430 likes | 443 Views
LHC machine status report. Roderik Bruce Beams Department, Accelerator and Beam Physics Group On behalf of the LHC team LHCC 12/09/2018
E N D
LHC machine status report Roderik Bruce Beams Department, Accelerator and Beam Physics Group On behalf of the LHC team LHCC 12/09/2018 Thanks for input and material: E. Bravin, S. Claudet, M. Giovannozzi, G. Iadarola, J. Jowett, A. Lechner, E. Metral, D. Nisbet, S. Redaelli, C. Schwick, J. Uythoven, J. Wenninger
Contents • Status and reminder from last LHCC • Operational achievements • Availability, faults and limitations • Status of luminosity production • Outlook on the rest of the year R. Bruce, LHCC 2018.09.12
2018 LHC timeline Previous LHCC Time period covered by R. Steerenberg at previous LHCC TS1 MD1 β*=90 m VdM TS2 13 TeVpp physics MD2 MD3 Today R. Bruce, LHCC 2018.09.12
Status at previous LHCC • Very efficient commissioning • reached full number of bunches ahead of schedule • Very good start of production • promising slope of integrated luminosity • Important last year before LS2 • Official goal of 60 fb-1 over the year in ATLAS/CMS, 2 fb-1 for LHCb • Some beam dumps due to 16L2 events R. Bruce, LHCC 2018.09.12
What has happened since May? • In general, good production achieved • Established very good peak performance • Excellent production achieved in certain periods • Production is on track for the yearly goal • Time lost due to faults - sometimes a rocky ride • A few faults caused several days downtime • Minor faults causing unforeseen dumps, making luminosity production less efficient R. Bruce, LHCC 2018.09.12
Contents • Status and reminder from last LHCC • Operational achievements • Availability, faults and limitations • Status of luminosity production • Outlook on the rest of the year R. Bruce, LHCC 2018.09.12
Beam parameters achieved • Established very good performance. Typical values: R. Bruce, LHCC 2018.09.12
Optimized running scenario • Changing both crossing angle and β* through leveling while in stable beams • Scenario optimized under a number of constraints Start of fill Later in fill – lower intensity R. Bruce, LHCC 2018.09.12
Fill 7127, September 5 Typical recent fill • Peak lumi: ~2×1034 cm-2s-1 • Twice LHC design luminosity! • Continuous crossing anti-leveling • β*-leveling in two steps towards end of fill • End point: 25 cm • Lowest β* ever in the LHC for physics! • If not dumped prematurely, ~0.5 fb-1produced per fill ATLAS/CMS time (h) time (h) time (h) R. Bruce, LHCC 2018.09.12
Very good production in some periods • Example: Reached almost 1 fb-1 in 24 h R. Bruce, LHCC 2018.09.12
Peak luminosity per fill • Peak performance regularly achieved in most fills • Reached record-high peak luminosity in stable beams: 2.1×1034 cm-2 s-1 • 2017: 8b4e scheme used; higher lumi reached before stable beams but leveling applied to limit pileup Data from: http://lpc.web.cern.ch R. Bruce, LHCC 2018.09.12
Integrated luminosity per fill • Fills not dumped prematurely produce regularly around 0.5 fb-1in ATLAS/CMS • CMS recorded 0.79 fb-1 in one fill • Barely breaks the 2017 record of 0.77fb-1 • … while ATLAS was leveled for low-pileup run R. Bruce, LHCC 2018.09.12
Fill 7127, September 5 Typical recent fill • LHCb: • separation leveling around 4.4×1032cm-2s-1 • typical production around 20 pb-1 in a fill not dumped prematurely • ALICE • separation leveling around 3.5×1030cm-2s-1 • typical production around 150 nb-1in a fill not dumped prematurely LHCb ALICE R. Bruce, LHCC 2018.09.12
Van der Meer scans and β*=90 m run • Very intense period – achieved complex commissioning of two configurations interleaved with standard intensity rampup • Data collected at β*=90 m: 4.7 pb-1 for ATLAS, 6.1 pb-1for CMS • Expected that CMS got more due to asymmetric optics: β*=90 m in IR1 and βx*=90 m and βy*=45 m in IR5 90m VdM Inj Low-β R. Bruce, LHCC 2018.09.12
Contents • Status and reminder from last LHCC • Operational achievements • Availability, faults and limitations • Status of luminosity production • Outlook on the rest of the year R. Bruce, LHCC 2018.09.12
Overview of pp run since May • Most of the time, high-intensity fills stacked next to each other • A few longer faults MD1 + TS1 MD2 90m + vdM Rocky recovery after TS1 due to several independent issues SPS magnetreplacement PS RF issue after18 kV transformer R. Bruce, LHCC 2018.09.12
Faults with longest duration • PS RF issue following 18 kV transformer failure • Several knock-on effects of transformer failure: Trip of transmission lines and injectors, PSB main power supply failed, RF problem in the PS (longest recovery) • No beam for 1.5 days, then only single bunches and later 12b trains possible • SPS dipole replacement • Magnet damaged by beam,causing vacuum leak • Replacement only possible after radiation cooldown R. Bruce, LHCC 2018.09.12
Cryogenics issues • 2 compressors failed (IR6 end of June, and IR8 end of July) • Special configurations with coupling of 2 compressor stations applied, with reduced cooling capacity • Large amounts of liquid nitrogen needed: 12 t/day (IR6) and 20 t/day (IR8) – 2 trucks per day • Clogging of water cooler in IR2 and IR8 • increased He temperature injected to the refrigerator degraded refrigeration capacity • Due to beam-induced heat load, bunch charge kept around 1.1E11 p/bunch • Plan: Interventions in TS2 • Replacement of compressors in IR6 and IR8 • Chemical cleaning of IR2 cooler • Cryogenics should go back to nominal configuration limitation removed R. Bruce, LHCC 2018.09.12
Examples of other faults • Various trips of LHC power converters • Trip of ALICE dipole • Quenches • Quenches triplet magnets • UFO in 21R3 quenched 8 magnets • Sparks at dilution kickers • Injection kickers • Issues in injectors affecting the LHC • LINAC2 bunchercavity • Electrical glitch issue with PSB synchronization R. Bruce, LHCC 2018.09.12
Beam dumps in stable beams • About half of the fills dumped by operators • Other half dumped prematurely by faults • Reducing this would increase slope of luminosity production Data from: http://lpc.web.cern.ch R. Bruce, LHCC 2018.09.12
Status of 16L2, a.k.a. the Gruffalo • Very fast losses starting in cell 16L2 believed to be caused by beam interacting with macro-particles of frozen air • 4 dumps due to 16L2 since end of May, 3 in stable beams • Long time now since last event MD1 + TS1 MD2 90m + vdM R. Bruce, LHCC 2018.09.12
Status of 16L2 (2) • Empirical recovery procedure seems to work well: one fill at 987 bunches for a few hours • 16L2 not a bottleneck for smooth operation with recent beams • Hard limit on beam conditions has not been probed in detail Recoveryfill Normal physics fill R. Bruce, LHCC 2018.09.12
Time period before MD2: 22/6 – 22/7 LHC Availability • In period between TS1 and MD2, spent 45% in stable beams • In period after MD2 until now: Spent more than 50% in stable beams • Good result, although still room for improvement 44.9% Stable Beams 22% Operation (other) 52.8% Stable Beams 21.9% in fault 2.3% Precycle Time period after MD2: 30/7 – 7/9 Data from: https://aft.cern.ch/dashboard R. Bruce, LHCC 2018.09.12
Contents • Status and reminder from last LHCC • Operational achievements • Availability, faults and limitations • Status of luminosity production • Outlook on the rest of the year R. Bruce, LHCC 2018.09.12
Status of luminosity production • Surpassed 50 fb-1 in ATLAS/CMS • On average 3.5-4 fb-1 produced per week Data from: http://lpc.web.cern.ch R. Bruce, LHCC 2018.09.12
Comparison with predictions (ATLAS/CMS) • On a good track for reaching 60 fb-1 target in ATLAS/CMS! Data from https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/viewauth/LhcMachine/LhcCoordinationMain R. Bruce, LHCC 2018.09.12
Comparison with prediction (LHCb) • LHCb has reached the official 2018 goal of 2 fb-1 ! (although they hope for more…) Data from https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/viewauth/LhcMachine/LhcCoordinationMain R. Bruce, LHCC 2018.09.12
ATLAS/CMS production over the years • 2018 production has just surpassed the production for whole 2017, and there’s still some time to go • In spite of some bumps in the road, 2018 is already another record year Data from https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/viewauth/LhcMachine/LhcCoordinationMain R. Bruce, LHCC 2018.09.12
150 fb-1 reached • Reached goal of 150 fb-1in Run 1 and Run 2 combined(~120 fb-1 in Run 2 only) • (F. Bordry, HL-LHC meeting 13/11/2017) • Good hope to reach 150 fb-1in Run 2 alone Goal: Run 1 + Run 2 Long Shutdown 1 Champagne from ATLAS R. Bruce, LHCC 2018.09.12
Contents • Status and reminder from last LHCC • Operational achievements • Availability, faults and limitations • Status of luminosity production • Outlook on the rest of the year R. Bruce, LHCC 2018.09.12
Outlook on rest of 2018 • Interesting period ahead • End of pp run • Special physics run: high-β* at injection • Forward physics measurements • Issues with high background under study • Heavy-ion run from beginning of November • Extra time for machine development? TS2 MD3 Today MD4 13 TeVpp physics LS2 Special run TS3 Pb-Pb ion run R. Bruce, LHCC 2018.09.12
Heavy-ion run • 24 days of physics run envisaged • Completely new machine configuration • New optics through the cycle – commissioning started • Intend to switch to 75 ns bunch spacing (to be confirmed by injectors) ~40% more bunches. Highest Pb intensity ever! • Potential to reach very high peak luminosities similar to HL-LHC leveling target • Planned to level all experiments • Plan to test 6 times design luminosities (ATLAS/CMS) • LHCb also squeezed and will be taking data • Approaching already the HL-LHC regime! • Challenges: collimation, small beam-beam separation at ALICE polarity switch R. Bruce, LHCC 2018.09.12
Extra time for machine development? • In case pp physics run continues successfully: request for extra MD time from machine side • Several interesting MDs could not get time allocated yet, e.g. • Flat ATS optics as option for Run III baseline • Electron cloud effects in the inner triplets • Beam-beam long range wire compensation with flat optics for Run 3 and HL-LHC • Instabilities from coupling generated by beam-beam • Injection into the LHC with the SPS Q22 optics in TI2 for possible Run III baseline • Crystal collimation with partially stripped ions for Physics beyond Colliders • 50Hz harmonics studies for possible lifetime improvement • MD requests to be submitted following MD#3 results • Last chance to obtain MD results before long shutdown! R. Bruce, LHCC 2018.09.12
Summary • Good production achieved • Established a good peak performance • On a good track to fulfill the 2018 production targets • Production in 2018 just surpassed 2017, and there’s still some time left – it is another record year • Some bumps in the road • A few longer faults and frequent premature beam aborts • Present limit on bunch charge at around 1.1E11 p/bunch from cryogenic compressor failures – mitigation planned for TS2 • 16L2 is not preventing smooth operation with present bunch intensities around 1.1E11 protons / bunch • Interesting end of 2018 ahead • End of pp physics run • High-beta run at injection under investigation • Heavy-ion run • Going into LS2 R. Bruce, LHCC 2018.09.12
Additional achievement • LHC particle collisions now available for 200 CHF • Thanks for your attention! R. Bruce, LHCC 2018.09.12
Backup R. Bruce, LHCC 2018.09.12
Highlights from machine development • ATS optics development (achromatic telescopic squeeze) • Flat optics successfully commissioned up to 1 train (β*is 60 cm in crossing plane, 15 cm in separation plane) • Potential of higher luminosity • Compensation of beam-beam effect with DC wires • Wires integrated in tertiary collimators around CMS • Could potentially allow smaller crossing angles • Demonstrated • Crystal collimation • Beam halo channeled by bent crystals to hit deeply in absorber with little leakage • Potential for significantly improved cleaning, in particular for ions • Channeling demonstrated with newly installed crystals • Further tests planned during heavy-ion run R. Bruce, LHCC 2018.09.12
Overview of faults • Considering period 31/5 – 10/9 Number of faults Average fault duration (h) R. Bruce, LHCC 2018.09.12
Intensities over summer • Rather stable performance over summer • Bunch intensities stable around 1.1E11 p/bunch after intensity rampup • Not increased due to several reasons: possible risk of 16L2 dumps, cryogenics, pileup limit / start of leveling R. Bruce, LHCC 2018.09.12
Heat loads Run 2, 6.5 TeV(physics fills with >800b) • Difference in heat load between sectors persists • With 25 ns beams, heat loads are now rather constant over time • Significant decrease seen with 8b4e in 2017 2016 2017 2018 8b+4e R. Bruce, LHCC 2018.09.12
Evolution of arc UFO rates in 2015–2018 R. Bruce, LHCC 2018.09.12
UFOs – evolution 2015 - 2018 R. Bruce, LHCC 2018.09.12