Introduction to the INTOSAI-Donor Cooperation

1. Introduction to theINTOSAI-Donor Cooperation Presented by: Place and Date:

2. Presentation outline • Importance of SAIs and the INTOSAI-Donor Cooperation • Governance structure • Results 2010-16 • Evaluation • Strategic direction 2016-2018 • Contact Information

3. 1. ImportanceofSAIs

4. What is the INTOSAI-Donor Cooperation? The Cooperation is a strategic partnership between the International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions (INTOSAI) and the Donor community. The Cooperation’s Program Objective is: Optimize the joint efforts of INTOSAI and Donor partners in enhancing the capacity of SAIs in developing countries INTOSAI AfricanDevelopment Bank Asian Development Bank AustraliaAustriaBelgium Canada European Commission France GAVI Alliance Global Fund IADB IFAD IMF Ireland Islamic Development Bank NetherlandsNorway OECD SwedenSwitzerland UK USAID World Bank

5. IDC Value Proposition • Strategic Partnership • Common goals • Global Forum • Influence Behaviour Working together to strengthen SAIs in developing Countries

6. 2. Governance structure of the Cooperation Decision making organ, consisting of the donor signatories to the MoU, SAIs nominated to represent the regional committees and INTOSAI bodies. The Committee meets about once a year. Provides strategic direction and interim decision making between SC meetings. Composed of two Co-Chairs, one representing INTOSAI and one representing the donors, and two vice-Chairs, one representing INTOSAI, and one representing the donors. Co-Chairs: SAI Saudi Arabia, World Bank Vice-Chairs: SAI USA, Department of International Development UK Supports the implementation of the MoU Hosted by IDI, in Oslo, Norway. Main financing sources: Irish Aid, SECO Switzerland and the Austrian Development Agency

7. 3. Results 2010-16

8. Results 2010-16

9. SAI PMF: Purpose and Practical Use

10. SAI PMF Assessments as at September 2016 Latvia Norway Netherlands Ireland Lithuania Czech Rep Armenia Cyprus Slovak Republic Dominican Republic Palestine Mexico Afghanistan Cuba Saudi Arabia Jamaica PuertoRico Guatemala Nepal Bangladesh Barbados Guam Honduras El Salvador Djibouti Trinidad and Tobago Vietnam Bhutan PASAI Co-ordinated Assessments Nicaragua Tuvalu SierraLeone(repeatassessment) Panama Papua New Guinea Colombia Somalia Samoa Costa Rica Burkina Faso Uganda Ecuador Solomon Islands Suriname Peru Tonga Guyana Cook Islands Mozambique Zambia Brazil (repeatassessment) Paraguay Swaziland Chile NewZealand Argentina Italics: based on earlierversions of SAI PMF Normal: based on SAI PMF Pilot Version Underlined: based on later versions of SAI PMF (v. 3.1, 3.2 and Endorsement Version) Final report Draft report Assessmentdecided by head of SAI

11. 4. Independent Evaluation • Relevance • Governance arrangements • Behaviour change – Donors and INTOSAI • Effectivenessand efficiency CONCLUSION: “Given the continued relevance of the MoU and evidence on positive changes that have the potential to contribute to improved performance of SAIs, the evaluation recommends that the Cooperation will be continued” • Evidenceof positive changes in behaviour • Too early for firm conclusions regarding overall effectiveness and efficiency • Cooperation remains relevant • Overall governancearrangement remainsappropriate • Reflection on the current governance arrangements and the responsibilities of key bodies • Increase the visibility of the Cooperation • Better alignment between the MoU and program document • Better prioritization of activities • Valuable input to furtherdevelopthe Cooperation • Confirmed the importance of the three key activities: the SAI PMF, the Global Call for Proposals, and the SAI Capacity Development Database • Formation of 6 working groups to develop the strategic direction • Resultsframework • Communications • Program document • Global Call for proposals • SAI Capacity Development Database • SAI-PMF

12. 4. Strategic Direction 2016-2018 • Global Call for Proposals • Project proposals based on MoU principles • Tier 1: Inclusive rolling process • Tier 2: Targeted to most challenged SAIs • Communications Strategy • Raise awareness • Influence behaviour change • Share results and successes • Results Measurement • IDC Performance Indicators • Measure progress towards MoU • Support monitoring, reporting and evaluation • MoU Principles • Scaled-up Support • Country-led Strategies • Co-ordination • Harmonisation • IDC Portal • Shared information on SAI proposals and funded projects • SAI performance data: global/regional/country-level • Success stories capturing benefits of MoU principles • Website for the IDC Supported by work on SAI PMF, Global Survey, relevant research and training

13. Global Call for Proposals

14. INTOSAI-Donor Cooperation Portal SAI Country Sites SAI Capacity Development Database IDC Work Streams Our partners Scaled-up support for SAIs – Country-led strategies – Harmonisation – Coordination

15. CommunicationsStrategy Successful SAI capacitydevelopmentinitiatives INTOSAI & Donor Communities Showcase country-levelsuccessstories Link to MoUPrinciples: WhyDid It Work?

16. INTOSAI-Donor Cooperation Results Framework GLOBAL OBJECTIVE OUTPUTS INTERMEDIATE OBJECTIVES 2 TRACKING INDICATORS – Global Environment 7 INDICATORS – Outputs directly under control of the Cooperation 2 INDICATORS – Number, spread and effectiveness of capacity development projects COOPERATION OBJECTIVES EXPECTED RESULTS 4 INDICATORS – SAI Performance 5 INDICATORS – Expected results from Cooperation’s Efforts Cooperation InfluencesResults Results due to SAIs, and ALL forms of support Results ATTRIBUTABLE to Cooperation Resultsbeyonddirectcontrol of SAI

17. 6. INTOSAI-Donor CooperationContacts INTOSAI-Donor Cooperation Secretariat E-mail: INTOSAI.Donor.Secretariat@idi.no INTOSAI Development Initiative  Stenersgata 2  N-0184 Oslo  Norway Web: http://www.idi.no/en/intosai-donor-cooperation E-mail: idi@idi.no SAI Capacity Development Database: www.SAIdevelopment.org Working Together To Strengthen SAIs in Developing Countries