Jonathan Mulvaine Josh Schortgen Michael Broski. PSSC’s. An ability measure internal temperature of two separate points in the meat and the temperature inside the roaster using RTD sensors.
E N D
TEAM BOAR Phillip Byers Jonathan Mulvaine Josh Schortgen Michael Broski
PSSC’s • An ability measure internal temperature of two separate points in the meat and the temperature inside the roaster using RTD sensors. • An ability to control the temperature inside the cooker by modifying gas flow using a clock signal to operate a stepper motor controlled needle valve. • An ability store and load cooking profiles from memory. • An ability to automatically ignite and detect whether a flame is present. • An ability to wirelessly communicate temperature information to a remote display device.
Patent Liability and AnalysisCompeting Products • LG Thing Automated Oven - http://engt.co/fvjvKF • Automated appliances that allow for remote communication. • Support both WiFi and ZigBee for wireless communication both at and away from home. • The Chef Stir Pan - http://bit.ly/GRIfbe • Programmable cooker that allows for “set and forget” cooking. • Allows for automated control of temperature given a target temperature. • Induction Cooker - http://bit.ly/HhagJd • Automated cooking based on induction heating. • Provides rapid electronic heating with user controllable temperatures and cooking profiles.
Our Viewpoint • Our product is somewhat unique in its design. While LG has created a very similar product, they are still in the production phase and are not available for retail as of today. • There are many examples of automated cookers out there, however there are few that allow control and monitoring via a remote user interface. • Countless patents exist for automated cooking and control of temperature. • US4289064 (automated sandwich cooker), US6112645 (automated cooking machine), US4195558 (fuel control), US3635018 (flame detection)
Our Goals • Create a usable and reliable product that is also cheap and affordable to everyone. • Eliminate things that aren’t extremely pertinent to our design (such as monitoring away from home) • Use readily available parts, and keep the design to a minimum to reduce the cost. • Work as a completely standalone solution not requiring the use of other devices to interface with (OOBE). • Eliminating control via a smartphone device so that the user isn’t required to have a phone to control the cooker. • Don’t require the remote to be able to control and interface with the cooker. • Make the use of the remote completely a convenience factor and not a necessity for operation. • Be as energy and fuel efficient as possible. • Program the remote to be an “intermittent responder” so battery consumption only spikes once every so often, allowing for a 90% “off” state if using a 10 second interval to check for data.