About the Employment History of Alexandra Hunt, Melissa Petro, Heidi Kaeslin, Nina Skye & Stacie Halas – #W (AACL)

1. THE EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION (EEOC) REFUSE TO CONFIRM OR DENY HAVING DISCUSSED THE EMPLOYMENT HISTORY OF ALEXANDRA HUNT, MELISSA PETRO, HEIDI KAESLIN, NINA SKYE & STACIE HALAS. BE WELL. TAKE CARE. KEEP YOURSELVES AT ARMS DISTANCE. MICHAEL A. AYELE (a/k/a) W ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF CIVIL LIBERTIES (AACL)

2. 131 M St, N. E., Fifth Floor Washington, D. C. 20507 Free: (833) 827-2920 ASL: (844) 234-5122 FAX: (202) 827-7545 Website: www.eeoc.gov U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Office of Legal Counsel May 13, 2022 VIA: waacl13@gmail.com Michael Ayele (aka) W ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF CIVIL LIBERTIES P.O. Box 20438 Addis Ababa, ETHIOPIA 10013 Re: FOIA No.: 820-2022-006131 D.C. Bill 318 and Prostitution Dear Mr. Ayele (aka) W: Your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, received on 03/15/2022, is processed. The paragraph(s) checked below apply. [X] Portions of your request are as follows: [X] Granted; [X] Denied pursuant to the subsection(s) of the FOIA indicated at the end of this letter. An attachment to this letter explains the use of these exemptions in more detail; and [X] Procedurally denied as no records fitting the description of the records you seek disclosed exist or could be located after a thorough search. See the Comments page for further explanation. [X] You may contact the Acting EEOC FOIA Public Liaison Michael L. Heise for further assistance or to discuss any aspect of your request. In addition, you may contact the Office of Government Information Services (OGIS) to inquire about the FOIA mediation services they offer. The contact information for OGIS is as follows: Office of Government Information Services, National Archives and Records Administration, 8601 Adelphi Road-OGIS, College Park, Maryland 20740- 6001, email at ogis@nara.gov; telephone at (202) 741-5770; toll free 1-877-684-6448; or facsimile at (202) 741-5769. The contact information for the FOIA Public Liaison is as follows: Michael L. Heise, EEOC FOIA Public Liaison, Office of Legal Counsel, FOIA Division, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 131 M. Street, N.E., Fifth Floor, Washington, D.C. 20507, email to FOIA@eeoc.gov, telephone at (202) 921-2542; or fax at (202) 827-7545. [X] If you are not satisfied with the response to this request, you may administratively appeal in writing. Your appeal must be postmarked or electronically transmitted in 90 days from receipt of this letter to the Office of Legal Counsel, FOIA Division, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 131 M Street, NE, 5NW02E, Washington, D.C. 20507, email to FOIA@eeoc.gov; online at https://eeoc.arkcase.com/foia/portal/login, or fax at (202) 827-7545. Your appeal will be governed by 29 C.F.R. § 1610.11.

3. 820-2022-006131 Sincerely, Michael L. Heise Assistant Legal Counsel (Acting) foia@eeoc.gov Applicable Sections of the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552(b): Exemption(s) Used: [X] (b)(3)(A)(i) [X] § 706(b) [X] § 709(e) [X] § 107 of the ADA [X] § 207 of the GINA (b)(3)(A)(i) Exemption 3 to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(3)(A)(i) (2016), as amended by the FOIA Improvement Act of 2016, Pub. L. No. 114-185, 130 Stat. 538, states that disclosure is not required for a matter specifically exempted from disclosure by statute if that statute: (A)(i) requires that the matters be withheld from the public in such a manner as to leave no discretion on the issue[.] Sections 706(b) and 709(e) of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-5(b), 2000e- 8(e)(2006), are part of such a statute. Section 706(b) provides that: Charges shall not be made public by the Commission . . . . Nothing said or done during and as a part of [the Commission's informal endeavors at resolving charges of discrimination] may be made public . . . . Section 709(e) of Title VII provides: It shall be unlawful for any officer of the Commission to make public in any manner whatever any information obtained by the Commission pursuant to its authority under this section [to investigate charges of discrimination and to require employers to maintain and submit records] prior to the institution of any proceeding under this title involving such information. Section 107 of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and § 207 of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) adopt the procedures of Sections 706 and 709 of Title VII. See EEOC v. Associated Dry Goods Co., 449 U.S. 590 (1981); Frito-Lay v. EEOC, 964 F. Supp. 236, 239-43 (W.D. Ky. 1997); American Centennial Insurance Co. v. EEOC, 722 F. Supp. 180 (D.N.J. 1989); and EEOC v. City of Milwaukee, 54 F. Supp. 2d 885, 893 (E.D. Wis. 1999). INFORMATION WITHHELD PURSUANT TO THE THIRD EXEMPTION TO THE FOIA:  Access to privileged charge information, if any exist: EEOC can neither confirm nor deny the existence, or non-existence, of any Title VII, ADA, and/or GINA, charges filed by an individual against an entity to which you are not, or do not represent, a party to the charge. [X] (b)(7)(C) 2 | P a g e

4. 820-2022-006131 (b)(7)(C) Exemption (b)(7)(C) to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(7)(C), as amended by the FOIA Improvement Act of 2016, Pub. L. No. 114-185, 130 Stat. 538, authorizes the Commission to withhold: records or information compiled for law enforcement purposes, but only to the extent that the production of such law enforcement records or information . . . (C) could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy . . . . The seventh exemption applies to civil and criminal investigations conducted by regulatory agencies. Abraham & Rose, P.L.C. v. United States, 138 F.3d 1075, 1083 (6th Cir. 1998). Release of statements and identities of witnesses and subjects of an investigation creates the potential for witness intimidation that could deter their cooperation. National Labor Relations Board v. Robbins Tire and Rubber Co., 437 U.S. 214, 239 (1978); Manna v. United States Dep’t. of Justice, 51 F.3d 1158,1164 (3d Cir. 1995). Disclosure of identities of employee-witnesses could cause "problems at their jobs and with their livelihoods." L&C Marine Transport, Ltd. v. United States, 740 F.2d 919, 923 (11th Cir. 1984). The Supreme Court has explained that only "[o]fficial information that sheds light on an agency's performance of its statutory duties" merits disclosure under FOIA, and noted that "disclosure of information about private citizens that is accumulated in various governmental files" would "reveal little or nothing about an agency's own conduct." United States Dep't of Justice v. Reporters Comm. for Freedom of the Press, 489 U.S. 749, 773 (1989). For the purposes of determining what constitutes an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy under exemption (b)(7)(C), the term “personal privacy” only encompasses individuals, and does not extend to the privacy interests of corporations. FCC v. AT&T Inc., 131 S.Ct. 1177, 1178 (2011). INFORMATION WITHHELD PURSUANT TO EXEMPTION (7)(C) TO THE FOIA:  EEOC cannot grant access to ADEA or EPA charges, filed by an individual against an entity, in order to prevent an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy by a third party. COMMENTS This office’s response to your request is as follows: (1) Your request for “formal and informal ties that exist between the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Department of State (DoS), the District of Columbia (D.C.) Council, the District of Columbia Government (DC.Gov), and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC),” is granted. The EEOC provides leadership and guidance to federal agencies on all aspects of the federal government's equal employment opportunity program. The requested information is already available online, via EEOC’s public website. See the following link: https://www.eeoc.gov/federal- sector. The EEOC enforces federal laws prohibiting employment discrimination, by an employer, against a job applicant or an employee. The requested information is already available online, via EEOC’s public website. See the following link: https://www.eeoc.gov/employers. (2) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about DC Bill 318 intent to decriminalize prostitution if those involved are 18 years of age or older” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. (3) Your request for “the researches and studies in use by [EEOC] on the subject of prostitution” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. 3 | P a g e

5. 820-2022-006131 (4) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about the contested studies dealing with the median age of entry into prostitution” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. (5) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about websites such as X-Video, X-Hamster, and Pornhub, being among the most visited throughout the world” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. (6) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about websites such as X-Video, X- Hamster, and Pornhub, having an estimated worth of between $3 (three) billion to tens of billions of U.S. dollars” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. (7) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about Google as a search engine, which can confirm that there are more searches for Pornhub than U.S. President Joe Biden,” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. (8) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about Google as a search engine, which can confirm that there are more searches for Pornhub than Covid- 19 (the Coronavirus disease),” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. (9) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about Google as a search engine, which can confirm that there are more searches for Pornhub than the online streaming platform Netflix,” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. (10) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about the decision of Pornhub to settle a lawsuit brought by 50 women against its website” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. (11) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about the decision of Pornhub to suspend content uploaded to their websites by non-verified users” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. (12) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about Google as a limited liability company (LLC) headquartered in Mountain View, California,” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. (13) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about the publicized 2018 investigation into police officers working for Prince George County, Maryland, and the Metropolitan Police Department (D.C.) following complaints that were filed against them alleging extortion of sexual intercourse in exchange for lack of criminal prosecution” is denied pursuant to the third and seventh exemptions to the FOIA. 5 U.S.C. §§ 552(b)(3)(A)(i) and (b)(7)(C). The confidentiality provisions of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the ADA, and GINA, prohibit the EEOC from confirming or denying the existence, or nonexistence, of a charge brought by an individual to a third party of the charge. The third exemption to the FOIA exempts this information from disclosure. The seventh exemption, 7(C), to the FOIA permits the agency to withhold information compiled in investigative files where disclosure of such information could result in an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. In this instance, we cannot grant access to, or copies of, any ADEA and EPA charges. 29 C.F.R. § 1610.17(g). (14) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about the MPD as law enforcement agency (within the D.C.Gov) that has previously disclosed to Michael 4 | P a g e

6. 820-2022-006131 A. Ayele, a.k.a W, the memorandum of understanding (MOU) they have concluded with the University of the District of Columbia (UDC)” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. (15) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about the University of Maryland (UMD) College Park as a post-secondary academic institution that has previously disclosed to Michael A. Ayele, a.k.a W, the memorandum of agreement (MOA) they have concluded with the Prince George County Police Department (PGPD)” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. (16) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about D.C. Code Section 22-3001 defining consent as words or overt actions indicating a freely given agreement to the sexual act or contact in question” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. (17) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about D.C. Code Section 22-3001 noting that the “lack of verbal or physical resistance or submission by the victim, resulting from the use of force, threats, or coercion (…) shall not constitute consent,” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. (18) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about the UMD as a post-secondary academic institution that defines sexual coercion as the use of unreasonable pressure in an effort to compel another individual to initiate or continue sexual activity against the individual’s will” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. (19) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about the UMD as a post-secondary academic institution which acknowledges that coercion includes but is not limited to intimidation, manipulation, threats of emotional or physical harm, and blackmail,” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. (20) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about the decision of Alexandra Hunt to speak on the subject of her work-experience as a stripper, when she was a college student,” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. (21) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about the retaliation faced by Alexandra Hunt at her previous place of employment for speaking on the subject of her work-experience as a stripper, when she was a college student,” is denied pursuant to the third and seventh exemptions to the FOIA. 5 U.S.C. §§ 552(b)(3)(A)(i) and (b)(7)(C). The confidentiality provisions of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the ADA, and GINA, prohibit the EEOC from confirming or denying the existence, or nonexistence, of a charge brought by an individual to a third party of the charge. The third exemption to the FOIA exempts this information from disclosure. The seventh exemption, 7(C), to the FOIA permits the agency to withhold information compiled in investigative files where disclosure of such information could result in an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. In this instance, we cannot grant access to, or copies of, any ADEA and EPA charges. 29 C.F.R. § 1610.17(g). (22) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about whether Alexandra Hunt’s previous place of employment was being consistent with Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act at the time it retaliated upon her for speaking on the subject of her work-experience as a stripper, when she was a college student,” is denied pursuant to the third and seventh exemptions to the FOIA. 5 U.S.C. §§ 552(b)(3)(A)(i) and (b)(7)(C). See Item # 21 above. 5 | P a g e

7. 820-2022-006131 (23) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about Alexandra Hunt as a woman who opposes the decision of former New York City (NYC) Mayor Michael Bloomberg calling for the removal of Melissa Petro as a teacher after she admitted to her past in sex work” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. (24) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about whether the former NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg was being consistent with Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act at the time he recommended the city take legal action” against Melissa Petro” is denied pursuant to the third and seventh exemptions to the FOIA. 5 U.S.C. §§ 552(b)(3)(A)(i) and (b)(7)(C). The confidentiality provisions of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the ADA, and GINA, prohibit the EEOC from confirming or denying the existence, or nonexistence, of a charge brought by an individual to a third party of the charge. The third exemption to the FOIA exempts this information from disclosure. The seventh exemption, 7(C), to the FOIA permits the agency to withhold information compiled in investigative files where disclosure of such information could result in an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. In this instance, we cannot grant access to, or copies of, any ADEA and EPA charges. 29 C.F.R. § 1610.17(g). (25) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about Alexandra Hunt as a woman who opposes the firing of Heidi Kaeslin from her previous job at the Lincoln Unified School District located in Northern California” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. (26) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about whether the Lincoln Unified School District was being consistent with Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act when it fired Heidi Kaeslin from her job as a school teacher there” is denied pursuant to the third and seventh exemptions to the FOIA. 5 U.S.C. §§ 552(b)(3)(A)(i) and (b)(7)(C). The confidentiality provisions of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the ADA, and GINA, prohibit the EEOC from confirming or denying the existence, or nonexistence, of a charge brought by an individual to a third party of the charge. The third exemption to the FOIA exempts this information from disclosure. The seventh exemption, 7(C), to the FOIA permits the agency to withhold information compiled in investigative files where disclosure of such information could result in an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. In this instance, we cannot grant access to, or copies of, any ADEA and EPA charges. 29 C.F.R. § 1610.17(g). (27) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about Alexandra Hunt as a woman who opposes the firing of Nina Skye from her previous job in a Los Angeles Christian preschool for moonlighting in the porn industry” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. (28) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about whether the firing of Nina Skye is consistent with Title VII of the 1964 and 1991Civil Rights Act” is denied pursuant to the third and seventh exemptions to the FOIA. 5 U.S.C. §§ 552(b)(3)(A)(i) and (b)(7)(C). The confidentiality provisions of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the ADA, and GINA, prohibit the EEOC from confirming or denying the existence, or nonexistence, of a charge brought by an individual to a third party of the charge. The third exemption to the FOIA exempts this information from disclosure. 6 | P a g e

8. 820-2022-006131 The seventh exemption, 7(C), to the FOIA permits the agency to withhold information compiled in investigative files where disclosure of such information could result in an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. In this instance, we cannot grant access to, or copies of, any ADEA and EPA charges. 29 C.F.R. § 1610.17(g). (29) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about Alexandra Hunt as a woman who opposes the firing of Stacie Halas from her job at the Oxnard School District for starring in pornographic films” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. (30) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about whether the Oxnard School District was being consistent with Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act when it fired Stacie Halas from her job as a teacher, for starring in pornographic films,” is denied pursuant to the third and seventh exemptions to the FOIA. 5 U.S.C. §§ 552(b)(3)(A)(i) and (b)(7)(C). The confidentiality provisions of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the ADA, and GINA, prohibit the EEOC from confirming or denying the existence, or nonexistence, of a charge brought by an individual to a third party of the charge. The third exemption to the FOIA exempts this information from disclosure. The seventh exemption, 7(C), to the FOIA permits the agency to withhold information compiled in investigative files where disclosure of such information could result in an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. In this instance, we cannot grant access to, or copies of, any ADEA and EPA charges. 29 C.F.R. § 1610.17(g). (31) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about Alexandra Hunt as a woman who is passionate about soccer” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. (32) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about Alexandra Hunt as a woman who has graduated with an undergraduate degree in Psychology from the University of Richmond” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. (33) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about Alexandra Hunt as a woman who graduated from Temple University with a Master of Public Health (MPH) degree” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. (34) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about Alexandra Hunt as a woman who identifies as a public health researcher, a girls’ soccer coach, an advocate for social, racial, economic, and environmental justice, and an organizer fighting for the 3rd district of Pennsylvania,” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. (35) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about Alexandra Hunt as a woman running for Congress on a progressive platform because she believes (…) politicians should fight for systemic change, ensuring equal opportunity and justice for all,” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. (36) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about Alexandra Hunt as a candidate running for Congress in order to decriminalize sex work” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. (37) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about Alexandra Hunt as a candidate running for Congress in order to reform the criminal justice system” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. 7 | P a g e

9. 820-2022-006131 (38) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about the criminal complaint filed by the Department of Justice (DOJ) against Brian Jeffrey Raymond in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, located at 333 Constitution Avenue, Washington D.C.)” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. (39) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about Brian Jeffrey Raymond as a Caucasian man who was 45 years old at the time the DOJ filed Document 68 with E. Barrett Prettyman Courthouse on July 23, 2021,” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. (40) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about Brian Jeffrey Raymond as a Caucasian man who was a longtime employee of the CIA” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. (41) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about Brian Jeffrey Raymond as a former CIA employee who has admitted to the DOJ having recorded and/or photographed at least 24 unconscious nude or partially nude women without their consent from 2006 to 2020” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. (42) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about Brian Jeffrey Raymond as a former CIA employee who drugged and incapacitated his sexual partners before taking nude photographs and videos of them” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. (43) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about Brian Jeffrey Raymond as a former CIA employee who drugged and incapacitated his sexual partners for the purpose of touching their breasts, buttocks, groin area, and/or genitalia,” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. (44) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about the federal magistrate judge in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California implying that Brian Jeffrey Raymond is two-faced” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. (45) Your request for “[EEOC] communications in the form of e-mails and postal correspondence about the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) as a federal agency which has identified drugs like flunitrazepam (Rohypnol), gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB), gamma-butyrolactone (GBL), and ketamine, being commonly used for the purpose of rape and sexual assault following a romantic date” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. (46) Your request for “the academic backgrounds, the professional responsibilities, and annual salaries, of Anita Bonds, David Grosso, Brianne Nadeau, Robert White, Charles Allen, Samantha Shero, Jaime Perry, Danielle Hickman, and April Russo,” is procedurally denied. No records exist within the EEOC. This response was prepared by Joanne Murray, Government Information Specialist, who may be reached by telephone to (202) 921-2541. 8 | P a g e

10. CITY OF NEW YORK CONFLICTS OF INTEREST BOARD 2 Lafayette Street, Suite 1010 New York, New York 10007 (212) 442-1400; (212) 437-0705 (Fax) www.nyc.gov/ethics @NYCCOIB March 18, 2022 Jeffrey D. Friedlander Chair Nisha Agarwal Board Member Fernando A. Bohorquez, Jr. Board Member Wayne G. Hawley Board Member Board Member ____________ Carolyn Lisa Miller Executive Director Ethan A. Carrier General Counsel Jeffrey Tremblay Director of Enforcement Katherine J. Miller Director of Annual Disclosure & Special Counsel Alex Kipp Director of Education & Engagement Varuni Bhagwant Director of Administration Derick Yu Director of Information Technology VIA E-MAIL W (Michael Ayele) waacl13@gmail.com Dear W: This is in response to your FOIL request to the New York City Conflicts of Interest Board (the “Board”), received March 15, 2022, for: “all records within your possession detailing [1] the formal and informal ties that exist between your office, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Department of State (DoS), the District of Columbia (D.C) Council, the District of Columbia Government (DC.Gov) and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC); [2] your communications about DC Bill 318 intent to ‘decriminalize prostitution if those involved are 18 years of age or older;’ [3] the researches and studies in use by your office on the subject of prostitution; [4] your communications about the contested studies dealing with the median age of entry into prostitution; [5] your communications about websites such as X-Video, X- Hamster and Pornhub being among the most visited throughout the world; [6] your communications about websites such as X-Video, X-Hamster and Pornhub having an estimated worth of between $3 (three) billions to tens of billions of U.S dollars; [7] your communications about Google as a search engine, which can confirm that there are more searches for Pornhub than U.S President Joe Biden; [8] your communications about Google as a search engine, which can confirm that there are more searches for Pornhub than Covid-19 (the Coronavirus disease); [9] your communications about Google as a search engine, which can confirm that there are more searches for Pornhub than the online streaming platform Netflix; [10] your communications about the decision of Pornhub to settle a lawsuit brought by 50 women against their website; [11] your communications about the decision of Pornhub to suspend content uploaded to their websites by non- verified users; [12] your communications about Google as a limited liability company (LLC) headquartered in Mountain View, California; [13] your communications about the publicized 2018 investigation into police officers working for Prince George County, Maryland and the Metropolitan Police Department (D.C) following complaints that were filed against them alleging extortion of sexual intercourse in exchange for lack of criminal prosecution; [14] your communications about the MPD as law enforcement agency (within the DC.Gov,) that has previously disclosed to Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W the memorandum of understanding (MOU) they have concluded with the University of the District of Columbia (UDC); [15] your communications about the University of Maryland (UMD) College Park as a

11. post-secondary academic institution that has previously disclosed to Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W the memorandum of agreement (MOA) they have concluded with the Prince George County Police Department (PGPD); [16] your communications about D.C. Code Section 22-3001 defining consent as ‘words or overt actions indicating a freely given agreement to the sexual act or contact in question;’ [17] your communications about D.C. Code Section 22-3001 noting that the ‘lack of verbal or physical resistance or submission by the victim, resulting from the use of force, threats, or coercion (…) shall not constitute consent;’ [18] your communications about the UMD as a post-secondary academic institution that defines ‘sexual coercion’ as the ‘use of unreasonable pressure in an effort to compel another individual to initiate or continue sexual activity against the individual’s will;’ [19] your communications about the UMD as a post-secondary academic institution, which acknowledges that ‘coercion include but is not limited to intimidation, manipulation, threats of emotional or physical harm, and blackmail;’ [20] your communications about the decision of Alexandra Hunt to speak on the subject of her work-experience as a stripper (when she was a college student); [21] your communications about the retaliation faced by Alexandra Hunt at her previous place of employment for speaking on the subject of her work-experience as a stripper (when she was a college student); [22] your communications about whether Alexandra Hunt’s previous place of employment was being consistent with Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act at the time it retaliated upon her for speaking on the subject of her work-experience as a stripper (when she was a college student).” The Board does not have any responsive documents. Should you wish to appeal this determination, you must send written notice within thirty days to Carolyn Lisa Miller, Records Appeals Officer, at FOIL@coib.nyc.gov. Very truly yours, cc: Katherine J. Miller Records Access Officer Carolyn Lisa Miller

12. CITY OF NEW YORK CONFLICTS OF INTEREST BOARD 2 Lafayette Street, Suite 1010 New York, New York 10007 (212) 442-1400; (212) 437-0705 (Fax) www.nyc.gov/ethics @NYCCOIB March 21, 2022 Jeffrey D. Friedlander Chair Nisha Agarwal Board Member Fernando A. Bohorquez, Jr. Board Member Wayne G. Hawley Board Member Board Member ____________ Carolyn Lisa Miller Executive Director Ethan A. Carrier General Counsel Jeffrey Tremblay Director of Enforcement Katherine J. Miller Director of Annual Disclosure & Special Counsel Alex Kipp Director of Education & Engagement Varuni Bhagwant Director of Administration Derick Yu Director of Information Technology VIA E-MAIL W (Michael Ayele) waacl13@gmail.com Dear W: This is in response to your FOIL request to the New York City Conflicts of Interest Board (the “Board”), received March 19, 2022, for: “records within your possession detailing [1] whether the City of New York has the right to fire employees (in your city government) for previously (i) starring in pornographic films, (ii) working as a prostitute, (iii) working as a stripper etc; [2] whether the City of New York had contacted federal agencies such as the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) to inquire about your rights to fire employees (in your city government) for previously (i) starring in pornographic films, (ii) working as a prostitute, (iii) working as a stripper etc; [3] whether the City of New York is being consistent with Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act when firing employees (in your city government) for previously (i) starring in pornographic films, (ii) working as a prostitute, (iii) working as a stripper; [4] the formal/informal opinions held by the City of New York on decriminalizing prostitution; [5] the formal/informal opinions held by the City of New York on the benefits of decriminalizing prostitution for the purpose of bolstering women’s confidence (as well as their trust) in the U.S government when reporting the sexual violence they have experienced.” The Board does not have any responsive documents. Should you wish to appeal this determination, you must send written notice within thirty days to Carolyn Lisa Miller, Records Appeals Officer, at FOIL@coib.nyc.gov. Very truly yours, Katherine J. Miller Records Access Officer cc: Carolyn Lisa Miller

13. CITY OF NEW YORK CONFLICTS OF INTEREST BOARD 2 Lafayette Street, Suite 1010 New York, New York 10007 (212) 442-1400; (212) 437-0705 (Fax) www.nyc.gov/ethics @NYCCOIB March 21, 2022 Jeffrey D. Friedlander Chair Nisha Agarwal Board Member Fernando A. Bohorquez, Jr. Board Member Wayne G. Hawley Board Member Board Member ____________ Carolyn Lisa Miller Executive Director Ethan A. Carrier General Counsel Jeffrey Tremblay Director of Enforcement Katherine J. Miller Director of Annual Disclosure & Special Counsel Alex Kipp Director of Education & Engagement Varuni Bhagwant Director of Administration Derick Yu Director of Information Technology VIA E-MAIL W (Michael Ayele) waacl13@gmail.com Dear W: This is a supplemental response to your FOIL request to the New York City Conflicts of Interest Board (the “Board”), received March 15, 2022, for: “all records within your possession detailing . . . [23] your communications about Alexandra Hunt as a woman who opposes the decision of former New York City (NYC) Mayor Michael Bloomberg calling for the removal of Melissa Petro as a teacher ‘after she admitted to her past in sex work;’ [24] your communications about whether the former NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg was being consistent with Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act at the time he ‘recommended the city take legal action’ against Melissa Petro; [25] your communications about Alexandra Hunt as a woman who opposes the firing of Heidi Kaeslin from her previous job (at the Lincoln Unified School District located in Northern California); [26] your communications about whether the Lincoln Unified School District was being consistent with Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act when it fired Heidi Kaeslin from her job as a school teacher there; [27] your communications about Alexandra Hunt as a woman who opposes the firing of Nina Skye from her previous job in a Los Angeles Christian preschool for ‘moonlighting in the porn industry;’ [28] your communications about whether the firing of Nina Skye is consistent with Title VII of the 1964 and 1991Civil Rights Act; [29] your communications about Alexandra Hunt as a woman who opposes the firing of Stacie Halas from her job at the Oxnard School District (for starring in pornographic films); [30] your communications about whether the Oxnard School District was being consistent with Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act when it fired Stacie Halas from her job as a teacher (for starring in pornographic films); [31] your communications about Alexandra Hunt as a woman who’s passionate about soccer; [32] your communications about Alexandra Hunt as a woman who has graduated with an undergraduate degree in Psychology from the University of Richmond; [33] your communications about Alexandra Hunt as a woman who graduated from Temple University with a Master of Public Health (MPH) degree; [34] your communications about Alexandra Hunt as a woman who identifies as ‘a public health researcher, a girls’ soccer coach, an advocate for social, racial, economic, and environmental justice, and an organizer fighting for the 3rd district of Pennsylvania;’ [35] your communications about Alexandra Hunt as a woman ‘running for’ Congress on a progressive platform because she believes (…) politicians should fight for systemic

14. change, ensuring equal opportunity and justice for all;’ [36] your communications about Alexandra Hunt as a candidate running for Congress in order to decriminalize sex work; [37] your communications about Alexandra Hunt as a candidate running for Congress in order to reform the criminal justice system; [38] your communications about the criminal complaint filed by the Department of Justice (DOJ) against Brian Jeffrey Raymond in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, (located 333 Constitution Avenue, Washington D.C); [39] your communications about Brian Jeffrey Raymond as a Caucasian man who was 45 years old at the time the DOJ filed Document 68 with E. Barrett Prettyman Courthouse on July 23rd 2021; [40] your communications about Brian Jeffrey Raymond as a Caucasian man who was a longtime employee of the CIA; [41] your communications about Brian Jeffrey Raymond as a former CIA employee who has admitted to the DOJ ‘having recorded and/or photographed at least 24 unconscious nude or partially nude women without their consent from 2006 to 2020;’ [42] your communications about Brian Jeffrey Raymond as a former CIA employee who drugged and incapacitated his sexual partners before taking nude photographs and videos of them; [43] your communications about Brian Jeffrey Raymond as a former CIA employee who drugged and incapacitated his sexual partners for the purpose of touching their ‘breasts, buttocks, groin area, and/or genitalia;’ [44] your communications about the federal magistrate judge in the U.S District Court for the Southern District of California implying that Brian Jeffrey Raymond is two-faced; [45] your communications about the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) as a federal agency, which has identified drugs like flunitrazepam (Rohypnol), gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB), gamma-butyrolactone (GBL), and ketamine being commonly used for the purpose of rape and sexual assault following a romantic date; [46] the academic backgrounds, the professional responsibilities and annual salaries of Anita Bonds, David Grosso, Brianne Nadeau, Robert White, Charles Allen, Samantha Shero, Jaime Perry, Danielle Hickman and April Russo.” The Board responded to your FOIL requests numbered 1 through 22 by letter dated March 18, 2022. Due to administrative error, the Board did not respond to your FOIL requests numbered 23 through 46 and does so in this supplemental response: the Board does not have any responsive documents. Should you wish to appeal this determination, you must send written notice within thirty days to Carolyn Lisa Miller, Records Appeals Officer, at FOIL@coib.nyc.gov. Very truly yours, cc: Katherine J. Miller Records Access Officer Carolyn Lisa Miller

32. 1 of 11 of 1 DEPARTMENT OPERATING REGULATION NUMBER DOR 6.665 MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH MARK STRINGER, DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR CHAPTER Human Resources SUBCHAPTER EFFECTIVE DATE 12/14/18 NUMBER OF PAGES 3 PAGE NUMBER 1 of 3 Employment Rules HISTORY SUBJECT Conflict of Interest/Conflicting Employment AUTHORITY 1 CSR 20-1.030(3) See Below SUNSET DATE PERSON RESPONSIBLE Deputy Director for Human Resources 7/1/22 PURPOSE: To establish guidelines for monitoring employees’ outside/secondary employment in order to avoid any conflict with the interests of the department, and to ensure high principles of conduct and ethical behavior in the fidelity and efficiency of department operations. (1)Department employees will not engage in any activity or employment in which there is a significant potential for or the appearance of a conflict of interest with the functions of the department. Conflict of interest is any activity or employment which would tend to influence a decision; create a bias or prejudice which would favor one side or the other in conflict with the employee’s duties; or which conflicts with the accomplishment of the department’s mission or goals. (2)Department employees must report current and anticipated employment that is secondary to their state employment. A request for approval should be made prior to accepting secondary employment if possible. Any employee who holds secondary employment without formal approval should request approval as soon as possible. (3)Department employees are required to fill out a DMH-8210, ‘Application for Determination of Conflicting Employment/Conflict of Interest’, specifying the nature of their secondary employment. After submission to the employee’s supervisor, it will be forwarded to the appointing authority of that department facility who will determine appropriateness of the request. (4)The factors which may be considered in rendering any decision regarding outside employment include consideration of the presence of: (A)An actual conflict of interest that would be presented by the secondary employment in light of the duties of the person’s employment with the department and/or functions of the division or department; (B)The appearance of a conflict of interest that would be presented by the secondary employment in light of the duties of the person’s employment with the department and the letter notifying an employee of such action shall inform the employee of this right; (C)The existence of laws and/or regulations which prohibit the secondary employment; and, (D)(When applicable) The employee’s past history concerning secondary employment issues.

33. DEPARTMENT OPERATING REGULATION NUMBER DOR 6.665 MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH MARK STRINGER,, DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR EFFECTIVE DATE NUMBER OF PAGES PAGE NUMBER 2 of 3 SUBJECT 3 Conflict of Interest/Conflicting Employment (5)Decisions to deny or approve the request for secondary employment shall be recorded on the DMH-8210. If the request is denied, the reasons shall be provided in writing on the DMH-8210. (6)If secondary employment is approved, it shall be subject to the following conditions: (A)Secondary employment must not be conducted or solicited in any manner while an employee is on duty; (B)Secondary employment must not be conducted or solicited from department facilities or while using state equipment or supplies; (C)Uniforms and clothing bearing department identification and insignia must not be worn while conducting or soliciting secondary employment; (D)Standard department procedures must not be bypassed; (E)Secondary employment must not be conducted or solicited at any time while an employee is on standby or actually working after normal hours, nor in any other manner interfere with the performance of the employee’s job; and, (F)Secondary employment may not be worked directly or indirectly for contractors, suppliers, or any other business or entity that may be construed to be a conflict of interest. (7)The completed DMH-8210 application and any relevant documents will be kept in the employee’s personnel file. (8)Any employee who receives approval for secondary employment must annually resubmit a DMH-8210 for a review of his/her current duties with the secondary employer and that employer’s present association with the department. The department reserves the right to revoke authorizations for secondary employment at any time should a conflict of interest develop or laws and/or regulations change. Should revocation be necessary, then the employee will be given a reasonable amount of time to cease secondary employment. (9)Unless approved by a health care provider, employees may not work secondary jobs while on sick leave, worker’s compensation or temporary disability. Employees will be subject to disciplinary action, up to and including dismissal, for working in secondary employment while on sick leave or worker’s compensation leave from the department. (10) Employees will not be influenced in their duties and responsibilities by any benefit other than their department compensation. Any form of a subsidy that is offered to an employee or employee’s benefactors for already duly compensated department service must be reported to the appointing authority of the employee’s facility. Acceptance of any such outside compensation is prohibited, with the employee subject to disciplinary action, up to and including dismissal. (11) Employees who are clinicians with private practices shall: 12/14/18

34. DEPARTMENT OPERATING REGULATION NUMBER DOR 6.665 MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH MARK STRINGER,, DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR EFFECTIVE DATE NUMBER OF PAGES PAGE NUMBER 3 of 3 SUBJECT 3 Conflict of Interest/Conflicting Employment (A)Not attend any of their private clients while on official department time; (B)Not solicit or refer any department clients to their own private practices or otherwise to themselves for services, nor to a spouse’s private practice or any other private practice in which the employee has a financial interest; (C)Not accept in their private practices any clients they attend in their department capacities; (D)Clarify in privately paid court evaluation or testimony that it is being done independent of the department with a statement such as: “Although I am employed by the Department of Mental Health, this evaluation or testimony is provided independently as a private practitioner.” (10) Employees may be exempted from the prohibition against using department equipment or supplies if, with prior approval of the appointing authority, they engage in the following activities (such activities may not be performed on official department time if the employee receives compensation for them): (A) Survey facilities in other states for accreditation or certification authorities recognized by the department; (B) Speak on subjects related to their department duties at conferences, seminars, and other events: (C) Write articles on professional topics relating to their official duties. (11) The Director of the Office of Human Resources will review and analyze any statutory, regulatory, or policy changes as they occur to determine their effect on the provisions of this Department Operating Regulation and will make changes as necessary. History: Original DOR Effective January 17, 2000. Amendment effective July 1, 2002. On July 1, 2003 the sunset date was extended to July 1, 2004. Amendment effective February 1, 2004. Amendment effective November 1, 2004. On July 1, 2008 the sunset date was extended to July 1, 2011. On May 20, 2011 the sunset date was extended to July 1, 2014. On June 17, 2014 the sunset date was extended to July 1, 2017. On June 15, 2017 the sunset date was extended to July 1, 2020. Amendment effective December 14, 2018. 12/14/18

40. Position Description Questionnaire (PDQ) STATE OF MISSOURI OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION DIVISION OF PERSONNEL DIVISION OF PERSONNEL USE ONLY Title Code: 05SP20 Classification Title: Senior Support Care Assistant (PT II) New Position Number: xxx xxxx xxxxxxx Effective Date: Enter Date Here This is an official position classification record. Please complete based upon permanent duties assigned to the position. It is important to provide adequate details because the information will be used to determine the proper job title of the position. Position classification is based on assigned duties and level of complexity, not volume of work or quality of work. Determinations do not consider an employee’s length of service or performance. ITEMS TO BE COMPLETED BY AGENCY PERSONNEL OFFICE Agency name: Department of Mental Health Agency code: 650 Organizational code: xxxx Position number: xxxxxxx Division: Behavioral Health Program, unit, or facility name or area of responsibility: Hawthorn Children’s Psychatric Hospital CURRENT - Classification code: 05SP20 Classification title: Senior Support Care Assistant (PT II) CIVS code: ☐ UCPP - Classified  UCPC – Merit/P-E ☐ UCPY – Merit/Grant-in-Aid If applicable, name of federal program or grant: Enter Text Here PROPOSED - Classification code: xxxxxx Classification title: Enter Text Here CIVS code: ☐ UCPP - Classified ☐ UCPC – Merit/P-E ☐ UCPY – Merit/Grant-in-Aid If applicable, name of federal program or grant: Enter Text Here Reason for preparing the PDQ: ☐ New position ☐ Significant change in duties or responsibilities ☐ Update ☐ Reorganization ☐ Special Study  Other (please explain): New incumbent in position Do you believe the position is correctly allocated?  Yes ☐ No If not, please explain: Enter Text Here Review initiated by: ☐ Employee  Supervisor ☐ Appointing Authority ☐ Division of Personnel Summarize education, experience, licensure, etc. needed for the position (Requirements should be based on the position; not on an incumbent or copied from class specification): 1+ years of experience as Psych Tech I or Security Aide I and high school diplomas or GED or 2+ years of experience as a Developmental Asst. I /II and high school diploma or GED or 2+ years of direct care experience on a ward or unit specific to residents who are prmiarily diagnosed with menatl illnes and a high school diploma or GED. An organizational chart is required to complete the position review process. For new positions, the organizational chart should show the reporting relationship of the new position. If applicable, organizational charts showing indirect reports should also be attached. Is a current organizational chart attached? ☐ Yes ☐ No If no, indicate where one can be reviewed on-line: Enter Text Here If there is a proposed change in the organizational structure, please provide a proposed organizational chart in addition to the current one. Is a proposed organizational chart attached? ☐ Yes ☐ No  Not applicable August 1, 2020

41. If duties were previously assigned to another position, please provide the position number, which duties, and why the duties were reassigned. Enter Text Here If there are any comparable positions, please provide position information below: Position Number Job Title Agcy Org Psn # Agcy Org Psn # Agcy Org Psn # Agcy Org Psn # Agcy Org Psn # Enter Text Here Enter Text Here Enter Text Here ITEMS TO BE COMPLETED BY INCUMBENT (SUPERVISOR IF VACANT) Working title: Senior Support Care Assistant (PT II) Name of incumbent: Enter Text Here Name and title of immediate supervisor: Unit Charge Nurse Name and titles of others who may assign and evaluate work: RN Supervisor, Stephanie Foster, CNE; Marcia Ford, COO If applicable, briefly identify the circumstance(s) leading to a change of duties: Enter Text Here Main purpose/focus of the position (A brief summary of 3 to 4 sentences providing the purpose/focus of the position and how it contributes to the organization’s objectives and goals): Follow oral and written direction from the RN and assist other team members in giving direct care to clients with mental illness admitted to this facility. Provide permanent, essential duties. (The duty statement block below expands as needed).  Please indicate if the duty statement describes a new (N), changed (C), or unchanged (U) duties.  Describe the duties performed starting with the most important. Do not copy language from the class specification.  Do not list minor duties that are less than 5% of the position’s time unless such duties are of significant importance to the position.  Use descriptive words; do not provide step-by-step instructions on how to perform a duty.  Each statement should be concise and brief.  Use a separate statement for each major duty or task.  Name specific business programs, technical systems, reports, or other items that may help us to understand the role. N=New C=Change U=Unchanged U Duty Statement Serves as a role model and mentor; assist the professional RN and CPCS in maintaining a safe, clean and theraputic environment; and provides nursing interventions utilizing information available from intershift report and considering patients current behavior. Demonstrates therapeutic communication skills in relating to and managing clients' behavior and activities of daily living consistent with cultural differences; knowledge of the legal rights and responsibility of clients and staff in the facility setting and fuctions accordingly; and the ability to develop a harmonious working relationship with clients, co-workers, supervisors and general public. Ability to understand and follow verbal and written instructions; possess knowledge and understanding to effectively practice therapeutic communication skills; recognizes and reports to the Professional RN changes in behavior of the client; and knowledge of current infection control practices. Attends to the physical components of client care and related diagnostic procedures under the supervision of a RN; attends in-service training and clinical conferences as scheduled Performs asll assigned duties in accordance with current departmental operating regulations and facility and departmental policy and procedures. U U U U August 1, 2020

42. U Escorts clients to other facilities in accordance with hosptial policy; participates as an active member of the Interdisciplinary Treatment Team Contributes to the assessment of physical, psychological, spiritual, and social dimension of assigned clients on an ongoing basis. Is particularly aware of elopement potential and suicidal In the absence of the RN or CPCS, insures that appropriate interventions and/or basic life support measures are initiated in accordance with the current accepted techniques and practice; and documents in the clients record assessments, interventions and client's response in accordance with the individual treatment plan. Observes, reports and charts significant changes in client behavior and physical condition, communicates any significant changes to the RN and CPCS immedicately; functions in the capacity of a co-facilitator, in support groups designed for skill buidling and remotivation, attend unit and facility staff programs as scheduled and any other assigned duties. U U U Provide a list of acronyms used in the above duty statements and what they mean:RN-Registered Nurse, CPCS-Child Psych Care Supervisor List parties that this position has regular contact with while performing typical duties (Clients calling in to request assistance, legislators requesting information, etc.): .): They have regular contact with the consumers providing assistance, other staff from various departments throughout the facility, family members of the consumers during a visit or by phone, other regional staff that may visit the facility and outside contractors. Describe special working conditions (Shift schedule, physical efforts, etc.): (work schedule) with every other weekend off; essential job functions include Crisis Response, ProAct, CPR, assisting in hygience, behavioral interventions for patients, and must be able to lift at least 25 lbs., walk and move without long term restrictions. Use a stethoscope, IVAC, copier, printer, computer and AED. Provide the type and application of guidelines in the performance of typical duties (Interprets state statutes, follows established procedures, etc.): They will follow the Regional and Facility polices and procedures, abide by the department policies and procedures, be kind and courteous to everyone (co-workers, parents, visitors, consumers and contractors). Provide examples of decisions made independently: To talk down a consumer that may be upset or agitated to keep from needing to isolate or restrain consumer. May correct or give directions to Psych Techs. Financial responsibilities (Please check all that apply):  Not applicable – No financial responsibilities ☐ Financial documents – Responsible for filing, reviewing, coding, entering, etc. ☐ Budget – Pulls reports as requested ☐ Budget – Provides information used in budget creation ☐ Budget –Recommends new budget items and/or changes to the budget ☐ Budget – Develops budgets ☐ Budget – Other (Please explain): Enter Text Here ☐ Grants – Reviews expenditures for compliance and fund dispersal ☐ Grants – Researches and submits grants ☐ Grants – Approve grant submission ☐ Grants – Manages grant program ☐ Other financial responsibilities (Provide brief explanation): Enter Text Here August 1, 2020

43. Supervisory duties: ☐ Does not supervise staff  Leads staff on a regular basis but is not the direct supervisor. May help coach/mentor, direct, schedule, or monitor staff but do not hire, fire, discipline, or evaluate staff. ☐ First-line supervisor over two or more full-time employees. Assists with hiring, firing, and discipline of staff. Evaluates staff performance. ☐ Manages a unit, program, section, or major function and supervises first-line supervisors. ☐ Other (Provide explanation): Enter Text Here Indicate the number of individuals supervised and titles (The below positions should be reflected on the organizational chart submitted): Full-time: Enter Text Here Part-time: Enter Text Here Seasonal/Temporary: Enter Text Here Volunteers:Enter Text Here Offenders/Clients: Enter Text Here Indirect Reports: Enter Text Here Other comments: Enter Text Here I understand that this questionnaire is not a review of my capabilities or job performance and I attest that this document accurately reflects the duties and responsibilities assigned to my position.  If applicable, the below printed name represents my agreement with the above statement and I agree the printed name is the same as a handwritten signature. Print/Sign and Date Here __________________________________________________________________________ __________________ Name Date ITEMS TO BE COMPLETED BY SUPERVISOR I ☐ agree ☐disagree with the employee’s statements. If you disagree please provide explanation: Enter Text Here I ☐ support ☐ do not support this request. If you do not support this request please provide explanation: Enter Text Here Other comments relevant to this review (Please remember this process is about the position; not the incumbent): Enter Text Here  If applicable, the below printed name represents my agreement with the above statement and I agree the printed name is the same as a handwritten signature. Print/Sign and Date Here _________________________________________________________________________ __________________ Name Date ITEMS TO BE COMPLETED BY APPOINTING AUTHORITY August 1, 2020

44. I ☐ support ☐ do not support this request. If you do not support this request please provide explanation: Enter Text Here Other comments relevant to this review (Please remember this process is about the position; not the incumbent): Enter Text Here ☐ If applicable, the below printed name represents my agreement with the above statement and I agree the printed name is the same as a handwritten signature. Print/Sign and Date Here _________________________________________________________________________ __________________ Name Date DIVISION OF PERSONNEL USE ONLY Action Taken: Enter Text Here Title Code/TCAT: Enter Data Here Title Long Description: Enter Text Here Effective Date: Enter Date Here Special Action Taken: Enter Text Here Date Received: Enter Date Here Other Comments: Enter Text Here August 1, 2020

47. RECORDS REQUEST 03/15/2022 W (AACL) Michael A. Ayele P.O.Box 20438 Addis Ababa, Ethiopia E-mail: waacl13@gmail.com ; waacl1313@gmail.com ; waacl42913@gmail.com Request for Records Hello, This is Michael A. Ayele sending this message though I now go by W. You may call me W. I am writing this letter to file a request for records with your offices.i The bases for this records request are [1] the District of Columbia “Community Safety and Health Amendment Act of 2019” (a.k.a) D.C Bill 318; ii [2] the article published by Alexandra Hunt on the Huffington Post entitled: “I’m a former Stripper Running for Congress. I Refuse to Be Ashamed”iii and [3] the recently publicized employment-history of Brian Jeffrey Raymond following his arrest in October 2020 on charges of sexual related misconducts. iv I) Records Requested What I am requesting for prompt disclosure are all records within your possession detailing [1] the formal and informal ties that exist between your office, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the Department of Justice (DOJ), the Department of State (DoS), the District of Columbia (D.C) Council, the District of Columbia Government (DC.Gov) and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC); [2] your communications about DC Bill 318 intent to “decriminalize prostitution if those involved are 18 years of age or older;” [3] the researches and studies in use by your office on the subject of prostitution; [4] your communications about the contested studies dealing with the median age of entry into prostitution; v [5] your communications about websites such as X-Video, X-Hamster and Pornhub being among the most visited throughout the world; [6] your communications about websites such as X-Video, X- Hamster and Pornhub having an estimated worth of between $3 (three) billions to tens of billions of U.S dollars; [7] your communications about Google as a search engine, which can confirm that there are more searches for Pornhub than U.S President Joe Biden; [8] your communications about Google as a search engine, which can confirm that there are more searches for Pornhub than Covid-19 (the Coronavirus disease); [9] your communications about Google as a search engine, which can confirm that there are more searches for Pornhub than the online streaming platform Netflix; vi [10] your communications about the decision of Pornhub to settle a lawsuit brought by 50 women against their website; vii [11] your communications about the decision of Pornhub to suspend content uploaded to their websites by non-verified users; viii [12] your communications about Google as a limited liability company (LLC) headquartered in Mountain View, California;ix [13] your communications about the publicized 2018 investigation into police officers working for Prince George County, Maryland and the Metropolitan Police Department (D.C) following complaints that were filed against them alleging extortion of sexual intercourse in exchange for lack of criminal prosecution; x [14] your communications about the MPD as law enforcement agency (within the DC.Gov,) that has previously disclosed to Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W the memorandum of understanding (MOU) they have concluded with the University of Date.: March 15th 2022 W (AACL) – MICHAEL A. AYELE 1

48. RECORDS REQUEST 03/15/2022 the District of Columbia (UDC); xi [15] your communications about the University of Maryland (UMD) College Park as a post-secondary academic institution that has previously disclosed to Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W the memorandum of agreement (MOA) they have concluded with the Prince George County Police Department (PGPD); xii [16] your communications about D.C. Code Section 22-3001 defining consent as “words or overt actions indicating a freely given agreement to the sexual act or contact in question;” [17] your communications about D.C. Code Section 22-3001 noting that the “lack of verbal or physical resistance or submission by the victim, resulting from the use of force, threats, or coercion (…) shall not constitute consent;” xiii [18] your communications about the UMD as a post-secondary academic institution that defines “sexual coercion” as the “use of unreasonable pressure in an effort to compel another individual to initiate or continue sexual activity against the individual’s will;” [19] your communications about the UMD as a post-secondary academic institution, which acknowledges that “coercion include but is not limited to intimidation, manipulation, threats of emotional or physical harm, and blackmail;” xiv [20] your communications about the decision of Alexandra Hunt to speak on the subject of her work-experience as a stripper (when she was a college student); [21] your communications about the retaliation faced by Alexandra Hunt at her previous place of employment for speaking on the subject of her work-experience as a stripper (when she was a college student); [22] your communications about whether Alexandra Hunt’s previous place of employment was being consistent with Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act at the time it retaliated upon her for speaking on the subject of her work-experience as a stripper (when she was a college student); [23] your communications about Alexandra Hunt as a woman who opposes the decision of former New York City (NYC) Mayor Michael Bloomberg calling for the removal of Melissa Petro as a teacher “after she admitted to her past in sex work;” [24] your communications about whether the former NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg was being consistent with Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act at the time he “recommended the city take legal action” against Melissa Petro; xv [25] your communications about Alexandra Hunt as a woman who opposes the firing of Heidi Kaeslin from her previous job (at the Lincoln Unified School District located in Northern California); [26] your communications about whether the Lincoln Unified School District was being consistent with Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act when it fired Heidi Kaeslin from her job as a school teacher there; xvi [27] your communications about Alexandra Hunt as a woman who opposes the firing of Nina Skye from her previous job in a Los Angeles Christian preschool for “moonlighting in the porn industry;” [28] your communications about whether the firing of Nina Skye is consistent with Title VII of the 1964 and 1991Civil Rights Act; xvii [29] your communications about Alexandra Hunt as a woman who opposes the firing of Stacie Halas from her job at the Oxnard School District (for starring in pornographic films); [30] your communications about whether the Oxnard School District was being consistent with Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act when it fired Stacie Halas from her job as a teacher (for starring in pornographic films); xviii [31] your communications about Alexandra Hunt as a woman who’s passionate about soccer; [32] your communications about Alexandra Hunt as a woman who has graduated with an undergraduate degree in Psychology from the University of Richmond; [33] your communications about Alexandra Hunt as a woman who graduated from Temple University with a Master of Public Health (MPH) degree; [34] your communications about Alexandra Hunt as a woman who identifies as “a public health researcher, a girls’ soccer coach, an advocate for social, racial, economic, and environmental justice, and an organizer fighting for the 3rd district of Pennsylvania;” [35] your communications about Alexandra Hunt as a woman “running for W (AACL) – MICHAEL A. AYELE 2

49. RECORDS REQUEST 03/15/2022 Congress on a progressive platform because she believes (…) politicians should fight for systemic change, ensuring equal opportunity and justice for all;” xix [36] your communications about Alexandra Hunt as a candidate running for Congress in order to decriminalize sex work; [37] your communications about Alexandra Hunt as a candidate running for Congress in order to reform the criminal justice system; [38] your communications about the criminal complaint filed by the Department of Justice (DOJ) against Brian Jeffrey Raymond in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, (located 333 Constitution Avenue, Washington D.C); [39] your communications about Brian Jeffrey Raymond as a Caucasian man who was 45 years old at the time the DOJ filed Document 68 with E. Barrett Prettyman Courthouse on July 23rd 2021; [40] your communications about Brian Jeffrey Raymond as a Caucasian man who was a longtime employee of the CIA; [41] your communications about Brian Jeffrey Raymond as a former CIA employee who has admitted to the DOJ “ having recorded and/or photographed at least 24 unconscious nude or partially nude women without their consent from 2006 to 2020;” [42] your communications about Brian Jeffrey Raymond as a former CIA employee who drugged and incapacitated his sexual partners before taking nude photographs and videos of them; [43] your communications about Brian Jeffrey Raymond as a former CIA employee who drugged and incapacitated his sexual partners for the purpose of touching their “breasts, buttocks, groin area, and/or genitalia;”xx [44] your communications about the federal magistrate judge in the U.S District Court for the Southern District of California implying that Brian Jeffrey Raymond is two-faced; xxi [45] your communications about the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) as a federal agency, which has identified drugs like flunitrazepam (Rohypnol), gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB), gamma-butyrolactone (GBL), and ketamine being commonly used for the purpose of rape and sexual assault following a romantic date; xxii [46] the academic backgrounds, the professional responsibilities and annual salaries of Anita Bonds, David Grosso, Brianne Nadeau, Robert White, Charles Allen, Samantha Shero, Jaime Perry, Danielle Hickman and April Russo. II) Request for a Fee Waiver and Expedited Processing The requested records have demonstrated that [1] police officers associated with the DC.Gov (MPD) and the PGPD had in 2018 been accused of extorting sexual intercourse from prostitutes in the D.C and Silver Spring, Maryland area; [2] the DC.Gov (MPD) has disclosed the MOU they have concluded with the UDC (pursuant to the Jeanne Clery Act) to Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W; [3] the UMD at College Park has disclosed the MOA they have concluded with the PGPD (pursuant to the Jeanne Clery Act) to Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W; [4] D.C. Code Section 22-3001 defines consent as “words or overt actions indicating a freely given agreement to the sexual act or contact in question;” [5] the UMD is a post-secondary academic institution that defines “sexual coercion” as the “use of unreasonable pressure in an effort to compel another individual to initiate or continue sexual activity against the individual’s will;” [6] the UMD is a post-secondary academic institution, which acknowledges that “coercion include but is not limited to intimidation, manipulation, threats of emotional or physical harm, and blackmail;” [7] Alexandra Hunt has previously worked as a stripper when she was a college student; [8] Alexandra Hunt has obtained a Bachelor and Master’s degree; [9]Alexandra Hunt has faced personal and professional adverse consequences for working as a stripper when she was a college student; [10] Alexandra Hunt is as of this writing “running for Congress on a progressive platform because she believes (…) politicians should fight for systemic change, ensuring equal W (AACL) – MICHAEL A. AYELE 3

50. RECORDS REQUEST 03/15/2022 opportunity and justice for all;” xxiii [11] Alexandra Hunt is a candidate running for Congress in order to decriminalize sex work; [12] Alexandra Hunt is a candidate running for Congress in order to reform the criminal justice system. The core issues raised in this records request are the following. 1) Has your city/county/state government previously considered decriminalizing sex work? If yes, will you promptly disclose similar bills to the District of Columbia “Community Safety and Health Amendment Act of 2019” your city/county/state government previously considered adopting? 2) Have you ever discussed and/or pursued research on the subject of sex work within the borders of the U.S.A? If yes, will you promptly disclose those records? 3) Would the decriminalization of sex work decrease and eradicate the violence committed against women engaged in that specific trade? Would the decriminalization of sex work reduce the risk of physical harm to women engaged in that specific trade? Would the decriminalization of sex work reduce the type of coercion the other has described in 2018? Would the decriminalization of sex work encourage women to report the sexual violence they may experience? Would the decriminalization of sex work improve the income of women engaged in that specific trade? Would the decriminalization of sex work improve the life-style of women engaged that specific trade? 4) Was the retaliation faced by Alexandra Hunt at her previous place of employment (for speaking on the subject of her work experience as a stripper) consistent with Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act? Were the calls of former NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg requesting the dismissal of Melissa Petro as a teacher (“after she admitted to her past in sex work”) consistent with Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act? Was the dismissal of Heidi Kaeslin from her job as a teacher with Lincoln Unified School District consistent with Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act? Was the dismissal of Nina Skye from her job as a teacher in a Los Angeles, California Christian preschool consistent with Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act? Was the dismissal of Stacie Halas from her job as a teacher at the Oxnard School District (for starring in pornographic films) consistent with Title VII of the 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Act? Taking into consideration that the facts I have enumerated (in the first paragraph of my request for a fee waiver and expedited processing) are likely not going to boost public confidence in the activities of the U.S government; I would like to take this opportunity to denounce sexual violence committed against women irrespective of their racial backgrounds, their sexual orientations, their national origins, their religious affiliations and/or their age groups. In my judgment, the records I have requested to be promptly disclosed [1] have put into question the government’s integrity and adversely impacted public confidence about the manner in which women and racial minorities are treated; [2] have identified operations and activities of the U.S federal, local and state government; [3] are meaningfully informative about government operations or activities in order to be “likely to contribute” to and increase public understanding of those operations. I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that all the statements I have made are to the best of my knowledge true and accurate. Have a good day. Take care. Keep yourselves at arms distance. W (AACL) – MICHAEL A. AYELE 4