1 / 190

"Web" Obscured Filtering of Events That Led Up to the Jeanne Clery Act

Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W is vexed by the very bizarre and persistent frenzy that has targeted him on the internet ever since he made the decision to publish on digital platforms [1] some of his recollections on how he was in the month of January 2010 (as an undergraduate student of Westminster College) informed about the April 05th 1986 rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery before being told what constitutes affirmative and effective consent in healthy sexual relationships; [2] his questions about Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972...

michaelayele9890
Download Presentation

"Web" Obscured Filtering of Events That Led Up to the Jeanne Clery Act

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 8/28/24, 3:38 PM The Yuba Community College District (California) Disclose Limited Records to Request Filed About the April 05th 1986 Rape & Mur… (1 of 36) ☆ ⚑ Flag ? Lists Favorite Share https://archive.org/details/michael-ayele-on-the-april-05th-1986-rape-and-murder-of-jeanne-clery-mou-of-yccd 1/5

  2. 8/28/24, 3:38 PM The Yuba Community College District (California) Disclose Limited Records to Request Filed About the April 05th 1986 Rape & Mur… ? The Yuba Community College District (California) Disclose Limited Records to Request Filed About the April 05th 1986 Rape & Murder of Jeanne Ann Clery - #Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W - #Association for the Advancement of Civil Liberties (AACL) by Michael Ayele (a.k.a) W - Association for the Advancement of Civil Liberties (AACL) Publication date Usage 2022-12-20 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International Topics #Michael Ayele (a.k.a) W January 2010, #Association for the Advancement of Civil Liberties (AACL), #Jeanne Ann Clery (November 23rd 1966 – April 05th 1986), #August 29th 1986, #May 17th 1987, #June 11th 1992, #Affirmative & Effective Consent, #Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972, #Yuba Community College District (California), #Memorandum of Understandings (MOU) Michael Ayele (a.k.a) W - Association for the Advancement of Civil Liberties (AACL) opensource Michael Ayele (a.k.a) W - Association for the Advancement of Civil Liberties (AACL) english-handwritten Are you a student of a U.S college/university? Are you an alumnus/alumna of a college/university in the U.S.A? Have you previously faced uncorroborated and racially… Have you previously faced uncorroborated and racially… Publisher Collection Contributor Language Rights Are you a student of a U.S college/university? Are you an alumnus/alumna of a college/university in the U.S.A? More... Item Size 17.7M The rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery continues to leave several key questions about Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 unaddressed. These questions include but are not limited to the follow- ing. 1) What are/were colleges/universities in the U.S.A obligations pursuant to Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972? Were colleges/universities throughout the U.S.A required by law to denounce vio- lence committed against women irrespective of their racial backgrounds, their sexual orientations, their reli- gious affiliations and their national origins following the enactment of Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972? If yes, were colleges/universities required to inform their students what constitute appropriate sexual boundaries pursuant to Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972? 2) Did colleges/universities throughout the U.S.A begin informing their students what constitute “affirmative and effective consent” follow- ing the enactment of Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972? If not, when did colleges/universities https://archive.org/details/michael-ayele-on-the-april-05th-1986-rape-and-murder-of-jeanne-clery-mou-of-yccd 2/5

  3. 8/28/24, 3:38 PM The Yuba Community College District (California) Disclose Limited Records to Request Filed About the April 05th 1986 Rape & Mur… begin to inform their incoming freshmen/transfer students about the concepts of “affirmative and effective con- sent?” Did colleges/universities throughout the U.S.A begin teaching the concepts of “affirmative and effective consent” to their incoming freshmen/transfer students following the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery (dated April 05th 1986)? If yes, why have colleges/universities throughout the U.S.A fixated on the rape and murder of this Caucasian woman by a Black/African American man to inform their incoming freshmen/transfer students about what constitutes “affirmative and effective consent?” 3) Are colleges/universities discussions pertaining to what constitutes “affirmative and effective consent” consistent with Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 if they are first informing their incoming/freshmen students about the rape and mur- der of Jeanne Ann Clery? Are colleges/universities discussions pertaining to what constitutes “affirmative and effective consent” consistent with their academic integrity policy if they are first informing their incoming freshmen/transfer students about the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery? 4) Were there forces out there in the 1970s and the 1980s looking for a case where a Black man rapes and murders a Caucasian woman for the purpose of enacting a law similar to the Jeanne Clery Act? Was the enactment of the Jeanne Clery Act the result of racist and sexist individuals coming together for the purpose of [a] preventing racial mi‐ norities from climbing the social ladder through academic education; [b] cracking down on interracial re‐ lationships particularly between a Caucasian woman and a Black/African American man; [c] not applying the same standards in circumstances where a Caucasian man sexually assaults a woman from a racial mi‐ nority (as in the case of Brock Turner and Chanel Miller following her rape on January 18th 2015 at the campus of Stanford University)? Be well. Take care. Keep yourselves at arms distance. Michael Ayele (a.k.a) W Anti-Racist Human Rights Activist Audio-Visual Media Analyst Anti-Propaganda Journalist Notes Are you a student of a U.S college/university? Are you an alumnus/alumna of a college/university in the U.S.A? Have you previously faced uncorroborated and racially motivated allegations of academic cheating as an undergraduate student? Has the uncorroborated and racially motivated allegation of academic cheating reached the person who’s serving as the Dean of Student in your college/university? Have you read the Annual Security Report (ASR) published by the college/university you are/were attending, which is published pursuant to the Jeanne Ann Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Crime Statistics Act? How were you informed about “affirmative and effective consent?” Were you informed about “affirmative and effective consent” after having been told about the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery on the campus of Lehigh University? Were you informed about “affirmative and effective consent” after having been told about the rape and murder of a Caucasian woman by a Black/African American? Is the way you have been informed about “affirmative and effective consent” academically, historically and socially responsible given the U.S.A well doc- umented history of slavery as well as systemic chauvinism, discrimination, misogyny, racism and sexism? Were there forces out there in the 1970s and the 1980s looking for a case where a Black man rapes and mur- ders a Caucasian woman for the purpose of enacting a law similar to the Jeanne Clery Act? Was the enact- ment of the Jeanne Clery Act the result of racist and sexist individuals coming together for the purpose of [a] preventing racial minorities from climbing the social ladder through academic education; [b] cracking down on interracial relationships particularly between a Caucasian woman and a Black/African American man; [c] not applying the same standards in circumstances where a Caucasian man sexually assaults a woman from a racial minority (as in the case of Brock Turner and Chanel Miller following her rape on January 18th 2015 at the campus of Stanford University)? https://archive.org/details/michael-ayele-on-the-april-05th-1986-rape-and-murder-of-jeanne-clery-mou-of-yccd 3/5

  4. 8/28/24, 3:38 PM The Yuba Community College District (California) Disclose Limited Records to Request Filed About the April 05th 1986 Rape & Mur… W (AACL) Michael A. Ayele Anti-Racist Human Rights Activist Audio-Visual Media Analyst Anti-Propaganda Journalist See Case Law: Goss v Lopez Addeddate Identifier 2022-12-20 07:58:03 michael-ayele-on-the-april-05th-1986-rape-and-murder- of-jeanne-clery-mou-of-yccd ark:/13960/s25gh8n4fxj tesseract 5.2.0-1-gc42a: language not currently OCRable 0.0.18 300 Internet Archive HTML5 Uploader 1.7.0 2022 Identifier-ark Ocr Ocr_module_version Ppi Scanner Year ? Reviews ? Add Review There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write a review. 14 Views DOWNLOAD OPTIONS CHOCR 1 file EPUB Generate HOCR 1 file ITEM TILE 1 file OCR PAGE INDEX 1 file OCR SEARCH TEXT 1 file PAGE NUMBERS JSON 1 file PDF 1 file SINGLE PAGE PROCESSED JP2 ZIP 1 file https://archive.org/details/michael-ayele-on-the-april-05th-1986-rape-and-murder-of-jeanne-clery-mou-of-yccd 4/5

  5. 8/28/24, 3:38 PM The Yuba Community College District (California) Disclose Limited Records to Request Filed About the April 05th 1986 Rape & Mur… SHOW ALL 13 Files 5 Original IN COLLECTIONS Community Texts Community Collections Uploaded by W (AACL) - Michael A. Ayele on December 20, 2022 Terms of Service (last updated 12/31/2014) https://archive.org/details/michael-ayele-on-the-april-05th-1986-rape-and-murder-of-jeanne-clery-mou-of-yccd 5/5

  6. 8/28/24, 4:33 PM Gmail - Public Records Request Michael Ayele <waacl13@gmail.com> Public Records Request Tawny Dotson <tdotson@yccd.edu> To: Jake Hurley <jhurley@yccd.edu>, Michael Ayele <waacl13@gmail.com> Cc: Kiara Koenig <kkoenig@yccd.edu>, Jeremy Brown <jbrown2@yccd.edu>, Tonia Teresh <TTeresh@yccd.edu>, Kuldeep Kaur <kkaur@yccd.edu>, Riley Hang <rfrederk@yccd.edu> Tue, Dec 6, 2022 at 4:41 PM W, I’m forwarding your request and associated documents to the office responsible for public records requests. AVCHR Hurley please let us know if you need our assistance. Dr. Tawny M. Dotson (she/her/hers) President, Yuba College Begin forwarded message: From: Michael Ayele <waacl13@gmail.com> Date: December 6, 2022 at 4:19:04 AM PST To: Tawny Dotson <tdotson@yccd.edu>, Jeremy Brown <jbrown2@yccd.edu>, Kiara Koenig <kkoenig@yccd.edu>, Tonia Teresh <TTeresh@yccd.edu>, Riley Hang <rfrederk@yccd.edu> Cc: Michael Ayele <waacl1313@gmail.com>, "Michael Ayele (W)" <waacl13@gmail.com>, Michael Ayele <waacl42913@gmail.com> Subject:Public Records Request [Quoted text hidden] 3 attachments W (AACL) Amended Records Request on Jeanne Clery and Yuba Community College.pdf 1511K W (AACL) - MA - Bachelors of Arts Degree - Letters of Recommendation.pdf 1126K 2022-Clery-Act-Report-1.pdf 3200K https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=be10e4fd3f&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f:1751472266024797604&simpl=msg-f:1751472266024797604 1/1

  7. 8/28/24, 4:34 PM Gmail - Public Records Request Michael Ayele <waacl13@gmail.com> Public Records Request Ana Gonzalez <Ana.Gonzalez@cityofwoodland.org> To: Michael Ayele <waacl13@gmail.com> Cc: Michael Ayele <waacl1313@gmail.com>, Michael Ayele <waacl42913@gmail.com> Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 2:39 AM Hi W, I am in receipt of your PRR. Thank you, Ana ******************************************************* Ana B. Gonzalez, CMC City Clerk City of Woodland 300 First Street Woodland, CA 95695 Phone: 530-661-5806 Fax: 530-661-5813 e-mail: ana.gonzalez@cityofwoodland.org ******************************************************* From: Michael Ayele [mailto:waacl13@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 4:10 AM To: Ana Gonzalez <Ana.Gonzalez@cityofwoodland.org> Cc: Michael Ayele <waacl1313@gmail.com>; Michael Ayele (W) <waacl13@gmail.com>; Michael Ayele <waacl42913@gmail.com> Subject: Public Records Request W (AACL) Date.: December 06th 2022 [Quoted text hidden] [Quoted text hidden] https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=be10e4fd3f&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f:1751509841796729813&simpl=msg-f:1751509841796729813 1/1

  8. 8/28/24, 4:35 PM Gmail - Public Records Request Michael Ayele <waacl13@gmail.com> Public Records Request Ana Gonzalez <Ana.Gonzalez@cityofwoodland.org> To: Michael Ayele <waacl13@gmail.com> Cc: Ana Gonzalez <Ana.Gonzalez@cityofwoodland.org>, Joanna Gin <Joanna.Gin@bbklaw.com> Fri, Dec 9, 2022 at 7:54 PM Good Morning W, This email is in response to your letter dated December 6, 2022, regarding certain records in the custody and control of the Yuba Community College District (“District”), the Department of Justice (“DOJ”), the Central Intelligence Agency (“CIA”), and Westminster College, pursuant to the Public Records Act (“PRA”). This response is being sent within ten (10) days of the City’s receipt of your written request and is therefore a timely response under the PRA. (Gov. Code, § 7922.535(a).) You asked for the 2022 Annual Security Report published by the District, a DOJ decision to reassign the criminal investigation of a matter involving Jeanne Ann Clery to the CIA, a CIA refusal to acknowledge assignment of the investigation involving Ms. Clery, and an invitation extended by Westminster College to William Webster on August 29, 1986. Under the PRA, a “public record” includes any writing containing information relating to the conduct of the public’s business prepared, owned, used, or retained by any state or local agency regardless of physical form or characteristics. (Gov. Code, § 7920.530(a).) The City did not prepare, nor own, use or retain, the records you requested. Therefore, the City does not have any such records in its possession to disclose. Please contact the agencies that created or possess the records that you seek. Thank you, ******************************************************* Ana B. Gonzalez, CMC City Clerk City of Woodland https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=be10e4fd3f&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f:1751756179116574086&simpl=msg-f:1751756179116574086 1/2

  9. 8/28/24, 4:35 PM Gmail - Public Records Request 300 First Street Woodland, CA 95695 Phone: 530-661-5806 Fax: 530-661-5813 e-mail: ana.gonzalez@cityofwoodland.org ******************************************************* From: Michael Ayele [mailto:waacl13@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 4:10 AM To: Ana Gonzalez <Ana.Gonzalez@cityofwoodland.org> Cc: Michael Ayele <waacl1313@gmail.com>; Michael Ayele (W) <waacl13@gmail.com>; Michael Ayele <waacl42913@gmail.com> Subject: Public Records Request W (AACL) Date.: December 06th 2022 [Quoted text hidden] [Quoted text hidden] https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=be10e4fd3f&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f:1751756179116574086&simpl=msg-f:1751756179116574086 2/2

  10. 8/28/24, 4:35 PM Gmail - Public Records Request Michael Ayele <waacl13@gmail.com> Public Records Request Michael Ayele <waacl13@gmail.com> To: Ana Gonzalez <Ana.Gonzalez@cityofwoodland.org> Cc: Ana Gonzalez <Ana.Gonzalez@cityofwoodland.org>, Joanna Gin <Joanna.Gin@bbklaw.com> Bcc: Michael Ayele <waacl1313@gmail.com>, "Michael Ayele (W)" <waacl13@gmail.com>, Michael Ayele <waacl42913@gmail.com> Mon, Dec 12, 2022 at 9:39 AM W (AACL) Date.: December 12th 2022 Michael A. Ayele P.O.Box 20438 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia E-mail: waacl13@gmail.com ; waacl1313@gmail.com ; waacl42913@gmail.com Public Records Request with the City of Woodland (California) [About the 2022 Annual Security Report (ASR) Published by the Yuba Community College District (YCCD), Which Explicitly Names the Woodland Police Department] Hello, Thank you for your email. I am in receipt of it. I am writing this letter in response to your correspondence from December 09th 2022 about the Public Records Act (PRA) request I had filed (in part) on the subject of the 2022 Annual Security Report (ASR) published by the Yuba Community College District (YCCD) pursuant to the Jeanne Clery Act. According to that report, which I have hereby attached, “the Yuba Community College District Police Department (YCCDPD) maintains a working relationship with agencies surrounding YCCD facilities and has memorandums of understanding with the Yuba County Sheriff’s Department, Yuba City Police Department, Clearlake Police Department, Marysville Police Department, Williams Police Department, Woodland Police Department, and County of Yuba Office of Emergency Services.” (See Page 10 of the 2022 ASR published by YCCD). Please be advised that I have several concerns with the way you have gone on to describe the bases for the records request I had filed with the City of Woodland (California). For instance, you say that I had requested “a copy” of the 2022 ASR published by the YCCD. However, I have not requested this. As previously noted, I have contacted the City of Woodland after having read the 2022 ASR published by the YCCD: I (personally) believe this is an important distinction not to disregard. As a Black man with a U.S college degree (who was in January 2010 informed what constitutes “affirmative and effective consent” after being told about the April 05th 1986 rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery), I have additional concerns with the adequacy of the search you have performed for my PRA request. For example, your correspondence from December 09th 2022 failed to acknowledge that YCCD has concluded a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the Woodland Police Department. Furthermore, your correspondence failed to make clear the extent of your county government knowledge in the manner that college/university students in the U.S.A are being taught about “affirmative and effective consent.” After (personally) corresponding with the YCCD, I was informed that there was a MOU in place between the YCCD and the Woodland Police Department. The MOUs, which have been disclosed to me by the YCCD are attached to this email for your review. As a representative of the media and a member of the general public, I hope you will perform a more thorough search for responsive records detailing [1] the time and place students of YCCD are being informed about the life and death of Jeanne Ann Clery (November 23rd 1966 – April 05th 1986) during the course of their Freshmen year of post-secondary academic education; [2] the time and place students of YCCD are being explicitly told that Jeanne Ann Clery was a Caucasian woman, who was raped and murdered on April 05th 1986; [3] the time and place students of YCCD are being explicitly told that Jeanne Ann Clery was raped and murdered on April 05th 1986 by a fellow student of Lehigh University, who’s Black/African American by race; [4] the time and place students of YCCD are being explicitly told that Jeanne Ann Clery was concerned about her safety and security when she was a high-school student considering what college/university to attend for her post-secondary academic education; [5] the time and place students of YCCD are being explicitly told that Jeanne Ann Clery chose to attend Lehigh University (located in the State of Pennsylvania) because she thought it was a “safe” school to attend; [6] the time and place students of YCCD are being explicitly told that Jeanne Ann Clery would not have attended Lehigh University had she known about the crimes on or near Lehigh University, and therefore would not have been raped and murdered; [7] the time and place students of YCCD are being explicitly told about the relatively short amount of time it took for the Jeanne Clery Act to be enacted into law in 1990 following her rape and murder on April 05th 1986; [8] the time and place students of YCCD are being informed what constitutes “affirmative https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=be10e4fd3f&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-a:r-5363753772904027839&simpl=msg-a:r-53637537729040… 1/2

  11. 8/28/24, 4:35 PM Gmail - Public Records Request and effective consent;” [9] the time and place students of YCCD are being informed what constitutes “healthy sexual relationships;” [10] the extent of your local government knowledge on whether students of YCCD are being told about “affirmative and effective consent” as well as “healthy sexual relationships” after having been informed about the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery, which took place on April 05th 1986; [11] the extent of your local government knowledge on whether students of YCCD were being informed about “affirmative and effective consent” as well as “healthy sexual relationships” on January 01st 1973 after Congress enacted Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972; [12] the extent of your local government knowledge on whether students of YCCD began being told about “affirmative and effective consent” as well as “healthy sexual relationships” after January 01st 1991 following the rape and murder of a Caucasian woman (i.e: Jeanne Ann Clery) by a Black/African American man (i.e: Josoph Henry). I hope you reconsider your response. Be well. Take care. Keep yourselves at arms distance. W (AACL) Michael A. Ayele Anti-Racist Human Rights Activist Audio-Visual Media Analyst Anti-Propaganda Journalist [Quoted text hidden] 3 attachments Local Law Enforcement Agreements.pdf 1288K W (AACL) Amended Records Request on Jeanne Clery and Yuba Community College.pdf 1511K 2022-Clery-Act-Report-1.pdf 3200K https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=be10e4fd3f&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-a:r-5363753772904027839&simpl=msg-a:r-53637537729040… 2/2

  12. 8/28/24, 4:36 PM Gmail - Public Records Request Michael Ayele <waacl13@gmail.com> Public Records Request Ana Gonzalez <Ana.Gonzalez@cityofwoodland.org> To: Michael Ayele <waacl13@gmail.com> Cc: Ana Gonzalez <Ana.Gonzalez@cityofwoodland.org> Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 8:16 PM Hi W, Thank you for your email and for clarifying that the email message included the bases for your public records request, and not the request itself. Upon reexamining your email, it was no?ced that your request was contained in one of the a?achments. On May December 6, 2022, the City of Woodland (“City”) received your request for the following records (with “your” referring to “City”: 1.the formal/informal ?es, which exist between the Yuba Community College District, the Yuba County Sheriff’s Department, the Yuba City Police Department, the Clearlake Police Department, the Marysville Police Department, the Williams Police Department, the Woodland Police Department, the County of Yuba Office of Emergency Services, the Department of Educa?on (DoED), the Department of Jus?ce (DOJ), the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and Westminster College (Fulton, Missouri); 2.your discussions about Yuba Community College as a post-secondary academic ins?tu?on, which recognizes that the Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Campus Crime Sta?s?cs Act requires them “to gather sta?s?cs, iden?fy reportable crimes and report/publish sta?s?cs to the DoED and the Federal Bureau of Inves?ga?on (FBI);” 3.your discussions about Jeanne Ann Clery as a Caucasian woman, who was born in the State of Pennsylvania on Wednesday, November 23rd 1966; 4.your discussions about Jeanne Ann Clery as an undergraduate student of Lehigh University, who was raped and murdered on April 05th 1986; 5. your discussions about Jeanne Ann Clery as a Caucasian woman very li?le is known about; 6.your discussions about Jeanne Ann Clery as a Caucasian woman whose name is published on the annual security reports (ASR) of colleges and universi?es throughout the United States of America (U.S.A) including that of Yuba Community College District; 7.your discussions about the decision of several colleges/universi?es (throughout the U.S.A) to men?on the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery on their ASR; 8.your discussions about the decision of colleges/universi?es (throughout the U.S.A) to omit from their ASR any men?on of former U.S President Donald Trump 1988 visit to Lehigh University; 9.your discussions about the decision of colleges/universi?es (throughout the U.S.A) to omit from their ASR any men?on of Donald Trump being awarded an honorary degree by Lehigh University in 1988; https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=be10e4fd3f&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f:1752119930227161617&simpl=msg-f:1752119930227161617 1/3

  13. 8/28/24, 4:36 PM Gmail - Public Records Request 10.your discussions about the decision of colleges/universi?es (throughout the U.S.A) to omit from their ASR any men?on of Donald Trump 1988 visit to Lehigh University by pu?ng the event in historical context and perspec?ve; 11.your discussions about the decision of colleges/universi?es (throughout the U.S.A) to omit from their ASR any men?on that Donald Trump was extended an invita?on to Lehigh University two-years following the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery on April 05th 1986; 12.your discussions about the decision of colleges/universi?es (throughout the U.S.A) to omit from their ASR any men?on of Donald Trump sexual misconducts at the ?me of Lehigh University invita?on for him to speak at the gradua?on ceremony class of 1988; 13.your discussions about the decision of colleges/universi?es (throughout the U.S.A) to omit from their ASR any men?on of Donald Trump being charged by the Department of Jus?ce (DOJ) for maliciously excluding Blacks/African Americans as customers of his New York residen?al proper?es that were for rent; 14.your discussions about the decision of colleges/universi?es (throughout the U.S.A) to omit from their ASR any men?on of Donald Trump loud advocacy in favor of the death penalty following the invita?on that was extended to him by Lehigh University in 1988; 15.your discussions about colleges/universi?es (throughout the U.S.A) failing to hold themselves to account; 16.your discussions about colleges/universi?es (throughout the U.S.A) failing to acknowledge their own par?cipa?on in the rise of Donald Trump to the presidency of the U.S.A; 17.your discussions about colleges/universi?es (throughout the U.S.A) failing to acknowledge their own par?cipa?on in the systemic chauvinism, discrimina?on, misogyny, racism and sexism that is plaguing the country; 18.the extent of your knowledge on whether Yuba Community College District educate their students about “affirma?ve and effec?ve consent” a?er having informed them about the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery; 19.the extent of your knowledge on whether Yuba Community College District educate their students about “affirma?ve and effec?ve consent” a?er having told them about the rape and murder of a Caucasian woman by a Black/African American man; 20.the extent of your knowledge on whether current/former students of Yuba Community College filed a complaint (either with the Yuba County Sheriff’s Department and/or the Yuba City Police Department and/or the Clearlake Police Department and/or the Marysville Police Department and/or the Williams Police Department and/or the Woodland Police Department and/or the County of Yuba Office of Emergency Services and/or the DoED and/or the DOJ and/or the U.S courts) for the manner that they were informed what cons?tutes “affirma?ve and effec?ve consent;” 21.the informa?on provided to current/former students of Yuba Community College in the event they wish to file a complaint (either with the Yuba County Sheriff’s Department and/or the Yuba City Police Department and/or the Clearlake Police Department and/or the Marysville Police Department and/or the Williams Police Department and/or the Woodland Police Department and/or the County of Yuba Office of Emergency Services and/or the DoED and/or the DOJ and/or the U.S courts) for the manner that they were informed what cons?tutes “affirma?ve and effec?ve consent;” 22.your discussions about Yuba Community College District as a post-secondary academic ins?tu?on, which has concluded memorandum of understandings (MOU) with the Yuba County Sheriff’s Department, the Yuba City Police Department, the Clearlake Police Department, the Marysville Police Department, the Williams Police Department, the Woodland Police Department and the County of Yuba Office of Emergency Services; 23.(there was no Request No. 23) 24.the MOU concluded between the Yuba Community College District and the Yuba County Sheriff’s Department; 25.the MOU concluded between the Yuba Community College District and the Yuba City Police Department; https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=be10e4fd3f&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f:1752119930227161617&simpl=msg-f:1752119930227161617 2/3

  14. 8/28/24, 4:36 PM Gmail - Public Records Request 26.the MOU concluded between the Yuba Community College District and the Clearlake Police Department; 27.the MOU concluded between the Yuba Community College District and the Marysville Police Department, 28.the MOU concluded between the Yuba Community College District and the Williams Police Department; 29.the MOU concluded between the Yuba Community College District and the Woodland Police Department; 30.the MOU concluded between the Yuba Community College District and the Yuba Office of Emergency Services. The City does not have records for Request Numbers 24-28, and 30 in its possession. Can you please clarify the records that you seek from the City of Woodland for Request No. 1: Are you looking for records detailing the formal/informal ?es between the City and the Yuba Community College District? Or with other en??es? Are there specific types of formal/informal ?es regarding a specific issue that you are referred to? Under the Public Records Act, requests for “voluminous” amounts of documents are one of the condi?ons that create “unusual circumstances.” Under such circumstances, the City may take an extension of the standard 10-day ?me period provided under the Public Records Act for making its determina?on on a request for records. Regarding your request, the City is taking this ?me extension pursuant to Government Code Sec?on 6253, subdivision (c), which states in part: “...In unusual circumstances, the ?me limit prescribed in this sec?on may be extended by wri?en no?ce by the head of the agency or his or her designee to the person making the request se?ng forth the reasons for the extension and the date on which a determina?on is expected to be dispatched. No no?ce shall specify a date that would result in an extension for more than 14 days. When the agency dispatches the determina?on, and if the agency determinates that the request seeks disclosable public records, the agency shall state the es?mated date and ?me when the records will be made available. As used in this sec?on, ‘unusual circumstances’ means, but only to the extent reasonably necessary to the proper processing of the par?cular request: … (2) The need to search for, collect, and appropriately examine a voluminous amount of separate and dis?nct records that are demanded in a single request.” In accordance with the above quoted sec?on of the Public Records Act, please be advised that this le?er serves as wri?en no?ce that the City of Woodland requires an extension of the standard 10 day ?me period for providing its determina?on on the remaining items listed in your records request. City staff will no?fy you in wri?ng with a determina?on on those items of your request no later than Friday, December 30, 2022. Nothing in this le?er should be construed as a representa?on that the City has all of the records requested, or that such records (if they exist) are subject to disclosure. [Quoted text hidden] https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=be10e4fd3f&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f:1752119930227161617&simpl=msg-f:1752119930227161617 3/3

  15. 8/28/24, 4:37 PM Gmail - Public Records Request Michael Ayele <waacl13@gmail.com> Public Records Request Michael Ayele <waacl13@gmail.com> To: Ana Gonzalez <Ana.Gonzalez@cityofwoodland.org> Cc: Michael Ayele <waacl1313@gmail.com>, "Michael Ayele (W)" <waacl13@gmail.com>, Michael Ayele <waacl42913@gmail.com> Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 11:12 AM Hello, Thank you for your email. I am in receipt of it. I am writing this letter in response to your correspondence from December 13th 2022. As previously mentioned, I decided to contact the City of Woodland. California (and you, Ana Gonzalez) after reading the 2022 Annual Security Report (ASR) published by the Yuba Community College District (YCCD) pursuant to the Jeanne Clery Act. According to that report, “the Yuba Community College District Police Department (YCCDPD) maintains a working relationship with agencies surrounding YCCD facilities and has memorandums of understanding with the Yuba County Sheriff’s Department, Yuba City Police Department, Clearlake Police Department, Marysville Police Department, Williams Police Department, Woodland Police Department, and County of Yuba Office of Emergency Services.” (See Page 10 of the 2022 ASR published by YCCD). After corresponding with the YCCD, they have gone on to confirm that they have a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the Woodland Police Department, which they have since disclosed (and I am hereby attaching to this email). However, several issues about their report published pursuant to the Jeanne Clery Act remain unaddressed. As you may be aware, the Jeanne Clery Act is named after Jeanne Ann Clery: a woman, who was born November 23rd 1966. I have previously heard it said that Jeanne Ann Clery was in high-school very much concerned about "safety" on college/university campuses and that she chose to attend Lehigh University (located in the State of Pennsylvania) in 1985 because she thought it was a "safe" university. Unfortunately, she was raped and murdered on April 05th 1986 by a Black/African American man, who was also attending Lehigh University: his name is Josoph Henry. According to information that is on the Internet's public domain, Josoph Henry is put to trial and he is at first sentenced to death for the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery. Afterwards though, he concludes a deal, whereby he decides to renounce all his appeal rights (given the death sentence he was facing) in exchange for life in prison without the possibility of parole. This is where things get a little murky for me. 4 (four) years after the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery on the campus of Lehigh University (Pennsylvania), the Jeanne Clery Act is enacted into law, supposedly I am told after her parents lobbied Congress....But how did the Jeanne Clery Act actually came to be enacted into law beyond what is "officially" being told led to the enactment of this law? And how are students of YCCD informed about "affirmative and effective consent?" Are students of YCCD informed about "affirmative and effective consent" after being told about the April 05th 1986 rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery? In other words, are students of YCCD informed about "affirmative and effective consent" after being told about the rape and murder of a Caucasian woman by a Black/African American man? If yes, is your city government of the position that it is academically honest and socially responsible to educate 17 (seventeen), 18 (eighteen) and 19 (nineteen) year olds about "affirmative and effective consent" after laying on their conscience the rape and murder of a Caucasian woman (i.e: Jeanne Ann Clery) by a Black/African American man (i.e: Josoph Henry)? What conversations is your city government actually having before signing these MOU pursuant to the Jeanne Clery Act? What conversations is your city government actually having about Jeanne Ann Clery before signing these MOU with YCCD? What conversations is your city government actually having about "affirmative and effective consent" before signing these MOU pursuant to the Jeanne Clery Act? In response to your request for clarification (which I have received on December 13th 2022), I would again like to reiterate that I am requesting for prompt disclosure records in your possession detailing [1] the time and place students of YCCD are being informed about the life and death of Jeanne Ann Clery (November 23rd 1966 – April 05th 1986) during the course of their Freshmen year of post-secondary academic education; [2] the time and place students of YCCD are being explicitly told that Jeanne Ann Clery was a Caucasian woman, who was raped and murdered on April 05th 1986; [3] the time and place students of YCCD are being explicitly told that Jeanne Ann Clery was raped and murdered on April 05th 1986 by a fellow student of Lehigh University, who’s Black/African American by race; [4] the time and place students of YCCD are being explicitly told that Jeanne Ann Clery was concerned about her safety and security when she was a high- school student considering what college/university to attend for her post-secondary academic education; [5] the time and place students of YCCD are being explicitly told that Jeanne Ann Clery chose to attend Lehigh University (located in the State of Pennsylvania) because she thought it was a “safe” school to attend; [6] the time and place students of YCCD are being explicitly told that Jeanne Ann Clery would not have attended Lehigh University had she known about the crimes on or near Lehigh University, and therefore would not have been raped and murdered; [7] the time and place students of YCCD are being explicitly told about the relatively short amount of time it took for the Jeanne Clery Act to be enacted into https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=be10e4fd3f&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-a:r5734906125021026641&simpl=msg-a:r5734906125021026… 1/2

  16. 8/28/24, 4:37 PM Gmail - Public Records Request law in 1990 following her rape and murder on April 05th 1986; [8] the time and place students of YCCD are being informed what constitutes “affirmative and effective consent;” [9] the time and place students of YCCD are being informed what constitutes “healthy sexual relationships;” [10] the extent of your local government knowledge on whether students of YCCD are being told about “affirmative and effective consent” as well as “healthy sexual relationships” after having been informed about the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery, which took place on April 05th 1986; [11] the extent of your local government knowledge on whether students of YCCD were being informed about “affirmative and effective consent” as well as “healthy sexual relationships” on January 01st 1973 after Congress enacted Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972; [12] the extent of your local government knowledge on whether students of YCCD began being told about “affirmative and effective consent” as well as “healthy sexual relationships” after January 01st 1991 following the rape and murder of a Caucasian woman (i.e: Jeanne Ann Clery) by a Black/African American man (i.e: Josoph Henry). For the purpose of being straightforward with the City of Woodward, California (and you, Ana Gonzalez); I would like to inform you that [1] I was informed what constitute "affirmative and effective consent" in January 2010; [2] I was informed what constitute "affirmative and effective consent" after being told about the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery; [3] I was informed what constitute "affirmative and effective consent" after being told about the rape and murder of a Caucasian woman (i.e: Jeanne Ann Clery) by a Black/African American man (i.e: Josoph Henry); [4] I am not of the opinion that the way I was informed about "affirmative and effective consennt" was academically honest and socially responsible; [5] I think violence committed against women are wrongs, which should be remedied without delay irrespective of the woman racial background, sexual orientation, national origin, religious affiliation and/or disability status; [6] I condemn the April 05th 1986 rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery. [Quoted text hidden] [Quoted text hidden] 2 attachments Local Law Enforcement Agreements.pdf 1288K 2022-Clery-Act-Report-1.pdf 3200K https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=be10e4fd3f&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-a:r5734906125021026641&simpl=msg-a:r5734906125021026… 2/2

  17. 8/28/24, 4:37 PM Gmail - Response to PRR dated December 16, 2022 Michael Ayele <waacl13@gmail.com> Response to PRR dated December 16, 2022 Ana Gonzalez <Ana.Gonzalez@cityofwoodland.org> To: Michael Ayele <waacl13@gmail.com>, Michael Ayele <waacl1313@gmail.com>, Michael Ayele <waacl42913@gmail.com> Cc: Ana Gonzalez <Ana.Gonzalez@cityofwoodland.org> Wed, Jan 4, 2023 at 3:47 AM Hi W, Please find below responses to the questions in your email dated December 16, 2022 in line with the text. In addition, this is a follow-up to the City’s prior email. Regarding Request No. 1, records relating to the formal/informal ties between the City and YCCD would be the MOU between the City and YCCD. The City will produce these records by January 12, 2023. Regarding Request No. 2, please find responsive records enclosed in the link below: https://spaces.hightail.com/receive/a8AqObZBu5 Access code - !BBKLAW20230103! Regarding Requests No. 3-8, there are no records in the City’s possession responsive to your request. Regarding Request No. 9, please find responsive records enclosed in the link below: https://spaces.hightail.com/receive/a8AqObZBu5 Access code - !BBKLAW20230103! Regarding Requests No. 10-21, there are no records in the City’s possession responsive to your request. Regarding Request No. 22, please find responsive records enclosed in the link below: https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=be10e4fd3f&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f:1754050877787614348&simpl=msg-f:1754050877787614348 1/4

  18. 8/28/24, 4:37 PM Gmail - Response to PRR dated December 16, 2022 https://spaces.hightail.com/receive/a8AqObZBu5 Access code - !BBKLAW20230103! There was no Request No. 23. As noted in the City’s previous correspondence, the City does not have records for Request Numbers 24-28, and 30 in its possession. Regarding Request No. 29, the City will produce these records by January 12, 2023. Thank you, Ana ******************************************************* Ana B. Gonzalez, CMC City Clerk City of Woodland 300 First Street Woodland, CA 95695 Phone: 530-661-5806 Fax: 530-661-5813 e-mail: ana.gonzalez@cityofwoodland.org ******************************************************* From: Michael Ayele [mailto:waacl13@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, December 16, 2022 12:12 AM To: Ana Gonzalez <Ana.Gonzalez@cityofwoodland.org> Cc: Michael Ayele <waacl1313@gmail.com>; Michael Ayele (W) <waacl13@gmail.com>; Michael Ayele <waacl42913@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Public Records Request Hello, Thank you for your email. I am in receipt of it. I am writing this letter in response to your correspondence from December 13th 2022. As previously mentioned, I decided to contact the City of Woodland. California (and you, Ana Gonzalez) after reading the 2022 Annual Security Report (ASR) published by the Yuba Community College District (YCCD) pursuant to the Jeanne Clery Act. According to that report, “the Yuba Community College District Police Department (YCCDPD) maintains a working relationship with agencies surrounding YCCD facilities and has memorandums of understanding with the Yuba County Sheriff’s Department, Yuba City Police Department, Clearlake Police Department, Marysville Police Department, Williams Police Department, Woodland Police Department, and County of Yuba Office of Emergency Services.” (See Page 10 of the 2022 ASR published by YCCD). https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=be10e4fd3f&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f:1754050877787614348&simpl=msg-f:1754050877787614348 2/4

  19. 8/28/24, 4:37 PM Gmail - Response to PRR dated December 16, 2022 After corresponding with the YCCD, they have gone on to confirm that they have a memorandum of understanding (MOU) with the Woodland Police Department, which they have since disclosed (and I am hereby attaching to this email). However, several issues about their report published pursuant to the Jeanne Clery Act remain unaddressed. As you may be aware, the Jeanne Clery Act is named after Jeanne Ann Clery: a woman, who was born November 23rd 1966. I have previously heard it said that Jeanne Ann Clery was in high-school very much concerned about "safety" on college/university campuses and that she chose to attend Lehigh University (located in the State of Pennsylvania) in 1985 because she thought it was a "safe" university. Unfortunately, she was raped and murdered on April 05th 1986 by a Black/African American man, who was also attending Lehigh University: his name is Josoph Henry. According to information that is on the Internet's public domain, Josoph Henry is put to trial and he is at first sentenced to death for the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery. Afterwards though, he concludes a deal, whereby he decides to renounce all his appeal rights (given the death sentence he was facing) in exchange for life in prison without the possibility of parole. This is where things get a little murky for me. 4 (four) years after the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery on the campus of Lehigh University (Pennsylvania), the Jeanne Clery Act is enacted into law, supposedly I am told after her parents lobbied Congress....But how did the Jeanne Clery Act actually came to be enacted into law beyond what is "officially" being told led to the enactment of this law? Please contact your Congressional representative regarding the legislative history of the Act. And how are students of YCCD informed about "affirmative and effective consent?" Please contact YCCD regarding how YCCD informs its students. Are students of YCCD informed about "affirmative and effective consent" after being told about the April 05th 1986 rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery? Please see previous response. In other words, are students of YCCD informed about "affirmative and effective consent" after being told about the rape and murder of a Caucasian woman by a Black/African American man? Please see previous response. If yes, is your city government of the position that it is academically honest and socially responsible to educate 17 (seventeen), 18 (eighteen) and 19 (nineteen) year olds about "affirmative and effective consent" after laying on their conscience the rape and murder of a Caucasian woman (i.e: Jeanne Ann Clery) by a Black/African American man (i.e: Josoph Henry)? Please see previous response. What conversations is your city government actually having before signing these MOU pursuant to the Jeanne Clery Act? Prior to entering into a MOU, the City would consult with the other party. For example, if the City is entering into a MOU with the YCCD, the City would consult with the appropriate YCCD representatives. These communications would not involve students. What conversations is your city government actually having about Jeanne Ann Clery before signing these MOU with YCCD? There are no records related to query. What conversations is your city government actually having about "affirmative and effective consent" before signing these MOU pursuant to the Jeanne Clery Act? There are no records related to query In response to your request for clarification (which I have received on December 13th 2022), I would again like to reiterate that I am requesting for prompt disclosure records in your possession detailing [1] the time and place students of YCCD are being informed about the life and death of Jeanne Ann Clery (November 23rd 1966 – April 05th 1986) during the course of their Freshmen year of post-secondary academic education; Please contact YCCD regarding how YCCD informs its students. The City does not have such records in its possession. [2] the time and place students of YCCD are being explicitly told that Jeanne Ann Clery was a Caucasian woman, who was raped and murdered on April 05th 1986; Please see previous response. [3] the time and place students of YCCD are being explicitly told that Jeanne Ann Clery was raped and murdered on April 05th 1986 by a fellow student of Lehigh University, who’s Black/African American by race; Please see previous response. [4] the time and place students of YCCD are being explicitly told that Jeanne Ann Clery was concerned about her safety and security when she was a high-school student considering what college/university to attend for her post-secondary academic education; Please see previous response. [5] the time and place students of YCCD are being explicitly told that Jeanne Ann Clery chose to attend Lehigh University (located in the State of Pennsylvania) because she thought it was a “safe” school to attend; Please see previous response. [6] the time and place students of YCCD are being explicitly told that Jeanne Ann Clery would not have attended Lehigh University had she known about the crimes on or near Lehigh University, and therefore would not have been raped and murdered; Please see previous response. [7] the time and place students of YCCD are being explicitly told about the relatively short amount of time it took for the Jeanne Clery Act to be enacted into law in 1990 following her rape and murder on April 05th 1986; Please see previous response. [8] the time and place students of YCCD are being informed what constitutes “affirmative and effective consent;” Please see previous response. [9] the time and place students of YCCD are being informed what constitutes “healthy sexual relationships;” Please see previous response. [10] the extent of your local government knowledge on whether students of YCCD are being told about “affirmative and effective consent” as well as “healthy sexual relationships” after having been informed about the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery, which took place on April 05th 1986; Please see previous response. [11] the extent of your local government knowledge on whether students of YCCD were being informed about “affirmative and effective consent” as well as “healthy sexual relationships” on January 01st 1973 after Congress enacted Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972; Please see previous response. [12] the extent of your local government knowledge on whether students of YCCD began being told about “affirmative and effective consent” as well as “healthy sexual relationships” after January 01st 1991 following the rape and murder of a Caucasian woman (i.e: Jeanne Ann Clery) by a Black/African American man (i.e: Josoph Henry). Please see previous response. For the purpose of being straightforward with the City of Woodward, California (and you, Ana Gonzalez); I would like to https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=be10e4fd3f&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f:1754050877787614348&simpl=msg-f:1754050877787614348 3/4

  20. 8/28/24, 4:37 PM Gmail - Response to PRR dated December 16, 2022 inform you that [1] I was informed what constitute "affirmative and effective consent" in January 2010; [2] I was informed what constitute "affirmative and effective consent" after being told about the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery; [3] I was informed what constitute "affirmative and effective consent" after being told about the rape and murder of a Caucasian woman (i.e: Jeanne Ann Clery) by a Black/African American man (i.e: Josoph Henry); [4] I am not of the opinion that the way I was informed about "affirmative and effective consennt" was academically honest and socially responsible; [5] I think violence committed against women are wrongs, which should be remedied without delay irrespective of the woman racial background, sexual orientation, national origin, religious affiliation and/or disability status; [6] I condemn the April 05th 1986 rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery. Be well. Take care. Keep yourselves at arms distance. W (AACL) Michael A. Ayele Anti-Racist Human Rights Activist Audio-Visual Media Analyst Anti-Propaganda Journalist https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=be10e4fd3f&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f:1754050877787614348&simpl=msg-f:1754050877787614348 4/4

  21. 8/28/24, 4:38 PM Gmail - Response to PRR dated December 16, 2022 Michael Ayele <waacl13@gmail.com> Response to PRR dated December 16, 2022 Ana Gonzalez <Ana.Gonzalez@cityofwoodland.org> To: Michael Ayele <waacl13@gmail.com>, Michael Ayele <waacl1313@gmail.com>, Michael Ayele <waacl42913@gmail.com> Cc: Ana Gonzalez <Ana.Gonzalez@cityofwoodland.org> Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 3:27 AM Hi W, Please see attached documents related to your Public Records Request. Thank you, Ana ******************************************************* Ana B. Gonzalez, CMC City Clerk City of Woodland 300 First Street Woodland, CA 95695 Phone: 530-661-5806 Fax: 530-661-5813 e-mail: ana.gonzalez@cityofwoodland.org ******************************************************* [Quoted text hidden] 3 attachments SKM_C360i23011013170.pdf 137K SKM_C360i23011013171.pdf 192K SKM_C360i23011013172.pdf 122K https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ik=be10e4fd3f&view=pt&search=all&permmsgid=msg-f:1754865013977820169&simpl=msg-f:1754865013977820169 1/1

  22. EXHIBIT 1.

  23. U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation Washington, D.C. 20535 March 7, 2022 MR. MICHAEL A. AYELE ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF CIVIL LIBERTIES POST OFFICE BOX 20438 ADDIS ABABA 10013 ETHIOPIA FOIPA Request No.: 1511415-000 Subject: Westminster College (Communications and Opinions) Dear Mr. Ayele: The enclosed documents were reviewed under the Freedom of Information/Privacy Acts (FOIPA), Title 5, United States Code, Section 552/552a. Below you will find check boxes under the appropriate statute headings which indicate the types of exemptions asserted to protect information which is exempt from disclosure. The appropriate exemptions are noted on the enclosed pages next to redacted information. In addition, a deleted page information sheet was inserted to indicate where pages were withheld entirely and identify which exemptions were applied. The checked exemption boxes used to withhold information are further explained in the enclosed Explanation of Exemptions. Section 552 (b)(1) (b)(2) (b)(3) (b)(7)(E) (b)(8) Section 552a (d)(5) (b)(7)(A) (b)(7)(B) (b)(7)(C) (b)(7)(D) (j)(2) (k)(1) (k)(2) (k)(3) (b)(7)(F) (k)(4) (k)(5) (b)(4) (b)(5) (b)(9) (k)(6) (b)(6) (k)(7) 2 pages were reviewed and 2 pages are being released. Please see the paragraphs below for relevant information specific to your request as well as the enclosed FBI FOIPA Addendum for standard responses applicable to all requests. Document(s) were located which originated with, or contained information concerning, other Government Agency (ies) [OGA]. This information has been referred to the OGA(s) for review and direct response to you. We are consulting with another agency. The FBI will correspond with you regarding this information when the consultation is completed.

  24. Please refer to the enclosed FBI FOIPA Addendum for additional standard responses applicable to your request. “Part 1” of the Addendum includes standard responses that apply to all requests. “Part 2” includes additional standard responses that apply to all requests for records about yourself or any third party individuals. “Part 3” includes general information about FBI records that you may find useful. Also enclosed is our Explanation of Exemptions. For questions regarding our determinations, visit the www.fbi.gov/foia website under “Contact Us.” The FOIPA Request Number listed above has been assigned to your request. Please use this number in all correspondence concerning your request. If you are not satisfied with the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s determination in response to this request, you may administratively appeal by writing to the Director, Office of Information Policy (OIP), United States Department of Justice, 441 G Street, NW, 6th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20530, or you may submit an appeal through OIP's FOIA STAR portal by creating an account following the instructions on OIP’s website: https://www.justice.gov/oip/submit-and-track-request-or-appeal. Your appeal must be postmarked or electronically transmitted within ninety (90) days of the date of my response to your request. If you submit your appeal by mail, both the letter and the envelope should be clearly marked "Freedom of Information Act Appeal." Please cite the FOIPA Request Number assigned to your request so it may be easily identified. You may seek dispute resolution services by contacting the Office of Government Information Services (OGIS). The contact information for OGIS is as follows: Office of Government Information Services, National Archives and Records Administration, 8601 Adelphi Road-OGIS, College Park, Maryland 20740-6001, e-mail at ogis@nara.gov; telephone at 202-741-5770; toll free at 1-877-684-6448; or facsimile at 202-741-5769. Alternatively, you may contact the FBI’s FOIA Public Liaison by emailing foipaquestions@fbi.gov. If you submit your dispute resolution correspondence by email, the subject heading should clearly state “DisputeResolution Services.” Please also cite the FOIPA Request Number assigned to your request so it may be easily identified. See additional information which follows. Sincerely, Michael G. Seidel Section Chief Record/Information Dissemination Section Information Management Division Enclosure(s) This is the final release of information responsive to your FOIPA request. This material is being provided to you at no charge. It is unnecessary to adjudicate your request for a fee waiver at this time, as no applicable fees were assessed. Records that may have been responsive to your request were destroyed. Since this material could not be reviewed, it is not known if it was responsive to your request. Record retention and disposal is carried out under supervision of the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), Title 44, United States Code, Section 3301 as implemented by Title 36, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 1228; Title 44, United States Code, Section 3310 as implemented by Title 36, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 1229.10. Additionally, records that may be responsive to your Freedom of Information/Privacy Acts (FOIPA)request has been transferred to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). If you wish to review these records, submit a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to NARA, Special Access and FOIA, 8601 Adelphi Road, Room 5500, College Park, MD 20740-6001. Please reference the file numbers 100-KC-13743 and 100-KC- 14235.

  25. FBI FOIPA Addendum As referenced in our letter responding to your Freedom of Information/Privacy Acts (FOIPA) request, the FBI FOIPA Addendum provides information applicable to your request. Part 1 of the Addendum includes standard responses that apply to all requests. Part 2 includes standard responses that apply to requests for records about individuals to the extent your request seeks the listed information. Part 3 includes general information about FBI records, searches, and programs. Part 1: The standard responses below apply to all requests: (i) 5 U.S.C. § 552(c). Congress excluded three categories of law enforcement and national security records from the requirements of the FOIPA [5 U.S.C. § 552(c)]. FBI responses are limited to those records subject to the requirements of the FOIPA. Additional information about the FBI and the FOIPA can be found on the www.fbi.gov/foia website. (ii) Intelligence Records. To the extent your request seeks records of intelligence sources, methods, or activities, the FBI can neither confirm nor deny the existence of records pursuant to FOIA exemptions (b)(1), (b)(3), and as applicable to requests for records about individuals, PA exemption (j)(2) [5 U.S.C. §§ 552/552a (b)(1), (b)(3), and (j)(2)]. The mere acknowledgment of the existence or nonexistence of such records is itself a classified fact protected by FOIA exemption (b)(1) and/or would reveal intelligence sources, methods, or activities protected by exemption (b)(3) [50 USC § 3024(i)(1)]. This is a standard response and should not be read to indicate that any such records do or do not exist. Part 2: The standard responses below apply to all requests for records on individuals: (i) Requests for Records about any Individual—Watch Lists. The FBI can neither confirm nor deny the existence of any individual’s name on a watch list pursuant to FOIA exemption (b)(7)(E) and PA exemption (j)(2) [5 U.S.C. §§ 552/552a (b)(7)(E), (j)(2)]. This is a standard response and should not be read to indicate that watch list records do or do not exist. (ii) Requests for Records about any Individual—Witness Security Program Records. The FBI can neither confirm nor deny the existence of records which could identify any participant in the Witness Security Program pursuant to FOIA exemption (b)(3) and PA exemption (j)(2) [5 U.S.C. §§ 552/552a (b)(3), 18 U.S.C. 3521, and (j)(2)]. This is a standard response and should not be read to indicate that such records do or do not exist. (iii) Requests for Records for Incarcerated Individuals. The FBI can neither confirm nor deny the existence of records which could reasonably be expected to endanger the life or physical safety of any incarcerated individual pursuant to FOIA exemptions (b)(7)(E), (b)(7)(F), and PA exemption (j)(2) [5 U.S.C. §§ 552/552a (b)(7)(E), (b)(7)(F), and (j)(2)]. This is a standard response and should not be read to indicate that such records do or do not exist. Part 3: General Information: (i) Record Searches. The Record/Information Dissemination Section (RIDS) searches for reasonably described records by searching systems or locations where responsive records would reasonably be found. A standard search normally consists of a search for main files in the Central Records System (CRS), an extensive system of records consisting of applicant, investigative, intelligence, personnel, administrative, and general files compiled by the FBI per its law enforcement, intelligence, and administrative functions. The CRS spans the entire FBI organization, comprising records of FBI Headquarters, FBI Field Offices, and FBI Legal Attaché Offices (Legats) worldwide; Electronic Surveillance (ELSUR) records are included in the CRS. Unless specifically requested, a standard search does not include references, administrative records of previous FOIPA requests, or civil litigation files. For additional information about our record searches, visit www.fbi.gov/services/information-management/foipa/requesting-fbi-records. (ii) FBI Records. Founded in 1908, the FBI carries out a dual law enforcement and national security mission. As part of this dual mission, the FBI creates and maintains records on various subjects; however, the FBI does not maintain records on every person, subject, or entity. (iii) Requests for Criminal History Records or Rap Sheets. The Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) Division provides Identity History Summary Checks – often referred to as a criminal history record or rap sheet. These criminal history records are not the same as material in an investigative “FBI file.” An Identity History Summary Check is a listing of information taken from fingerprint cards and documents submitted to the FBI in connection with arrests, federal employment, naturalization, or military service. For a fee, individuals can request a copy of their Identity History Summary Check. Forms and directions can be accessed at www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/identity-history-summary-checks. Additionally, requests can be submitted electronically at www.edo.cjis.gov. For additional information, please contact CJIS directly at (304) 625-5590. (iv) National Name Check Program (NNCP). The mission of NNCP is to analyze and report information in response to name check requests received from federal agencies, for the purpose of protecting the United States from foreign and domestic threats to national security. Please be advised that this is a service provided to other federal agencies. Private Citizens cannot request a name check.

  26. EXPLANATION OF EXEMPTIONS SUBSECTIONS OF TITLE 5, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 552 (b)(1) (A) specifically authorized under criteria established by an Executive order to be kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy and (B) are in fact properly classified to such Executive order; (b)(2) (b)(3) related solely to the internal personnel rules and practices of an agency; specifically exempted from disclosure by statute (other than section 552b of this title), provided that such statute (A) requires that the matters be withheld from the public in such a manner as to leave no discretion on issue, or (B) establishes particular criteria for withholding or refers to particular types of matters to be withheld; (b)(4) (b)(5) trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person and privileged or confidential; inter-agency or intra-agency memorandums or letters which would not be available by law to a party other than an agency in litigation with the agency; (b)(6) (b)(7) personnel and medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy; records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes, but only to the extent that the production of such law enforcement records or information ( A ) could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings, ( B ) would deprive a person of a right to a fair trial or an impartial adjudication, ( C ) could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, ( D ) could reasonably be expected to disclose the identity of confidential source, including a State, local, or foreign agency or authority or any private institution which furnished information on a confidential basis, and, in the case of record or information compiled by a criminal law enforcement authority in the course of a criminal investigation, or by an agency conducting a lawful national security intelligence investigation, information furnished by a confidential source, ( E ) would disclose techniques and procedures for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions, or would disclose guidelines for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions if such disclosure could reasonably be expected to risk circumvention of the law, or ( F ) could reasonably be expected to endanger the life or physical safety of any individual; (b)(8) contained in or related to examination, operating, or condition reports prepared by, on behalf of, or for the use of an agency responsible for the regulation or supervision of financial institutions; or (b)(9) geological and geophysical information and data, including maps, concerning wells. SUBSECTIONS OF TITLE 5, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 552a (d)(5) (j)(2) information compiled in reasonable anticipation of a civil action proceeding; material reporting investigative efforts pertaining to the enforcement of criminal law including efforts to prevent, control, or reduce crime or apprehend criminals; (k)(1) information which is currently and properly classified pursuant to an Executive order in the interest of the national defense or foreign policy, for example, information involving intelligence sources or methods; (k)(2) investigatory material compiled for law enforcement purposes, other than criminal, which did not result in loss of a right, benefit or privilege under Federal programs, or which would identify a source who furnished information pursuant to a promise that his/her identity would be held in confidence; (k)(3) material maintained in connection with providing protective services to the President of the United States or any other individual pursuant to the authority of Title 18, United States Code, Section 3056; (k)(4) (k)(5) required by statute to be maintained and used solely as statistical records; investigatory material compiled solely for the purpose of determining suitability, eligibility, or qualifications for Federal civilian employment or for access to classified information, the disclosure of which would reveal the identity of the person who furnished information pursuant to a promise that his/her identity would be held in confidence; (k)(6) testing or examination material used to determine individual qualifications for appointment or promotion in Federal Government service the release of which would compromise the testing or examination process; (k)(7) material used to determine potential for promotion in the armed services, the disclosure of which would reveal the identity of the person who furnished the material pursuant to a promise that his/her identity would be held in confidence. FBI/DOJ

  27. U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation Washington, D.C. 20535 November 12, 2020 MR. MICHAEL A. AYELE ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF CIVIL LIBERTIES POST OFFICE BOX 20438 ADDIS ABABA ETHIOPIA FOIPA Request No.: 1480829-000 Subject: CLERY, JEANNE ANN Dear Mr. Ayele: This acknowledges receipt of your Freedom of Information/Privacy Acts (FOIPA) request to the FBI. Below you will find check boxes and informational paragraphs about your request, as well as specific determinations required by these statutes. Please read each one carefully. Your request has been received at FBI Headquarters for processing. You submitted your request via the FBI’s eFOIPA system. We have reviewed your request and determined it is consistent with the FBI eFOIPA terms of service. Future correspondence about your FOIPA request will be provided in an email link unless the record’s file type is not supported by the eFOIPA system. We have reviewed your request and determined it is not consistent with the FBI eFOIPA terms of service. Future correspondence about your FOIPA request will be sent through standard mail. The subject of your request is currently being processed and documents will be released to you upon completion. Release of responsive records will be posted to the FBI’s electronic FOIA Library (The Vault), http:/vault.fbi.gov, and you will be contacted when the release is posted. Your request for a public interest fee waiver is under consideration and you will be advised of the decision if fees are applicable. If your fee waiver is not granted, you will be responsible for applicable fees per your designated requester fee category below. For the purpose of assessing any fees, we have determined: As a commercial use requester, you will be charged applicable search, review, and duplication fees in accordance with 5 USC § 552 (a)(4)(A)(ii)(I). As an educational institution, noncommercial scientific institution or representative of the news media requester, you will be charged applicable duplication fees in accordance with 5 USC § 552 (a)(4)(A)(ii)(II). As a general (all others) requester, you will be charged applicable search and duplication fees in accordance with 5 USC § 552 (a)(4)(A)(ii)(III).

  28. Please check the status of your FOIPA request at www.fbi.gov/foiaby clicking on FOIPA Status and entering your FOIPA Request Number. Status updates are adjusted weekly. The status of newly assigned requests may not be available until the next weekly update. If the FOIPA has been closed the notice will indicate that appropriate correspondence has been mailed to the address on file. For questions regarding our determinations, visit the www.fbi.gov/foia website under “Contact Us.” The FOIPA Request number listed above has been assigned to your request. Please use this number in all correspondence concerning your request. If you are not satisfied with the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s determination in response to this request, you may administratively appeal by writing to the Director, Office of Information Policy (OIP), United States Department of Justice, 441 G Street, NW, 6th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20530, or you may submit an appeal through OIP's FOIA STAR portal by creating an account following the instructions on OIP’s website: https://www.justice.gov/oip/submit-and-track-request-or-appeal. Your appeal must be postmarked or electronically transmitted within ninety (90) days of the date of my response to your request. If you submit your appeal by mail, both the letter and the envelope should be clearly marked "Freedom of Information Act Appeal." Please cite the FOIPA Request Number assigned to your request so it may be easily identified. You may seek dispute resolution services by contacting the Office of Government Information Services (OGIS). The contact information for OGIS is as follows: Office of Government Information Services, National Archives and Records Administration, 8601 Adelphi Road-OGIS, College Park, Maryland 20740-6001, e-mail at ogis@nara.gov; telephone at 202-741-5770; toll free at 1-877-684-6448; or facsimile at 202-741-5769. Alternatively, you may contact the FBI’s FOIA Public Liaison by emailing foipaquestions@fbi.gov. If you submit your dispute resolution correspondence by email, the subject heading should clearly state “DisputeResolution Services.” Please also cite the FOIPA Request Number assigned to your request so it may be easily identified. Sincerely, Michael G. Seidel Section Chief Record/Information Dissemination Section Information Management Division

  29. U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation Washington, D.C. 20535 February 25, 2021 MICHAEL A. AYELE ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF CIVIL LIBERTIES POST OFFICE BOX 20438 ADDIS ABABA ETHIOPIA FOIPA Request No.: 1480829-000 Subject: CLERY, JEANNE ANN Dear Michael Ayele: The enclosed documents were reviewed under the Freedom of Information/Privacy Acts (FOIPA), Title 5, United States Code, Section 552/552a. Below you will find check boxes under the appropriate statute headings which indicate the types of exemptions asserted to protect information which is exempt from disclosure. The appropriate exemptions are noted on the enclosed pages next to redacted information. In addition, a deleted page information sheet was inserted to indicate where pages were withheld entirely and identify which exemptions were applied. The checked exemption boxes used to withhold information are further explained in the enclosed Explanation of Exemptions. Section 552 (b)(1) (b)(2) (b)(3) (b)(7)(E) (b)(8) Section 552a (d)(5) (b)(7)(A) (b)(7)(B) (b)(7)(C) (b)(7)(D) (j)(2) (k)(1) (k)(2) (k)(3) (b)(7)(F) (k)(4) (k)(5) (b)(4) (b)(5) (b)(9) (k)(6) (b)(6) (k)(7) 5 page(s) were reviewed and 5 page(s) are being released. Please see the paragraphs below for relevant information specific to your request as well as the enclosed FBI FOIPA Addendum for standard responses applicable to all requests. Document(s) were located which originated with, or contained information concerning, other Government Agency [OGA]. This information has been referred to the OGA(s) for review and direct response to you. We are consulting with another agency. The FBI will correspond with you regarding this information when the consultation is completed. Please refer to the enclosed FBI FOIPA Addendum for additional standard responses applicable to your request. “Part 1” of the Addendum includes standard responses that apply to all requests. “Part 2” includes additional standard responses that apply to all requests for records about yourself or any third party individuals. “Part3” includes general information about FBI records that you may find useful. Also enclosed is our Explanation of Exemptions.

  30. The FOIPA Request Number listed above has been assigned to your request. Please use this number in all correspondence concerning your request. If you are not satisfied with the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s determination in response to this request, you may administratively appeal by writing to the Director, Office of Information Policy (OIP), United States Department of Justice, 441 G Street, NW, 6th Floor, Washington, D.C. 20530, or you may submit an appeal through OIP's FOIA STAR portal by creating an account following the instructions on OIP’s website: https://www.justice.gov/oip/submit-and-track-request-or-appeal. Your appeal must be postmarked or electronically transmitted within ninety (90) days of the date of my response to your request. If you submit your appeal by mail, both the letter and the envelope should be clearly marked "Freedom of Information Act Appeal." Please cite the FOIPA Request Number assigned to your request so it may be easily identified. You may seek dispute resolution services by contacting the Office of Government Information Services (OGIS). The contact information for OGIS is as follows: Office of Government Information Services, National Archives and Records Administration, 8601 Adelphi Road-OGIS, College Park, Maryland 20740-6001, e-mail at ogis@nara.gov; telephone at 202-741-5770; toll free at 1-877-684-6448; or facsimile at 202-741-5769. Alternatively, you may contact the FBI’s FOIA Public Liaison by emailing foipaquestions@fbi.gov. If you submit your dispute resolution correspondence by email, the subject heading should clearly state “DisputeResolution Services.” Please also cite the FOIPA Request Number assigned to your request so it may be easily identified. For questions regarding our determinations, visit the www.fbi.gov/foia website under “Contact Us.” See additional information which follows. The enclosed documents represent the final release of information responsive to your Freedom of Information/Privacy Acts (FOIPA) request. It is unnecessary to adjudicate your request for a public interest fee waiver because there are not assessable fees. Sincerely, Michael G. Seidel Section Chief Record/Information Dissemination Section Information Management Division Enclosure(s)

  31. FBI FOIPA Addendum As referenced in our letter responding to your Freedom of Information/Privacy Acts (FOIPA) request, the FBI FOIPA Addendum provides information applicable to your request. Part 1 of the Addendum includes standard responses that apply to all requests. Part 2 includes standard responses that apply to requests for records about individuals to the extent your request seeks the listed information. Part 3 includes general information about FBI records, searches, and programs. Part 1: The standard responses below apply to all requests: (i) 5 U.S.C. § 552(c). Congress excluded three categories of law enforcement and national security records from the requirements of the FOIPA [5 U.S.C. § 552(c)]. FBI responses are limited to those records subject to the requirements of the FOIPA. Additional information about the FBI and the FOIPA can be found on the www.fbi.gov/foia website. (ii) Intelligence Records. To the extent your request seeks records of intelligence sources, methods, or activities, the FBI can neither confirm nor deny the existence of records pursuant to FOIA exemptions (b)(1), (b)(3), and as applicable to requests for records about individuals, PA exemption (j)(2) [5 U.S.C. §§ 552/552a (b)(1), (b)(3), and (j)(2)]. The mere acknowledgment of the existence or nonexistence of such records is itself a classified fact protected by FOIA exemption (b)(1) and/or would reveal intelligence sources, methods, or activities protected by exemption (b)(3) [50 USC § 3024(i)(1)]. This is a standard response and should not be read to indicate that any such records do or do not exist. Part 2: The standard responses below apply to all requests for records on individuals: (i) Requests for Records about any Individual—Watch Lists. The FBI can neither confirm nor deny the existence of any individual’s name on a watch list pursuant to FOIA exemption (b)(7)(E) and PA exemption (j)(2) [5 U.S.C. §§ 552/552a (b)(7)(E), (j)(2)]. This is a standard response and should not be read to indicate that watch list records do or do not exist. (ii) Requests for Records about any Individual—Witness Security Program Records. The FBI can neither confirm nor deny the existence of records which could identify any participant in the Witness Security Program pursuant to FOIA exemption (b)(3) and PA exemption (j)(2) [5 U.S.C. §§ 552/552a (b)(3), 18 U.S.C. 3521, and (j)(2)]. This is a standard response and should not be read to indicate that such records do or do not exist. (iii) Requests for Records for Incarcerated Individuals. The FBI can neither confirm nor deny the existence of records which could reasonably be expected to endanger the life or physical safety of any incarcerated individual pursuant to FOIA exemptions (b)(7)(E), (b)(7)(F), and PA exemption (j)(2) [5 U.S.C. §§ 552/552a (b)(7)(E), (b)(7)(F), and (j)(2)]. This is a standard response and should not be read to indicate that such records do or do not exist. Part 3: General Information: (i) Record Searches. The Record/Information Dissemination Section (RIDS) searches for reasonably described records by searching systems or locations where responsive records would reasonably be found. A standard search normally consists of a search for main files in the Central Records System (CRS), an extensive system of records consisting of applicant, investigative, intelligence, personnel, administrative, and general files compiled by the FBI per its law enforcement, intelligence, and administrative functions. The CRS spans the entire FBI organization, comprising records of FBI Headquarters, FBI Field Offices, and FBI Legal Attaché Offices (Legats) worldwide; Electronic Surveillance (ELSUR) records are included in the CRS. Unless specifically requested, a standard search does not include references, administrative records of previous FOIPA requests, or civil litigation files. For additional information about our record searches, visit www.fbi.gov/services/information-management/foipa/requesting-fbi-records. (ii) FBI Records. Founded in 1908, the FBI carries out a dual law enforcement and national security mission. As part of this dual mission, the FBI creates and maintains records on various subjects; however, the FBI does not maintain records on every person, subject, or entity. (iii) Requests for Criminal History Records or Rap Sheets. The Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) Division provides Identity History Summary Checks – often referred to as a criminal history record or rap sheet. These criminal history records are not the same as material in an investigative “FBI file.” An Identity History Summary Check is a listing of information taken from fingerprint cards and documents submitted to the FBI in connection with arrests, federal employment, naturalization, or military service. For a fee, individuals can request a copy of their Identity History Summary Check. Forms and directions can be accessed at www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/identity-history-summary-checks. Additionally, requests can be submitted electronically at www.edo.cjis.gov. For additional information, please contact CJIS directly at (304) 625-5590. (iv) National Name Check Program (NNCP). The mission of NNCP is to analyze and report information in response to name check requests received from federal agencies, for the purpose of protecting the United States from foreign and domestic threats to national security. Please be advised that this is a service provided to other federal agencies. Private Citizens cannot request a name check.

  32. EXPLANATION OF EXEMPTIONS SUBSECTIONS OF TITLE 5, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 552 (b)(1) (A) specifically authorized under criteria established by an Executive order to be kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy and (B) are in fact properly classified to such Executive order; (b)(2) (b)(3) related solely to the internal personnel rules and practices of an agency; specifically exempted from disclosure by statute (other than section 552b of this title), provided that such statute (A) requires that the matters be withheld from the public in such a manner as to leave no discretion on issue, or (B) establishes particular criteria for withholding or refers to particular types of matters to be withheld; (b)(4) (b)(5) trade secrets and commercial or financial information obtained from a person and privileged or confidential; inter-agency or intra-agency memorandums or letters which would not be available by law to a party other than an agency in litigation with the agency; (b)(6) (b)(7) personnel and medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy; records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes, but only to the extent that the production of such law enforcement records or information ( A ) could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings, ( B ) would deprive a person of a right to a fair trial or an impartial adjudication, ( C ) could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, ( D ) could reasonably be expected to disclose the identity of confidential source, including a State, local, or foreign agency or authority or any private institution which furnished information on a confidential basis, and, in the case of record or information compiled by a criminal law enforcement authority in the course of a criminal investigation, or by an agency conducting a lawful national security intelligence investigation, information furnished by a confidential source, ( E ) would disclose techniques and procedures for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions, or would disclose guidelines for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions if such disclosure could reasonably be expected to risk circumvention of the law, or ( F ) could reasonably be expected to endanger the life or physical safety of any individual; (b)(8) contained in or related to examination, operating, or condition reports prepared by, on behalf of, or for the use of an agency responsible for the regulation or supervision of financial institutions; or (b)(9) geological and geophysical information and data, including maps, concerning wells. SUBSECTIONS OF TITLE 5, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 552a (d)(5) (j)(2) information compiled in reasonable anticipation of a civil action proceeding; material reporting investigative efforts pertaining to the enforcement of criminal law including efforts to prevent, control, or reduce crime or apprehend criminals; (k)(1) information which is currently and properly classified pursuant to an Executive order in the interest of the national defense or foreign policy, for example, information involving intelligence sources or methods; (k)(2) investigatory material compiled for law enforcement purposes, other than criminal, which did not result in loss of a right, benefit or privilege under Federal programs, or which would identify a source who furnished information pursuant to a promise that his/her identity would be held in confidence; (k)(3) material maintained in connection with providing protective services to the President of the United States or any other individual pursuant to the authority of Title 18, United States Code, Section 3056; (k)(4) (k)(5) required by statute to be maintained and used solely as statistical records; investigatory material compiled solely for the purpose of determining suitability, eligibility, or qualifications for Federal civilian employment or for access to classified information, the disclosure of which would reveal the identity of the person who furnished information pursuant to a promise that his/her identity would be held in confidence; (k)(6) testing or examination material used to determine individual qualifications for appointment or promotion in Federal Government service the release of which would compromise the testing or examination process; (k)(7) material used to determine potential for promotion in the armed services, the disclosure of which would reveal the identity of the person who furnished the material pursuant to a promise that his/her identity would be held in confidence. FBI/DOJ

More Related