About Jennifer Lawrence September 2022 Vogue Interview & the #MeToo Movement - #Michael Ayele (a.k.a) W

2. C O U N T YO FL O SA N G EL E S OFF IC E OF THE C OUNTY C OUNS E L 648 KENNETH HAHN HALL OF ADMINISTRATION 500 WEST TEMPLE STREET TELEPHONE LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012-2713 (213) 974-1828 FACSIMILE DAWYN R. HARRISON County Counsel (213) 626-5578 April 5, 2023 TDD (213) 633-0901 E-MAIL jmccaverty@counsel.lacounty.gov VIA E-MAIL ONLY Mr. Michael Ayele Post Office Box 20438 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia waacl13@gmail.com Re: Public Records Act Request Dear Mr. Ayele: This letter is in response to your Public Records Act request dated and received by the Office of the County Counsel on February 1, 2023, seeking the following records: "[1] the paperwork that were filed by the Los Angeles County to extradite Harvey Weinstein from the State of New York to the State of California (on or around July 20th 2021); [2] the criminal charges filed by the Los Angeles County against Harvey Weinstein following his extradition from the State of New York to the State of California (on or around July 20th 2021)." On February 13, 2023, my office responded to this request and extended the time to respond by 14 days pursuant to Government Code section 7922.535, subdivision (b), which included up and to February 27, 2023. HOA.104030570.1

3. Mr. Michael Ayele April 5, 2023 Page 2 Please be advised that after a diligent search enclosed are all responsive records. Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, DAWYN R. HARRISON County Counsel By JONATHAN McCAVERTY Principal Deputy County Counsel APPROVED AND RELEASED: for NICOLE DAVIS TINKHAM Chief Deputy JM:pec Enclosures HOA.104030570.1

4. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES The People of the State of California, CASE NO. BA484270 Plainriff, f i ~f ~1[~1171~1► ~~ v. HARVEY WEINSTEIN COU NT 1 Th e sai d H ARVEY W EI NSTEI N i s accused by t h e G rand Jury of t h e Count y of Los Ang el es, St at e of Cal i f orni a, by t h i s I nd i ct m ent , of t h e cri m e of FORCI BLE ORAI . COPU LATI ON, i n vi ol at i on of Penal Cod e Sect i on 28 8 a(c) (2) (A) , a Fel ony, com m i t t ed p ri or t o t h e f i nd i ng of t h i s I nd i ct m ent , and as f ol l ow s: On or about February 18 , 2013, i n t h e Count y of Los Ang el es, t h e sai d H ARVEY W EI NSTEI N w h o d i d u nl aw f ul l y p art i ci p at e i n anact of oral cop ul at i on w i t h Jane Doe # 1 and d i d accom p l i sh sai d act ag ai nst sai d vi ct i m 's w i l l by f orce, vi ol ence, d uress, m enace or f ear of i m m ed i at e and unl aw f ul bod i l y i njury t o sai d vi ct i m . 1 9 • ~. . ~. : : ! '~ ••~• ~ s ~ Present ed by t h e Forep erson of t h e G rand Jury i n t h e p resence of t h e G rand Jury, i n op en Sup eri or Court of t h e St at e of Cal i f orni a, w i t h i n and f or t h e Count y of Los Ang el es, and f i l ed as a record i n sai d Court t h i s 15` hd ay of March , 2021 SH ERRI R. CARTER, Execut i ve Of f i cer/ Cl erk Bai l Recom m end ed BY $ ~/ ~ 6a~ l Dep ut y G EOR CON, Di st ri ct At t orney Bai l By W ,. ~aT~o. $ Dep ut y

5. "NOTICE: Conviction of this offense will require the court to order you to submit to a blood test for evidence of antibodies to the probable causative agent of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome ( AIDS}. Penal Code Section 1202.1." " NOTICE: Conviction of this offense will require you to register pursuant to Penal Code Section 290 et. Seq, Willful failure to register is a crime." " 1~tOTICB: The above offense is a serious felony within the meaning of Penal Code Section 1192.?(c} and a violent felony within the meaning of Penal Code Section 6675(c)." **,~* COUNT2 For a further and sepazate cause of action, being a different offense of the same class of crimes and offenses as the charge set forth in the aforestated Count hereof, the said HARVEY WEINSTEIN is accused by the Grand Jury of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, by this Indictment, of the crime of SEXUAL PENETRATION BY FOREIGN OBJECT, in violation of Penal Code Section 289(a)(1)(A), a Felony, committed prior to the finding of this Indichnent, and as follows: On or about February 18, 2013, in the County of Los Angeles, the said HARVEY WEINSTEIN, who committed an act of sexual penetration against the will of Jane Doe #1 by means of force, violence, duress, menace or fear of immediate and unlawful bodily injury on Jane Doe #1. " NOTICE: Conviction of this offense will require you to register pursuant to Penal Code Section 290 et. Seq. Willful failure to register is a crime." " NOTICE: Being charged with this criminal offense can result in mandatory pre-conviction HIV/AIDS testing and disclosure of the results to a victim and the Chief Medical Officer of the jail or prison facility where you are incarcerated pursuant to Penal Code Section 1524.1 and Health and Safety Code section 121055 following a probable cause hearing resulting in a court order." " NOTICE: The above offense is a serious felony within the meaning of Penal Code Section 1192.7(c) and a violent felony within the meaning of Penal Code Section 667.5(c)." ****,~ COUNT3 For a further and separate cause of action, being a different offense of the same class of crimes and offenses as the charge set forth in the aforestated Count hereof, the said HARVEY WEINSTEIN is accused by the Grand Jury of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, by this Indichnent, of the crime of FORCIBLE RAPE, in violation of Penal Code Section 261(a)(2), a Felony, committed prior to the finding of this Indictment, and as follows:

6. On or about February 18, 2013, in the County of Los Angeles, the said HARVEY WEINSTEIN, who did unlawfully accomplish an act of sexual intercourse with a person, to wit, Jane Doe #1, not his spouse, against said person's will, by means of force, violence, duress, menace or fear of immediate and unlawfully bodily injury on said person. " NOTICE: Conviction of this offense will require the court to order you to submit to a blood test for evidence of antibodies to the probable causative agent of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome ( AIDS). Penal Code Section 1202.1." " NOTICE: Conviction of this offense wilt require you to register pursuant to Penal Code Section 290 et. Seq. Willful failure to register is a crime." " NOTICE: The above offense is a serious felony within the meaning of Penal Code Section 1192.7(c) and a violent felony within the meaning of Penal Code Section 667.5(c)." F .i'.i'.f3.9 COUNT 4 For a further and separate cause of action, being a different offense of the same class of crimes and offenses as the charge set forth in the aforestated Count hereof, the said HARVEY WEINSTEIN is accused by the Grand Jury of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, by this Indictment, of the crime of SEXUAL BATTERY BY RESTRAINT, in violation of Penal Code Section 243.4(a), a Felony, committed prior to the f inding of this Indictment, and as follows: On or about February 19, 2013, in the County of Los Angeles, the said HARVEY WEINSTEIN, who did willfully and unlawfully Couch anintimate parC of Jane Doe #2, while said person was unlawfully restrained by said defendant, Harvey Weinstein, against the will of said person and for the purpose of sexual arousal, sexual gratification or sexual abuse. ' `NOTICE: Conviction of this offense will require you to register pursuant to Penal Code Section 290 et. Seq. Willful failure to register is a crime." ~ ~xx~ COUNT 5 For a further and separate cause of action, being a different offense of the same class of crimes and offenses as the charge set forth in the aforestated Count hereof, the said HARVEY WEINSTEIN is accused by the Grand Jury of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, by this Indictment, of the crime of SEXUAL BATTERY BY RESTRAINT, in violation of Penal Code Section 243.4(a}, a Felony, committed prior to the f inding of this Indictment, and as follows: On or about May 1 i, 2010, in the County of Los Angeles, the said HARVEY WEINSTEIN, who did willfully and unlawfully touch an intimate part of Jane Doe #3, while said person was unlawfully restrained by said defendant, Harvey Weinstein, against the will of said person and for the purpose of sexual arousal, sexual gratification or sexual abuse.

7. "NOTICE: Conviction of this offense will require you to register pursuant to Penal Code Section 290 et. Seq. Willful failure to register is a crime." *x ~ :~ ,~ COUNT 6 For a further and sepazate cause of action, being a different offense of the same class of crimes and offenses as the charge set forth in the aforestated Count hereof, the said HARVEY WEINSTEIN is accused by the Grand Jury of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, by this Indictment, of the crime of FORCIBLE ORAL. COPULATION, in violation of Penal Code Section 288a(c)(2}, a Felony, committed prior to the finding of this Indictment, and as follows: Between arabout September 1, 2004 and September 30, 2005, in the County of Los Angeles, the said HARVEY WEINSTEIN, who did unlawfully accomplish anact of oral copulation with Jane Doe #4 and did accomplish said act against said victim's will by force, violence, duress, menace or fear of immediate and unlawful bodily injury to said victim. " NOTICE: The above offense is a serious felony within the meaning of Penal Code Section 1192.7(c)." " NOTICE: Conviction of this offense will require you to register pursuant to Penal Code Section 290 et. Seq. Willful failure to register is a crime." ' `NOTICE: Conviction of this offense will require the court to order you to submit to a blood test for evidence of antibodies to the probable causative agent of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome ( AIDS). Penal Cade Section 1202.1." `NOTICE: Being charged with this criminal offense can result in mandatory pre-conviction HIV(AIDS testing and disclosure of the results to a victim and Che Chief Medical Officer of the jail or prison facility where you are incarcerated pursuant to Penal Code Section 1524.1 and Health and Safety Code section 121055 following a probable cause hearing resulting in a court order." ~ ~~~~ C K1111`► ~I Ti I For a f urt h er and sep arat e cause of act i on, bei ng a d i f f erent of f ense of t h e sam e cl ass of cri m es and of f enses as t h e ch arg e set f ort h i n t h e af orest at ed Count h ereof , t h e sai d H ARVEY W EI NSTEI N i s accused by t h e G rand Jury of t h e Count y of Los Ang el es, St at e of Cal i f orni a, by t h i s I nd i ct m ent , of t h e cri m e of FORCI BLE RAPE, i n vi ol at i on of Penal Cod e Sect i on 261(a) (2) , a Fel ony, com m i t t ed p ri or t o t h e f i nd i ng of t h i s I nd i ct m ent , and as f ol l ow s: Bet w een or about Sep t em ber 1, 2004 and Sep t em ber 30, 2005, i n t h e Count y of Los Ang el es, t h e sai d H ARVEY W EI NSTEI N, w h o d i d unl aw f ul l y accom p l i sh anact of sexual i nt ercourse w i t h a p erson, t o w i t , Jane Doe # 4, not h i s sp ouse, ag ai nst sai d p erson's w i l l , by m eans of f orce, vi ol ence, d uress, m enace or f ear of i m m ed i at e and unl aw f ul l y bod i l y i njury on sai d p erson.

8. "NOTICE: Conviction of this offense will require the court to order you to submit to a blood test for evidence of antibodies to the probable causative agent of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome ( AIDS). Penal Code Section 1202.1." ` 'NOTICE: Conviction of this offense will require you to register pursuant to Penal Code Section 290 et. Seq. Willful failure to register is a crime." " NOTICE: The above offense is a serious felony within the meaning of Penal Code Section 1192.7(c) and a violent felony within the meaning of Pena]. Code Section 667.5(c)." ~ ~*~* COUNT8 For a further and separate cause of action, being a different offense of the same class of crimes and offenses as the charge set forth in the aforestated Count hereof, the said HARVEY WEINSTEIN is accused by the Grand Jury of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, by this Indictment, of the crime of FORCIBLE ORAL COPULATION, in violation of Penal Code Section 288a(c}(2), a Felony, committed prior to the finding of this Indichnent, and as follows: Between or about November 3, 2009 and November 9, 2009, in the County of Los Angeles, the said HARVEY WEINSTEIN, who did unlawfully accomplish an act of oral copulation with Jane Doe #5 and did accomplish said act against said victim's will by force, violence, duress, menace or feaz of immediate and unlawful bodily injury to said victim. " NOTICE: The above offense is a serious felony within the meaning of Penal Code Section 1192.7(c}." " I~IOTICE: Conviction of this offense will require you to register pursuant to Penal Code Section 290 et. Seq. Willful failure to regisfer is a crime." " NOTICE: Conviction of this offense will require the court to order you to submit to a blood test for evidence of antibodies to the probable causative agent of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome ( AIDS). Penal Code Section 1202.1." " NOTICE: Being charged with this criminal offense can result in mandatory pre-conviction HIV/AIDS testing and disclosure of the results to a victim and the Chief Medical Officer of the jail or prison facility where you aze incarcerated pursuant to Penal Code Section 1524.1 and Health and Safety Code section 121055 following a probable cause hearing resulting in a court order." ~ ~x~~ COUNT9 For a further and separate cause of action, being a different offense of the same class of crimes and offenses as the charge set forth in the aforestated Count hereof, the said HARVEY WEINSTEIN is accused by the Grand Jury of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, by this Indictment, of the crime of FORCIBLE RAPE, in violation of Penal Code Section 261(a)(2), a Felony, committed prior to the finding of this Indictment, and as follows:

9. Between or about November 3, 2009 and November 9, 2009, in the County of Los Angeles, the said HARVEY WEINSTEIN, who did unlawfully accomplish an act of sexual intercourse with a person, to wit, Jane Doe #5, not his spouse, against said person's will, by means of force, violence, duress, menace or fear of immediate and unlawfully bodily injury on said person. ' `NOTICE: Conviction of this offense will require the court to order you to submit to a blood test for evidence of antibodies to the probable causative agent of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome ( AIDS). Penal Code Section 1202.1." " NOTICE: Conviction of this offense will require you to register pursuant to Penal Code Section 290 et. Seq. Willful failure to register is a crime." " NOTICE: The above offense is a serious felony within the meaning of Penal Code Section 1192.7(c) and a violent felony within the meaning of Penal Code Section 667.5(c)." ***~* COUNT 10 For a fizrther and separate cause of action, being a different offense of the same class of crimes and offenses as the charge set forth in the aforestated Count hereof, the said HARVEY WEINSTEIN is accused by the Grand Jury of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, by this Indictment, of the crime of FORCIBLE ORAL COPULATION, in violation of Penal Code Section 288a(c)(2), a Felony, committed prior to the finding of this Indictment, and as follows: On or about November 5, 2010, in the County of Los Angeles, the said HARVEY WEINSTEIN, who did unlawfully participate in anact of oral copulation with Jane Doe #5 and did accomplish said act against said victim's will by force, violence, duress, menace or fear of immediate and unlawful bodily injury to said victim. " NOTICE: Conviction of this offense will require you to register pursuant to Penal Code Section 290 et. Seq. Willful failure to register is a crime." ' `NOTICE: Conviction of this offense will require the court to order you to submit to a blood test for evidence of antibodies to the probable causative agent of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome ( AIDS). Penal Code Section 1202.1." " NOTICE: The above offense is a serious felony within the meaning of Penal Code Section 1192.7(c) and a violent felony within the meaning of Penal Code Section 667.5(c)." : ~~x:~*

10. ,Kliii~fl liil For a further and separate cause of action, being a different offense of the same class of crimes and offenses as the charge set forth in the aforestated Count hereof, the said HARVEY WEINSTEIN is accused by the Grand Jury of the County of Los Angeles, State of California, by this Indictment, of the crime of FORCIBLE RAPE, in violation of Penal Code Section 261(a)(2), a Felony, committed prior to the finding of this Indictment, and as follows: On or about November 5, 2Q10, in the County of Los Angeles, the said HARVEY WEINSTEIN, who did unlawfiilly accomplish anact of sexual intercourse with a person, to wit, Jane Doe #5, not his spouse, against said person's will, by means of force, violence, duress, menace or fear of immediate and unlawfully bodily injury on said person. " NOTICB: Conviction of this offense will require the court to order you to submit to a blood test for evidence of antibodies to the probable causative agent of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome ( AIDS). Penal Code Section 1202.1." " NOTICE: Conviction of this offense will require you to register pursuant to Penal Code Section 290 et. Seq. Willful failure to register is a crime." " NOTICE: The above offense is a serious felony within the meaning of Penal Code Section 1192.7(c) and a violent felony within the meaning of Penal Code Section 667.5(c)." IY is further alleged, within the meaning of Penal Code section 667.61(b} and (e}, as to defendant, HARVEY WEINSTEIN, as to counts) 1, 2, 3,6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11 that the following circumstances apply: The defendant has been convicted in this case (1) Rape by Use of Force, Violence, Duress, Menace or Fear of Immediate and Unlawful Bodily Injury in violation of Penal Code §261(a}(2), (2} Oral Copulation by Use of Farce, Violence, Duress, Menace or Fear of Immediate and Unlawful Bodily Injury in violation of Penal Code §288a(c)(2) or Penal Code §288a(c)(2)(A}, or (3) Penetration by Foreign Object by Use of Force, Violence, Duress, Menace or Feaz of Immediate and Unlawful Bodily Injury in violation of Penal Code §289(a)(1)(A) against more than one victim. x ~*~:~

11. NOTICE: Conviction of this offense will require the defendant to provide DNA samples and print impressions pursuant to Penal Code sections 296 and 296.1. Willful refusal to provide the samples and impressions is a crime. NOTICE: The People of the State of California intend to present evidence and seek jury findings regarding all applicable circumstances in aggravation, pursuant to Penal Code section 117d(b) and Cunningham a California, (2007) 549 U.S. 270. NOTICE: A Suspected Child Abuse Report (SCAR} may have been generated within the meaning of Penal §§ ll166 and 11168 involving the charges alleged in this complain Dissemination of a SCAR is limited by Penal Code §§ 11167 and 11167.5 and a court order is required for full disclosure of the contents of a SCAR. NOTICE: Any allegation making a defendant ineligible to serve a state prison sentence in the county jail shall not be subject to dismissal pursuant to Penal Code § 1385. NOTICE: Conviction of this offense prohibits you from owning, purchasing, receiving, possessing, or having under your custody and control any firearms, and effective January 1, 2018, will require you to complete a Prohibited Persons Retinquis6ment Form ("PPR"} pursuant to Penal Code § 29810. ***x*

14. C O U N T YO FL O SA N G EL E S OFF IC E OF THE C OUNTY C OUNS E L 648 KENNETH HAHN HALL OF ADMINISTRATION 500 WEST TEMPLE STREET TELEPHONE LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012-2713 (213) 974-1828 FACSIMILE DAWYN R. HARRISON Interim County Counsel (213) 626-5578 February 13, 2023 TDD (213) 633-0901 E-MAIL jmccaverty@counsel.lacounty.gov VIA E-MAIL ONLY Mr. Michael Ayele Post Office Box 20438 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia waacl13@gmail.com Re: Public Records Act Request Dear Mr. Ayele: This letter is in response to your Public Records Act request dated and received by the Office of the County Counsel on February 1, 2023, seeking the following records: "[1] the paperwork that were filed by the Los Angeles County to extradite Harvey Weinstein from the State of New York to the State of California (on or around July 20th 2021); [2] the criminal charges filed by the Los Angeles County against Harvey Weinstein following his extradition from the State of New York to the State of California (on or around July 20th 2021)." Please be advised that pursuant to Government Code section 7922.535, subdivision (b), the time to respond to your request must be extended by an additional fourteen (14) days. I will be able to provide you with a further response by February 27, 2023. In the meantime, please contact me for any reason. Very truly yours, DAWYN R. HARRISON Interim County Counsel By JONATHAN McCAVERTY Principal Deputy County Counsel Justice and Safety Division JM:pec HOA.104019866.1

15. PUBLIC RECORDS REQUEST APPEAL 02/01/2023 W (AACL) Michael A. Ayele P.O.Box 20438 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia E-mail: waacl13@gmail.com ; waacl1313@gmail.com ; waacl42913@gmail.com Date.: February 01st 2023 Public Records Act (PRA) Request Hello, This is Michael Ayele sending this message though I now go by W. You may call me W. I am writing this letter in response to your correspondence dated January 31st 2023 following the Public Records Act (PRA) request I had filed with the Los Angeles County Counsel on the subject of the #MeToo movement and Jennifer Lawrence September 06th 2022 interview with Vogue (magazine). Please be advised that I have several concerns with the way you have gone on to process my PRA request. One of the main reasons I have concerns with your correspondence from January 31st 2023 is because of your failure to disclose the paperwork that was filed by the Los Angeles County Counsel to extradite Harvey Weinstein from the State of New York to the State of California on (or around) July 20th 2021. According to a July 20th 2021 article published by Reuters (for instance), “former Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein was extradited from New York to Los Angeles to face trial on rape and sexual assault charges. Weinstein was convicted in February 2020 for sexual assault and rape and was sentenced to 23 years in prison. In Los Angeles, he is wanted for trial on 11 charges of attacking five women from 2004 to 2013. The Los Angeles charges include forcible rape, forcible oral copulation, sexual battery by restraint, and sexual penetration by use of force…” i Additionally, I have other concerns with the way you have gone on to process my PRA request for failing to disclose the criminal charges filed by the Los Angeles County Counsel on July 21st 2021 against Harvey Weinstein. According to a press release issued by your own office (on July 21st2021), the Los Angeles County District Attorney George Gascon had “announced (…) that former film producer Harvey Weinstein was indicted on charges that he sexually assaulted five women in separate incidents that span nearly a decade.” ii As a representative of the media and a member of the general public, I hope you will perform a more thorough search for responsive records detailing [1] the paperwork that were filed by the Los Angeles County Counsel to extradite Harvey Weinstein from the State of New York to the State of California (on or around July 20th 2021); [2] the criminal charges filed by the Los Angeles County Counsel against Harvey Weinstein following his extradition from the State of New York to the State of California (on or around July 20th 2021). MICHAEL A. AYELE (A.K.A) W 1

16. PUBLIC RECORDS REQUEST APPEAL 02/01/2023 Be well. Take care. Keep yourselves at arms distance. Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Anti-Racist Human Rights Activist Audio-Visual Media Analyst Anti-Propaganda Journalist MICHAEL A. AYELE (A.K.A) W 2

17. PUBLIC RECORDS REQUEST APPEAL 02/01/2023 Work Cited i Harvey Weinstein extradited to Los Angeles to face second rape trial. Reuters.: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/harvey-weinstein-extradited-california-face-second-rape-trial- 2021-07-20/ iiJuly 21st 2021: Harvey Weinstein Indicted for Sexually Assaulting 5 Women. Los Angeles County District Attorney.: https://da.lacounty.gov/media/news/harvey-weinstein-indicted- sexually-assaulting-5-women MICHAEL A. AYELE (A.K.A) W 3

18. C O U N T YO FL O SA N G EL E S OFF IC E OF THE C OUNTY C OUNS E L 648 KENNETH HAHN HALL OF ADMINISTRATION 500 WEST TEMPLE STREET TELEPHONE LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012-2713 (213) 974-1905 FACSIMILE DAWYN R. HARRISON Interim County Counsel (213) 617-6785 TDD (213) 633-0901 January 31, 2023 E-MAIL egrospe@counsel.lacounty.gov VIA E-MAIL ONLY Michael Ayele P.O. Box 20438 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia waacl13@gmail.com Re: Public Records Act Request Dated December 14, 2022 Dear Mr. Ayele: This is in response to your California Public Records Act ("CPRA") request to the Office of the County Counsel ("County Counsel") dated December 14, 2022, seeking the following: "What I am requesting for prompt disclosure are records in your possession detailing your discussions about [1] Jennifer Lawrence as a Caucasian woman, who was born August 15th 1990 in the State of Kentucky;iii [2] Jennifer Lawrence as a woman, who's known worldwide for being an actress; [3] Jennifer Lawrence as a woman, who has in the month of September 2022 agreed to answer 73 (seventy three) questions for the purpose of an interview with Vogue; [4] Vogue (as a news magazine), which has decided to broach the subject of the 'most bizarre thing she's read about herself' with Jennifer Lawrence; [5] Vogue (as a news magazine), which has for the purpose of their interview with Jennifer Lawrence (in the month of September 2022) questioned her about 'the most bizarre thing she's read about herself;' [6] Jennifer Lawrence as a woman, who has told Vogue (magazine) that the 'most bizarre thing she's read about herself' is that she 'f***** Harvey Weinstein;' [7] Vogue (as a news magazine), which has decided not to follow-up Jennifer Lawrence answer to their question by asking her about the pervasive culture of sexual harassment/sexual assault and rape at the workplace (including but not limited to Hollywood); [8] Vogue (as a news magazine), which has decided not to follow-up Jennifer Lawrence answer to their question by asking her if she has had in the past sexual relations, which were not consensual; [9] Jennifer Lawrence as a woman, who has not answered any HOA.103986279.3

19. Michael Ayele January 31, 2023 Page 2 questions on the subject of the pervasive culture of sexual harassment/sexual assault and rape at the workplace (including but not limited to Hollywood) for the purpose of her interview with Vogue (magazine) (in the month of September 2022); [10] Jennifer Lawrence as a woman, who was not asked for the purpose of her interview with Vogue (magazine) (in the month of September 2022) whether or not she has had in the past sexual relations which were not consensual; [11] Jennifer Lawrence as a woman, who has firmly denied (on or around December 15th 2018) having any sexual relationship with Harvey Weinstein; [12] Jennifer Lawrence as a woman, who has previously won an Oscar for the Weinstein-produced film entitled: 'Silver Linings Playbook;' iv [13] Jennifer Lawrence as a woman, who has in the month of August 2018 left CAA, 'the agency that represented her for 10 years' because they were 'making (…) decisions that should have been hers alone;'v [14] Jennifer Lawrence as a woman, who has toward the end of October 2018 launched her production company called Excellent Cadaver;vi [15] Tarana Burke as a Black/African American woman, who's the founder of the #MeToo movement;vii [16] Harvey Weinstein as a Caucasian Jewish man, who was on (or around) February 24th 2020 convicted of third-degree rape and first-degree criminal sexual act in the New York Supreme Court;viii [17] Harvey Weinstein as a Caucasian Jewish man, who was on March 11th 2020 sentenced to 23 (twenty three) years of prison for the crimes he was found guilty of on (or around) February 24th 2020 in the New York Supreme Court;ix [18] the July 20th 2021 extradition of Harvey Weinstein from the State of New York to the State of California (in the County of Los Angeles);x [19] the decision of the Los Angeles County District Attorney to indict Harvey Weinstein for sexually assaulting 5 (five) women in 'separate incidents that span a decade;' xi [20] the decision of Harvey Weinstein to plead not guilty to the sexual assault charges filed against him in the County of Los Angeles (California);xii [21] the ongoing trial of Harvey Weinstein in Los Angeles, California (as of this writing dated December 14th 2022); [22] the impact of Harvey Weinstein trial in exposing a systemically chauvinistic, discriminatory, misogynistic and sexist culture in Hollywood, which abuses and takes advantage of women;xiii [23] your discussions about the movie entitled 'She Said,' which is adapted from the book by New York Times reporters Megan Twohey and Jodi Kantor; xiv [24] Megan Twohey as a journalist of the New York Times, who has in the past reached out to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to obtain information about the charges of discrimination filed (pursuant to Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act) against the companies owned and operated by Harvey Weinstein; [25] Megan Twohey as a journalist of the New York Times, HOA.103986279.3

20. Michael Ayele January 31, 2023 Page 3 who was informed by the EEOC that they were unwilling to disclose to her information about the companies that were routinely (and frequently) subject of charges of discrimination (filed pursuant to Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act); [26] the content of the FOIA request(s) submitted by the New York Times with the EEOC on the subject of Harvey Weinstein sexually harassing/sexually assaulting and/or raping women employed in his company; [27] the response(s) provided by the EEOC to the FOIA request(s) submitted by the New York Times on the subject of Harvey Weinstein sexually harassing/sexually assaulting and/or raping women employed in his company; xv [28] the FOIA and/or other public records request(s) submitted by the New York Times with your local/state/federal government agency since January 01st 2016; [29] the response(s) provided by your local/state/federal government agency to a public records request and/or a FOIA request submitted by the New York Times; [30] the real possibility that the EEOC had intimate knowledge of Harvey Weinstein sexual abuse of women and yet did nothing about it; [31] the real possibility that the EEOC was complicit in the sexual harassment, the sexual assault and the rape of women working in Hollywood and/or elsewhere in the U.S.A." On December 28, 2022, our office notified you that the time to respond would be extended by 14 days under Government Code section 7922.535. On January 10, 2023, we informed you that due to the COVID-19 pandemic, as reflected in Governor Newsom's and the County's Declarations of Emergency, the typical record search could not occur with regular pace. We anticipated having more information on or before January 31, 2023. Regarding Request No. 29 (i.e., "[29] the response(s) provided by your local/state/federal government agency to a public records request and/or a FOIA request submitted by the New York Times"), there was no time frame identified in your request. Government Code section 7922.530, subdivision (a), requires a public record request to "reasonably describe [ ] an identifiable record or records." And under the CPRA, "[a]n agency may legitimately raise an objection that a request is overbroad or unduly burdensome, or that the documents cannot be located with reasonable effort." (Fredericks v. Superior Court (2015) 233 Cal.App.4th 209, 225.) As such, we have interpreted your request to seek responses prepared by County Counsel to CPRA requests submitted by the New York Times, or requesters who identified themselves as working with the New York Times, from January 1, 2016, (a date identified elsewhere in your request) to December 14, 2022, (the date the request was received). County Counsel conducted a search HOA.103986279.3

21. Michael Ayele January 31, 2023 Page 4 based on the above criteria and located responsive records, which are attached to this response. County Counsel conducted a search based on the above criteria and located responsive records, which are attached to this response. As for the remainder of your request, County Counsel has conducted a thorough search and determined that there are no responsive records. This concludes our response to your CPRA request dated December 14, 2022. In providing you with this response, County Counsel is not waiving any rights, defenses, or claims of privilege or exemption of any record under the CPRA or any other statutes. Very truly yours, DAWYN R. HARRISON Interim County Counsel By EMILY A. GROSPE Deputy County Counsel Social Services Division APPROVED AND RELEASED: for JUDY W. WHITEHURST Acting Chief Deputy EAG:lal Attachments HOA.103986279.3

22. COUNTYOFLOSANGELES OFFICE OF THE COUNT Y COUNSEL 648 KENNETH HAHN HALL OF ADMINISTRATION 500 WEST TEMPLE STREET TELEPHONE LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012-2713 (213) 974-1905 FACSIMILE DAWYN R. HARRISON Interim County Counsel (213) 617-6785 January 10, 2023 TDD (213) 633-0901 E-MAIL egrospe@counsel.lacounty.gov VIA E-MAIL ONLY Michael Ayele P.O. Box 20438 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia waacl13@gmail.com Re: Public Records Act Request Dated December 14, 2022 Dear Mr. Ayele: This is in response to your California Public Records Act ("CPRA") request to the Office of the County Counsel ("County Counsel") dated December 14, 2022, seeking the following: "What I am requesting for prompt disclosure are records in your possession detailing your discussions about [1] Jennifer Lawrence as a Caucasian woman, who was born August 15th 1990 in the State of Kentucky;iii [2] Jennifer Lawrence as a woman, who's known worldwide for being an actress; [3] Jennifer Lawrence as a woman, who has in the month of September 2022 agreed to answer 73 (seventy three) questions for the purpose of an interview with Vogue; [4] Vogue (as a news magazine), which has decided to broach the subject of the 'most bizarre thing she's read about herself' with Jennifer Lawrence; [5] Vogue (as a news magazine), which has for the purpose of their interview with Jennifer Lawrence (in the month of September 2022) questioned her about 'the most bizarre thing she's read about herself;' [6] Jennifer Lawrence as a woman, who has told Vogue (magazine) that the 'most bizarre thing she's read about herself' is that she 'f***** Harvey Weinstein;' [7] Vogue (as a news magazine), which has decided not to follow-up Jennifer Lawrence answer to their question by asking her about the pervasive culture of sexual harassment/sexual assault and rape at the workplace (including but not limited to Hollywood); [8] Vogue (as a news magazine), which has decided not to follow-up Jennifer Lawrence answer to their question by HOA.103976078.1

23. Michael Ayele January 10, 2023 Page 2 asking her if she has had in the past sexual relations, which were not consensual; [9] Jennifer Lawrence as a woman, who has not answered any questions on the subject of the pervasive culture of sexual harassment/sexual assault and rape at the workplace (including but not limited to Hollywood) for the purpose of her interview with Vogue (magazine) (in the month of September 2022); [10] Jennifer Lawrence as a woman, who was not asked for the purpose of her interview with Vogue (magazine) (in the month of September 2022) whether or not she has had in the past sexual relations which were not consensual; [11] Jennifer Lawrence as a woman, who has firmly denied (on or around December 15th 2018) having any sexual relationship with Harvey Weinstein; [12] Jennifer Lawrence as a woman, who has previously won an Oscar for the Weinstein-produced film entitled: 'Silver Linings Playbook;' iv [13] Jennifer Lawrence as a woman, who has in the month of August 2018 left CAA, 'the agency that represented her for 10 years' because they were 'making (…) decisions that should have been hers alone;'v [14] Jennifer Lawrence as a woman, who has toward the end of October 2018 launched her production company called Excellent Cadaver;vi [15] Tarana Burke as a Black/African American woman, who's the founder of the #MeToo movement;vii [16] Harvey Weinstein as a Caucasian Jewish man, who was on (or around) February 24th 2020 convicted of third-degree rape and first-degree criminal sexual act in the New York Supreme Court;viii [17] Harvey Weinstein as a Caucasian Jewish man, who was on March 11th 2020 sentenced to 23 (twenty three) years of prison for the crimes he was found guilty of on (or around) February 24th 2020 in the New York Supreme Court;ix [18] the July 20th 2021 extradition of Harvey Weinstein from the State of New York to the State of California (in the County of Los Angeles);x [19] the decision of the Los Angeles County District Attorney to indict Harvey Weinstein for sexually assaulting 5 (five) women in 'separate incidents that span a decade;' xi [20] the decision of Harvey Weinstein to plead not guilty to the sexual assault charges filed against him in the County of Los Angeles (California);xii [21] the ongoing trial of Harvey Weinstein in Los Angeles, California (as of this writing dated December 14th 2022); [22] the impact of Harvey Weinstein trial in exposing a systemically chauvinistic, discriminatory, misogynistic and sexist culture in Hollywood, which abuses and takes advantage of women;xiii [23] your discussions about the movie entitled 'She Said,' which is adapted from the book by New York Times reporters Megan Twohey and Jodi Kantor; xiv [24] Megan Twohey as a journalist of the New York Times, who has in the past reached out to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to obtain information about the charges of discrimination filed (pursuant to Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil HOA.103976078.1

24. Michael Ayele January 10, 2023 Page 3 Rights Act) against the companies owned and operated by Harvey Weinstein; [25] Megan Twohey as a journalist of the New York Times, who was informed by the EEOC that they were unwilling to disclose to her information about the companies that were routinely (and frequently) subject of charges of discrimination (filed pursuant to Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act); [26] the content of the FOIA request(s) submitted by the New York Times with the EEOC on the subject of Harvey Weinstein sexually harassing/sexually assaulting and/or raping women employed in his company; [27] the response(s) provided by the EEOC to the FOIA request(s) submitted by the New York Times on the subject of Harvey Weinstein sexually harassing/sexually assaulting and/or raping women employed in his company; xv [28] the FOIA and/or other public records request(s) submitted by the New York Times with your local/state/federal government agency since January 01st 2016; [29] the response(s) provided by your local/state/federal government agency to a public records request and/or a FOIA request submitted by the New York Times; [30] the real possibility that the EEOC had intimate knowledge of Harvey Weinstein sexual abuse of women and yet did nothing about it; [31] the real possibility that the EEOC was complicit in the sexual harassment, the sexual assault and the rape of women working in Hollywood and/or elsewhere in the U.S.A." On December 28, 2022, our office notified you that the time to respond would be extended by 14 days under Government Code section 7922.535. Thank you for your patience as we continue to review and respond to your request. The record review process associated with your request is still ongoing because of the current unprecedented situation stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic. We appreciate the need for transparency and your right to disclosable public records. However, because of the current unprecedented situation stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic, as reflected in Governor Newsom's and the County's Declarations of Emergency (collectively, "Emergency"), the typical record search cannot occur with regular pace. During the pendency of the Emergency, resource allocation has been altered accordingly to ensure that County residents receive essential services in a manner that protects public health and safety. Government Code section 7922.000 allows an agency to withhold a record by demonstrating that, "the public interest served by not disclosing the record clearly outweighs the public interest served by disclosure of the record." In this instance, additional time is needed to respond to your request for the aforementioned reasons. Therefore, our office extends the time to respond and will provide you with a determination as to whether or not we are able to identify any disclosable public records and will provide you with a response by January 31, 2023. HOA.103976078.1

25. Michael Ayele January 10, 2023 Page 4 County Counsel continues to reserve its right to assert all applicable rights, defenses, or claims of privilege or exemption of any record under the CPRA or any other statutes. Very truly yours, DAWYN R. HARRISON Interim County Counsel By EMILY A. GROSPE Deputy County Counsel Social Services Division EAG:jn HOA.103976078.1

26. COUNTYOFLOSANGELES OFFICE OF THE COUNT Y COUNSEL 648 KENNETH HAHN HALL OF ADMINISTRATION 500 WEST TEMPLE STREET TELEPHONE LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90012-2713 (213) 974-1905 FACSIMILE DAWYN R. HARRISON Interim County Counsel (213) 617-6785 December 28, 2022 TDD (213) 633-0901 E-MAIL VIA E-MAIL ONLY Michael Ayele P.O. Box 20438 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia waacl13@gmail.com egrospe@counsel.lacounty.gov Re: Public Records Act Request Dated December 14, 2022 Dear Mr. Ayele: This is in response to your California Public Records Act ("CPRA") request to the Office of the County Counsel dated December 14, 2022, seeking the following: "What I am requesting for prompt disclosure are records in your possession detailing your discussions about [1] Jennifer Lawrence as a Caucasian woman, who was born August 15th 1990 in the State of Kentucky;iii [2] Jennifer Lawrence as a woman, who's known worldwide for being an actress; [3] Jennifer Lawrence as a woman, who has in the month of September 2022 agreed to answer 73 (seventy three) questions for the purpose of an interview with Vogue; [4] Vogue (as a news magazine), which has decided to broach the subject of the 'most bizarre thing she's read about herself' with Jennifer Lawrence; [5] Vogue (as a news magazine), which has for the purpose of their interview with Jennifer Lawrence (in the month of September 2022) questioned her about 'the most bizarre thing she's read about herself;' [6] Jennifer Lawrence as a woman, who has told Vogue (magazine) that the 'most bizarre thing she's read about herself' is that she 'f***** Harvey Weinstein;' [7] Vogue (as a news magazine), which has decided not to follow-up Jennifer Lawrence answer to their question by asking her about the pervasive culture of sexual harassment/sexual assault and rape at the workplace (including but not limited to Hollywood); [8] Vogue (as a news magazine), which has decided not to follow-up Jennifer Lawrence answer to their question by asking her if she has had in the past sexual relations, which were not consensual; [9] Jennifer Lawrence as a woman, who has not answered any questions on the subject of the pervasive culture of sexual harassment/sexual assault and rape at the workplace (including but not limited to Hollywood) for the purpose of her interview with Vogue HOA.103959418.1

27. Michael Ayele December 28, 2022 Page 2 (magazine) (in the month of September 2022); [10] Jennifer Lawrence as a woman, who was not asked for the purpose of her interview with Vogue (magazine) (in the month of September 2022) whether or not she has had in the past sexual relations which were not consensual; [11] Jennifer Lawrence as a woman, who has firmly denied (on or around December 15th 2018) having any sexual relationship with Harvey Weinstein; [12] Jennifer Lawrence as a woman, who has previously won an Oscar for the Weinstein-produced film entitled: 'Silver Linings Playbook;' iv [13] Jennifer Lawrence as a woman, who has in the month of August 2018 left CAA, 'the agency that represented her for 10 years' because they were 'making (…) decisions that should have been hers alone;'v [14] Jennifer Lawrence as a woman, who has toward the end of October 2018 launched her production company called Excellent Cadaver;vi [15] Tarana Burke as a Black/African American woman, who's the founder of the #MeToo movement;vii [16] Harvey Weinstein as a Caucasian Jewish man, who was on (or around) February 24th 2020 convicted of third-degree rape and first-degree criminal sexual act in the New York Supreme Court;viii [17] Harvey Weinstein as a Caucasian Jewish man, who was on March 11th 2020 sentenced to 23 (twenty three) years of prison for the crimes he was found guilty of on (or around) February 24th 2020 in the New York Supreme Court;ix [18] the July 20th 2021 extradition of Harvey Weinstein from the State of New York to the State of California (in the County of Los Angeles);x [19] the decision of the Los Angeles County District Attorney to indict Harvey Weinstein for sexually assaulting 5 (five) women in 'separate incidents that span a decade;' xi [20] the decision of Harvey Weinstein to plead not guilty to the sexual assault charges filed against him in the County of Los Angeles (California);xii [21] the ongoing trial of Harvey Weinstein in Los Angeles, California (as of this writing dated December 14th 2022); [22] the impact of Harvey Weinstein trial in exposing a systemically chauvinistic, discriminatory, misogynistic and sexist culture in Hollywood, which abuses and takes advantage of women;xiii [23] your discussions about the movie entitled 'She Said,' which is adapted from the book by New York Times reporters Megan Twohey and Jodi Kantor; xiv [24] Megan Twohey as a journalist of the New York Times, who has in the past reached out to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to obtain information about the charges of discrimination filed (pursuant to Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act) against the companies owned and operated by Harvey Weinstein; [25] Megan Twohey as a journalist of the New York Times, who was informed by the EEOC that they were unwilling to disclose to her information about the companies that were routinely (and frequently) subject of charges of discrimination (filed pursuant to Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act); [26] the content of the FOIA request(s) submitted by the New York Times with the EEOC on the subject of HOA.103959418.1

28. Michael Ayele December 28, 2022 Page 3 Harvey Weinstein sexually harassing/sexually assaulting and/or raping women employed in his company; [27] the response(s) provided by the EEOC to the FOIA request(s) submitted by the New York Times on the subject of Harvey Weinstein sexually harassing/sexually assaulting and/or raping women employed in his company; xv [28] the FOIA and/or other public records request(s) submitted by the New York Times with your local/state/federal government agency since January 01st 2016; [29] the response(s) provided by your local/state/federal government agency to a public records request and/or a FOIA request submitted by the New York Times; [30] the real possibility that the EEOC had intimate knowledge of Harvey Weinstein sexual abuse of women and yet did nothing about it; [31] the real possibility that the EEOC was complicit in the sexual harassment, the sexual assault and the rape of women working in Hollywood and/or elsewhere in the U.S.A." Please be advised that we are extending the time to respond by an additional 14 days due to unusual circumstances under Government Code section 6253, subdivision (c). These unusual circumstances include the need to search for, collect, and appropriately examine a voluminous amount of separate and distinct records that are demanded in a single request; the need for consultation, which shall be conducted with all practicable speed, among two or more components of the agency having substantial subject matter interest therein; and the need to review any records that may be located to determine if they can be disclosed. Accordingly, you will be provided with a determination on or before January 10, 2023, as to the identification of public records, if any, that are responsive to your request and are disclosable. In providing you with this response, the County of Los Angeles is not waiving any rights, defenses, or claims of privilege, exception or exemption under the CPRA or any other statutes. Very truly yours, DAWYN R. HARRISON Interim County Counsel By EMILY A. GROSPE Deputy County Counsel Social Services Division EAG:jn HOA.103959418.1

29. REQUEST FOR RECORDS 12/14/2022 W (AACL) Michael A. Ayele P.O.Box 20438 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia E-mail: waacl13@gmail.com ; waacl1313@gmail.com ; waacl42913@gmail.com Request for Records Hello, This is Michael A. Ayele sending this message though I now go by W. You may call me W. I am writing this letter to file a request for records with your office.i The basis for this records request is the answer provided by Jennifer Lawrence to a question asked of her by Vogue magazine (this Calendar Year 2022) on the subject of the “most bizarre thing she’s read about herself.” ii Date.: December 14th 2022 I) Requested Records What I am requesting for prompt disclosure are records in your possession detailing your discussions about [1] Jennifer Lawrence as a Caucasian woman, who was born August 15th 1990 in the State of Kentucky;iii [2] Jennifer Lawrence as a woman, who’s known worldwide for being an actress; [3] Jennifer Lawrence as a woman, who has in the month of September 2022 agreed to answer 73 (seventy three) questions for the purpose of an interview with Vogue; [4] Vogue (as a news magazine), which has decided to broach the subject of the “most bizarre thing she’s read about herself” with Jennifer Lawrence; [5] Vogue (as a news magazine), which has for the purpose of their interview with Jennifer Lawrence (in the month of September 2022) questioned her about “the most bizarre thing she’s read about herself;” [6] Jennifer Lawrence as a woman, who has told Vogue (magazine) that the “most bizarre thing she’s read about herself” is that she “f***** Harvey Weinstein;” [7] Vogue (as a news magazine), which has decided not to follow-up Jennifer Lawrence answer to their question by asking her about the pervasive culture of sexual harassment/sexual assault and rape at the workplace (including but not limited to Hollywood); [8] Vogue (as a news magazine), which has decided not to follow-up Jennifer Lawrence answer to their question by asking her if she has had in the past sexual relations, which were not consensual; [9] Jennifer Lawrence as a woman, who has not answered any questions on the subject of the pervasive culture of sexual harassment/sexual assault and rape at the workplace (including but not limited to Hollywood) for the purpose of her interview with Vogue (magazine) (in the month of September 2022); [10] Jennifer Lawrence as a woman, who was not asked for the purpose of her interview with Vogue (magazine) (in the month of September 2022) whether or not she has had in the past sexual relations which were not consensual; [11] Jennifer Lawrence as a woman, who has firmly denied (on or around December 15th 2018) having any sexual relationship with Harvey Weinstein; [12] Jennifer Lawrence as a woman, who has previously won an Oscar for the Weinstein-produced film entitled: “Silver Linings Playbook;”iv [13] W (AACL) – MICHAEL A. AYELE 1

30. REQUEST FOR RECORDS 12/14/2022 Jennifer Lawrence as a woman, who has in the month of August 2018 left CAA, “the agency that represented her for 10 years” because they were “making (…) decisions that should have been hers alone;”v [14] Jennifer Lawrence as a woman, who has toward the end of October 2018 launched her production company called Excellent Cadaver;vi [15] Tarana Burke as a Black/African American woman, who’s the founder of the #MeToo movement;vii [16] Harvey Weinstein as a Caucasian Jewish man, who was on (or around) February 24th 2020 convicted of third-degree rape and first-degree criminal sexual act in the New York Supreme Court;viii [17] Harvey Weinstein as a Caucasian Jewish man, who was on March 11th 2020 sentenced to 23 (twenty three) years of prison for the crimes he was found guilty of on (or around) February 24th 2020 in the New York Supreme Court;ix [18] the July 20th 2021 extradition of Harvey Weinstein from the State of New York to the State of California (in the County of Los Angeles);x [19] the decision of the Los Angeles County District Attorney to indict Harvey Weinstein for sexually assaulting 5 (five) women in “separate incidents that span a decade;”xi [20] the decision of Harvey Weinstein to plead not guilty to the sexual assault charges filed against him in the County of Los Angeles (California);xii [21] the ongoing trial of Harvey Weinstein in Los Angeles, California (as of this writing dated December 14th 2022); [22] the impact of Harvey Weinstein trial in exposing a systemically chauvinistic, discriminatory, misogynistic and sexist culture in Hollywood, which abuses and takes advantage of women;xiii [23] your discussions about the movie entitled “She Said,” which is adapted from the book by New York Times reporters Megan Twohey and Jodi Kantor; xiv [24] Megan Twohey as a journalist of the New York Times, who has in the past reached out to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to obtain information about the charges of discrimination filed (pursuant to Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act) against the companies owned and operated by Harvey Weinstein; [25] Megan Twohey as a journalist of the New York Times, who was informed by the EEOC that they were unwilling to disclose to her information about the companies that were routinely (and frequently) subject of charges of discrimination (filed pursuant to Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act); [26] the content of the FOIA request(s) submitted by the New York Times with the EEOC on the subject of Harvey Weinstein sexually harassing/sexually assaulting and/or raping women employed in his company; [27] the response(s) provided by the EEOC to the FOIA request(s) submitted by the New York Times on the subject of Harvey Weinstein sexually harassing/sexually assaulting and/or raping women employed in his company; xv [28] the FOIA and/or other public records request(s) submitted by the New York Times with your local/state/federal government agency since January 01st 2016; [29] the response(s) provided by your local/state/federal government agency to a public records request and/or a FOIA request submitted by the New York Times; [30] the real possibility that the EEOC had intimate knowledge of Harvey Weinstein sexual abuse of women and yet did nothing about it; [31] the real possibility that the EEOC was complicit in the sexual harassment, the sexual assault and the rape of women working in Hollywood and/or elsewhere in the U.S.A. II) Request for a Fee Waiver and Expedited Processing W (AACL) – MICHAEL A. AYELE 2

31. REQUEST FOR RECORDS 12/14/2022 The requested records do/will demonstrate that [1] Jennifer Lawrence is a Caucasian woman, who was born August 15th 1990 and is known worldwide for being an actress; [2] Jennifer Lawrence is a woman, who has in 2012 won an Oscar while working for a company owned and operated by Harvey Weinstein; [3] Harvey Weinstein is a Caucasian Jewish man, who was on March 11th 2020 sentenced to 23 years of prison after being found guilty in the New York Supreme Court of third-degree rape and first-degree criminal sexual act; [4] Harvey Weinstein is a Caucasian Jewish man, who has more likely than not bragged about having sex with Jennifer Lawrence when she was previously working on a movie for his production company; [5] Jennifer Lawrence is a woman, who was in the month of September 2022 asked by Vogue magazine what was “the most bizarre thing she’s read about herself;” [6] Jennifer Lawrence is a woman, who has told Vogue magazine that “the most bizarre thing she’s read about herself” is that she “f***** Harvey Weinstein;” [7] Vogue is a news magazine, which has opted not to seriously follow up on the answer provided by Jennifer Lawrence (about the “most bizarre thing she’s read about herself”) by asking her about the sexual harassment she and/or other women have suffered at the workplace; [8] Vogue is a news magazine, which has opted not to follow up on the answer provided by Jennifer Lawrence (about the “most bizarre thing she’s read about herself”) by asking her if she has had in the past sexual relations, which were not consensual; [9] Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W is a Black man, who has been in on and off contact with the Department of Justice (DOJ) Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) about the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery; [10] Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W is a Black man, who had informed the DOJ (FBI) that he was told what constitute “affirmative and effective consent” at Westminster College (Fulton, Missouri) in January 2010 (shortly after his arrival on U.S territory in the month of December 2009); [11] Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W is a Black man, who had informed the DOJ (FBI) that he was told what constitute “affirmative and effective consent” after he was told about the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery (in January 2010); [12] Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W is a Black man, who had informed the DOJ (FBI) that he was told what constitute “affirmative and effective” after he was told about the rape and murder of a Caucasian woman by a Black/African American man (in January 2010); [13] Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W is a Black man, who had previously asked for the DOJ (FBI) to disclose (to him) responsive information they had on the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery; [14] the DOJ (FBI) is a federal agency, which has informed Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W that they’ve contacted the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) about the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery; [15] the DOJ (FBI) is a federal agency, which has informed Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W that they had assigned the case of Jeanne Ann Clery to the CIA on June 11th 1992; [16] the DOJ (FBI) is a federal agency, which has informed Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W that they were contacted by his alma mater Westminster College (Fulton, Missouri) on August 29th 1986 (approximately five months following the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery); [17] the DOJ (FBI) is a federal agency, which has informed Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W that they were contacted by his alma mater (Westminster College on August 29th 1986) because they had extended an invitation to their then-Director William Webster to “deliver the 1987 Commencement Address on Sunday, May 17th 1987 at 2:30 P.M;” xvi[18] William Webster is a Caucasian man, who has previously worked as Director of the FBI (from 1978 to 1987) and Director of the CIA (from 1987 to 1991); [19] the CIA have informed W (AACL) – MICHAEL A. AYELE 3

32. REQUEST FOR RECORDS 12/14/2022 Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W that they were never assigned the case of Jeanne Ann Clery rape and murder by the FBI on June 11th 1992; [20] the CIA have informed Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W that they have no information about the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery and that he should contact the FBI and the Department of Education (DoED);xvii [21] Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W is a Black man, who is very much unhappy with the way that the CIA, the DoED and the DOJ processed his Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request about the Jeanne Clery Act as well as what constitutes “affirmative and effective consent;”xviii [22] Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W is a Black man, who has previously corresponded with the Los Angeles County Library and the Los Angeles County District Attorney about the way college/university students in the U.S.A are being informed what constitutes “affirmative and effective consent;” [23] Megan Twohey is a journalist of the New York Times, who has previously initiated contact with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to obtain “public records” about the charges of discrimination filed (pursuant to Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act) against the companies owned and operated by Harvey Weinstein; [24] the EEOC have informed Megan Twohey that they were unwilling to disclose to her information about the companies that were routinely (and frequently) subject of complaints of discrimination filed (pursuant to Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act); [25] Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W is a Black man, who was previously (in Calendar Year 2013) employed for the Missouri Department of Mental Health (MODMH): a state government agency; [26] Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W is a Black man, who has been in very bad terms with the EEOC for several years in part because of the way they have processed a charge of discrimination he had filed with and which they have assigned Charge Number.: 28E – 2014 – 00485C;xix [27] Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W is a Black man, who doesn’t exclude the possibility that (i) the EEOC had intimate knowledge of Harvey Weinstein sexual abuse of women and yet did nothing about it, (ii) the EEOC was complicit in the sexual harassment, the sexual assault and the rape Harvey Weinstein inflicted on women in the past, (iii) the EEOC could have intimate knowledge of companies that routinely (and frequently) sexually harass/sexually assault and/or rape women, (iv) the EEOC could be complicit in the sexual harassment/sexual assault/rape inflicted on women by several companies of Hollywood (and other companies, whose primary place of business is not Hollywood). In my judgment, the facts presented in this records request are not the sort to bolster public confidence in the activities of the U.S government overall (and more particularly in the accountability of agencies responsible for the enforcement of Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 as well as Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act, namely the DoED and the EEOC). As a Black man with a U.S college degree (who has in the past filed a charge of discrimination pursuant to Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act), I would like to take this opportunity to [1] denounce all form of violence committed against women irrespective of their racial backgrounds, their sexual orientations, their national origins, their religious affiliations, their age groups and/or their disability status; [2] call upon colleges/universities in the U.S.A to be straightforward about the exact year they began informing their students what constitutes “affirmative and effective consent;” [3] call upon colleges/university in the U.S.A to be straightforward about the reasons why they began W (AACL) – MICHAEL A. AYELE 4

33. REQUEST FOR RECORDS 12/14/2022 informing their students what constitutes “affirmative and effective consent;” [4] call upon colleges/universities in the U.S.A to refrain from educating their students about “affirmative and effective consent” after telling them about the April 05th 1986 rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery; [5] call upon colleges/universities in the U.S.A to refrain from educating their students about “affirmative and effective consent” after informing them about the rape and murder of a Caucasian woman (i.e: Jeanne Ann Clery) by a Black/African American man (i.e: Josoph Henry); [6] denounce the April 05th 1986 rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery; [7] denounce the pain and suffering Harvey Weinstein inflicted on women; [8] denounce the statements made by Harvey Weinstein alleging that he doesn’t have a good grasp for what constitutes “affirmative and effective consent;” xx [9] denounce the EEOC handling of Charge No.: 28E – 2014 – 00485C; [10] denounce the systemic chauvinism, discrimination, misogyny, racism and sexism I have been witness to; [11] express the surprise I felt when I first auditioned the answer of Jennifer Lawrence to the question asked of her by Vogue about the “most bizarre thing she’s read about herself;” [12] express the unease I felt by the failure of Vogue (as a news magazine) to ask Jennifer Lawrence about the sexual harassment she may have experienced in the past while employed as an actress; [13] express the unease I felt by the failure of Vogue (as a news magazine) to ask Jennifer Lawrence about her past sexual relations, which may not have been consensual; [14] wish Jennifer Lawrence well in her future endeavors. The core issues presented in this records request are as follows. 1) Have you had conversations about the September 2022 interview of Jennifer Lawrence with Vogue (magazine)? Have you had conversations about the answer given by Jennifer Lawrence to the question asked of her by Vogue (magazine) on the subject of the “most bizarre thing she’s read about herself?” Have you had conversations about the decision of Vogue (as a news magazine) not to follow up on the answer given to them by Jennifer Lawrence by asking her about the sexual harassment she and/or other women (have) suffer(ed) at the workplace? Have you had conversations about the decision of Vogue (as a news magazine) not to follow up on the answer given to them by Jennifer Lawrence by asking her if she’s ever had in the past sexual relations, which were not consensual? If yes, will you promptly disclose those records? 2) Have you had conversations about the efforts of Megan Twohey to obtain “public records” from the EEOC about the charges of discrimination filed against the companies owned and operated by Harvey Weinstein? Have you had conversations about the decision of the EEOC not to cooperate with Megan Twohey Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request(s) by promptly disclosing to her public records of the companies that were routinely (and frequently) subject of complaints of discrimination (filed pursuant to Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act)? Have you had conversations about the real possibility that the EEOC had (for many years in the past) intimate knowledge about Harvey Weinstein sexually harassing/sexually assaulting and raping the female employees of his company even before the New York Times articles published by Jodi Kantor and Megan Twohey? Have you had conversations about the real possibility that the EEOC was complicit in the sexual harassment/sexual assault and/or rape Harvey Weinstein inflicted on women well before the New York Times articles published by Jodi Kanto and Megan Twohey? Have you had conversations about the real possibility that the EEOC could have intimate knowledge of the W (AACL) – MICHAEL A. AYELE 5

34. REQUEST FOR RECORDS 12/14/2022 sexual harassment/sexual assault/rape women suffer at the workplace and yet could opt not to do anything about it? If yes, will you promptly disclose those records? 3) Does your local/state/federal government agency retain public records and/or FOIA request(s) submitted by the New York Times? If yes, will you promptly disclose the public records and/or FOIA request(s) submitted by the New York Times with your local/state/federal government agency? Will you also disclose the response you have provided to the New York Times in response to their public records and/or FOIA request(s)? This records request should be expedited because it puts into question the government’s integrity about the way that people are treated in the U.S.A on account of their gender, their racial backgrounds, their national origins and their disability status. My request for a fee waiver should be granted because [1] I have identified operations and activities of the federal government in concert with U.S city/county/state government as well as news media organizations such as Vogue (magazine) and the New York Times; [2] the issues presented are meaningfully informative about government operations or activities in order to be ‘likely to contribute’ to and increase public understanding of those operations or activities. Under penalty of perjury, I hereby declare all the statements I have made to be true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. Be well. Take care. Keep yourselves at arms distance. W (AACL) Michael A. Ayele Anti-Racist Human Rights Activist Audio-Visual Media Analyst Anti-Propaganda Journalist W (AACL) – MICHAEL A. AYELE 6

35. REQUEST FOR RECORDS 12/14/2022 Work Cited iPlease be advised that I have previously disseminated a vast number of documents obtained through records request via Archive.org, Scribd.com, Medium.com and YouTube.com. These documents have been made available to the public at no financial expense to them. As a member of the media, I would like to take this opportunity to inform you that the records you disclose to me could be made available to the general public through the means I have mentioned above or other ones. On December 10th 2021, I have launched a website on Wordpress.com for the purpose of making the records previously disclosed to me by the U.S government further accessible to members of the general public interested in the activities of their elected and non- elected representatives. You can find out more about the recent publications of the Association for the Advancement of Civil Liberties (AACL) here.: https://michaelayeleaacl.wordpress.com/ ii Around the 6 (six) minutes mark of Vogue (magazine) interview with Jennifer Lawrence Question asked by Vogue: What is the most bizarre thing you’ve read about yourself? Answer Provided by Jennifer Lawrence: That I f***** Harvey Weinstein… Awkward silence follows this Q&A, where Jennifer Lawrence seems uncomfortable and then turns her head in an opposite direction from the camera. Then... Question asked by Vogue: Now, you did back to back films for seven years…What is the most important thing you’ve learned about work during that time? 73 Questions with Jennifer Lawrence. Vogue (magazine) on YouTube.: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uIsg5x19Xu8 iii Jennifer Lawrence, in full Jennifer Shrader Lawrence (born August 15, 1990, Indian Hills, northeast of Louisville, Kentucky, U.S.) is an American actress who’s known for her versatility on-screen and her accessible, honest off-screen persona. At the age of 22 she won the Academy Awards for best actress for her performance in Silver Linings Playbook (2012). Britannica.: https://www.britannica.com/biography/Jennifer-Lawrence ivAn actress who filed a lawsuit against disgraced movie mogul Harvey Weinstein (…) reportedly claims he boasted about sleeping with Jennifer Lawrence before her Oscar win – something both Weinstein and Lawrence deny. W (AACL) – MICHAEL A. AYELE 7

36. REQUEST FOR RECORDS 12/14/2022 Citing court documents, Variety reported that the actress – referred in the suit as Jane Doe – alleged that Weinstein “forcibly performed oral sex on her, repeatedly masturbated in front of her and threatened to harm her career if she objected.” “I slept with Jennifer Lawrence and look where she is; she has just won an Oscar,” the accuser recalled Weinstein telling her, Variety reported. In a statement obtained by People, Lawrence – who won an Oscar for the Weinstein produced film Silver Linings Playbook – denied any sexual relationship with Weinstein. “My heart breaks for all the women who were victimized by Harvey Weinstein,” Lawrence 28, said. “I have never had anything but a professional relationship with him. This is yet another example of the predatory tactics and lies that he engaged in to lure countless women.” Jennifer Lawrence Responds to Harvey Weinstein’s Alleged Brag About Sexual Relationship. People.: https://people.com/movies/jennifer-lawrence-denies-harvey-weinstein-alleged-brag-sexual- relationship/ vEventually, Lawrence realized that too many people were involved in making the decisions that should have been hers alone, and in August 2018, as she wrapped reshoots for the “X-Men” film “Dark Phoenix,” she left CAA, the agency that represented her for 10 years. “I had let myself be hijacked,” she said. Lawrence has always had a gift for candor: Onscreen, she’ll show you things — and offscreen, tell you things — that other actresses, fortified by fame, tend to keep at a remove. Maybe she never had time to develop a protective shell. When “Winter’s Bone” was released, Lawrence was only 19; a year later, she was cast as Katniss Everdeen in “The Hunger Games,” and only two years after that, she won an Oscar for “Silver Linings Playbook.” “Jennifer Lawrence is Katniss Everdeen, I guess,” Jennifer Lawrence said. “Is that weird?”Who is Jennifer Lawrence Now? The New York Times.: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/02/movies/jennifer-lawrence- causeway.html viOscar winner Jennifer Lawrence is gearing up for a more significant presence behind the camera with the launch of production company Excellent Cadaver. With her producing partner Justine Polsky, Lawrence and Excellent Cadaver have inked a first-look film deal with Brad Weston’s Makeready. Under the agreement, Makeready will have a first look at the film projects Excellent Cadaver develops and produces. Through the first-look film deal, Makeready and Excellent Cadaver will finance and produce films both independently and as part of Makeready’s deals with Universal and Entertainment One. The deal encompasses films that Lawrence and Polsky will produce, and some that Lawrence will additionally star in. Makeready’s head of film, Pam Abdy, will oversee any Excellent Cadaver projects. W (AACL) – MICHAEL A. AYELE 8

37. REQUEST FOR RECORDS 12/14/2022 “In a relatively short amount of time, Jennifer has already proven herself to be a one-of-a-kind actress and businesswoman,” says Weston. “Her versatility and commitment to working with the greatest filmmakers in the industry highlights our shared ambition to create thoughtful, fearless films, and we are extremely excited to partner with Jennifer and Justine as they start this new chapter.” “Brad and Pam are visionary producers with incredible taste and a history of supporting diverse and compelling storytelling. We are thrilled to be partnering with Makeready and look forward to this exciting collaboration,” added Lawrence and Polsky. Weston, the former president and CEO of New Regency, launched Makeready in 2017 with backing from eOne and a five-year agreement with Uni to handle worldwide distribution and marketing on two feature films per year. The company is currently developing Queen & Slim, the debut feature for Emmy winner Lena Waithe starring Get Out actor Daniel Kaluuya. Jennifer Larence Launches Production Company Excellent Cadaver. The Hollywood Reporter.: https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/jennifer-lawrence-launches-production- company-excellent-cadaver-1156266/ Such is the cannibalistic nature of the Hollywood starlet cycle: when a female star is on the rise, our culture is all too happy to chew her up and spit her back out, deeming her “annoying” for all the reasons we previously enjoyed her. It happened to Anne Hathaway, and it also affected Jennifer Lawrence, who admitted during an event at the BFI London Film Festival that she “lost a sense of control” during the peak of her fame. “Between the Hunger Games coming out and winning the Oscar, I became such a commodity that I felt like every decision was a big, big group decision,” she said (per Deadline). “Because I had no idea what a huge movie star does next or what Katniss Everdeen should do after this… When I reflect now, I think of those following years as just kind of a loss of control and then a reaction to try to get back.” The actor has returned to indie filmmaking with her new movie Causeway, the first project she’s produced under her company Excellent Cadaver. She explained the name during the event: “It’s a Sicilian mafia term for a hit on a major celebrity. It just made sense. I think there was a part of me that wanted to execute that part of me.”And there has been, if not adeath per se, a closing of a chapter for Lawrence. While she was once the queen of the blockbuster—headlining The Hunger Games as well as the X-Men reboot series—those days are now, apparently, over. “Franchises are so fun. … I could never do one now cause I’m just too old and brittle,” the 32- year-old told the crowd. Instead, she’s setting a new course. “I’m so happy that I eventually, finally, in my late 20s kind of just stopped and made some major changes, and I got the voice in my head back,” Lawrence reflected. “Now, it feels personal to me for the first time in a long time.”Jennifer Lawrence knows things got a bit weird there for a minute. AV Club.: https://www.avclub.com/jennifer-lawrence-loss-of-control-career-lff-1849637874 vii #MeToo.: https://metoomvmt.org/get-to-know-us/tarana-burke-founder/ W (AACL) – MICHAEL A. AYELE 9

38. REQUEST FOR RECORDS 12/14/2022 viii Harvey Weinstein has been found guilty of sexual assaults, including rape, capping a stunning downfall for the former Hollywood mogul and a victory for the #MeToo movement. Weinstein, 67, was convicted in New York City of third-degree rape and first-degree criminal sexual act. (…) At least 80 women had accused him of sexual misconduct stretching back decades, including actresses Gwyneth Paltrow, Uma Thurman and Salma Hayek. (…) The jury of seven men and five women reached their verdict on Monday morning, the fifth day of deliberations. Weinstein - who denied all charges - was convicted of sexually assaulting former production assistant Mimi Haleyi in 2006 and raping Jessica Mann, a former aspiring actress, in 2013. The judge ordered him sent to jail immediately. But the jury acquitted him on two counts of predatory sexual assault, which carried a potential life sentence, and first-degree rape of Mann. In the minutes after the verdict, Weinstein showed no emotion as he talked to his lead lawyer Donna Rotunno. (…) The third-degree rape charge in New York is defined as engaging in sexual intercourse with a person who is incapable of consent, or under age 17, or who has not given consent for a reason other than the inability to consent. Prosecutors portrayed Weinstein as a serial predator who used his position of power in Hollywood to manipulate and attack women. (…) Ms Haleyi, who had worked on one of Weinstein's television productions, said she was assaulted by the producer after he invited her to his Lower Manhattan home. (…) She testified that he backed her into a bedroom, held her down on the bed and forced himself on her. Ms Mann said that she found herself in an "extremely degrading" relationship with him that did not involve intercourse until he raped her in a New York City hotel room in 2013. She said he was a "Jekyll and Hyde" figure who could be charming in public but showed his dark side when they were alone. Another one of Weinstein's accusers, Sopranos actress Annabella Sciorra, told jurors he raped her in her apartment one night in the mid-1990s. (…) Her allegation was too old to be charged as a separate crime, but prosecutors used it in an attempt to demonstrate that the accused was a repeat sexual offender. Following the verdict, Ms Sciorra said: "I spoke for myself and with the strength of the 80-plus victims of Harvey Weinstein in my heart." (…) Rose McGowan told the BBC’s Newshour programme: "The little girl I was when I was hurt, she's ecstatic...This is a great day. The trash has been taken out." Harvey Weinstein found guilty of rape in watershed case. BBC News.: https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-51621041 ixHarvey Weinstein was sentenced to 23 years on sex crime convictions in New York on Wednesday, following a landmark trial that spotlighted Hollywood power dynamics, predatory sexual violence and complex questions about the nature of consent and coercion. That sentence includes 20 years for criminal sexual assault in the first degree, which stems from an accusation from former "Project Runway" production assistant Mimi Haley, and three years for rape in the third degree, which stems from an accusation from Jessica Mann, who is now being named by W (AACL) – MICHAEL A. AYELE 10

39. REQUEST FOR RECORDS 12/14/2022 ABC News as she told the district attorney's office after a verdict was reached she does not object to being named publicly. The sentences are set to run consecutively. (…) Victims Mimi Haley and Jessica Mann had given impassioned victim impact statements that at times drew them to tears. "I had no reason not to go there," Haley said of the evening she was sexually assaulted in 2006. "Harvey Weinstein wasn’t a stranger. He knew people I knew. I had no reason to think that even if he made sexual advances towards me and I rejected him, that he wouldn’t respect my rejection. I had no reason to believe that he would force an act of sexual violence on me. But that’s exactly what he did.(…) I believe that when he attacked me that evening, with physical force, with no regard for anything I said, no regard for my cries and protests, my physical resistance, my panic and fear - it scarred me deeply - mentally and emotionally - perhaps irreparably, perhaps forever. What he did not only stripped me off my dignity as a human being and as a woman, but crushed my confidence and faith in my professional future for a long time," Haley said. "It diminished my confidence and faith in people, and my confidence and faith in myself. I was confused, in distress and in disbelief. It was embarrassing and frankly incredibly hurtful, that this person, who I knew to some degree, but who had also for a long time known someone I loved and trusted, would do this to me." Mann focused much of her statement on physiological effects of rape on the human body. "This rape induced paralysis is a natural response designed to activate under situations such as sexual abuse, or rape," Mann told Judge Burke. "When the brain assess that flight or fight are not possible, sometimes after using another mechanism called freezing (the state in which those responses are put on hold to assess the situation) the immobility response is activated. Harvey at the time had every advantage over me. Given the immense physical stature of Harvey’s weight, height, and ox like strength – he used that physicality to trap me and prevent me from leaving. That was a powerful assessment that flight was not possible. “Fight was also not possible," she continued. "His strength overpowered me trying to leave." "Rape paralysis, or immobility is very real in humans. A good visual of this is when animals ‘play dead’ under stress. While they remain flexible, and aware, they are trapped in a survival response until the threat is removed. In people, this response can also be accompanied with fainting or blacking out. Such as what happened to me in a separate rape committed against me by Harvey Weinstein, which you heard in my testimony, as well as Annabella’s testimony. Just like our hearts without our conscious awareness, it is critical that victims, and the courts understand that the ability to fight during rape can be out of the victims’ control when this defense response is triggered unconsciously. (…) I ask you to consider the horrors of being rendered immobile by my own biological response, while I had to endure his penis, raping me on his time, as slow as he wanted while he pleasured himself inside my body. I wish I had been able to fight him while he raped me. I could have walked away with a sense of control over my body instead of a deeper shame." "Please understand," she implored Burke, "that to show distress, especially while still in shock, would have been dangerous. I was not about to advertise that I was a weak and wounded prey and attract more potential violence. This is a response we see in nature, and should be of no surprise that hiding weakness is something every human being on this planet exercises." Harvey Weinstein sentenced to 23 years on sex crime convictions. ABC News.: https://abcnews.go.com/US/harvey-weinstein-despondent-faces-sentencing- york/story?id=69516249 W (AACL) – MICHAEL A. AYELE 11

40. REQUEST FOR RECORDS 12/14/2022 Harvey Weinstein, the titan of Hollywood turned convicted rapist, has been sentenced to 23 years in prison on Wednesday in New York. The fallen mogul was handed down his punishment by Judge James Burke at the New York supreme court having been convicted of two counts of sexual assault. The judge imposed 20 years for a first-degree criminal sex act for forcing oral sex on a production assistant, Miriam Haley, in 2006. He also imposed a three-year sentence for third-degree rape of a woman whom the Guardian is not naming because her wishes over identification are not clear. The two sentences will run consecutively, meaning that Weinstein, 67, will have to complete the terms of the criminal sex act before serving the rape sentence. Both the main accusers, as well as the four other witnesses from trial – the Sopranos actor Annabella Sciorra, Dawn Dunning, Tarale Wulff and Lauren Young – came into court as a united group, sitting at the front row alongside Cyrus Vance, the district attorney of New York who led the prosecution. The women were cheered as they walked into court. (…) Within a few hours of the stunning sentence being delivered, Weinstein was hit with a further withering blow. The district attorney in Los Angeles announced that it has begun extradition proceedings to bring him to face two charges relating to two additional west coast accusers. The women, one of whom, Lauren Young, testified at the New York trial, allege they were sexually assaulted on two consecutive days in 2013. The charges carry a possible maximum sentence of 28 years in prison. Since he was convicted, Weinstein has been moving between a secure wing of Bellevue hospital in Manhattan where he underwent heart surgery in which a stent was fitted and the North Infirmary of Rikers Island. His spokesman, Juda Engelmayer, told Page Six that he was miserable but trying to be optimistic, even though he suffered a fall earlier this week. “He has had a lot of time to think about his life and be humbled, but he thinks it’s going to be a long, uphill battle from here.” After sentencing, Weinstein will pass into the bowels of the New York state department of corrections. He will be taken to a reception center in Fishkill, New York, for “processing”, and then transported to a prison in upstate New York. He is likely to experience a rude awakening as he enters the prison system. As part of his reception procedure, he will be required to have a shower and go through delousing treatment. He will then be made to sit through a suicide prevention video. That part of the proceedings is likely to be closely observed as New York is in a heightened state of tension after the financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein killed himself in a federal jail in Manhattan. Weinstein had also indicated he had suicidal thoughts in documents released on Tuesday from December 2017. The lengthy prison sentence marks the second major glass ceiling that has been cracked by the Weinstein saga in the legal treatment of sexual assault in the wake of the #MeToo movement. It was extremely unusual for prosecutors to bring the New York case all the way to trial in the first place – authorities have in the past tended to shy away from accusers who have maintained close and in some cases sexual contact with their attackers as did several of the Weinstein witnesses. Harvey Weinstein sentenced to 23 years in prison on rape conviction. The Guardian.: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/11/harvey-weinstein-sentencing-rape-conviction xFormer Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein was extradited from New York to Los Angeles on Tuesday to face trial on rape and sexual assault charges. Weinstein was convicted in New York in February 2020 for sexual assault and rape and was sentenced to 23 years in prison. In W (AACL) – MICHAEL A. AYELE 12

41. REQUEST FOR RECORDS 12/14/2022 Los Angeles, he is wanted for trial on 11 charges of attacking five women from 2004 to 2013. The Los Angeles charges include forcible rape, forcible oral copulation, sexual battery by restraint, and sexual penetration by use of force. If convicted, Weinstein could spend the rest of his life in prison. Los Angeles police said Weinstein had arrived in Los Angeles and "after being medically cleared for booking, he will be booked into custody with LA County Sheriffs." Harvey Weinstein extradited to Los Angeles to face second rape trial. Reuters.: https://www.reuters.com/world/us/harvey-weinstein-extradited-california-face-second-rape-trial- 2021-07-20/ xiJuly 21st 2021: Harvey Weinstein Indicted for Sexually Assaulting 5 Women. Los Angeles County District Attorney.: https://da.lacounty.gov/media/news/harvey-weinstein-indicted- sexually-assaulting-5-women xii Harvey Weinstein, in a wheelchair, pleads not guilty to sexual assault charges in Los Angeles,CNN.: https://edition.cnn.com/2021/07/21/us/harvey-weinstein-los-angeles- plea/index.html xiiiNow into its second week of deliberations, the jury in the Harvey Weinstein trial has not reached a verdict. The jury began deliberating on Dec. 2. When jury members left the courthouse on Monday, they were approaching nearly 30 hours of deliberations. They are due back at 9:30 a.m. on Tuesday. The 12-person jury is made up of eight men and four women. The jurors are tasked with poring through a hefty amount of evidence, including testimony from 50 witnesses. Including jury selection, the trial has now spanned more than two months. Weinstein is facing seven charges stemming from four accusers, including five counts of sexual assault and two counts of rape. The jurors must be unanimous to reach a verdict on each of the counts. The jury has not submitted any questions or notes to the judge — at least, in the presence of the media — so there is no indication of what the jury might be focused on, or what they might be stuck on. Last week, one of the six alternate jurors asked to be excused from the case, citing a vacation that was planned for this week. After the defense objected, the judge declined to excuse the alternate juror. If convicted, Weinstein could face up to 60 years to life in prison, on top of the 23-year sentence he is already serving in connection with his conviction in New York in 2020. The former Hollywood titan was extradited to Los Angeles in 2021 and has been held since then in a medical unit of the Twin Towers Correctional Facility. Harvey Weinstein Jury Deliberates for Second Week With No Verdict Yet. Variety.: https://variety.com/2022/film/news/harvey- weinstein-jury-deliberating-verdict-rape-case-1235458374/ W (AACL) – MICHAEL A. AYELE 13

42. REQUEST FOR RECORDS 12/14/2022 xiv She Said. Official Trailer.: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i5pxUQecM3Y xvIn mid-July, with Jodi focused on Hollywood, Megan turned to a basic investigative question: Were there any public records of abusive behavior by Weinstein? After all, there were laws to protect victims of sexual harassment, and at least in theory, government agencies enforcing them. If Weinstein had been a serial harasser, some of his victims might have filed complaints with the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) or the corresponding state agencies in New York and Los Angeles, the cities where Weinstein had run his companies. The federal and New York agencies had nothing. But Grace Ashford, a savvy young researcher on her first month at the Times, obtained a report from California’s Department of Fair Employment and Housing, which showed several workplace complaints for Miramax. The information was shrouded in the ultraobscure language of state bureaucracy: addresses, dates, and numerical codes denoting the nature of the allegation and how it was resolved, but nothing about who the people were or what had happened to them. On September 12, 2001, the agency had received a complaint of sexual harassment against Miramax. Strangely, it had been closed the same day. The report noted “complainant elected court action,” which normally meant the agency had signed off on the merits of the complaint and steered it into the civil legal system. But there was nothing further, nor was there any record of a courts case in California’s docket. How could a complaint filed with the government disappear within hours? Megan kept calling the agency to ask, but it was like ringing a house where no one was home. When she finally reached someone by email, the government official told her the complaint against Miramax and any other related records had been destroyed under an agency policy that prevented the retention of documents after three years. Another policy prohibited the official from providing the name of the person who had filed the allegation. This was maddening. After some additional prodding, Megan secured the name of the government investigator who had been assigned the case at the time it was filed. The woman was retired. No one at the agency knew where she lived. Through social media sites and address searches, Megan found her living east of Los Angeles and finally got her on the phone. The interview was brief. The former investigator had reviewed hundreds of complaints during her time with the California agency. She didn’t recall this one. “What’s Miramax?” she asked. (…) Even the EEOC, the government agency that was supposed to enforce sexual harassment laws, often kept its settlements confidential. The agency had very little enforcement authority, and, under, its founding mandate, was required to settle whenever possible, often disclosing little. “Weknow internally who the companies are that have the most charges,” Chai Feldblum, then the commissioner of the EEOC, had told Jodi. But the agency was prohibited from making that information public. Before taking a job, a woman could not check with the EEOC to see what kind of record the prospective employer had on harassment. No wonder Megan hadn’t gotten anywhere with the old Miramax complaints to the California agency. Such agencies would gather crucial information with taxpayer dollars and then, for the most part, were required to lock it away where almost no one could see it. Jodi cut to the point: The United States had a system for muting sexual harassment claims, which often enabled the harassers instead of stopping them. Women routinely signed away the right to talk about their own experiences. W (AACL) – MICHAEL A. AYELE 14

43. REQUEST FOR RECORDS 12/14/2022 Harassers often continued onward, finding fresh ground on which to commit the same offenses. The settlements and confidentiality agreements were almost never examined in law school classrooms or open court. This was why the public had never really understood that this was happening. Even those in the room with long histories of covering gender issues had never fully registered what was going on. Leaving the meeting, Jodi and Megan realized how much needed to be investigated. Would the public be interested in these obscure legal instruments or their ramifications? Jodi Kantor & Megan Twohey. She Said. Chapter Three. How to Silence a Victim. xviThe Department of Justice (DOJ) Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) have disclosed limited records of Westminster College (Fulton, Missouri) August 29th 1986 invitation to their former Director William Webster. These records were disclosed by the FBI following a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request submitted by the Association for the Advancement of Civil Liberties (AACL) on or around October 12th2021. It’s the 2nd (second) time the Department of Justice (DOJ) have referred the AACL to the National Archives Records Administration (NARA) on issues not unrelated to the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery. The recent FBI disclosure show that Westminster College had extended an invitation to William Webster to “deliver the 1987 Commencement Address on Sunday, May 17, 1987 at 2:30 P.M.” The August 29th 1986 letter was signed by Westminster College former President J. Harvey Saunders. On October 31st 1986, William Webster accepted the invitation of Westminster College, acknowledging his formal and informal ties to Westminster College as well as Callaway County. The Department of Justice (DOJ) Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Disclose Limited Records of Westminster College (Fulton, MO) August 29th 1986 Invitation of Former Director William Webster. The rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery continues to leave several key questions about Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 unaddressed. These questions include but are not limited to the following. 1) What are/were colleges/universities in the U.S.A obligations pursuant to Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972? Were colleges/universities throughout the U.S.A required by law to denounce violence committed against women irrespective of their racial backgrounds, their sexual orientations, their religious affiliations and their national origins following the enactment of Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972? If yes, were colleges/universities required to inform their students about what constitute appropriate sexual boundaries pursuant to Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972? 2) Did colleges/universities throughout the U.S.A begin informing their students about what constitute “affirmative and effective consent” following the enactment of Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972? If not, when did colleges/universities begin to inform their incoming freshmen/transfer students about the concepts of “affirmative and effective consent?” Did colleges/universities throughout the U.S.A begin teaching the concepts of “affirmative and effective consent” to their incoming freshmen/transfer students following the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery (dated April 05th 1986)? If yes, why have colleges/universities throughout the U.S.A fixated on the rape and murder of this Caucasian woman by a Black/African American man to inform their incoming freshmen/transfer students about what constitutes “affirmative and W (AACL) – MICHAEL A. AYELE 15

44. REQUEST FOR RECORDS 12/14/2022 effective consent?” 3) Are colleges/universities discussions pertaining to what constitutes “affirmative and effective consent” consistent with Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 if they are first informing their incoming/freshmen students about the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery? Are colleges/universities discussions pertaining to what constitutes “affirmative and effective consent” consistent with their academic integrity policy if they are first informing their incoming freshmen/transfer students about the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery? W (AACL), Michael A. Ayele Official Website.: https://michaelayeleaacl.wordpress.com/2021/12/10/jeanne-clery-april-1986-and-michael-ayele- aacl-january-2010-in-review-affirtmative-and-effective-consent-in-question-title-ix-doj-fbi-cia- dhs-westminster-college-fulton-missouri-index/ xviiAre you a student of a U.S college/university? Are you an alumnus/alumna of a college/university in the U.S.A? Have you previously faced uncorroborated and racially motivated allegations of academic cheating as an undergraduate student? Has the uncorroborated and racially motivated allegation of academic cheating reached the person who’s serving as the Dean of Student in your college/university? Have you read the Annual Security Report (ASR) published by the college/university you are/were attending, which is published pursuant to the Jeanne Ann Clery Disclosure of Campus Security Policy and Crime Statistics Act? How were you informed about “affirmative and effective consent?” Were you informed about “affirmative and effective consent” after having been told about the rape and murder of Jeanne Ann Clery on the campus of Lehigh University? Were you informed about “affirmative and effective consent” after having been told about the rape and murder of a Caucasian woman by a Black/African American? Is the way you have been informed about “affirmative and effective consent” academically, historically and socially responsible given the U.S.A well-documented history of slavery as well as systemic chauvinism, discrimination, misogyny, racism and sexism? Were there forces out there in the 1970s and the 1980s looking for a case where a Black man rapes and murders a Caucasian woman for the purpose of enacting a law similar to the Jeanne Clery Act? Was the enactment of the Jeanne Clery Act the result of racist and sexist individuals coming together for the purpose of [a] preventing racial minorities from climbing the social ladder through academic education; [b] cracking down on interracial relationships particularly between a Caucasian woman and a Black/African American man; [c] not applying the same standards in circumstances where a Caucasian man sexually assaults a woman from a racial minority (as in the case of Brock Turner and Chanel Miller following her rape on January 16th 2015 at the campus of Stanford University)? The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Denied Being in Possession of Records Pertaining to the Rape & Murder of Jeanne Ann Clery Contradicting Previous Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Disclosure Made to the Association for the Advancement of Civil Liberties (AACL). Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W on Archive.: https://archive.org/details/the-cia-deny-being-in- possession-of-records-pertaining-to-jeanne-ann-clery-contr W (AACL) – MICHAEL A. AYELE 16

45. REQUEST FOR RECORDS 12/14/2022 xviiiExcerpt of E-mail Sent by Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W to the Department of Education (DoED) on October 18th 2022 Hello, This is Michael A. Ayele sending this message though I now go by W. You may call me W. I am writing this letter in response to your correspondence from September 12th 2022 for the purpose of filing an appeal to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, which you had assigned Case No.: 21 – 02190 – F. Please be advised that I have several concerns with the adequacy of the search you have performed for my FOIA request. For instance, you have failed to acknowledge that the Department of Education (DoED) had sent me a letter on February 16th2021 stating that the “San Francisco Office for Civil Rights (OCR) received the complaint” I had filed on that same day. Additionally, you have failed to acknowledge that the DoED “was evaluating [my] complaint to determine whether OCR will accept” the issues that formed the basis for my complaint “for investigation” on February 16th 2021. Furthermore, you have also failed to acknowledge that I had provided the DoED a signed Privacy Act Consent Form on (or around) February 18th 2021. As a Black man with a U.S college degree (who was in January 2010 informed what constitutes “affirmative and effective consent”), I was deeply vexed by your correspondence from September 12th2022 for [1] pretending as if I haven’t filed a complaint on February 16th 2021 with the Department of Education (DoED); [2] engaging in a pattern that looked to me very much like a cover-up; [3] failing to make clear how the DoED “evaluates” complaints filed with them pursuant to the Jeanne Clery Act as well as Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of the 1972; [4] giving me the strong impression that the pain and suffering endured by Chanel Miller is worth less than that of Jeanne Ann Clery because she was not raped by a Black/African American man; [5] giving me the strong impression that the pain and suffering endured by Chanel Miller is worth less than that of Jeanne Ann Clery because she was not murdered after she had been raped on the campus of Stanford University (on or around January 17th 2015). As a representative of the media and a member of the general public, I hope you will perform a more thorough search for responsive records detailing [1] whether the DoED initiated contact with the San Francisco Office for Civil Rights (OCR) for the purpose of FOIA Request Case No.: 21 – 02190 – F; [2] the discussions between the DoED and the San Francisco Office for Civil Rights (OCR) about FOIA request Case No.: 21 – 02190 – F; [3] how the DoED “evaluates” complaints filed with them pursuant to the Jeanne Clery Act as well as Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972; [4] your discussions about the pain and suffering endured by Chanel Miller being worth less than that of Jeanne Ann Clery because was not raped by a Black/African American man; [5] your discussions about the pain and suffering of Chanel Miller being worth less than that of Jeanne Ann Clery because she was not murdered after she had been raped on the campus of Stanford University (on or around January 17th 2015); [6] the standard definition in use by the DoED for what constitutes a "cover-up." I hope you reconsider your response. Be well. Take care. Keep yourselves at arms distance. W (AACL) – MICHAEL A. AYELE 17

46. REQUEST FOR RECORDS 12/14/2022 W (AACL) Michael A. Ayele Anti-Racist Human Rights Activist Audio-Visual Media Analyst Anti-Propaganda Journalist xix In October 2021, there were 5276 (five thousand two hundred and seventy-six) employees working for the MODMH. Of those, 3752 (three thousand seven hundred and fifty-two) employees were women and 1502 (one thousand five hundred and two) employees were men. While 64% (sixty four percent) of the MODMH employees identified as White, 31% (thirty one percent) identified as Black. Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W was previously employed for the MODMH. He has in 2013 filed a charge of employment discrimination with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) against the MODMH. The charge of employment discrimination filed by Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W with the EEOC was previously assigned Case No.: 28E – 2014 – 00485C. The charge of employment discrimination filed by Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W with the EEOC has been subject of intense scrutiny for various reasons. Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W has recently been informed by his former employers that 9 (nine) charges of employment discrimination have been filed against the MODMH between January 01st 2010 and December 17th 2021. Of those, the MODMH opted to engage in the alternative dispute resolution (ADR) program offered by the EEOC on 4 (four) separate occasions. They also declined to engage in the ADR program offered by the EEOC on 5 (five) separate occasions. As of this writing, it remains unclear for the Association for the Advancement of Civil Liberties (AACL) why the MODMH opted to engage in certain ADR sessions offered by the EEOC, while refusing to do so for others. The AACL unequivocally denounces discrimination on the bases of gender, racial background, sexual orientation, national origin and religious affiliation. The AACL also unequivocally denounces discrimination against people with disabilities (PWD). The AACL has decided to publish this information to members of the general public because of the language used by the EEOC to describe their processing of Charge No.: 28E – 2014 – 00485C and also because of the EEOC frequent reference to this charge of discrimination. The AACL has effectively put the EEOC on notice that given their processing of Charge No.: 28E – 2014 – 00485C, they have forfeited their rights to represent Missouri State employees who [1] have opposed discriminatory practices in the service of healthcare pursuant to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA); [2] have been subjected to racially motivated internal investigations (and were afterwards cleared of that investigation); [3] have been fired from their jobs as retaliation; [4] have been arrested for demanding the payment of their salary for the job they have performed. Have You Previously Filed a Charge of Employment Discrimination With the Equal Employment W (AACL) – MICHAEL A. AYELE 18

47. REQUEST FOR RECORDS 12/14/2022 Opportunity Commission (EEOC) Pursuant to Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act? Does Your Current/Former Employer Have a History of Facing Complaints Filed With the EEOC Pursuant to Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act? Has Your Current/Former Employer Participated in the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Program Offered by the EEOC? Why Has Your Current/Former Employer Participated in the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Program Offered by the EEOC? Have You Ever Received a “Right to Sue” Letter from the EEOC? Have You Ever Opted Not to File a Complaint With the Judicial Branch of the U.S Government With an EEOC “Right to Sue” Letter? Have You Ever Felt that the Judicial Branch of the U.S Government Takes an EEOC “Right to Sue” Letter Less Seriously than a Complaint Filed by the EEOC Pursuant to Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act? Have You Ever Informed the Judicial Branch of the U.S Government that the Complaint You Are Filing With an EEOC “Right to Sue Letter” Does Not Have Less Merit Because the EEOC Has Failed to Represent You in a Complaint Filed Pursuant to Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act? Have You Ever Filed a Complaint With the Judicial Branch of the U.S Government Against the EEOC? Has the EEOC Ever Set a Terrible Precedent that Impacts the Integrity of their Institution by the Manner they Have Processed Your Charge of Employment Discrimination Filed Pursuant to Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act? The Missouri Department of Mental Health (MODMH) Disclose Records Documenting their Total Number of Employees on the Bases of Gender and Racial Background. Michael Ayele (a.k.a) W Official Website.: https://michaelayeleaacl.wordpress.com/2022/09/11/the-missouri-department-of- mental-health-modmh-disclose-records-documenting-their-total-number-of-employees-on-the- bases-of-gender-and-racial-background-w-aacl-michael-a-ayele/ Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W was a former employee of the Fulton State Hospital (FSH): a state agency, which is a component of the Missouri Department of Mental Health (MODMH). Between October 26th 2013 and November 20th 2013, Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W was subject of an internal state investigation after a complaint of “employee misconduct” was filed against him. In a letter hand-delivered to him on (or around) November 21st 2013, the-then Chief Operating Officer (COO) of the FSH informed Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W that he was “cleared” of any and all wrongdoing related to the October 26th 2013. As a former employee of the MODMH (FSH), Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W has initiated contact with his former employers as well as the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to obtain pertinent information about the complaint filed against him on October 26th 2013. Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W has also initiated contact with his former employers as well as the EEOC to obtain information about the investigation he was supposedly “cleared” of on (or around) November 21st 2013. Unfortunately, however, Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W has thus far been unsuccessful to obtain these records either from his former employers and/or the EEOC. In the judgement of the Association for the Advancement of Civil Liberties (AACL), the decision of the MODMH to withhold these records were not consistent with their obligations pursuant to W (AACL) – MICHAEL A. AYELE 19

48. REQUEST FOR RECORDS 12/14/2022 Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act. The decision of the MODMH to withhold these records were not consistent with Missouri state laws including but not limited to 1 Missouri Sunshine Law (Section 630.140, RSMO) as well as Missouri Senate Bill 26 (Section 590.030 & Section 590.502, RSMO). Missouri Revised Statutes (RSMO) Section 590.502 specifically states for instance that law enforcement officers (who have passed a criminal background check with the Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation) who “reasonably believe he or she is under investigation which could lead to disciplinary action, demotion, dismissal, transfer of placement that could lead to economic loss” [1] shall be informed in writing of the existence and nature of the alleged violation and who will be conducting the investigation; [2] shall be provided a “written statement outlining the complaint;” [3] shall be informed that “he or she is being ordered to answer questions under threat of disciplinary action and that the (…) answers to the questions will not be used (…) in a criminal proceeding;” [4] shall be “questioned by up to two investigators and shall be informed of the name and rank of each questioning officer.” For the reasons mentioned above, the AACL regrets the decision of the MODMH to withhold records of Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W employment with the FSH between October 26th 2013 and November 21st 2013. Fulton State Hospital (FSH) is located approximately 2 (two) miles away from Westminster College (Fulton, MO). Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W has been an alumnus of Westminster College (Fulton, MO) since Saturday, December 31st 2016. Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W is exploring all legal avenues to obtain these records and other (just and appropriate) legal relief. Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W has absolutely no regrets whatsoever about not filing a complaint with the judicial branch of the U.S government (the courts) pursuant to Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act with a “Right to Sue” letter. Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W has read the settlement agreement concluded between Tara Cable and the Village of Suffern (New York) after she filed a complaint of employment discrimination with the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) without initiating contact with the EEOC. Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W has also read the August 03rd 2021 report published by the New York Attorney General Office of Letitia James, which made numerous references to Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act. The Missouri Department of Mental Health (MODMH) Withhold Records About Several Aspects of Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W Employment With the Fulton State Hospital (FSH) Between October 26th 2013 & November 21st 2013. Michael Ayele (a.k.a) W Official Website.: https://michaelayeleaacl.wordpress.com/2022/10/28/michael-ayele- 26-october-2013-eeoc-charge-28e-2014-00485c-november-2013-index/ xxWeinstein was rolled into the courtroom in a wheelchair. Moments later, Jodi Kantor and Megan Twohey, the New York Times reporters who broke the Weinstein story triggering the #MeToo movement, walked in and sat near the front. In a victim statement read out in court, Haley said that Weinstein “not only stripped me of my dignity as a human being and as a woman … it diminished my confidence and faith in myself”. She added she felt alone as she was going through the trauma with no idea other women were out there who had similarly suffered abuse. W (AACL) – MICHAEL A. AYELE 20

49. REQUEST FOR RECORDS 12/14/2022 In her statement, the rape victim said she had finally found her voice. “It is time people who rape other people pay with their life and the life they took.” Both main accusers asked Burke to impose the maximum sentence. Lawyers for Weinstein pleaded with the judge for the minimum sentence of five years in prison. Donna Rotunno, his chief defense attorney, cited his work in the film industry as well as his failing health as mitigating factors. The sex offender also addressed the court personally in a rambling address in which he expressed remorse as well as implying he had been “confused” in his dealings with the women. “I’m totally confused, men are confused about all of this issue.” Weinstein went on to say: “I really feel remorse for this situation, I feel it deeply in my heart,” adding: “We may have different truths.” Harvey Weinstein sentenced to 23 years in prison on rape conviction. The Guardian.: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/mar/11/harvey-weinstein-sentencing-rape-conviction W (AACL) – MICHAEL A. AYELE 21