390 likes | 400 Views
In this module, Professor Stephen Gaetz discusses the various uses of research in the context of Point-in-Time (PiT) counts. The module covers conceptual, instrumental, symbolic, and process uses of research, and explores how PiT count data can be analyzed, tracked, and used to support local planning, engage the public, and enhance understanding at a national level. The module also highlights the benefits of comparing results across communities and engaging higher levels of government to address homelessness.
E N D
Mobilizing PiT Count Results • Stephen Gaetz • Canadian Observatory on Homelessness • Professor, Faculty of Education, • York University, Toronto, Canada Point in Time Count Workshop • Module 7 – Mobilizing Results
Part 1 The uses of RESEARCH
Part 1 The uses of RESEARCH!
Four Uses of Research • Conceptual • Instrumental • Symbolic • Process
Conceptual research Contributes to the: “subtle but potentially weighty shifts in knowledge, understanding and discourse, can be hugely significant in policy and practice settings, not just as a means to more instrumental impacts from research but as an end in themselves.” (Sandra Nutley).
Instrumentaluse of research • This refers to situations where research can be seen to have a direct and concrete impact on decision-making and actions by policy-makers and practitioners. • Typically focuses on existing policies and practices • Often involves program evaluation research that answers the questions: What works, for whom and in what contexts?
Symbolic use of research . . . involves using research results in the public realm to legitimate and sustain arguments, strategies and positions.
Process use of research . . . engaging in the research process (through program evaluation, for instance), can lead to changes in ways of thinking, alter attitudes about the use of research and raise questions about the value of different kinds of knowledge and evidence.
Uptake • Use • Impact ‘the ways in which research affects society are based on complex, iterative, self-reinforcing processes, distributed unequally across research initiatives ’ (Molas-Galart 2000 : 172).
Part 2 Mobilizing PiT Count Data
things you can do with data
1 Understanding the local context
Sub populations seniors Mapping the problem youth Indigenous people women Newcomers Key issues Level of Chronicity Service priorities of clients? Substance use Do services match subpopulations?
2 Tracking progress
You’ve got to be careful, because if you don’t know where you are going, you might not get there.” Yogi Berra
A count tells us how we are doing. • Your first count provides a baseline • Additional counts enable you to measure progress • Trends amongst sub-populations
Some communities are seeing real reductions in homelessness • Vancouver – 66% reduction in street homelessness since 2008 • Calgary – 11% reduction since 2008 • Edmonton – 30% reduction since 2008 • Lethbridge – 55% reduction since 2010
3 Support local planning
Do your systems and services adequately address the needs of the homeless population?
4 Engaging the Public
Reporting out
5 Enhance understanding at a NATIONAL LEVEL
Aggregating Data The more communities that participate, the more effectively we can tell the story of homelessness at a NATIONAL REGIONAL LOCAL level
The benefits of Comparing Results
Good data supports engagement with higher levels of government Federal, Provincial, Territorial and Indigenous Governments Community planning and programs
Homelessness amongst Indigenous People in Canada Belanger, et al. 2012
Supporting a National Strategy
Questions or comments?